`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
` Case No.: 17-cv-183-CAB-BGS
`
`ORDER GRANTING JOINT
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`EXHIBITS TO JOINT STATEMENT
`RE FURTHER RELIEF
`
`[ECF 901]
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`ESET, LLC and ESET SPOL. SR.O.,
`Defendants.
`
`FINJAN, LLC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to File Under Seal Exhibits to Joint
`Statement Re Further Relief. (ECF 901). It seeks to file five exhibits that were submitted
`in support of the parties’ Joint Statement (ECF 903) under seal—Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 to
`the Declaration of Nicola A. Pisano (“Pisano Decl.”) and Exhibits A and B to the
`Declaration of Nicole Williams (“Williams Decl.”). (ECF 901.) The Joint Statement these
`exhibits were filed in support of, and other exhibits were filed publicly. (ECF 903.)
`Because the documents the parties seek to file under seal were filed in support of
`briefing on a discovery dispute, their request to file under seal is subject to a showing of
`good cause. See Kamankana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179-80 (9th
`Cir. 2003) (distinguishing between filing documents under seal in support of a non-
`
`1
`
`17-cv-183-CAB-BGS
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00183-CAB-BGS Document 905 Filed 04/03/23 PageID.41014 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`dispositive discovery motion, subject to good cause, and filing documents under seal in
`support of a dispositive motion, subject to compelling reasons standard); see also Foltz v.
`State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135-37 (9th Cir. 2003).
`In support of sealing these exhibits, counsel for Finjan has submitted a declaration.
`(Decl. of K. Nicole Williams in Support of Parties’ Joint Motion to File Documents
`Under Seal (“Williams Decl. in Support of Sealing”) [ECF 901-1].) The declaration
`explains that Exhibits 1-3 contain highly sensitive business information such as non-
`public financial figures as well as licensing, acquisition, and litigation strategy, and
`Exhibits A and B contain highly sensitive financial figures and confidential agreement
`terms. (Id. ¶¶ 4-5.) Counsel also explains that these exhibits are confidentially
`maintained by Finjan in its regular course of business and that their public disclosure
`could harm Finjan’s business and competitive positions. (Id. ¶ 6.) Additionally, the Court
`has reviewed the exhibits.
`Based on the foregoing, the Court finds good cause to GRANT the Joint Motion.
`The Clerk shall file these exhibits under seal.
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`Dated: April 3, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`2
`
`17-cv-183-CAB-BGS
`
`