`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
` Case No.: 17cv2398 DMS(MDD)
`
`ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
`ASSERT ADDITIONAL CLAIMS
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`v.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Counter Claimant,
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`
`
`23
`
`QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,
`
`Counter Defendant.
`
`On May 22, 2018, Plaintiff Qualcomm Incorporated filed a Motion to Assert
`
`24
`
`Additional Claims in Its Preliminary Infringement Contentions. [Doc. No. 109] Apple has
`
`25
`
`filed a response to the motion in which it states it does not oppose Qualcomm’s request.
`
`26
`
`/ / /
`
`27
`
`/ / /
`
`28
`
`/ / /
`
`1
`
`17cv2398 DMS(MDD)
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-02398-DMS-MDD Document 114 Filed 07/09/18 PageID.600 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`Accordingly, having considered the motion and finding good cause, the Court HEREBY
`
`GRANTS the Motion. Qualcomm is granted leave to assert infringement of up to twelve
`
`total claims of the asserted patents.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: July 9, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`2
`
`17cv2398 DMS(MDD)
`
`