throbber

`
`
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`COUNTY OF KERN
`
`BAKERSFIELD COURT
`
`1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE
`
`BAKERSFIELD CA 93301
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
`DAMIEN HARRISON
`DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
` HORSE IN THE ALLEY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
`LIABILITY COMPANY
`LEE MAREK
`NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES AND
`NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CRC RULE 3.110 AND
`NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
`
`
`
`
`
` FOR COURT USE ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FILED
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
`COUNTY OF KERN
`
`OCTOBER 09, 2020
`BY Sophia Munoz Alvarez DEPUTY
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`
`
`BCV-20-102361
`
`
`By order of the presiding judge, the above entitled case is assigned to the Honorable Stephen D. Schuett for all purposes. It
`will be managed on the direct calendar program in Bakersfield Department 10 until its conclusion. Peremptory challenges, if
`any, must be made within the times set out in CCP §170.6. Please include the initials SDS after the case number on all future
`pleadings filed in this case.
`
`TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL:
`You are ordered to appear on January 22, 2021 in Bakersfield Department 10 at 8:30 AM in the above entitled court to
`give any legal reason why sanctions shall not be imposed for failure to serve the complaint on all named defendants and file
`proof(s) of service with the court within sixty (60) days after the filing of the complaint pursuant to California Rules of
`Court, Rule 3.110. All appearances are mandatory, unless the court receives the required proof(s) of service five (5) court
`days prior to the hearing date, and then no appearance is necessary.
`
`TO EACH PARTY AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEY(S) OF RECORD:
`This case is set for Case Management Conference, by the Honorable Stephen D. Schuett on April 07, 2021
`at 8:15am in Bakersfield Department 10 of the above entitled court. Case management statements are to be filed at least
`fifteen (15) days prior to the conference in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rules 3.720 – 3.730. All parties
`shall comply with California Rules of Court, Rules 3.720 – 3.730.
`
`
`NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL
`IMPORTANT: You are required to serve this Notice of Assignment and Notice of Order to Show Cause Date and
`Notice of Case Management Conference Date with the Summons, Complaint [Local Rule 3.7(a)], Alternative
`Dispute Resolution (ADR) Information Packet, and ADR Stipulation and Order Form ( California Rules of Court,
`Rule 3.221).
`
`
`NOTICE TO CROSS COMPLAINANT’S COUNSEL
`IMPORTANT: If you are bringing a cross complaint against new parties, you are, likewise, required to serve this
`Notice of Assignment pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.110 and Notice of Order to Show Cause date
`and Notice of Case Management Conference date on the new cross defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: October 09, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TAMARAH HARBER-PICKENS
`CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
`
`By:
`
`
`Sophia Munoz Alvarez
`
`Sophia Munoz Alvarez, Deputy Clerk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Notice of Assignment/Notice of Order to Show Cause Re CRC 3.110/Notice of Case Management Conference
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`HARRISON VS HORSE IN THE ALLEY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ET AL
`BCV-20-102361
`The Clerk of the Superior Court’s office has received a civil complaint from you for filing. Pursuant to the Trial Court
`Delay Reduction Act, your case has been assigned to the Honorable Stephen D. Schuett as monitoring judge.
`
`Judge Stephen D. Schuett has instituted a direct calendaring system for all cases assigned to him/her as the monitoring
`judge.
`
`All law and motion, case management and trial setting conferences, ex parte matters and trials will be scheduled before
`him/her in Bakersfield Department 10. This will involve all cases in which the clerk has assigned the initials SDS to the
`complaint at the time of filing. Counsel is expected to make the initials of the monitoring judge a part of the case number
`on all pleadings and papers.
`
`Law & Motion and Ex-Parte hearing dates must be pre-cleared by contacting the Direct Calendaring Clerk at 661-868-
`5404. Tentative rulings can be located by visiting “http://www.kern.courts.ca.gov/”, after 4:00 pm. Click on the Non-
`Criminal Case Information link to enter the case number. Please note, not all departments provide tentative rulings.
`
`At the time of filing the complaint, plaintiff's counsel will be given a Notice of Case Management Conference which sets a
`conference approximately one hundred eighty (180) days after filing of the complaint. This notice must be served with the
`summons and complaint on all defendants. Defendants must serve the notice on all cross-defendants named. The notice must
`also be served on interveners and lien claimants.
`
`Telephonic appearances for case management conferences and law and motion hearings are available through Court Call.
`The toll free telephone number for Court Call is (888) 88-COURT. Proper procedures must be complied with under
`California Rules of Court, Rule 3.670. Arrangements to make appearances through Court Call must be made at least five (5)
`court days prior to the hearing date.
`
`Another judge will hear settlement conferences in cases assigned to Judge Stephen D. Schuett. However, those cases that do
`not settle will be set for trial before him/her.
`
`Notice of Assignment/Notice of Order to Show Cause Re CRC 3.110/Notice of Case Management Conference
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`HARRISON VS HORSE IN THE ALLEY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ET AL
`BCV-20-102361
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
`COUNTY OF KERN
`SPECIAL RULES RELATING TO CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES
`
`
`At least fifteen (15) days prior to the case management conference, each party shall prepare, file and serve on each other party
`a case management conference statement providing the Court with the following information:
`
`1. The “at-issue” status of the case including any new parties that may be contemplated;
`2. A brief statement of the type of case and the general facts or contentions;
`3. A description of the discovery done to date and that contemplated to be done;
`4. Estimated time for trial and whether a jury is demanded;
`5. Whether or not the case is entitled to priority in trial setting and if so, the legal authority thereof;
`6. An evaluation of the case for alternative dispute resolution, including arbitration (judicial or binding), mediation or
`private judge handling;
`7. If a person injury action, a description of the injuries sustained by each plaintiff and the elements of claimed damage;
`8. A statement of any settlement negotiations undertaken thus far;
`9. The name of the attorney primary responsible for the case on behalf of the party filing the statement.
`
`More than one party may join in the filing of a single statement.
`
`The case management conference shall be attended by the attorney primarily responsible for the case on behalf of each party
`or a member of his or her firm or counsel formally associated in the case. The attorney attending shall be thoroughly
`familiar with the case, and be able to engage in meaningful discussions with court and counsel, and to enter into agreements
`on behalf of his or her client on the following subjects:
`
`1. The “at-issue” status of the case including the dismissal of the unnamed doe defendants or cross-defendants by
`agreement of all parties;
`2. Discovery conducted and remaining to be done;
`3. Amenability of the case to alternative dispute resolution including, but no limited to, arbitration (judicial or binding),
`mediation, and private judge handling.
`4. Delineation of issues including stipulation of facts not in substantial controversy;
`5. Settlement prospects;
`6. Setting the matter for trial, pre-trial conferences, settlement conference or further case management conference;
`7. Any other matters relevant to the processing of the case to a final resolution.
`
`Any violation of these rules shall result in the imposition of substantial sanctions which may include monetary, issue,
`termination, or other appropriate sanctions.
`
`Notice of Assignment/Notice of Order to Show Cause Re CRC 3.110/Notice of Case Management Conference
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`HARRISON VS HORSE IN THE ALLEY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ET AL
`BCV-20-102361
`
`CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
`
`
`The undersigned, of said Kern County, certify: That I am a Deputy Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of California,
`in and for the County of Kern, that I am a citizen of the United States, over 18 years of age, I reside in or am employed in
`the County of Kern, and not a party to the within action, that I served the Notice of Assignment/Notice of Order to Show
`Cause Re CRC 3.110/Notice of Case Management Conference attached hereto on all interested parties and any
`respective counsel of record in the within action by posting true copies thereof, to the Superior Court of California,
`County of Kern, Non-Criminal Case Information Portal (https://odyprodportal.kern.courts.ca.gov/portalprod).
`
`
`Date of Posting:
`
`Place of Posting:
`
`October 09, 2020
`
`Bakersfield, CA
`
` I
`
` declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`
`Date: October 09, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`TAMARAH HARBER-PICKENS
`CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
`
`By:
`
`Sophia Munoz Alvarez
`
`Sophia Munoz Alvarez, Deputy Clerk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Certificate of Posting - Notice of Assignment/Notice of Order to Show Cause Re CRC 3.110/Notice of Case Management Conference
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket