STATE BAR NUMBER:298078
`
`STATE: CA
`ZIP CODE29021 1
`FAX NO; 310-861-9000
`
`ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY
`NAMEIlan N. Rosen Janfaza
`FIRM NAMEiLaw Offices of Ilan N. Rosen Janfaza, A.P.C.
`STREET ADDRESS19025 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 304
`c'TVIBeverIy Hills
`TELEPHONE No.:310_550-5000
`EMA'L ADDRESSilitigation@hotelinjurylaw.com
`ATTORNEY FOR (Nam°)=Plaintiffs. Joseph Sollars, et al.
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Contra Costa
`STREET ADDRESSI725 Court sweet
`MAILING ADDRESS:725 Court Street
`CITY AND ZIP CODEMarfineZ' CA 94553
`BRANCH NAMEWakefield Taylor Courthouse
`CASE NAME:
`Joseph Sollars, et al. v. Travel & Leisure 00., et al.
`
`FOR COURT USE ONLY
`
`MC-355
`
`|]
`
`L.
`AU 28
`
`K writ
`SLI'I Hz 10
`
`F
`
`IA
`
`ORDER TO DEPOSIT FUNDS IN BLOCKED ACCOUNT
`
`CASE NUMBER
`C23—0061 6
`
`1. The petition of (name): ISELA SOLLARS
`acting as (specify representative capacity): Parent and Guardian Ad Litem
`funds in one or more blocked accounts came on for hearing on (dale): August 16. 2024
`
`of the person named in item 2, to deposit
`at (time): 9:00am in Dept: 18
`
`THE COURT ORDERS
`2. Funds that belong to (name): BRANDON NEVAREZ
`must be deposited in one or more interest-bearing. federally insured blocked accounts.
`
`3. Each account must be opened in the legal name of the petitioner as
`
`E other (specify relationship):
`
`parent E guardian E conservator
`
`of the person named in 2.
`
`4. The total amount authorized for deposit. including any accrued interest. is: $ $15,000.00
`
`5. Withdrawals (check a or b):
`
`a. E No withdrawal of principal or interest may be made from the blocked account or accounts without a written order under this
`case name and number signed by a judicial officer and file-stamped by this court. The money on deposit is not subject to
`escheat.
`b. E The funds in the blocked account or accounts belong to a minor, who was born on (date): 12/12/2006
`
`No withdrawal of principal or interest may be made from the blocked account or accounts without a written order under this
`case name and number signed by a judicial officer and file-stamped by this court until the minor reaches 18 years of age.
`When the minor reaches 18 years of age, the depository, without further order of this court, is authorized and directed to
`pay by check or draft directly to the former minor, on proper demand. all funds, including interest, deposited under this
`order. The money on deposit is not subject to escheat.
`
`6. The petitioner and the petitioner's attorney, if any, must (1) deliver a copy of this order to each depository in which funds are
`deposited under this order and (2) file with this court an acknowledgment from each depository of receipt of this order and the funds
`within 15 days of deposit.
`
`Date
`
`YIN \1'1
`
`Hon. G. Dashman
`
`/\
`
`\// JUDICIAL OFFICER
`
`Form Adopted tor Mandatory Use
`Judicial Councrl of Calliomia
`MC-355 [Rem January 1, 2021]
`
`ORDER To DEPOSIT FUNDS IN BLOCKED ACCOUNT
`
`Page 1 of 1
`Code of Civil Procedure, § 372;
`Probate Code, §§ 3500, 3600—3613;
`Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.1384, 7.953
`www.murls.ca.gov
`
`

`

`PROOF 0F SER VICE
`Joseph Sollars, e! a1. v. Travel & Leisure Co., e: al.
`County ofCoun'a Costa Case N0.' C23-00616
`STATE OF CALIFOI1N1A, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
`
`I, Georgia Hovcy , am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California.
`I am
`over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 9025 Wilshire
`Blvd., Suite 304, Beverly Hills, Califomia 9021 1.
`
`On August 16, 2024, I served the foregoing document(s) described beloxv as:
`ORDER T0 DEPOSIT FUNDS IN BLOCKED ACCOUNT
`
`l 2 34567009
`
`on the following interested parties in this action:
`E (By E-Mail or Electronic Transmission) Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties
`to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, 1 caused the document(s) to be sent to
`the following e-mail address(es): Tara.Farkhondch@amtrustgroup.com,
`MaryJo.Colwell@amtrustgroup.com, and Megan.McGinnis@amtrustgroup.com. I did not
`receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other
`indication that the transmission was not successful.
`_ E (State)
`I declareundetlagalty of perjury under the _la_w_s_of the State of_(_3a1i_fomia that the
`lore—going 'is 'truc and correct.
`
`El
`
`I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at
`(Federal)
`whose direction the service was made.
`
`Executed on August 16, 2024, at Los Angeles, California.
`
`Georja Hovey
`
`10
`ll
`12
`
`l3
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`l8
`
`19
`
`20
`
`2]
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`PROOF 0F SERVICE
`
`

`

`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
`MARTINEZ, CA
`DEPARTMENT 18
`JUDICIAL OFFICER: GINA DASHMAN
`HEARING DATE: 08/16/2024
`
`9:00 AM
`CASE NUMBER:
`C22-01062
`2.
`CASE NAME: AMANDO RUIZ VS. MOLLY BUZANIS
`*HEARING ON MOTION COMPELLING COMPLIANCE W/ DEMAND FOR PHYSICAL EXAM AND ORDER
`IMPOSING SANCT
`FILED BY: BUZANIS, MOLLY
`'TENTATIVE RULING:"
`
`Defendant's motion to compel compliance with demand for (second) Independent Medical
`Examination is granted. The court finds good cause, pursuant to CCP Section 2032.320. Plaintiff shall
`submit to a physical examination pursuant to CCP Section 2032.240 to be conducted by Dr. Kirkham
`Wood, orthopedic surgeon, who specializes in spinal conditions. The examination shall take place
`within 45 days of this order. The IME shall be limited to examination of plaintiff's spine. Sanctions
`are denied.
`
`'
`
`9:00 AM
`CASE NUMBER:
`C22-01170
`3.
`CASE NAME: MARILYN KNOWLES VS. FCA US LLC
`*HEARING ON MOTION IN RE: ENFORCING SETTLEMENT AND SANCTIONS
`FILED BY:
`*TENTATIVE RULING:*
`
`_
`
`Plaintiff was ordered to serve Defendant, but no proof of service has been filed for this hearing or the
`prior hearing. Motion is dropped without prejudice.
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`9:00 AM
`C22-02258
`4.
`CASE NAME: KENNETH DAWLEY VS. A&E AUTO
`HEARING ON DEMURRER TO: DEMURRER FILED BY A&E AUTO
`FILED BY:
`*TENTATIVE RULING:*
`
`_
`
`.
`
`Defendant A&E Auto's demurrer to plaintiff's complaint is continued to October 11, 2024 at 9:00 a.m.
`Defendant did not timely file and did not serve the Defendant's CCP 430.41 declaration. Defendant
`shall serve the Notice of Demurrer and related pleadings no later than August 23, 2024 indicating the
`new hearing date, and file proof of service of same.
`
`9:00 AM
`CASE NUMBER:
`5
`CASE NAME: SOLLARS VS. JOSEPH
`*HEARING ON MINOR'S COMPROMISE RE BRANDON NEVAREZ
`FlLED BY: SOLLARS, ISELA
`'TENTATIVE RUUNG:*
`
`C23-00616
`
`Petition to approve compromise of minor Brandon Nevarez's claim is granted. Petition was
`unopposed. No personal appearance is required.
`
`

`

`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
`MARTINEZ, CA
`DEPARTMENT 18
`JUDICIAL OFFICER: GINA DASHMAN
`HEARING DATE: 08/16/2024
`
`9:00 AM
`CASE NUMBER:
`6
`CASE NAME: SOLLARS vs. JOSEPH
`I"HEARING 0N MINOR'S COMPROMISE RE JULIAN NEVAREZ
`FILED BY: SOLLARS, ISELA
`'TENTATIVE RUI.ING:"I
`
`C23-00616
`
`Petition to approve compromise of minorJulian Neveraz's claim is granted. Petition was unopposed.
`No personal appearance is required.
`
`9:00 AM
`CASE NUMBER:
`C23-01054
`7
`CASE NAME: SWEET ADELINE INC VS. TASTYWINGS INC
`*HEARING ON MOTION FOR DISCOVERY MOTION T0 COMPEL DEFENDANT AND CROSS-
`COMPLAINANT TASTYWINGS INC.S RESPONSES T0 INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR
`PRODUU'ION
`FILED BY:
`*TENTATIVE RUIJNG:*
`
`Plaintiff/Cross-Defendants' motion to compel responses to interrogatories and requests for
`production of documents'is'deemed moot: responses to the requested discovery have been served:
`Deficiencies in the newly served responses are not within the purview of the current motion and will
`not be considered. While the court under circumstances such as these (where responses were served
`after the motiOn was filed) may award sanctions to the moving party, the court declines to do so in
`light of counsel's lack of candor in its 8/9/24 Reply to the court that responses were served by
`defendant on August 5, 2024, four days prior to the date the Reply was submitted.
`
`9:00 AM
`CASE NUMBER:
`C23-01268
`8
`CASE NAME: SARAH DAVIS VS. ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
`*HEARING ON MOTION FOR DISCOVERY T0 COMPEL RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY
`FILED BY: ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
`*TENTATIVE RULING.'*
`
`Defendant's motion to compel verified responses to supplemental interrogatories and supplemental
`requests for production of documents is granted. While the court acknowledges that the plaintiff
`served verified supplemental responses to the discovery on May 30, 2024, after the motion was filed
`and prior to the hearing, the court finds credible the declaration of counsel Estabrook that the
`responses are not in accord with plaintiff's representations in her CMC statement filed on 7/17/24
`indicating that plaintiff is undergoing continued medical treatment and discovery responses relating
`to that treatment were not served or identified, or declared non-existent, in the responses of May 30,
`2024. Sanctions are denied.
`
`