throbber

`
`Zachary Howitt
`201 Allen St #10037
`New York, NY 10002
`567-246-9488
`
`GAETANI REAL ESTATE,
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`ZACHARY HOWITT, DOES 1 TO 10,
`inclusive
`Defendant(s)
`
`
`
`I, Zachary Howitt, declare:
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
`CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`
`ELECTRONICALLY
`F I L E D
`
`Superior Court of California,
`County of San Francisco
`04/29/2024
`Clerk of the Court
`BY: EDWARD SANTOS
`Deputy Clerk
`
`Case No. CUD-24-673920
`
`DECLARATION OF ZACHARY HOWITT
`(BY SPECIAL APPEARANCE) IN
`SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS ON
`THE GROUNDS OF AN INCONVENIENT
`FORUM OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE
`FOR A STAY OF THE ENTIRE ACTION
`
`Date: May 29, 2024
`Time: 9:30AM
`Dept: 501
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`1. I am the defendant in the above-captioned unlawful detainer action for the address 617 Oak
`
`Street, San Francisco, CA 94117.
`
`2. The facts stated below are personally known to me. If called as a witness, I could and would
`
`competently testify as follows.
`
`3. I was a friend and business partner of the former owner of the property, Thomas Iveli, who
`
`passed away at the end of 2019. I rented the units from him and then subrented the units/rooms as
`
`part of a business deal with him. After Iveli passed away, the property went into an Estate. The
`
`Executor of the Estate and President of several New York-corporations which I believe own the
`
`premises, Michael Rooney, lived in Jersey City, NJ and maintained an office in New York, NY. It
`
`24
`
`was at this time Rooney negotiated a deal for me to help support the estate with funds, which affected
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`this unit. After Rooney passed away, Jon Vigna, who also lives and maintains his place of business in
`
`New York, NY took over the estate and trust and refused all claims from me and others, which is
`
`what this dispute arises from.
`
`
`- 1 -
`Declaration of Zachary Howitt in Support of Motion to Dismiss on the Grounds of Inconvenient Forum
`
`
`

`

`
`
`6. I currently live in New York, New York. California is an inconvenient forum for me, especially
`
`for travel. It is also an inconvenient forum for other witnesses, for example, Jon Vigna, who also lives
`
`in New York and has refused to travel to California in the last several years. To my knowledge, this
`
`case would not be barred under the statute of limitations in the State of New York. However, I hereby
`
`agree to submit to a stipulation to waive any issue concerning statute of limitations.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true
`
`and correct.
`
`Dated: April 29, 2024
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`__________________
`Declarant
`
`
`- 2 -
`Declaration of Zachary Howitt in Support of Motion to Dismiss on the Grounds of Inconvenient Forum
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket