`FILED
`
`Superior Court of California,
`County of San Francisco
`
`10/03/2025
`Clerk of the Court
`BY: ZEPHANIAH DIZON
`Deputy ClerH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`xocoqmm.hwl\:b-t
`
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`
`- 21
`
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Jefltey B. Neustadt, SBN 057889
`Law Offices of Jeffrey B. Neustadt
`345 Grove Street, First Floor
`
`San Francisco CA 94102
`
`TEL: (415) 434-4440
`
`JBNeustadtlaw@email.
`
`com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`
`DARUKA WANIGATUNGA
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIF ORNIA
`COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCb ~ UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
`
`DARUKA WANIGATUNGA,
`
`Plaintiff]
`
`V.
`
`THOMAS “TOBY” A.
`
`ROEBUCK, aka
`
`“TA ROEBUCK,” THOMAS A.
`ROEBUCK 1992 REVOCABLE TRUST,
`
`CHONG S. HAN, SS
`LLC, and DOES 1-40,
`
`Defendants.
`
`DREAMBUILDERS,
`
`/
`
`The Ex Parte Application of attorney Jeffiey B. Neustadt, dba Law Offices of Jeffrey B.
`Neustadt, came befqre this on October 3, 2025, at 9:00 a.m., in Department E,
`Francisco Superiorzz}ourt, 400 McAliister Street in San Francisco. The Court, having considered
`the papers filed, any argument and-eppesition, having reviewed the file, hereby finds good cause
`
`to grant the request for an order shortening time to hear the Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for
`
`Plaintiff Daruka Wanigatunga.
`
`The moving papers have previously been served and filed.
`
`Any Opposition shall be filed and electronically served on /4 @Z/ 5 » 2025, amany
`
`Department m of @s Court.
`
`vo|n s
`
`HOd cl = Lo w
`The hearing on counsel’s Motion shall proceed on October 15),’2025 , at i
`
`f’:: NlDORSE D
`Superigr Cou
`rt of Caj
`ounty of San Frg?wgifgtr:g’a
`
`. OCT ¢ 3 2995
`LERK OF THE ooy 1l
`5 LORINA yo "
`
`DePUty Clork |
`
`No. CGC-25-622806
`| d] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE
`APPLICATION OF PLAINTIFF DARUKA
`WANIGATUNGA’S COUNSEL FOR ORDER ,
`SHORTENING FIMEdgypnciive. HLATAW &
`
`Date: October 3, 2025
`Time: 9:00 a.m.
`
`Dept: 501/TBD
`
`CCP §170.6 Motion Pending
`(Peremptory Challenge)
`
`of the San
`
`3
`
`ORDER re: EX PARTE APPLICATION
`
`Wanigatunga v. Roebuck, et al.
`
`) in
`&M’W % |
`POT2ORDER 2 |
`&
`
`1 ' VIR M{wpm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
