throbber

`CM-110
`ATTORNEY OR PARTY WlTHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Slate Bar number, and address):
`FOR COURTUSE ONLY
`
`Jan A. Gruen
`(Bar # 129842)
`
`Paymon Hifai
`(Bar # 306133)
`
`HORNER LAW GROUP, RC.
`
`
`800 S. Broadway, Suite 200
`ELECTRON ICALLY
`
`
`
`Walnut Creek, CA 94596
`FAXNO. (Optional): (925) 943-6888
`TELEPHONE No.: (925) 943-6570
`
`
`E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): j gmen@hornerlawgroup.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Union Investment Real Estate GmbH, Plaintiff
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`08/ 20/ 2018
`
`
`Clark of the Court
`STREET ADDRESS: 400 McAllister Street
`
`BY:JEFFREY LEE
`
`
`MAiLlNG ADDRESS:
`[.‘Jepvutylr Clerk
`
`
`FILED
`Superior Court of California,
`County of San Francisco
`
`CITY AND ZIP CODE: San Francisco 94102
`BRANCH NAME:
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Turner Construction Company, a New York
`
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`
`
`
`l:l LIMITED CASE
`UNLIMITED CASE
`
`(Amount demanded is $25,000
`(Amount demanded
`
`CGC-17—561439
`or less)
`exceeds $25,000)
`
`
`A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 12, 2018
`Time: 10:30 am.
`Dept: 610
`Div.:
`Room:
`Address of court (if different from the address above):
`
`Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Jan A. Gruen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` %i
`El
`l5
`iii
`lI
`
`iiii
`
`PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Union Investment Real Estate GmbH
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`(Check one):
`
`
`
`INSTRUCTIONS: Ail applicable boxes must be Checked, and the specified information must be provided.
`
`1.
`
`Party or parties (answer one):
`
`This statement is submitted by party (name):
`a.
`b. l:l This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
`
`Union Investment Real Estate GmbH
`
`2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross—complainants only)
`a. The complaint was filed on (date): September 21, 2017
`b.
`The cross—complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 03/12/18 (Benson); 04/30/18 (Turner)
`
`3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
`a. l:l All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
`b.
`The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
`(1)
`3Z1
`have not been served (specify names and explain why not): ShenZhen Sanxin Special Glass
`Technology Co., Ltd. (foreign entity)
`have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
`Novum Structures, LLC
`(3) l:] have had a default entered against them (specify names):
`
`
`
`X l
`
`(2)
`
`C.
`
`The following additional arties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
`they may be served):
`nknown presently.
`
`‘
`4. Description of case
`(Describe, including causes of action):
`l:l cross-complaint
`complaint
`a.
`Type Of 0389 In
`Strict liability; strict liability (component parts); negligence; breach of contract; breach of express
`warranty; breach of contract (third—party beneficiary).
` Page 1 of 5
`Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
`Cal. Rules of Court,
`Judicial Council of California
`mles 3120—1730
`CM—110 [Rev. July 1, 2011]
`www.courtspalgov
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms
`
`

`

`
`
`
`CM-110
`
`PLAlNTlFF/PETlTIONER: Union Investment Real Estate GmbH, a German CASE NUMBER:
`
`DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Turner Construction Company, a New York CGC‘17'561439
`4.
`b.
`Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (if personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and
`damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amounfl, estimated future medical expenses, lost
`eamings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. if equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.)
`This matter involves defective glass panes installed as part of a commercial building's lobby cable net wall
`system. Full replacement is required. The amount of damages/costs of replacement is under evaluation, but
`exceeds $45 0,000. Attorney's fees and costs and experts' fees and costs are contractually recoverable.
`.
`Settlement negotiations for full replacement and related damages are ongoing.
`l:l (If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.)
`
`5.
`
`Jury or nonjury trial
`The party or parties request
`requesting a jury trial):
`
`6. Trial date
`
`ajury trial [:1 a nonjury trial.
`
`(If more than one party, provide the name of each party
`
`a. 1:: The trial has been set for (date):
`b.
`No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if
`not, explain):
`
`0. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability):
`
`7. Estimated length of trial
`The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one):
`
`days (specify number): 10~12 days
`a.
`b. I: hours (short causes) (specify):
`
`8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party)
`The party or parties will be represented at trial
`a. Attorney:
`b
`Firm:
`0 Address:
`
`d. Telephone number:
`
`E-mail address:
`e
`E] Additional representation is described in Attachment 8.
`9. Preference
`
`[:1 This case is entitled to preference (specify code section):
`
`10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
`
`by the attorney or party listed in the caption 1:] by the following:
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`Fax number:
`
`Party represented:
`
`a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read
`the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for information about the processes available through the
`court and community programs in this case.
`has 1:] has not
`(1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel
`in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client.
`
`provided the ADR information package identified
`
`(2) For self—represented parties: Party :1 has :1 has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221.
`
`b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available).
`(1)
`This matter is sub'ect to mandatoryjudicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action
`mediation under ode of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the
`statutory limit.
`
`(2)
`
`Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of
`Civil Procedure section 1141.11.
`
`
`
`(3)
`
`x
`
`This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action
`mediation under Code of Civii Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption):
`CRC 3.811(1); CCP 1775.5 — The amount in controversy exceeds $50,000.
`
`CM-“OIRSV-JU'WWI
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`Pawn”
`
`LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CM—110
`CASE NUMBER:
`
`PLA'NT'FF/PET'T'ONERI Union Investment Real Estate GmbH, a German
`
`
`CGC—17—561439
`E
`a New York
`FENDANT/RESPONDENT: Turner Construction Compan
`
`10. 0.
`
`Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or
`have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information):
`
`
`
`The party or parties completing
`this form are willing to
`participate in the following ADR
`processes (check all that apply):
`
`If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to
`participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes,
`indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties’ADR
`stipulation):
`
`Mediation session not yet scheduled
`
`DEED Mediation completed on (date):
`
`Mediation session scheduled for (date): Ongoing
`
`Agreed to complete mediation by (date):
`
`
`
`(1) Mediation
`
`(2) Settlement
`conference
`
`3
`
`(
`
`) N
`
`|
`1
`eutra eva uation
`
`(4) Nonbinding judicial
`arbitration
`
`(5) Binding private
`arbitration
`
`(6) Other (specify):
`
`Settlement conference not yet scheduled
`
`I:l
`
`Settlement conference scheduled for (date):
`
`[:1
`
`Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date):
`
`[:1
`
`Settlement conference completed on (date):
`
`[:1
`
`[:1
`
`[:1
`
`[:1
`
`Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled
`
`Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date):
`Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date):
`
`Neutral evaluation completed on (date):
`
`I:
`
`Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled
`
`[II]
`
`III
`
`I:
`
`Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date):
`Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date):
`
`Judicial arbitration completed on (date):
`
`III
`
`Private arbitration not yet scheduled
`
`l:l
`
`[I]
`
`[:3
`
`Private arbitration scheduled for (date):
`Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date):
`
`Private arbitration completed on (date):
`
`I:|
`
`ADR session not yet scheduled
`
`[:1
`
`ADR session scheduled for (date):
`
`El
`
`Agreed to complete ADR session by (date):
`
`1:] ADR completed on (date):
`
`cum-110 [Rev. July 1, 20111
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`Page a of 5
`
`LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Farms
`
`

`

`PLAINTIFF/PETlTlONER: Union Investment Real Estate GmbH, a German
`
`DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Turner Construction Company, aNew York
`
`11. insurance
`
`a. l:l Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name):
`b. Reservation of rights:
`[:3 Yes E: No
`c. E: Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain):
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`
`CGC—l7-56l439
`
`12. Jurisdiction
`
`Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status.
`:3 Bankruptcy l:l Other (specify):
`Status:
`
`13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
`a. [:i There are companion, underlying, or related cases.
`(1) Name of case:
`(2) Name of court:
`(3) Case number:
`(4) Status:
`
`[:3 Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a.
`
`b. I:] A motion to
`
`[:I consolidate
`
`[:1 coordinate
`
`will be filed by (name party):
`
`14. Bifurcation
`
`
`l: The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of
`action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons):
`
`15. Other motions
`
`[:3 The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues):
`
`16. Discovery
`a. |:l The party or parties have completed all discovery.
`b.
`The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery):
`Berti
`Description
`Plaintiff
`Written Discovery
`Plaintiff
`Depositions
`Plaintiff
`Subpoenas
`Plaintiff
`Expert Discovery
`
`931?.
`Per Code
`Per Code
`Per Code
`Per Code
`
`c, [:l The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are
`anticipated (specify):
`
`
`
`CM-“OIRBV- NM 2011]
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`ream”
`LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms
`
`

`

` I l li
`
`CM~11O
`
`PLAlNTlFF/PETlTIONER: Union Investment Real Estate GmbH, a German
`CASE NUMBER
`
`DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Turner Construction Company, a New York CGC"17“561439
`
`17. Economic litigation
`a. l:] This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code
`of Civil Procedure sections 90—98 will apply to this case.
`
`b. l:| This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional
`discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial
`should not apply to this case):
`
`18. Other issues
`
`The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management
`conference (specify):
`The parties have been working with Mediator, Robert Bellagamba,
`protracted litigation. Significant progress has been made.
`
`to resolve this matter short of
`
`19. Meet and confer
`
`a.
`
`The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules
`of Court (if not, explain):
`
`b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following
`(specify):
`Plaintiff requests that this Case Management Conference be continued ninety (60) calendar days and
`that entry of default as to any served parties be continued for sixty (30) calendar days to accommodate
`settlement negotiations.
`
`20. Total number of pages attached (if any):
`
`I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution,
`as well as otherissues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these'Issues at the time of
`the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required.
`-.
`
`Date: August
`
`I I , 2018
`
`
`Jan A. Gruen
`(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
`
`‘TORNEW
`
`
`
`
`
` ., “'I/j
`
`(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
`
`(SIGNATURE or PARTY OR A‘TORNEY)
`
`|:l Additional signatures are attached.
`
`
`
`CM—110lRev. Julyt, 2011]
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`Page5°f5
`LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms
`
`

`

`PROOF OF SERVICE
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`Case Name: Union Investment Real Estate GmbH, v. Turner Construction Company
`Case No:
`CGC—17—561439
`
`I am employed in the County of Contra Costa, State of California. My business address is
`800 S. Broadway, Suite 200, Walnut Creek, California 94596. I am over the age of eighteen
`years, and not a party to the within action
`
`On August 20, 2018, I caused to be served the within:
`
`Plaintiffs Case Management Statement
`
`7
`
`on the party(ies) listed below, addressed as follows:
`
`J. Kevin Moore
`8
`Renee Welze Livingston, Esq.
`9 Bold, Polisner, Maddow, Nelson & Judson
`Livingston Law Firm
`2125 Oak Grove Road, Suite 210
`1600 S. Main Street, #280
`10 Walnut Creek, California 94598
`Walnut Creek, CA 94596
`
`for Defendant/Cross—Complainant,
`Attorneys
`11 Attorneys For Turner Construction Company
`
`Benson Industries, Inc.
`
`By Mail/Ordinary Business Practices |C.C.P. §§ 1013, 1013al. By causing a true copy
`thereof to be enclosed in a sealed envelope or package, addressed to the party[ies] as stated on
`the attached service list.
`I am readily familiar with the firm's business practice for collection
`and processing of envelopes and packages for mailing with the United States Postal Service.
`Under the firm's practice, mail is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United
`States Postal Service at Walnut Creek, California, that same day, with postage thereon fully
`prepaid.
`I am aware that upon motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal
`cancellation date or postage meter date on the envelope or package is more than one day after
`the date of deposit for mailing.
`
`By:
`
`
`,6
`1;“
`Sharon Piserchio
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`1 6
`
`17
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`HORNER LAW GROUP, RC.
`300 s. umdmy, Suite 100
`Walnut Creek, California 94596
`
`
`_ 1 _
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket