throbber

`
`LANCE EVANDER, et al.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`VERITAS INVESTMENTS, INC., et al. and
`DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`Jonathan E. Sommer (SBN 209179)
`Abram P. Petersen (SBN 254832)
`Ian E. Browning (SBN 262246)
`Gabriel A. Peixoto (SBN 306758)
`LUBIN OLSON & NIEWIADOMSKI LLP
`The Transamerica Pyramid
`600 Montgomery Street, 14th Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Telephone:
`(415) 981-0550
`Facsimile:
`(415) 981-4343
`jsommer@lubinolson.com
`apetersen@lubinolson.com
`ibrowning@lubinolson.com
`gpeixoto@lubinolson.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`VERITAS INVESTMENTS, INC., et al.
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
` Case No. CGC-18-570435
`
`DISCOVERY
`
`DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED NOTICE OF
`MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL
`RESPONSES TO FORM
`INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS
`FOR PRODUCTION, AND PRODUCTION
`OF RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS
`
`Date:
`June 6, 2022
`Time:
`9:00 a.m.
`Dept.:
`301
`
`
`Action Filed:
`Trial Date:
`
`
`ELECTRONICALLY
`F I L E D
`
`Superior Court of California,
`County of San Francisco
`05/10/2022
`Clerk of the Court
`BY: EDNALEEN ALEGRE
`Deputy Clerk
`
`October 11, 2018
`October 3, 2022
`
`
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on June 6, 2022, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as
`counsel may be heard, in Department 301 of the above-captioned Court, located at 400 McAllister
`Street, San Francisco, CA 94102, Veritas Investments, Inc., et al. (collectively “Defendants”) will
`and hereby do move this Court to (a) compel Plaintiffs Angel Tenorio, Jianying Zeng, Raquel
`Dominguez, Antonio Godoy, Elizabeth Maticello, Sook Fung, Alix Myrthil, Manuel Alvarado,
`07039.00920/1249462v1
`1
`DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO
`FORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`Landra Tankha, Mei Ying Chen, Li Kuang, Man Fat Lui, Jian Liang Zhen, Shun Mei Zhu, Jay
`Wilson Fisher, Robert McCrady, Victor Pech, Maria Pech Uc, Menta Srikanth Sundara, Florence
`Norman, Jason Sanders, and Dolly Tang (collectively, the “Non-Responding Plaintiffs”) to
`provide verified, objection-free responses to Defendants Form Interrogatories (Set One) (the
`“Form Rogs”) and Request for Production (Set One) (the “RFPs”; collectively, the “Requests”)
`within five days of the hearing, (b) compel the Non-Responding Plaintiffs and also Plaintiffs
`Raymond Sullivan, Cynthia Spears, Gloria Fortier, Katherine Shannon, Patrick Shannon, Bryan
`Butler, Meredith Spoto, Brenda Ellis, James Hutchison, Jeffrey Gilmore, John Hughes, and Tarun
`Mehta (collectively, the “Non-Producing Plaintiffs”) to provide documents responsive to the RFPs
`within five days of the hearing, (c) compel Plaintiffs Thomas Bulger, Jon Christenson, Mario
`Dzul, Vicente Dzul, Ana Escandon, Lance Evander, Alvaro Fortiz, Rebecca Frazzano, Rosario
`Garcia, Germain Gongora, Miguel Gongora, Marianna Graham, Karen McMillan, Jose Najea,
`Debra Nunez, Shirrod Richardson, Ellen Sheeley, Lidia Sullon, Silmarie Torres, Sofia Uc,
`Emanuel Waktola, Mary Wilson, Stephen Wilson, along with Non-Producing Plaintiffs Brenda
`Ellis, Jeffrey Gilmore, John Hughes, James Hutchison, Tarun Mehta, Katherine Shannon, Patrick
`Shannon, Meredith Spoto, and Raymond Sullivan (collectively, the “Non-Verifying Plaintiffs”) to
`produce verifications of their previously produced responses to the Form Rogs and RFPs within
`five days of the hearing, and (d) issue sanctions against the above Plaintiffs and their counsel in
`the amount of $5,136.00 to compensate Defendants for the costs in bringing and pursuing this
`motion.
`This motion to compel is made pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure sections
`2030.300, et seq., and 2031.300, et seq., on the grounds that Defendants Requests were timely and
`properly propounded; that the Non-Responding Plaintiffs provided no responses to the Requests;
`that these Plaintiffs waived their right to object to these requests; that the Non-Producing Plaintiffs
`provided no responsive documents in responsive to the RFPs despite agreeing to do so; and that
`the Non-Verifying Plaintiffs failed to produce verifications to their Form Rog and RFP responses.
`FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that Defendants will also seek monetary sanctions in the
`amount of not less than $5,136.00 against the Non-Responding and Non-Producing Plaintiffs and
`07039.00920/1249462v1
`2
`DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO
`FORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`their attorneys of record, Bracamontes & Vlasak, P.C. and Greenstein & McDonald, joint and
`severally, for the costs, including attorneys’ fees, in bringing and pursuing this motion, as
`authorized by Code of Civil Procedure sections 2023.010, et seq., 2023.030(a), 2030.290(c),
`2031.300(c) and 2031.320(b).
`This Motion is based on this Notice of Motion, the attached Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities, the Declarations of Jonathan E. Sommer and Abram P. Petersen and filed
`concurrently herewith, all of the pleadings, files, and records in this proceeding, all other matters
`of which the Court may take judicial notice, and any argument or evidence that may be presented
`to or considered by the Court prior to its ruling.
`Dated: May 10, 2022
`LUBIN OLSON & NIEWIADOMSKI LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`Abram P. Petersen
`Attorneys for Defendants
`VERITAS INVESTMENTS, INC., et al.
`
`07039.00920/1249462v1
`3
`DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO
`FORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`Lance Evander, et al. v. Veritas Investments, Inc., et al.
`San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-18-570435
`At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am
`employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. My business address is The
`Transamerica Pyramid, 600 Montgomery Street, 14th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111.
`On May 10, 2022, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as
`DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL
`RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION,
`AND PRODUCTION OF RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS
`on the interested parties in this action as follows:
`Ryan J. Vlasak
`Steven J. McDonald
`Betzy Bras-Gonzalez
`Ariel M. Gershon
`Bracamontes & Vlasak, P.C.
`Kelli Shields
`1901 Harrison Street, Suite 1590
`Greenstein & McDonald
`Oakland, CA 94612
`300 Montgomery Street, Suite 621
`Tel: (415) 835-6777
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Fax: (415) 835-6780
`Tel: (415) 773-1240
`Email: rvlasak@bvlawsf.com
`Fax: (415) 773-1240
`
`bgonzalez@bvlawsf.com
`Email: sjm@greensteinmcdonald.com
`
`
`ariel@greensteinmcdonald.com
`Attorneys for All Plaintiffs
`
`kelli@greensteinmcdonald.com
`
`Attorneys for All Plaintiffs
`BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: I caused a copy of the
`document(s) to be sent from e-mail address cmontoya@lubinolson.com to the persons at the e-
`mail addresses listed in the Service List. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the
`transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful.
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
`foregoing is true and correct.
`Executed on May 10, 2022, at Antioch, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Catherine Montoya
`
`07039.00920/1249462v1
`
`
`
`4
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket