1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`ELECTRONICALLY
`F I L E D
`
`Superior Court of California,
`County of San Francisco
`05/04/2023
`Clerk of the Court
`BY: JUDITH NUNEZ
`Deputy Clerk
`
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`Amy P. Lally (SBN 198555)
`alally@sidley.com
`1999 Avenue of the Stars, 17th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Telephone: (310) 595 9662
`Facsimile: (310) 595 9501
`
`Alycia A. Degen (SBN 211350)
`adegen@sidley.com
`Monique M. Candiff (SBN 340315)
`mcandiff@sidley.com
`555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
`Los Angeles, California 90013
`Telephone: (213) 896 6000
`Facsimile: (213) 896 6600
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`W3ll People, Inc.
`Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
`
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`Willis M. Wagner (SBN 310900)
`will.wagner@arnoldporter.com
`Andrew J. Rambo (SBN 339503)
`andrew.rambo@arnoldporter.com
`Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
`Telephone:
`415.471.3100
`Facsimile:
`415.471.3400
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`Shiseido Americas Corporation
`bareMinerals USHoldco Inc.
`Sephora USA, Inc.
`SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
` NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF PETITION
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATES,
`FOR COORDINATION AND
`INC.,
`APPLICATION FOR STAY ORDER
`Case No. CGC-23-604171
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`W3LL PEOPLE, INC., a Delaware corporation;
`ULTA SALON, COSMETICS &
`FRAGRANCE, INC., a Delaware corporation;
`and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-1-
`NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF PETITION FOR COORDINATION
`
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 3.522 of the California Rules of Court,
`notice is hereby given that on May 3, 2023, Shiseido Americas Corporation, bareMinerals US
`Holdco Inc., and Sephora USA, Inc., the defendants in Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v.
`Bareminerals US Holdco Inc., Alameda County Superior Court Case No. 22CV008711 (filed Mar.
`22, 2022), submitted a Petition of Coordination (“Petition”) seeking to coordinate the above-
`entitled Proposition 65 action with 107 other Proposition 65 actions involving alleged exposures to
`“titanium dioxide (airborne, unbound particles of respirable size)” in powdered facial cosmetic
`products (singularly, “Included Action”) and collectively, the “Included Actions”). The
`Defendants in the Included Actions were involved in the decision to file this Petition for
`Coordination and agree the Included Actions should be coordinated. In addition, an Application
`for Stay was submitted requesting that the Judicial Council stay all proceedings in the Included
`Actions pending resolution of their Petition for Coordination. Copies of the Petition and
`Application for Stay Order, together with Petitioners’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities and
`Declaration of Willis M. Wagner are enclosed hereto.1
`
`Petitioners are represented by Willis M. Wagner and Andrew J. Rambo of Arnold & Porter
`Kaye Scholer LLP, whose address is Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor, San Francisco, CA
`94111-4024. The named Defendants in this matter that are joining the petition are represented by
`Amy P. Lally of Sidley Austin LLP, whose address is 1999 Avenue of the Stars, 17th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90067, and Alycia A. Degen and Monique M. Candiff of Sidley Austin LLP,
`whose address is 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000, Los Angeles, CA 90013.
`
`All Included Actions pending in this County are listed below:
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Sephora USA, Inc., San Francisco Superior
`Court Case No. CGC-22-599492 (filed May 4, 2022);
`
`
`1 The Declaration of Willis M. Wagner, as submitted to the Judicial Counsel and served on all counsel of record in the
`Included Actions, included 114 exhibits. Those exhibits are not enclosed with this Notice, but will be made available
`promptly upon request.”
`
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF PETITION FOR COORDINATION
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Profusion Cosmetics Corp., et al., San
`Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-599495 (filed May 4, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Pearl World Inc., et al., San Francisco
`Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-599530 (filed May 6, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Buth-Na-Bodhaige, Inc. dba “The Body
`Shop” et al., San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-599678 (filed May 18,
`2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Tarte, Inc., et al., San Francisco Superior
`Court Case No. CGC-22-599743 (filed May 23, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Too Faced Cosmetics, LLC, San Francisco
`Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-600953 (filed July 27, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Physicians Formula Cosmetics, Inc., et al.,
`San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-600957 (filed July 27, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Mineral Fusion Natural Brands LLC, et al.,
`San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-601187 (filed Aug. 9, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Enchante Accessories Inc., et al., San
`Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-602653 (filed Oct. 28, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Kiss Products, Inc. et al., San Francisco
`Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-602737 (filed Nov. 2, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Estee Lauder Inc., et al., San Francisco
`Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-602967 (filed Nov. 15, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Clinique Laboratories, LLC et al., San
`Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-602968 (filed November 15, 2022).
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Beauty Bakerie Cosmetics Brand, Inc., et al.,
`San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-602985 (filed Nov. 16, 2022).
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Laura Mercier US Buyer LLC, et al., San
`Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-603487 (filed Dec. 14, 2022);
`
`-3-
`NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF PETITION FOR COORDINATION
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Jaclyn Cosmetics, LLC, et al., San Francisco
`Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-603488 (filed Dec. 14, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Beauty Treats International Co., et al., San
`Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-22-603489 (filed Dec. 14, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Karity LLC, et al., San Francisco Superior
`Court Case No. CGC-23-603899 (filed Jan. 10, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Origins Natural Resources Inc., et al., San
`Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-23-603901 (filed Jan. 10, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Fenty Beauty LLC, et al., San Francisco
`Superior Court Case No. CGC-23-604168 (filed Jan. 23, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v.W3ll People Inc., et al., San Francisco
`Superior Court Case No. CGC-23-604171 (filed Jan. 23, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Mented Cosmetics, Inc., et al., San Francisco
`Superior Court Case No. CGC-23-604172 (filed Jan. 23, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Sugarpill LLC, et al., San Francisco Superior
`Court Case No. CGC-23-604173 (filed Jan. 23, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Jouer Cosmetics, et al., San Francisco
`Superior Court Case No. CGC-23-604176 (filed Jan. 23, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Nails.Inc Limited, et al., San Francisco
`Superior Court Case No. CGC-23-604446 (filed Feb. 3, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Lawless Beauty Inc., et al., San Francisco
`Superior Court Case No. CGC-23-604457 (filed Feb. 3, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Parfums Christian Dior U.S. Corp., et al., San
`Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-23-605174 (filed Mar. 16, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Anastacia Beverly Hills, LLC, et al., San
`Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-23-605175 (filed Mar. 16, 2023)
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Gucci America Inc., et al., San Francisco
`Superior Court Case No. CGC-23-605662 (filed Apr. 6 2023);
`
`-4-
`NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF PETITION FOR COORDINATION
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Pop Beauty Inc., et al., San Francisco
`Superior Court Case No. CGC-23-605664 (filed Apr. 6, 2023).
`Petitioner Sephora USA, Inc. is also a party in the following Included Actions:
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. bareMinerals, et al., Alameda Superior Court
`Case No. 22CV008711 (filed Mar. 22, 2022)
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Melt Cosmetics, et al., Contra Costa Superior
`Court Case No. C22-01698 (filed Aug. 15, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Memebox Corporation, et al., Contra Costa
`Superior Court Case No. C22-02111 (filed Oct. 3, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Rare Beauty, LLC, et al., Contra Costa
`Superior Court Case No. C22-02658 (filed Dec. 14, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Kat Von D, Inc., et al., Contra Costa Superior
`Court Case No. C22-02685 (filed Dec. 16, 2022);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Kingdom Animalia LLC, et al., Santa Cruz
`Superior Court Case No. 23CV00063 (filed Jan. 10, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Danessa Myricks Beauty, LLC, et al.,
`Alameda Superior Court Case No. 23CV025460 (filed Jan. 10, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. HB USA Holdings, Inc., et al., Santa Cruz
`Superior Court Case No. 23CV00188 (filed Jan. 23, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Federici Brands LLC, et al., Santa Cruz
`Superior Court Case No. 23CV00293 (filed Feb. 2, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Patrick Ta Beauty, LLC, et al., Contra Costa
`Superior Court Case No. C23-00270 (filed Feb. 3, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Givenchy Corporation, et al., Alameda
`Superior Court Case No. 23CV027282 (filed Feb. 3, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Guerlain, Inc., et al., Contra Costa Superior
`Court Case No. C23-00402 (filed Feb. 23, 2023);
`
`-5-
`NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF PETITION FOR COORDINATION
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Make Up For Ever LLC, et al., Santa Cruz
`Superior Court Case No. 23CV00445 (filed Feb. 23, 2023);
`
`• Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Artist Couture, et al., Alameda Superior Court
`Case No. 23CV028399 (filed Feb. 27, 2023).
`Pursuant to CRC 3.522(a)(4), you are hereby advised that if you intend to oppose the
`
`Petition for Coordination, you must serve and submit an opposition thereto at least nine court days
`before the hearing date.
`
`Dated: May 3, 2023
`
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Monique M. Candiff
`Amy P. Lally
`Alycia A. Degen
`Monique M. Candiff
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`W3LL PEOPLE, INC.
`ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE,
`INC.
`
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`
`By:
`
`
`/s/ Willis M. Wagner
`Willis M Wagner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`SHISEIDO AMERICAS CORPORATION
`BAREMINERALS US HOLDCO INC.
`SEPHORA USA, INC.
`
`-6-
`NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF PETITION FOR COORDINATION
`
`
`Dated: May 3, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`Willis M. Wagner (SBN 310900)
`will.wagner@arnoldporter.com
`Andrew J. Rambo (SBN 339503)
`andrew.rambo@arnoldporter.com
`Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
`Telephone:
`415.471.3100
`Facsimile:
`415.471.3400
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`SHISEIDO AMERICAS CORPORATION
`BAREMINERALS USHOLDCO INC.
`SEPHORA USA, INC.
`
`JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`Case No.: ______________
`
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION
`PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL
`PROCEDURE § 404 AND REQUEST FOR
`HEARING
`
`
`
`[Filed concurrently with: Petition for
`Coordination; Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities in Support of Petition for
`Coordination and Application for Stay Order;
`Declaration of Willis M. Wagner]
`
`
`IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR
`COORDINATION OF THE FOLLOWING
`ACTIONS:
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
`
`CASE No. 22CV008711
`
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATES,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`BAREMINERALS US HOLDCO, INC., a
`Delaware corporation; SHISEIDO AMERICAS
`CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation;
`SEPHORA USA, INC., a Michigan
`corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,
`inclusive,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-i-
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
`
`CASE No. 22CV008695
`
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATES,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`BH COSMETICS, LLC, a Delaware limited
`liability company; and DOES 1 through 100,
`inclusive,
`
` Defendants.
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
`
`CASE No. 22CV008722
`
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`COSNOVA, INC., a Delaware corporation;
`ULTA BEAUTY, INC., a Delaware
`corporation; ULTA BEAUTY CREDIT
`SERVICES CORPORATION, a Delaware
`corporation; ULTA SALON COSMETICS &
`FRAGRANCE, INC., a Delaware corporation;
`and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
`
`CASE No. 22CV008726
`
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`SEED BEAUTY, LLC, a California limited
`liability company; ULTA BEAUTY, INC., a
`
`
`
`- ii -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`Delaware corporation; ULTA SALON
`COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC., a
`California limited liability company; and DOES
`1 through 100, inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-599492
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`SEPHORA USA, INC., a Michigan
`corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,
`inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-599495
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`PROFUSION COSMETICS CORP., a
`California corporation, ROSS STORES, Inc., a
`Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through
`100, inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`- iii -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-599530
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`PEARL WORLD INC. a New York
`corporation, ROSS STORES, INC., a Delaware
`corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,
`inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-599678
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`BUTH-NA-BODHAIGE, INC. dba “THE
`BODY SHOP”, a Virginia corporation; and
`DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
`
`
` Defendants
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-599743
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`TARTE, INC. a New York corporation, KOSE
`AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation,
`SEPHORA USA, INC., a Michigan
`corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,
`inclusive,
`
`
`
`
`- iv -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

` Defendants
`
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
`
`CASE No. 22CV399098
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`THE CRÈME SHOP, INC., a California
`corporation; URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC., a
`Pennsylvania corporation; and DOES 1 through
`100, inclusive,
`
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
`
`CASE No. 22CV400211
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`FORMA BRANDS LLC, a California limited
`liability company; AMAZON.COM, INC., a
`Delaware corporation; JEFREE STAR
`COSMETICS, INC., a California corporation;
`and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
`
`
` Defendants
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`- v -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-600953
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`TOO FACED COSMETICS, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company; SEPHORA USA,
`INC., a Michigan corporation; and DOES 1
`through 100, inclusive,
`
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-600957
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`PHYSICIANS FORMULA COSMETICS, INC.
`a Delaware corporation; PHYSICIANS
`FORMULA, INC., a New York corporation;
`MARKWINS BEAUTY BRANDS, INC., a
`California corporation; TARGET
`CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation; and
`DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
`
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-01606
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`- vi -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`v.
`REVOLUTION BEAUTY, INC., a Delaware
`corporation; TARGET CORPORATION, a
`Minnesota corporation; AMAZON.COM, INC.,
`a Delaware corporation and DOES 1 through
`100, inclusive
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-601187
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`MINERAL FUSION NATURAL BRANDS
`LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;
`TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota
`corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,
`inclusive,
`
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-01667
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`MICHAEL GIORDANO INTERNATIONAL,
`INC.; a Florida corporation; ROSS STORES,
`INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1
`through 100, inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`
`
`- vii -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`CASE No. C22-01669
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`THE BOOTS COMPANY PLC, a United
`Kingdom public limited company;
`WALGREEN CO., an Illinois corporation; and
`DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-01695
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`BEAUTY 21 COSMETICS, INC., a California
`corporation; CVS HEALTH CORPORATION,
`a Delaware corporation; CVS PHARMACY,
`INC., a Rhode Island corporation; and DOES 1
`through 100, inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-01697
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`LARKLY, LLC, a Georgia limited liability
`company; NORDSTROM, INC., a Washington
`corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,
`inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`
`
`- viii -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-01698
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`MELT COSMETICS, a California corporation;
`SEPHORA USA, INC., a Michigan
`corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,
`inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-01739
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`SKIN PS BRANDS, a California corporation;
`DR. SANDRA J. LEE M.D. P.C., a California
`corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,
`inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`- ix -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-01794
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`ABSOLUTE NEW YORK, a New York
`corporation; BEAUTY SUPPLY
`WAREHOUSE, INC., a California corporation;
`and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-01795
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`BLACK OPAL, LLC, an Illinois limited
`liability company; ULTA SALON,
`COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC., a
`Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through
`100, inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-01796
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`NICKA K NEW YORK, a New York
`corporation; BEAUTY SUPPLY
`WAREHOUSE, INC., a California corporation;
`ABSNY GMBH, a German corporation; and
`DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
`
`
`
`- x -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-01932
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`BYS COSMETICS AUSTRALIA, an
`Australian company; MARSHALLS OF MA,
`INC., a Massachusetts corporation; and DOES 1
`through 100, inclusive,
` Defendants
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
`
`CASE No. 22CV018926
`
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATES,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`THE BEAUTY CROP, LIMITED, a United
`Kingdom limited company; MARSHALLS OF
`MA, INC., a Massachusetts corporation; and
`DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
`
` Defendants.
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-02111
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`- xi -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`v.
`MEMEBOX CORPORATION, a Delaware
`corporation; SEPHORA USA, INC., a
`Michigan corporation; and DOES 1 through
`100, inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
`
`CASE No. 22CV019356
`
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATES,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`URBAN DECAY COSMETICS LLC, a New
`York limited liability company; NIHC, INC., a
`Colorado corporation; NORDSTROM, INC., a
`Washington corporation; and DOES 1 through
`100, inclusive,
` Defendants.
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-02235
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`JON DAVLER, INC., a California corporation;
`BURLINGTON STORES, INC., a Delaware
`corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,
`inclusive,
`
` Defendants
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`- xii -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ
`
`CASE No. 22CV02301
`
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATES,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`ISDIN CORP., a Delaware corporation; and
`DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
` Defendants.
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-02292
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
` v.
`LAURA LEE LOS ANGELES LLC, a
`Delaware limited liability company;
`MARSHALLS OF MA, INC., a Massachusetts
`corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,
`inclusive,
` Defendants
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-602653
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`ENCHANTE ACCESSORIES INC., a New
`York corporation; TJ MAXX OF CA, LLC, a
`Virginia limited liability corporation; and
`DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
`
`
` Defendants
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`- xiii -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-602737
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`KISS PRODUCTS, INC., a New York
`corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,
`inclusive,
`
`
` Defendants
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
`
`CASE No. 22CV020982
`
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATES,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`MAESA LLC, a Delaware limited liability
`company; SALLY BEAUTY SUPPLY LLC, a
`Virginia limited liability company; and DOES 1
`through 100, inclusive,
` Defendants.
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-02405
`
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATES,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`PACIFICA BEAUTY, LLC a Delaware limited
`liability company; T.J. MAXX OF CA, LLC
`Virginia limited liability company; and DOES 1
`through 100, inclusive,,
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`- xiv -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ
`
`CASE No. 22CV02540
`
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATES,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`PERFUME WORLDWIDE, INC., a New York
`corporation; CARTER BEAUTY
`COSMETICS, an Irish company; WALMART
`INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1
`through 100, inclusive,,
` Defendants.
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-602967
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`ESTEE LAUDER, INC., a Delaware
`corporation; SEPHORA USA, INC. a Michigan
`corporation; ROSS STORES, INC., a Delaware
`corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,
`inclusive,
`
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-602968
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`CLINIQUE LABORATORIES, LLC, a
`Delaware limited liability company; SEPHORA
`
`
`
`- xv -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`USA, INC., a Michigan corporation; and DOES
`1 through 100, inclusive,
`
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-602985
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`BEAUTY BAKERIE COSMETICS BRAND,
`INC., a Delaware corporation; TJ MAXX OF
`CA, LLC a Virginia limited liability company;
`and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
`
`
`
` Defendants
`
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-02462
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
` v.
`E.L.F. COSMETICS, INC., a Delaware
`corporation; BIG LOTS STORES, LLC, an
`Ohio limited liability company; ULTA SALON,
`COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC., a
`Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through
`100, inclusive,
` Defendants
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. N22-2241
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
` v.
`
`
`
`- xvi -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`KARA BEAUTY, INC., a California
`corporation; T.J. MAXX OF CA, LLC, a
`Virginia limited liability company; and DOES 1
`through 100, inclusive,
` Defendants
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-02657
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
` v.
`HARD CANDY, INC.; HARD CANDY LLC;
`WALMART, INC., a Delaware Corporation;
`and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
` Defendants
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-603487
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
` v.
`LAURA MERCIER US BUYER LLC, a
`Delaware limited liability company; SEPHORA
`USA, INC., a Michigan corporation; and DOES
`1 through 100, inclusive,
` Defendants
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-603488
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
` v.
`JACLYN COSMETICS, LLC., a Delaware
`limited liability company; and DOES 1 through
`100, inclusive,
` Defendants
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`- xvii -
`PETITION FOR COORDINATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
`
`

`

`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`CASE No. CGC-22-603489
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
` v.
`BEAUTY TREATS INTERNATIONAL CO.,
`INC., a California corporation; ROSS STORES,
`INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1
`through 100, inclusive,
` Defendants
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
`
`CASE No. C22-02658
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
` v.
`RARE BEAUTY, LLC, a Delaware limited
`liability company; SEPHORA USA, INC., a
`Michigan corporation; and DOES 1 through
`100, inclusive,
` Defendants
`
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE
`COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
`
`CASE No. 22CV023816
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
`ADVOCATES, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
` v.
`NYX PROFESSIONAL MAKEUP LLC, a
`New Yo