throbber
Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.22 Page 1 of 17
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 6
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.23 Page 2 of 17
`
`Ryan Stygar (SBN 332764)
`CENTURION TRIAL ATTORNEYS
`8880 Rio San Diego Drive, Suite 800
`San Diego, California 92108
`Telephone:
`(858) 206-8833
`Email:
`ryan@centurionta.com
`Robert A. Waller, Jr. (SBN 169604)
`LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT A. WALLER, JR.
`P.O. Box 999
`Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California 92007
`Telephone:
`(760) 753-3118
`Facsimile:
`(760) 753-3206
`Email:
`robert@robertwallerlaw.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff BRIANA GALLLARDO, Individually and on behalf of all other
`employees similarly situated
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
`IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
`
`BRIANA GALLARDO, Individually and
`on behalf of all employees similarly
`situated,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, A
`Delaware Limited Liability Company
`f.k.a. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC.;
`and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive,
`Defendants.
`
`CASE NO.
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR
`DAMAGES
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY
`
`Plaintiff BRIANA GALLARDO (“Plaintiff”), for herself and all others similarly
`situated, alleges as follows:
`1.
`Plaintiff is an individual and is now and at all times referenced mentioned
`in this complaint was a resident of San Diego County, California. At all times herein
`mentioned Plaintiff was employed by Defendant AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC.
`2.
`Defendant AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC is and at all times mentioned
`herein was a Delaware limited liability company organized, existing, and conducting
`business in California under and by virtue of the laws of California (Entity Number
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-1-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 7
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.24 Page 3 of 17
`
`202001010303). Defendant AMAZON was formerly known as AMAZON.COM SERVICES,
`INC. (California Secretary of State Entity Number C3678136) before reorganizing itself in
`January 2020. Because the claims asserted herein pre-date the reorganization both the LLC
`and INC entities are referred to herein as “Defendant AMAZON.”
`3.
`Plaintiff is unaware of the true identities and/or capacities of those
`defendants sued herein as “DOES 1 through 25, inclusive,” and are for that reason sued by
`such fictitious names. Plaintiff will amend this complaint to allege the true names,
`capacities and identities of such “DOE” defendants if, and when, ascertained. Plaintiff is
`informed, believes and thereon alleges that each of the fictitiously named defendant(s)
`is/are thereon responsible in some manner for the occurrences herein alleged, and that
`Plaintiffs’ injuries as herein alleged were proximately caused by such acts.
`4.
`Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges that at all times mentioned
`herein, each of the defendants was the agent, employee, servant, partner and/or
`representative of each of the remaining defendants, and in doing the things hereinafter
`alleged, was acting within the course and scope of such agency, employment, servitude,
`partnership and/or other relationship and with the consent of each other.
`I.
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`Plaintiff was employed by Defendant AMAZON in a position titled “Area
`5.
`Manager.” Plaintiff was hired by AMAZON in January 2021.
`6.
`In the position of “Area Manager” Plaintiff and all other similarly situated
`employees were designated and categorized by Defendant AMAZON as exempt from
`receiving overtime compensation for hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours in a day or
`forty (40) hours in a workweek. Defendant AMAZON stated on Plaintiff’s wage
`statements/pay stubs, as well as those of all other similarly situated employees, that their
`“Basis of Pay” was “salary.” Throughout Plaintiff’s employment she was paid $28.00 per
`hour.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-2-
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 8
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.25 Page 4 of 17
`
`Plaintiff alleges based on the job duties and/or responsibilities of an “Area
`7.
`Manager” she and all other similarly situated employees did not meet the criteria of any
`recognized test in California for being exempt from receiving overtime compensation.
`Plaintiff alleges neither she nor any similarly situated “Area Managers” met the criteria for
`Executive Exemption, Administrative Exemption, and/or Professional Exemption
`regardless of whether she/they were/are paid an hourly rate equivalent to two times the
`applicable minimum wage.
`8.
`Plaintiff alleges that at no time during her and all other “Area Manager”
`employees’ employment by Defendant AMAZON were they paid overtime wages at the
`statutory rate of one and one-half (1½) times their regular rate of pay when they were
`employed for more than eight (8) hours any workday or in excess of forty (40) hours in a
`workweek.
`Plaintiff alleges throughout her and all similarly situated employees’
`9.
`employment Defendant AMAZON stated on their wage statements/pay stubs that they
`were paid, at most, eighty (80) hours per two-week pay period without regard to the actual
`number of hours Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees were employed in a
`given day or workweek.
`10.
`Plaintiff alleges not only did Defendant AMAZON fail to pay overtime
`wages, but Defendant AMAZON also failed to pay minimum wage to Plaintiff and all
`others similarly situated for all hours they worked and were employed in excess of eighty
`(80) in any given pay period.
`11.
`Plaintiff alleges Defendant AMAZON failed to maintain records of hours
`worked by Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees including but not limited
`to all hours worked beyond eighty (80) in a two week pay period.
`12.
`Plaintiff alleges Defendant AMAZON stated on her and all other similarly
`situated employees’ wage statements/pay stubs that she/they performed work in
`categories identified as “Regular Hours”, “Personal Time”, and/or “Vacation Pay” for
`which they were compensated at their regular hourly rate of pay. Plaintiff alleges that, to
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-3-
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 9
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.26 Page 5 of 17
`
`her knowledge and understanding, she did not perform work which would be properly
`and accurately categorized as “Personal Time” for which she and all other similarly
`situated employees would be compensated in their pay checks.
`13.
`Plaintiff alleges that, to her knowledge and understanding, she did not
`perform work which would be properly and accurately categorized as “Vacation Pay” for
`which she and all other similarly situated employees would be compensated in her pay
`check.
`
`Plaintiff alleges “Personal Time” is an employment benefit offered by
`14.
`Defendant AMAZON which accrues incrementally during the course of employment
`which can be used by the employee for situations such as when they have a last minute
`absence and want to be paid for that time and preserve other benefits such as Unpaid Time
`Off and/or Vacation Time. Plaintiff alleges “Personal Time” is not a category of labor or
`services for which an employee would be compensated, as opposed to accruing the benefit
`for later use, during any given pay period. Plaintiff and all other similarly situated
`employees are therefore unable to readily ascertain from their wage statement/pay stubs
`the information about why they are paid “Personal Time” without reference to other
`documents or information and they are unable to identify what labor or services they
`performed in the “Personal Time” category which is separate and apart from their Regular
`Hours worked as identified on their wage statements/pay stubs.
`15.
`Plaintiff alleges “Vacation Pay” is an employment benefit offered by
`Defendant AMAZON which accrues incrementally during the course of employment and
`which can be used by the employee for situations such as a preplanned vacation. Plaintiff
`alleges “Vacation Pay” is not a category of labor or services for which an employee would
`be compensated, as opposed to accruing the benefit for later use, during any given pay
`period. Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees are therefore unable to readily
`ascertain the information about why they are paid “Vacation Pay” without reference to
`other documents or information and they are unable to identify what labor or services they
`performed in the “Vacation Pay” category which is separate and apart from their Regular
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-4-
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 10
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.27 Page 6 of 17
`
`Hours worked as identified on their wage statements/pay stubs.
`16.
`Plaintiff alleges that throughout her employment Defendant AMAZON failed
`and/or refused to provide Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees with
`adequate seating even though the nature of the work reasonably permits the use of seats.
`II.
`CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
`(California Code of Civil Procedure §382)
`
`Plaintiff incorporates by this reference each and every previous paragraph
`17.
`and all allegations contained therein as though set forth in full herein.
`18.
`Plaintiff alleges the number of employees affected by Defendant AMAZON’s
`actions, conduct and unlawful policy and/or practice as herein alleged are so numerous
`as to make joinder of individual cases impractical, a waste of judicial resources, and not
`judicially economical. Based on information and belief Plaintiff alleges there are more than
`500 employees of Defendant AMAZON located in California who during the applicable
`limitations period were affected by Defendant AMAZON’s practice of not paying overtime
`compensation to Area Managers, failing to pay Area Managers minimum wage for hours
`they were employed but did not receive compensation, Defendant AMAZON’s failure to
`provide accurate wage statements/pay stubs, failure to maintain records, and failing to
`provide adequate seating, as herein alleged.
`19.
`Plaintiff alleges for herself and all other employees similarly situated the
`actions of AMAZON as herein alleged involve common questions of law and fact including
`but not limited to whether AMAZON violated the provisions of California Labor Code
`§204 (failure to pay wages earned), §226 (failure to provide accurate wage statements), §510
`(failure to pay overtime wages), §1194 (failure to pay minimum wage and overtime wages),
`§226 and §1174 (failure to maintain records) and California Business & Professions Code
`§17200 (unlawful business practice).
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-5-
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 11
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.28 Page 7 of 17
`
`Plaintiff alleges her claims against Defendant AMAZON, as herein alleged,
`20.
`are typical of all other similarly situated employees who are part of the class and/or
`subclasses as herein alleged.
`21.
`Plaintiff GALLARDO alleges the class and/or subclasses are defined as
`follows:
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`titled
`All “Area Managers” or similarly
`employees of Defendant AMAZON located in
`California who were not paid overtime wage for
`hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours per
`day or forty (40) hours per workweek;
`titled
`All “Area Managers” or similarly
`employees of Defendant AMAZON located in
`California who were not paid minimum wage
`for all hours worked;
`All employees of Defendant AMAZON.COM
`SERVICES, INC located in California who were
`not given accurate wage statements/pay stubs;
`All employees of Defendant AMAZON.COM
`SERVICES, INC located in California whom
`Defendant failed to maintain proper records of
`hours worked.
`Plaintiff alleges neither she nor her counsel of record herein have any real or
`22.
`potential conflicts with members of the putative class and that he will adequately represent
`the interests of the class. Plaintiff further alleges her counsel of record herein are qualified,
`experienced and capable of effectively and adequately prosecuting this class action for the
`benefit of the class as a whole. Plaintiff is therefore an adequate class representative and
`his counsel of record herein are adequate to representative the putative class.
`III.
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`FAILURE TO PAY OVERTIME WAGES
`(Cal. Labor Code §1194, §510, §204, et seq.)
`Plaintiff incorporates by this reference each and every previous paragraph
`23.
`and all allegations contained therein as though set forth in full herein.
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-6-
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 12
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.29 Page 8 of 17
`
`At all times herein mentioned Defendant AMAZON and/or DOES failed to
`24.
`pay Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees wages for all overtime hours
`worked, permitted, directed and/or suffered in excess of eight (8) hours in any workday
`or in excess of 40 hours in any workweek as herein alleged.
`25.
`At all times herein mentioned Defendant AMAZON and/or DOES failed to
`pay Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees minimum wages for all hours
`worked, permitted, directed and/or suffered in excess of the eighty (80) hours that are
`identified on Plaintiff’s and all other similarly situated employees’ wages statements/pay
`stubs as herein alleged.
`26.
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ and each of their failure to
`pay wages in violation of California Labor Code §204, §510 and/or §1194, et seq., Plaintiff
`and all other similarly situated employees suffered damages in an amount according to
`proof at trial including interest thereon.
`27.
`As a further direct and proximate result of Defendants’ and each of their
`conduct as herein alleged, Plaintiffs and each of them have retained legal counsel and are
`thereon entitled to an award of attorney’s fees and costs of suit pursuant to applicable
`statute(s) including but not limited to California Labor Code §98.2(c), §218.5, §1194(a), in
`an amount according to proof at trial.
`
`IV.
`SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`FAILURE TO PAY MINIMUM WAGE
`(Cal. Labor Code §1194, §510, §204, et seq.)
`Plaintiff incorporates by this reference each and every previous paragraph
`28.
`and all allegations contained therein as though set forth in full herein.
`29.
`Plaintiff alleges Defendant AMAZON and/or DOES failed to pay Plaintiff
`and all other similarly situated employees minimum wage for all hours worked, permitted,
`directed and/or suffered in excess of the eighty (80) hours identified on Plaintiff’s and all
`other similarly situated employees’ wages statements/pay stubs as herein alleged.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-7-
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 13
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.30 Page 9 of 17
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ and each of their failure to
`30.
`pay wages in violation of California Labor Code §204, §510 and/or §1194, et seq., Plaintiff
`and all other similarly situated employees suffered damages in an amount according to
`proof at trial including interest thereon.
`31.
`As a further direct and proximate result of Defendants’ and each of their
`conduct as herein alleged, Plaintiffs and each of them have retained legal counsel and are
`thereon entitled to an award of attorney’s fees and costs of suit pursuant to applicable
`statute(s) including but not limited to California Labor Code §98.2(c), §218.5, §1194(a), in
`an amount according to proof at trial.
`
`V.
`THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
`INACCURATE PAY STUBS /WAGE STATEMENTS
`(Cal. Labor Code §226, et seq.)
`Plaintiff incorporates by this reference each and every previous paragraph
`32.
`and all allegations contained therein as though set forth in full herein.
`33.
`Defendant AMAZON and/or DOES failed to provide Plaintiff and all other
`similarly situated employees accurate itemized pay stubs/wage statements in violation of
`California Labor Code §226 as herein alleged.
`34.
`Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees allege Defendant
`AMAZON and/or DOES provided Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees with
`inaccurate wage statements/pay stubs to the extent Defendant paid Plaintiff and all other
`similarly situated employees for “Personal Time” and/or “Vacation Pay” as identified on
`their wage statements/pay stubs when Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees,
`to the beset of their knowledge, did not work the categories of hours referred to as
`“Personal Time” and/or “Vacation Pay” as herein alleged.
`35.
`Plaintiff alleges that, to the best of her/their knowledge “Personal Time”
`and/or “Vacation Pay” are benefits which are accrued as opposed to hours worked for
`which they would be paid on a regular wage statement/pay stub.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-8-
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 14
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.31 Page 10 of 17
`
`Based thereon, Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees are unable
`36.
`to readily ascertain from their wage statements/pay stubs information about why they
`were paid “Personal Time” and/or “Vacation Pay” without reference to other documents
`or information and they are unable to identify what labor or services they performed in the
`“Personal Time” and/or “Vacation Pay” category which is separate and apart from their
`Regular Hours worked as identified on their wage statements/pay stubs.
`37.
`Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees allege Defendant
`AMAZON’s and/or DOES’ conduct in failing to provide accurate wage statements/pay
`stubs as required, as herein alleged, was knowing and intentional.
`38.
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’
`failure to provide accurate wage statements/pay stubs as required Plaintiff and all other
`similarly situated employees are entitled to recover a civil penalty of $500 in accordance
`with California Labor Code §1174.5.
`39.
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ and each of their failure to
`provide itemized accurate wage statements/pay stubs as required Plaintiffs and each of
`them are entitled to recover the greater of all actual damages or fifty dollars ($50) for the
`initial pay period in which a violation occurs and one hundred dollars ($100) per employee
`for each violation in a subsequent pay period, not to exceed an aggregate penalty of four
`thousand dollars ($4,000) in accordance with California Labor Code §226(e)(1).
`40.
`As a further direct and proximate result of Defendants’ and each of their
`conduct as herein alleged, Plaintiffs and each of them have retained legal counsel and are
`thereon entitled to an award of attorney’s fees and costs of suit pursuant to applicable
`statute(s) including but not limited to California Labor Code§226(e)(1), in an amount
`according to proof at trial.
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-9-
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 15
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.32 Page 11 of 17
`
`VI.
`FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ACCURATE RECORDS
`(Cal. Labor Code §226, §1174, §1174.5, et seq.)
`Plaintiff incorporates by this reference each and every previous paragraph
`41.
`and all allegations contained therein as though set forth in full herein.
`42.
`Defendant AMAZON and/or DOES failed to maintain accurate records of
`the hours Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees worked in violation of
`California Labor Code §226 and/or §1174 as herein alleged.
`43.
`Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees allege Defendant
`AMAZON and/or DOES failed to maintain accurate records of all hours worked by
`Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees beyond the eighty (80) hours as
`identified on their wage statements/pay stubs regardless of how many hours they worked.
`44.
`Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees allege Defendant
`AMAZON’s and/or DOES’ conduct in failing to maintain accurate records as required, as
`herein alleged, was knowing and intentional.
`45.
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’
`failure to maintain accurate records as required Plaintiff and all other similarly situated
`employees are entitled to recover a civil penalty of $500 in accordance with California
`Labor Code §1174.5.
`46.
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ and each of their failure to
`provide itemized accurate pay stubs as required Plaintiffs and each of them are entitled to
`recover the greater of all actual damages or fifty dollars ($50) for the initial pay period in
`which a violation occurs and one hundred dollars ($100) per employee for each violation
`in a subsequent pay period, not to exceed an aggregate penalty of four thousand dollars
`($4,000) in accordance with California Labor Code §226(e)(1).
`/ / /
`/ / /
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-10-
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 16
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.33 Page 12 of 17
`
`As a further direct and proximate result of Defendants’ and each of their
`47.
`conduct as herein alleged, Plaintiffs and each of them have retained legal counsel and are
`thereon entitled to an award of attorney’s fees and costs of suit pursuant to applicable
`statute(s) including but not limited to California Labor Code§226(e)(1), in an amount
`according to proof at trial.
`
`VII.
`FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`WAITING TIME PENALTIES
`(Cal. Labor Code §203)
`
`Plaintiff incorporates by this reference each and every previous paragraph
`48.
`and all allegations contained therein as though set forth in full herein.
`49.
`Plaintiff alleges for herself and all other similarly situated employees their
`unpaid overtime and/or minimum wage compensation constitute wages in accordance
`with California Labor Code §200, §515 and/or §1194.
`50.
`Defendant AMAZON and/or DOES failed to pay Plaintiff and all other
`similarly situated employees overtime and/or minimum wages when due in violation of
`California Labor Code §204, §510, and/or §1194.
`51.
`Plaintiff for herself and all other employees similarly situated alleges
`Defendant AMAZON violated California Labor Code §203 by willfully failing to pay
`Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees all earned and accrued overtime and/or
`minimum wages as required by California Labor Code §204, §510 and/or §1194.
`52.
`Plaintiff alleges for herself and all employees similarly situated Defendant
`AMAZON’s and/or DOES’ conduct in failing to pay overtime and/or minimum wages as
`herein alleged was willful or intentional because AMAZON and/or DOES knew Plaintiff
`and all other similarly situated employees were not exempt from overtime compensation
`under any applicable test and as such Defendant AMAZON had a legal obligation law to
`pay such overtime and/or minimum wages in accordance with California Labor Code
`§204, §510, §1194.
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-11-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 17
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.34 Page 13 of 17
`
`Plaintiff alleges for herself and all other employees similarly situated that as
`53.
`a direct and proximate result of Defendant AMAZON’S and/or DOES’ actions as herein
`alleged Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees are entitled to recover all
`additional and continuing wages provided by California Labor Code §203 including
`interest thereon in an amount according to proof at trial.
`54.
`Plaintiff alleges for herself and all other similarly situated employees that as
`a direct and proximate result of Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’ conduct as herein
`alleged Plaintiff and all other employees were denied use and benefit of their wages,
`including but not limited to having lost interest on those monies, all in an amount
`according to proof at trial.
`55.
`In addition, as a proximate result of Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’
`conduct as herein alleged Plaintiff did employ attorneys and/or other legal professionals
`to prosecute this action and is thereon entitled to an award of attorney fees in an amount
`according to proof in accordance with California Labor Code §218.5.
`56.
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’
`conduct and actions as alleged herein the court shall award pursuant to California Labor
`Code §218.6, interest on all due and unpaid wages at the rate of interest specified in
`subdivision (b) of Section 3289 of the Civil Code, which shall accrue from the date that the
`wages were due and payable as provided in Part 1 (commencing with Section 200) of
`Division 2, in an amount according to proof at trial.
`57.
`As a further direct and proximate result of Defendant AMAZON’s and/or
`DOES’ actions as herein alleged Plaintiff was required to and did retain attorneys and other
`legal professionals to represent her in this action and because this action confers a
`substantial benefit on a large group of persons and/or the general public and enforces
`significant rights Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney fees and costs in accordance
`with C.C.P. §1021.5.
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-12-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 18
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.35 Page 14 of 17
`
`VIII.
`SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`UNLAWFUL BUSINESS PRACTICE
`(Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §17200)
`
`Plaintiff incorporates by this reference each and every previous paragraph
`58.
`and all allegations contained therein as though set forth in full herein.
`59.
`Plaintiff alleges Defendant AMAZON and/or DOES engaged in an unlawful
`business practice by categorizing Plaintiff and all other similarly situated employees as
`exempt from being paid overtime and/or minimum wage compensation when Plaintiff
`and all other similarly situated employees did not meet the criteria under any test for
`exempt status including but not limited to the fact neither Plaintiff nor any similarly
`situated “Area Managers” met the criteria for Executive Exemption, Administrative
`Exemption, and/or Professional Exemption regardless of whether she/they were/are paid
`an hourly rate equivalent to two times the applicable minimum wage.
`60.
`Defendant AMAZON and/or DOES failed to pay Plaintiff and all other
`employees similarly situated their earned and accrued overtime and/or minimum wages
`as required by California Labor Code §204, §510, §1194.
`61.
`Plaintiff alleges as a result of Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’s actions
`and conduct as herein alleged Plaintiff has suffered an injury in fact and actual damage in
`the form of lost wages and money.
`62.
`Plaintiff alleges Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’s conduct as herein
`alleged constitutes an unlawful business practice in violation of California Business &
`Professions Code §17200.
`63.
`Plaintiff alleges for herself and all other employees similarly situated that
`Defendant AMAZON and/or DOES engaged in the unlawful business practice herein
`alleged within four (4) years of the date of filing this action as specified in Cal. Bus. & Prof.
`Code §17208, and Defendant AMAZON continues to engage in the unlawful business
`practice(s) that are alleged in this complaint.
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-13-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 19
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.36 Page 15 of 17
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’s
`64.
`unlawful business practice of violating California Labor Code §204, §510, and/or §1194, as
`herein alleged, Plaintiff and all other employees similarly situated are entitled to restitution
`of all unpaid wages and other benefits including interest thereon in an amount according
`to proof at trial so as to restore Plaintiff and all other employees to the money acquired by
`Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’s from its unlawful business practice as herein
`alleged.
`Pursuant to California Business & Professions Code §17204, Defendant
`65.
`AMAZON and/or DOES should be enjoined from engaging in or continuing its unlawful
`business practice as herein alleged.
`66.
`As a further direct and proximate result of Defendant AMAZON’s and/or
`DOES’s actions as herein alleged Plaintiff was required to and did retain attorneys and
`other legal professionals to represent him and all other employees similarly situated in this
`action and because this action confers a substantial benefit on a large group of persons and
`enforces significant rights Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney fees and costs in
`accordance with C.C.P. §1021.5.
`
`IX.
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`Plaintiff BRIANA GALLARDO, for herself and all other similarly situated
`employees, hereby prays for the following relief:
`1.
`That this action be certified as a class action;
`2.
`For special and/or economic damages in an amount according to proof at
`
`trial;
`
`For restitution of Plaintiff’s and all similarly situated employees’ unpaid
`3.
`overtime and/or minimum wages including interest thereon as specified in California
`Labor Code §200, §204, §510, and/or §1194 for Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’s
`violation of California Business & Professions Code §17200 in an amount according to
`proof at trial;
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-14-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 20
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.37 Page 16 of 17
`
`For injunctive relief prohibiting Defendant AMAZON and/or DOES from
`4.
`continuing its alleged unlawful business practice pursuant to California Business &
`Professions Code §17204;
`5.
`For Plaintiff’s and all similarly situated employees’ unpaid wages including
`interest thereon for Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’s violation of California Labor
`Code §200, §204, §510, and/or §1194, respectively, in an amount according to proof at trial;
`6.
`For Plaintiff’s and all similarly situated employees’ continuing wages as
`specified in California Labor Code §203 for Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’s
`violation of California Labor Code §200, §204, §510, and/or §1194, respectively, in an
`amount according to proof at trial;
`7.
`For damages and/or penalties for Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’
`failure to provide accurate wages statements/pay stubs in violation of California Labor
`Code §226 an amount according to proof at trial;
`8.
`For damages and/or penalties for Defendant AMAZON’s and/or DOES’
`failure to maintain records in violation of California Labor Code §226 and/or §1174 in an
`amount according to proof at trial;
`9.
`For attorney fees in an amount according to proof pursuant to California
`Labor Code §98, §218.5 and/or §1194.
`10.
`For costs of suit according to proof;
`11.
`For prejudgment interest according to proof; and
`12.
`For such other relief as may be fair just and equitable.
`
`Dated: January 13, 2022
`
`By,
`/s/ Robert A. Waller, Jr.
`ROBERT A. WALLER, JR.
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`BRIANA GALLARDO, Individually and
`on behalf of all other employees similarly
`situated
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-15-
`
`EXHIBIT B
`PAGE 21
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-00297-LAB-AHG Document 1-3 Filed 03/04/22 PageID.38 Page 17 of 17
`
`X.
`DEMAND FOR JURY
`
`Plaintiff BRIANA GALLARDO for herself and all other employees similarly situated
`hereby demands a jury trial on each and every cause of action for which a jury trial is
`available.
`
`Dated: January 13, 2022
`
`By,
`/s/ Robert A. Waller, Jr.
`ROBERT A. WALLER, JR.
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`BRIANA GALLARDO Individually and
`on behalf of all other employees similarly
`situated
`
`Gallardo v. Amazon.com Services LLC;
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`-16-
`
`1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket