\OOO\IO\Ul-S>UJN*—‘
`
`WNQMAWNHOKOOOQO‘xm-wa—‘O
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`.
`
`V
`
`.
`
`'
`
`Superior CouErt-éf Cgfilomiafli
`
`County of San Francisco
`
`DEPARTMENT 305
`
`‘ CLEH OF THE COURT
`BY:..
`flfém'fi.
`Deputy Clerk
`
`.-
`
`'
`GENERAL ORDER
`RE CASE REASSIGNMENT
`
`'
`DEPARTMENT 305
`COMPLEX LITIGATION
`
`~
`
`-
`
`
`
`Pursuant to authorization by Presiding Judge Garrett L. Wong, the undersigned HEREBY
`
`ORDERS:
`
`'
`
`1.: The following cases are assigned to Judge Teri L. Jackson, Complex Department 613 for all
`
`jpurposes:
`
`
`
`
`
`1000 Channel Street v. Arquitectonica
`
`.
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`' CGC 18-564410
`
`A. Doe. v. AJ Boggs
`
`‘
`
`CGC 18-565456
`
`
`
`. Ahavitete v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
`‘ ‘Aiona v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
`
`‘
`
`’ Airco Mechanical v. Build Group
`
`‘ Alfinito v. Loop Transportation'
`
`CGC 14-542992
`CGC-13 532931
`
`.
`
`CGC-18 568199
`
`CGC 17-556677
`
`
`
`I
`
`
`
`
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`_—
`
`Ashlock v. Sunrurz
`
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`- 1 -
`.
`GENERAL ORDER RE CASE REASSIGNMENT
`
`>
`
`
`
`
`
`WNQMAWNHOKOOOQO‘xm-wa—‘O
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`.
`
`V
`
`.
`
`'
`
`Superior CouErt-éf Cgfilomiafli
`
`County of San Francisco
`
`DEPARTMENT 305
`
`‘ CLEH OF THE COURT
`BY:..
`flfém'fi.
`Deputy Clerk
`
`.-
`
`'
`GENERAL ORDER
`RE CASE REASSIGNMENT
`
`'
`DEPARTMENT 305
`COMPLEX LITIGATION
`
`~
`
`-
`
`
`
`Pursuant to authorization by Presiding Judge Garrett L. Wong, the undersigned HEREBY
`
`ORDERS:
`
`'
`
`1.: The following cases are assigned to Judge Teri L. Jackson, Complex Department 613 for all
`
`jpurposes:
`
`
`
`
`
`1000 Channel Street v. Arquitectonica
`
`.
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`' CGC 18-564410
`
`A. Doe. v. AJ Boggs
`
`‘
`
`CGC 18-565456
`
`
`
`. Ahavitete v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
`‘ ‘Aiona v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
`
`‘
`
`’ Airco Mechanical v. Build Group
`
`‘ Alfinito v. Loop Transportation'
`
`CGC 14-542992
`CGC-13 532931
`
`.
`
`CGC-18 568199
`
`CGC 17-556677
`
`
`
`I
`
`
`
`
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`_—
`
`Ashlock v. Sunrurz
`
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`- 1 -
`.
`GENERAL ORDER RE CASE REASSIGNMENT
`
`>
`
`
`
`
`
`\OOOQQM-PUJNH
`
`NNNNNNNNND—lb—lD—ID—‘HHHb—lb—lh—lWflQM-QMNHOKOOOQONM-waHO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Carroll v City and County ofSan Franczsco
`
`Cervantes v Dignity Health
`
`Champion v Syngenta AG
`
`Charles v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
`
`City and County ofSan Franczsco v Retirement Board
`
`Chute v Lyft
`
`Clark/Hathaway Dinwiddie v. Illinois Union Insurance
`
`
`
`CGC—17—562580
`
`CGC-19-575072
`
`CGC—19-575 01 1
`
`CGC-14-53 8933
`
`CPF-16—515266
`
`CGC-18-571063
`
`CGC-16-553972
`
`Cole v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
`
`CGC-14—543394
`
`Eskelsen v. Syngenta AG
`
`CGC—19-_57SOQ4
`
`Huang v. Twitter
`
`CGC—15-544813
`
`
`
`_ 2 _
`
`GENERAL ORDER RE CASE REASSIGNMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.N
`
`KOOOQONUI-PUJ
`
`‘10
`
`11
`
`12'
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`~20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27_
`
`28
`
`-
`CGC 17-561775 *
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Louden v. Syngenta AG
`
`'
`
`CGC 19 575010-
`
`3 Lyon v. Dignity Health
`
`CGC 19 575002
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Olson v. Lyft
`
`,
`
`‘
`
`—_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I
`
`.
`
`
`
`CGC-17 ~558733
`
`CGC-14640584
`
`CGC-17-5 57774
`
`
`
`' Protect _Our Benefits v. City & County ofSan Francisco CPF-13-512788
`
`_ 3 -
`GENERAL ORDER RE CASE REASSIGNMENT
`
`¥ Perry v. .John Stewart Company I
`
`PharmaInvest v. Aminopterin
`
`‘
`
`Polymathic Properties v. Krause
`
`‘
`
`
`
`OO\]O\U‘14>UJN
`
`KO
`
`1o
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`'22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Quigley v. Eaze Solutions
`
`CGC—16-550805
`
`Radiance Owners Association v. Bosa Development
`
`CGC-16-551093
`
`Ramirez v. Recology
`
`Redevelopment Agency of City ofStockton v. Colberg
`
`Richard v. Loop Transportation
`
`'
`
`CGC-17-556653
`
`_
`
`CGC—07-470099
`
`CGC—19—572507
`
`Rimler v. Postmates
`
`'
`
`CGC-18-567868
`
`Rivera v. Wells Fargo
`
`‘
`
`Roe v. Heritage Management Services
`
`Roe 2 v. Heritage Management Services
`
`Rothschild v. Eatwell Enterprises
`
`RoWland v. Cucagna
`
`Sadino v. Propark
`
`CGC-19-574545
`
`CGC-15-544389
`
`CGC-16-555733
`
`-
`
`CGC-18-563796
`
`CGc-16-555127'
`
`CGC-17-560186
`
`Santa Fe Braun v. Insurance Co. ofNorth America
`
`CGC—O4—428686
`
`Simpkins v. GPS Consumer Direct
`
`'
`
`-
`
`CGC-18-570781
`
`Smith v. Syngenta AG
`
`Smythe v. Uber
`
`Stoetzl v. State ofCalifornia
`
`Tabola v. Uber
`
`Tenorio v. Gilead Sciences
`
`Thomas v. Crothall Healthcare
`
`CGC—19—575008
`
`CGC-16-552035
`
`CGC-08-474096
`
`CGC-16-550992
`
`CGC-19-575245
`
`CGC-18-566489
`
`Valdez v. Pro Unlimited
`
`'
`
`CGC-19-574146
`
`Valdz‘via v Di Pietro Todd — Post Street
`
`.
`
`CGC-16-551342 '
`
`Veliz v. Saarman Construction '
`
`,
`
`Villanueva v.’ Dech Foods
`
`Wang v. Stubhub
`
`vWest v. Navient
`
`Winns v. Postmates
`
`Young v. CEP America
`
`Young v. Gap
`
`Young v. RemX
`
`CGC-18-569752
`
`CGC-16-555202
`
`CGC-18-564120 '
`
`CGC-18-566401
`
`CGC—177562282
`
`'CGC-l6—554619
`
`CGC-1.8,-568507I
`
`'
`
`CGC-14-538409
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`GENERAL ORDER RE CASE REASSIGNMENT
`
`
`
`_
`
`2
`
`3
`4
`
`5 »
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8-
`9
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`l3
`
`- 14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`'18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`'23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`2.
`
`This order shall be effective as of July 15, 2019.
`
`3. Unless otherwise ordered, all existing deadlines will remain the same and calendar dates for
`motions, case management conferences, or other matters set for hearing in these cases will go
`
`forward in Department 613 as currently scheduled.
`
`4. The clerk of the Court is directed to file a copy of this order in each case or proceeding listed
`
`above.
`
`Dated: June26,2019
`
`/
`
`.
`
`_
`
`.
`
`
`C,\
`/%§«
`.
`~ g' . '1‘ ,—
`
`_ uperior Court
`
`Judg 0
`
`I
`
`'
`
`.
`_ 5 _
`GENERAL ORDER RE CASE REASSIGNMENT'
`
`
`
`Superior 001%? CE ' D
`County of San Fraggfiggga
`
`JUN 2 6 2019
`
`BY:
`
`CLER , OF THE COURT
`,fl’i fl“ "
`-
`Deputy Clerk
`
`-
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`DEPARTMENT 206
`
`DEPARTMENT 206
`PRESIDING JUDGE
`
`A
`
`‘
`
`AUTHORIZATION T0 REASSIGN
`' CONTPLEX CASES AND PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`Judge Mary E. Wiss is hereby authorized to reassign all complex cases which have been singly
`
`assigned to her for all purposes and which are currently pending in Department 305.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: June 26, 2019
`
`.
`
`Garrett L. Wong
`Presiding Judge of the Superior Court
`
`\lO\U]A'mN
`
`10
`
`. 11
`
`12
`
`1.3
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`'26
`
`27-
`
`28
`
`AUTHORIZATION TO REASSIGN COWLEX CASES AND PROCEEDINGS
`
`_ 1 _
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE
`
`(CCP 1010.6(6) & CRC 2.260(g))
`
`I,‘ SEAN KANE, a Deputy Clerk ofthe Superior Court of(the County of San Francisco,
`certify that I am not a party to the within action.
`
`On June 26, 2019, I electronically served the GENERAL ORDER RE CASE-
`
`REASSIGNMENT; AUTHORIZATION TO REASSIGN CASES AND PROCEEDINGS via
`
`File&ServeXpress on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the
`
`File&ServeXpress Website.
`
`-
`
`Dated:
`
`June 26, 2019
`
`T. Michael Yuen, Clerk
`
`By:
`
`,
`
`-
`SEAN KANE,'Deputy Clerk
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
