throbber
COLLIN J. COX (admitted pro hac vice)
`
`ccox@yettercoleman.com
`JAMES E. ZUCKER (admitted pro hac vice)
`jzucker@yettercoleman.com
`GRANT B. MARTINEZ (admitted pro hac vice)
`gmartinez@yettercoleman.com
`YETTER COLEMAN LLP
`811 Main Street, Suite 4100
`Houston, Texas 77002
`(713) 632-8000
`
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`
`AMY L. BOMSE (No. 218669)
`amy.bomse@apks.com
`Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 9411 1—4024
`Telephone:
`415.471.3100
`Facsimile:
`415.471.3400
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`ELECTRON 'CALLY
`F I L E D
`Superior Court of Gaff-fornfa,
`com“? “56'” ”mm”
`09 I 28/ 2018
`BY:VANESSA wu
`Clerk of the Court
`[.‘Jepvutyglr Clerk
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
`
`IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`RevPAR Collective, Inc. d/b/a/ Stash Hotel
`Rewards,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`Synchrony Financial and
`Synchrony Bank,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No:
`
`CGC-18-566487
`
`DECLARATION OF GRANT MARTINEZ IN
`
`SUPPORT OF STASH’S UNOPPOSED
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`Date:
`Time:
`Dept:
`Judge:
`
`Case Filed: May 10, 2018
`Trial Date: None Set
`
`
`DECLARATION OF GRANT MARTINEZ IN SUPPORT OF STASH’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
`FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`1o
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF GRANT MARTINEZ
`
`1, Grant Martinez, declare:
`
`1.
`
`I am an active member in good standing of the State Bar of Texas and am admitted
`
`pro hac vice in the above-captioned matter.
`
`I am an associate in the law firm of Yetter Coleman
`
`LLP and counsel of record for Plaintiff RevPAR Collective, Inc. d/b/a/ Stash Hotel Rewards
`
`(“Stash”).
`
`I make this declaration based upon personal knowledge or, where stated, information and
`
`belief, as to the facts herein. If called as a witness, I could and would competently testify thereto.
`
`2.
`
`The proposed amended complaint addresses certain purported legal deficiencies in
`
`the prior pleading that can be cured through amendment. Specifically, the proposed amendment
`
`clarifies and amplifies allegations about the various forms of damages suffered by Plaintiff,
`
`including Plaintiff’s out-of-pocket losses, in response to Defendants’ arguments that Plaintiff had
`
`not sufficiently pleaded out-of-pocket losses. The proposed amendment clarifies and amplifies
`
`allegations about misrepresentations made by Defendants in response to an argument by Defendants
`
`that such misrepresentations are non-actionable statements of opinion. Finally, the amended
`
`complaint sets forth a separate cause of action for promissory fraud. This claim arises out of the
`
`same underlying events alleged in the original complaint and the allegations in the first amended
`
`complaint.
`
`3.
`
`These amendments are made in response to Defendants’ General Demurrer filed on
`
`September 11, 2018. Prior to that time, Stash’s counsel was unaware of the potential need for
`
`clarification and amplification of the allegations in the first amended complaint. Stash’s counsel
`
`believed that many of the issues raised in Defendants’ General Demurrer to the original complaint
`
`had been resolved through the filing of the first amended complaint.
`
`4.
`
`The proposed amendment is necessary and proper to allow Plaintiff to recover all
`
`damages it suffered from defendants’ wrongful acts related to the subject matter of this action in a
`
`single lawsuit.
`
`5.
`
`The case management conference is two months away, now set for November 28,
`
`2018. No trial date has been set in this action and no discovery deadlines have been set. Plaintiff
`
`-1-
`DECLARATION OF GRANT MARTINEZ IN SUPPORT OF STASH’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
`FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`\10
`
`9
`
`10
`
`ll
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`anticipates that any additional discovery generated by the amendments will be minimal and will not
`
`result in any delay.
`
`6.
`
`On September 26, 2018, I provided Defendants’ counsel with a copy of the proposed
`
`amended complaint. On September 28, Defendants’ counsel stated that they do not oppose the
`
`motion for leave to file the second amended complaint.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State Of California that the foregoing
`
`is true and correct.
`
`Executed this 28th day of September, 2018, in Houston, Texas‘
`
`Karate ~—
`
`lfat/ant B Martinez
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARA'I‘ION OF GRANT MARTINEZ IN SUPPORT OF srAiirs UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
`FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket