throbber
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
`Peter V. Dessau, Esq. SBN: 135361 | Rosanna E. Fristed, Esq. SBN: 257751
`Miller Morton Caillat & Nevis, LLP
`2001 Gateway Place, Suite 220W
`San Jose, CA 95110
`(408) 436-8272
`(408) 292-1765
`TELEPHONE NO.:
`FAX NO. (Optional):
`pvd@millermorton.com; ref@millermorton.com
`E-MAIL ADDRESS:
`MHYF Holdings, LLC, Matthew Humphrey and Ying Fu , Plaintiffs
` ATTORNEY FOR (Name):
`SAN FRANCISCO
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
`400 McAllister Street
`STREET ADDRESS:
`MAILING ADDRESS:
`San Francisco, CA 94102-4515
`CITY AND ZIP CODE:
`Civic Center Courthouse
`BRANCH NAME:
`MHYF Holdings, LLC, , et al.
` PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
` DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
`Chris V. Kelly, et al.
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`LIMITED CASE
`UNLIMITED CASE
`(Amount demanded is $25,000
`(Amount demanded
`or less)
`exceeds $25,000)
`
`(Check one):
`
`X
`
`CM-110
`
`FOR COURT USE ONLY
`
`ELECTRONICALLY
`F I L E D
`
`Superior Court of California,
`County of San Francisco
`04/12/2022
`Clerk of the Court
`BY: VERA MU
`Deputy Clerk
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`
`CGC-21-596771
`
`A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
`April 27, 2022
`10:30 a.m.
`610
`Date:
`Time:
`Dept.:
`Address of court (if different from the address above):
`
`Div.:
`
`Room:
`
`X
`
`Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
`Rosanna E. Fristed, Esq.
`INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
`1. Party or parties (answer one):
`MHYF Holdings, LLC, Matthew Humphrey and Ying Fu
`a.
`This statement is submitted by party (name):
`X
`This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
`b.
`2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
`November 22, 2021
`a. The complaint was filed on (date):
`The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
`b.
`3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
`a.
`All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
`b.
`The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
`(1)
`have not been served
` (specify names and explain why not):
`
`X
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`X
`
`have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed
` (specify names):
`CornerstoneHD Construction, Inc., and Infinium Air, Inc.
`have had a default entered against them
` (specify names):
`
`c.
`
`The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
`they may be served):
`
`4. Description of case
`cross-complaint
`complaint
`a. Type of case in
` (Describe, including causes of action):
`
`X
`COMPLAINT FOR 1) NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION; 2) FRAUD; 3) CONCEALMENT; 4) NON-DISCLOSURE
`(STATUTORY AND COMMON LAW); 5) BREACH OF CONTRACT; 6) NEGLIGENCE; AND 7) NEGLIGENCE.
`
`Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
`Judicial Council of California
`CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021]
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`Page 1 of 5
`Cal. Rules of Court,
`rules 3.720–3.730
`www.courts.ca.gov
`LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms
`
`
`

`

` PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
` DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
`
`MHYF Holdings, LLC, , et al.
`CASE NUMBER:
`CGC-21-596771
`Chris V. Kelly, et al.
`4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (If personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and
`damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost
`earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.)
`
`CM-110
`
`(If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.)
`5. Jury or nonjury trial
`a nonjury trial.
`a jury triaI
`The party or parties request
` (If more than one party, provide the name of each party
`X
`requesting a jury trial):
`
`6. Trial date
`a.
`The trial has been set for (date):
`No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint
`b.
`not, explain):
`See attachment.
`
`X
`
`(if
`
`c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability):
`
`by the attorney or party listed in the caption
`
`by the following:
`
`f. Fax number:
`g. Party represented:
`
`provided the ADR information package identified
`
`7. Estimated length of trial
`The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one):
`25 Days
`a.
`days (specify number):
`X
`b.
`hours (short causes) (specify):
`8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party)
`The party or parties will be represented at trial
`X
`a. Attorney:
`b. Firm:
`c. Address:
`d. Telephone number:
`e. E-mail address:
`Additional representation is described in Attachment 8.
`9. Preference
`This case is entitled to preference (specify code section):
`10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
`a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read
`the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 of the California Rules of Court for information about the
`processes available through the court and community programs in this case.
`(1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel
`has
`has not
`X
`in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client.
`has
`(2) For self-represented parties: Party
`has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221.
`b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available).
`(1)
`This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action
`mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the
`statutory limit.
`Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of
`Civil Procedure section 1141.11.
`This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action
`mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq.
` (specify exemption):
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021]
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms
`
`

`

` PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
` DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
`
`10. c.
`
`MHYF Holdings, LLC, , et al.
`Chris V. Kelly, et al.
`Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or
`have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information):
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`CGC-21-596771
`
`CM-110
`
`The party or parties completing
`this form are willing to
`participate in the following ADR
`processes (check all that apply):
`
`X
`
`X
`
`If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to
`participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes,
`indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties' ADR
`stipulation):
`Mediation session not yet scheduled
`Mediation session scheduled for (date):
`Agreed to complete mediation by (date):
`Mediation completed on (date):
`
`X
`
`X
`
`Settlement conference not yet scheduled
`Settlement conference scheduled for (date):
`Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date):
`Settlement conference completed on (date):
`
`Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled
`Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date):
`Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date):
`Neutral evaluation completed on (date):
`
`Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled
`Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date):
`Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date):
`Judicial arbitration completed on (date):
`
`Private arbitration not yet scheduled
`Private arbitration scheduled for
`(date):
`Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date):
`Private arbitration completed on (date):
`
`ADR session not yet scheduled
`ADR session scheduled for (date):
`Agreed to complete ADR session by (date):
`ADR completed on (date):
`
` (1) Mediation
`
` (2) Settlement
` conference
`
`(3) Neutral evaluation
`
`(4) Nonbinding judicial
` arbitration
`
` (5) Binding private
` arbitration
`
` (6) Other (specify):
`
`CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021]
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms
`
`

`

` PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
` DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
`
`MHYF Holdings, LLC, , et al.
`Chris V. Kelly, et al.
`
`CM-110
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`CGC-21-596771
`
`11. Insurance
`a.
`Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name):
`b. Reservation of rights:
`Yes
`No
`Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain):
`c.
`X
`The construction defects will trigger insurance defense; the coverages of the specific trade
`contractors will impact settlement.
`12. Jurisdiction
`Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status.
`Bankruptcy
`Other (specify):
`Status:
`
`13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
`a.
`There are companion, underlying, or related cases.
`(1) Name of case:
`(2) Name of court:
`(3) Case number:
`(4) Status:
`Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a.
`
`b.
`
`coordinate
`consolidate
`A motion to
` wiII be filed by (name party):
`
`14. Bifurcation
`The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of
`action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons):
`
`15. Other motions
`The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial
` (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues):
`
`16. Discovery
`a.
`The party or parties have completed all discovery.
`b.
`The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery):
`Party
`Description
`Pursuant to CMO/PTO once agreed
`
`X
`
`Date
`
`c.
`
`The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are
` (specify):
`anticipated
`
`CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021]
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms
`
`

`

` PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
` DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
`
`MHYF Holdings, LLC, , et al.
`Chris V. Kelly, et al.
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`CGC-21-596771
`
`17. Economic litigation
`a.
`This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code
`of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case.
`This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional
`discovery will be filed
` (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial
`should not apply to this case):
`
`b.
`
`CM-110
`
`18. Other issues
`The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management
`conference (specify):
`
`19. Meet and confer
`a.
`The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules
`X
`of Court
` (if not, explain):
`
`b.
`
`After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following
`(specify):
`
`4
`20. Total number of pages attached (if any):
`I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution,
`as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of
`the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required.
`April 12, 2022
`Peter V. Dessau, Esq.
`(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
`
`(SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
`
`Date:
`
`(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
`
`(SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
`Additional signatures are attached.
`
`CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021]
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`Page 5 of 5
`
`LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms
`
`

`

`6.b. ATTACHMENT
`This matter involves multiple construction defects that will be litigated both in a tort and contract
`context depending upon the effected party. Given that the matter was filed in November 2021
`and the matter is still not at issue, it is anticipated that the matter will be ready for trial in late
`2023.
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
`
`
`I, the undersigned, declare: I am now and at all times herein mentioned have been over
`the age of eighteen years, a citizen of the United States, employed in Santa Clara County,
`California, and not a party to the within action or cause; my business address is 2001 Gateway
`Place, Suite 220W, San Jose, California 95110. On the date set forth below, I served the below-
`stated person(s) the attached
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
` BY MAIL on the following party(ies) in said action, in accordance with CCP §1013a, by
`placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as shown below. I
`caused such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United States
`mail at San Jose, California. I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and
`processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the
`same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of party served,
`service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one
`day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
`
` BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE The undersigned electronically served the above
`referenced document(s) on all parties listed on the attached service list at the e-mail address
`indicated.
`
`(STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
`foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST
`
`Executed on April 12, 2022, at San Jose, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`
`
`Monica H. Rocha
`
`
`
`1
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`MILLER, MORTON, CAILLAT & NEVIS, LLP
`
`2001 Gateway Place, Suite 220W
`
`Telephone: (408) 292-1765
`
`San Jose, CA 95110
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`SERVICE LIST
`
`Sarah Marsey, Esq.
`Holland & Knight LLP
`50 California Street, Ste. 2800
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`
`
`Catherine L. Deter, Esq.
`David J. Libertella, Esq.
`Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP
`6A Liberty Street, Suite 200
`Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
`
`
`Benjamin D . Koegel, Esq.
`W. Patrick Cronican, Esq.
`Elguindy, Meyer & Koegel, APC
`2990 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 205
`Roseville, CA 95661
`
`
`Ryan P. Harley, Esq.
`Taylor J. Pohle, Esq.
`Collins + Collins LLP
`2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 835
`Walnut Creek, CA 94596
`
`Attorney(s) for Defendants Chris V. Kelly and
`Lara G. Kelly
`
`Telephone (415) 743-6947
`
`Email: sarah.marsey@hklaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant PH Architects
`
`Telephone (949) 757-4514
`Cell Phone (949) 379-0044
`
`Email: CDeter@wshblaw.com
`
` dlibertella@wshblaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Cal-C.A.D.E.
`
`Telephone: (916)778-3310
`Facsimile: (916) 330-4433
`
`Email:
`
`
`
`
`bkoegel@emklawyers.com
`pcronican@emklawyers.com
`
`(510) 844-5100
`(510) 844-5101
`
` rharley@ccllp.law
` tpohle@ccllp.law
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Xie Associates, Inc.
`
`Telephone:
`Facsimile:
`Email:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Assistant:
`
`
`
`
`Kelly Forst
`kforst@ccllp.law
`
`Robert P. Hamilton, Esq.
`Don Schaefer, Esq.
`Goodman Neuman Hamilton LLP
`One Post Street, Suite 2100
`San Francisco, California 94104
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Arch Plumbing Inc., a California corporation
`
`Telephone: (415) 705-0400
`Facsimile: (415) 705-0411
`
`Email rhamilton@gnhllp.com
`
` dschaefer@gnhllp.com
`
`
`
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`
`2
`
`MILLER, MORTON, CAILLAT & NEVIS, LLP
`
`2001 Gateway Place, Suite 220W
`
`Telephone: (408) 292-1765
`
`San Jose, CA 95110
`
`

`

`Jonathan M. Blute, Esq.
`Jackson Stogner, Esq.
`Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, P.C.
`580 California Street
`Suite 1100
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`
`Attorney for Defendant Ramirez Roofing Corp.
`
`Main (415) 788-1900
`Direct: (415) 962-2808
`
`Email JBlute@MPBF.com
`
` JStogner@MPBF.com
`
`Assistant Brenda Renner
`BRenner@MPBF.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`
`3
`
`MILLER, MORTON, CAILLAT & NEVIS, LLP
`
`2001 Gateway Place, Suite 220W
`
`Telephone: (408) 292-1765
`
`San Jose, CA 95110
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket