throbber
Case 3:20-cv-02082-JAH-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/22/20 PageID.1 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`ROBERT S. BREWER, JR.
`United States Attorney
`JANET CABRAL (Cal. Bar No.: 168900)
`Assistant U.S. Attorney
`Office of the U.S. Attorney
`880 Front Street, Room 6293
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Tel: (619) 546-8715
`Email: janet.cabral@usdoj.gov
`Attorneys for the United States
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case No.
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF A
`CIVIL ACTION
`
`
`[28 U.S.C. §§ 1441(c)(1) and
`1442(a)(1)]
`
`(Removed from Superior Court of
`California, County of San Diego,
`North County Division, Case No. 37-
`2020-00034326-CU-CR-NC)
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`AGRO DYNAMICS, LLC, a Wyoming
`Limited Liability Company,
`
`
`
`
`
`DRUG ENFORCEMENT
`ADMINISTRATION; SAN DIEGO
`COUNTY; SPECIAL AGENTS PAUL
`GELLES. ERIC BALL, KIERAN GARCIA,
`MARSHA DAWE, ROSS VAN
`NOSTRAND, AND JEREMY FEUZ;
`FRANK HASKELL, ANDREW AGUILAR,
`JASON STEIN, TIMOTHY SMITH,
`MICHAEL ASTORGA, CHRISTOPHER
`MORRIS, SGT. STEVE BODINE, DET.
`JUSTIN MOORE, DET. DWAYNE
`PRICKETT, DET. CHRISTOPHER PEREZ,
`AND DET. RICARDO ANDRADE; and
`DOES 1 to 50, inclusive
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`'20
`
`CV2082
`
`KSC
`
`JAH
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02082-JAH-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/22/20 PageID.2 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`TO: ALL PARTIES AND THE CLERK OF COURT
`
`
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the United States of America, through its attorneys,
`
`Robert S. Brewer, Jr., United States Attorney, and Janet A. Cabral, Assistant U.S. Attorney,
`respectfully removes to this Court the above-captioned civil action from the Superior Court
`of California, County of San Diego. The grounds for this removal include the following:
`
`1.
`On or about September 22, 2020, Plaintiff initiated this action as Case No. 37-
`2020-00034326-CU-CR-NC in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego.
`Plaintiff names as Defendants the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), as well as
`as DEA Special Agents Paul Gelles, Eric Ball, Kieran Garcia, Marsha Dawe, Ross Van
`Nostrand, and Jeremy Feuz, and DEA Task Force Officers (“TFOs”) Frank Haskell,
`Andrew Aguilar, Jason Stein, Timothy Smith, Michael Astorga, and Christopher Morris.
`The complaint alleges claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against all Defendants for
`unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and for taking of
`property without compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The complaint further
`alleges violation of the California Constitution and the California Tort Claims Act. All of
`Plaintiff’s causes of action arise out of the execution of a search warrant at property
`allegedly leased and occupied by Plaintiff in Fallbrook, California, on September 12, 2019.
`A copy of the complaint is attached as Exhibit A, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a).
`
`2.
`The DEA is an Agency of the United States.
`
`3.
`Plaintiff alleges that DEA Special Agents Paul Gelles, Eric Ball, Kieran
`Garcia, Marsha Dawe, Ross Van Nostrand, and Jeremy Feuz, along with DEA TFOs Frank
`Haskell, Andrew Aguilar, Jason Stein, Timothy Smith, Michael Astorga, and Christopher
`Morris, were acting in their capacity as agents and/or officers of the DEA at all times
`relevant to the causes of action set forth in the Complaint.
`
`4.
`This action may be removed to this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c)(1)
`because it contains claims arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
`This action may also be removed to this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1) because it
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02082-JAH-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/22/20 PageID.3 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`contains claims against the DEA, an agency of the United States, as well as officers and
`agents of the United States and its agencies.
`
`5.
`It also is anticipated that the United States may raise several defenses to the
`complaint, including but not limited to the United States’ sovereign immunity and qualified
`immunity.
`
`6. Because this is an action against an agency of the United States and officers
`of the United States, joinder of all Defendants in the notice of removal is not required.
`
`7.
`As of this time, neither the summons nor complaint in the above-captioned
`civil action has been served on the United States Attorney for the Southern District of
`California or the Attorney General of the United States.
`
`WHEREFORE this case, now pending in the Superior Court of California, County
`of San Diego, is properly removed to this Court.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`ROBERT S. BREWER, JR.
`United States Attorney
`
`DATED: October 22, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Janet A. Cabral
`Janet Cabral
`Assistant United States Attorney
`Attorney for United States
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket