throbber
STATE BAR NUMBER: 237990
`
`ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY
`NAME: Andrew Watters
`FIRM NAME: Andrew G. Watters, Esq.
`STREETADDRESS: 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Ste. 135
`CITY: Redwood City
`(415) 261-8527
`TELEPHDNE No.:
`EMAIL ADoREss: andreW@andreWwatterS.COm
`ATTDRNEY FQR (name): Raphael B. Stricker, MD
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
`sTREET AooREss: 400 McAllister Street
`MAILING ADDRESS:
`GITY AND zIP coDE: San Francisco 94102
`BRANGH NAME: Civic Center Courthouse
`PLAINTIFF: SCHNITZER PROPERTIES REALTY LLC, SERIES A
`DEFENDANT: Raphael B. Stricker, MD
`
`sTATE: CA
`FAX NO.:
`
`zIP coDE: 94065
`
`UD-105
`
`FOR COURT USE ONLY
`
`ELECTRONICALLY
`F I L E D
`
`Superior Court of California,
`County of San Francisco
`03/26/2024
`Clerk of the Court
`BY: EDWARD SANTOS
`Deputy Clerk
`
`ANSWER—UNLAWFUL DETAINER
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`C UD24674486
`
`Defendant (all defendants for whom this answeris Sled must be named and must sign this answer unless their attorney signs):
`Raphael B. Stricker, MD
`
`answers the complaint as follows.
`2. DENIALS (Check ONLY ONE of the next two boxes.)
`
`a. ~ General Denial (Do not check this box if the complaint demands more than $ 1,000.)
`
`Defendant generally denies each statement of the complaint and of Mandatory Cover Sheet and Supplemental
`Allegations—Unlawful Detainer (form UD-101).
`
`b. ~x
`
`Specific Denials (Check this box and complete (1) and (2) below if complaint demands more than $1,000.)
`Defendant admits that all the statements of the complaint and of Mandatory Cover Sheet and Supplemental Allegations—
`Unlawful Detainer (form UD-101) are true EXCEPT:
`(1) Denial of Allegations in Complaint (form UD-100 or other complaint for unlawful detainer)
`(a) Defendant claims the following statements of the complaint are false (state paragraph numbers from the complaint or
`explain below or, if more room needed, on form MC-025):
`Explanation is on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 2b(1)(a).
`10(a)(2) Defendant was not served Notice
`
`(b) Defendant has no information or belief that the following statements of the complaint are true, so defendant denies
`them (state paragraph numbers from the complaint or explain below or, if more room needed, on form MC-025):
`Explanation is on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 2b(1)(b).
`
`(2) Denial of Allegations in Mandatory Cover Sheet and Supplemental Allegations—Unlawful Detainer (form UD-101)
`(a) ~x Defendant did not receive plaintiffs Mandatory Cover Sheet and Supplemental Allegations (form UD-101). (If
`not checked, complete (b) and (c), as appropriate.)
`(b) Defendant claims the following statements on Mandatory Cover Sheet and Supplemental Allegations— Unlawful
`Detainer (form UD-101) are false (state paragraph numbers from form UD-101 or explain below or, if more room
`
`needed, on form MC-025): ~ Explanation is on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 2b(2)(b).
`
`Form Approved for Optional Use
`Judicial Council of CaNomia
`UD-105 [Rev. January 1, 2024]
`
`ANSWER—UNLAWFUL DETAINER
`
`Page 1 of 4
`Civil Code, II 1940 et seq.;
`Code of Civil Procedure, 5]i 425.12,
`1161 et seq., 1179.01 et seq.
`www. courts.ca.gov
`
`
`

`

`PLAINTIFF: SCHNITZER PROPERTIES REALTY LLC, SERIES A
`DEFENDANT: Raphael B. Stricker, MD
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`C UD24674486
`
`2.
`
`b.
`
`(2)
`
`(c) Defendant has no information or belief that the following statements on Mandatory Cover Sheet and Supplemental
`Allegations—Unlawful Detainer (form UD-101) are true, so defendant denies them (state paragraph numbers from
`form UD-101 or explain below or, if more room needed, on form MC-025):
`
`~ Explanation is on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 2b(2)(c).
`
`UD-105
`
`3. DEFENSES AND OBJECTIONS (NOTE: For each box checked, you must state bnef facts to supportitinitem 3t (on page 3) or, if
`more room is needed, on form MC-025. You can leam more about defenses and objections at
`mictian~.)
`
`~ (Nonpayment of rent only) Plaintiff has breached the warranty to provide habitable premises.
`
`(Nonpayment of rent only) Defendant made needed repairs and properly deducted the cost from the rent, and plaintiff did
`not give proper credit.
`(Nonpayment of rent only) On (date):
`the rent due but plaintiff would not accept it.
`(Nonpayment of rent only) Plaintiffs demand for possession is based on nonpayment of rent due more than one year ago.
`Plaintiff waived, changed, or canceled the notice to quit.
`Plaintiff served defendant with the notice to quit or filed the complaint to retaliate against defendant.
`
`before the notice to pay or quit expired, defendant offered
`
`defendant in violation of the Constitution or the laws of the United States or California.
`
`~ By serving defendant with the notice to quit or filing the complaint, plaintiff is arbitrarily discriminating against the
`~ Plaintiff's demand for possession violates the local rent control or eviction control ordinance of (city or county, title of
`
`a b c d e f
`
`. 9 h
`
`I.
`
`j.
`
`k.
`
`~x
`~x
`~x
`
`~x
`
`ordinance, and date of passage):
`(Also, briefly state in item 3t the facts showing violation of the ordinance.)
`Plaintiff's demand for possession is subject to the Tenant Protection Act of 2019, Civil Code section 1946.2 or 1947.12,
`and is not in compliance with the act. (Check all that apply and briefly stateinitem 3t the facts that support each.)
`
`(1) ~ Plaintiff failed to state a just cause for termination of tenancy in the written notice to terminate.
`(2) ~ Plaintiff failed to provide an opportunity to cure any alleged violations of terms and conditions of the lease (other than
`(3) ~ Plaintiff failed to comply with the relocation assistance requirements of Civil Code section 1946.2(d).
`(4) ~ Plaintiff has raised the rent more than the amount allowed under Civil Code section 1947.12, and the only unpaid
`(5) ~ Plaintiff violated the Tenant Protection Act in another manner that defeats the complaint.
`~ Plaintiff seeks to evict defendant based on an act—against defendant, defendant's immediate family member, or a
`
`payment of rent) as required under Civil Code section 1946.2(c).
`
`rent is the unauthorized amount.
`
`~x
`
`Plaintiff accepted rent from defendant to cover a period of time after the date the notice to quit expired.
`
`member of defendant's household—that constitutes domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, human trafficking, abuse
`of an elder or a dependent adult, or a crime that caused bodily injury, involved a deadly weapon, or used force or threat of
`force. (This defense requires one of the following, which may be included with this form: (1) a temporary restraining
`order, protective order, or police report that is not more than 180 days old; (2) a signed statement from a qualified
`third party (e.g., a doctor, domestic violence or sexual assault counselor, human trafficking caseworker, psychologist, or
`a victim of violent crime advocate concerning the injuries or abuse resulting from these acts); or (3) another form of
`documentation or evidence that verifies that the abuse or violence occurred.)
`
`(1) ~ The abuse or violence was committed by a person who does not live in the dwelling unit.
`(2) ~ The abuse or violence was committed by a person who lives in the dwelling unit and defendant claims protection
`~ Plaintiff seeks to evict defendant based on defendant or another person calling the police or emergency assistance (e.g.,
`~ Plaintiffs demand for possession of a residential property is based on nonpayment of rent or other financial obligations
`(1) ~ plaintiff received or has a pending application for rental assistance from a governmental rental assistance program or
`
`from eviction under Code of Civil Procedure section 1161.3(d)(2).
`
`ambulance) by or on behalf of a victim of abuse, a victim of crime, or an individual in an emergency when defendant or
`the other person believed that assistance was necessary.
`
`and (check a/I that apply)
`
`some other source relating to the amount claimed in the notice to pay rent or quit. (Health 8 Saf. Code,
`Mi 50897.1(d)(2)(B) and 50897.3(e)(2).)
`
`UD-1 05 [Rev. January 1, 2024]
`
`ANSWER—UNLAWFUL DETAINER
`
`Page2of4
`
`

`

`PLAINTIFF: SCHNITZER PROPERTIES REALTY LLC, SERIES A
`DEFENDANT: Raphael B. Stricker, MD
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`C UD24674486
`
`3. m.
`
`UD-105
`
`15 days of receiving governmental rental assistance. (Health 8 Saf. Code, g 50897.1(e)(2)(B).)
`
`ordinance regarding evictions in some other way (briefly state facts describing this in item 3t).
`
`(2) ~ plaintiff received or has a pending application for rental assistance from a governmental rental assistance program or
`some other source for rent accruing since the notice to pay rent or quit. (Health 8 Saf. Code, 8 50897.1(d)(2)(B) and
`(3) ~ plaintiffs demand for possession is based only on late fees for defendant's failure to provide landlord payment within
`50897.3(e)(2).)
`n. ~ Plaintiff violated the COVID-19 Tenant Relief Act (Code Civ. Proc., g 1179.01 et seq.) or a local COVID-19-related
`o. ~ The property is covered by the federal CARES Act and the plaintiff did not provide 30 days'otice to vacate.
`
`(Property covered by the CARES Act means property where the landlord
`~ is participatingin a covered housing program as defined by the Violence Against Women Act;
`~ is participatingin the rural housing voucher program under section 542 of the Housing Act of 1949; or
`~ has a federally backed mortgage loan or a federally backed multifamily mortgage loan.)
`
`p. ~ Plaintiff improperly applied payments made by defendant in a tenancy that was in existence between March 1, 2020, and
`(1) ~ Plaintiff applied a security deposit to rent, or other financial obligations due, without tenant's written agreement.
`(2) ~ Plaintiff applied a monthly rental payment to rent or other financial obligations that were due between March 1, 2020,
`q. ~ Plaintiff refused to accept payment from a third party for rent due. (Civ. Code, g 1947.3; Gov. Code, g 12955.)
`r. ~ Defendant has a disability and plaintiff refused to provide a reasonable accommodation that was requested.
`s. ~ Other defenses and objections are stated in item 3t.
`~ Description of facts or defenses are on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 3t.
`
`September 30, 2021 (Code Civ. Proc., Q 1179.04.5), as follows (check all that apply):
`
`and September 30, 2021, other than to the prospective month's rent, without tenant's written agreement.
`
`(Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, g 12176(c).)
`
`t.
`
`(Provide facts for each item checked above, either below or, if more room needed, on form MC-025):
`
`4. OTHER STATEMENTS
`
`a. ~ Defendant vacated the premises on (date):
`b. ~ The fair rental value of the premises alleged in the complaint is excessive (explain below or, if more room needed, on
`form MC-025).~ Explanation is on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 4b.
`c. ~ Other (specify below or, if more room needed, on form MC-025):
`
`Other statements are on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 4c.
`
`5. DEFENDANT REQUESTS
`a.
`that plaintiff take nothing requested in the complaint.
`costs incurred in this proceeding.
`b.
`c. ~x
`reasonable attorney fees.
`
`UD-105 [Rev. January 1, 2024]
`
`ANSWER—UNLAWFUL DETAINER
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`UD-1 05
`
`PLAINTIFF: SC)4NITZER PROPERTIES REALTY LLC, SERIES A
`DEFENDANT: Raphael B. Stricker, MD
`
`CASE NUMBER
`CUD24674486
`
`5. d. ~ that plaintiff be ordered to (1) make repairs and correct the conditions that constitute a breach of the warranty to provide
`e. ~ Other (specify below oron form MC-025):
`~ All other requests are stated on form MC-025, titled as Attachment 5e.
`
`habitable premises and (2) reduce the monthly rent to a reasonable rental value until the conditions are corrected.
`
`6. Number of pages attached:
`
`7.
`
`UNLAWFUL DETAINER ASSISTANT (Bus. & Prof. Code, Q 6400-6415)
`(Must be completed in a/I cases.) An unlawful detainer assistant ~rr
`for compensation give advice or
`assistance with this form. If defendant has received any help or advice for pay from an unlawful detainer assistant, state
`a. assistant's name:
`telephone number:
`b.
`street address, city, and zip code:
`
`did not ~ did
`
`c.
`
`d. county of registration;
`
`e.
`
`registration number:
`
`f. expiration date:
`
`(Each defendant for whom this answer is filed must be named in item 1 and must sign this answer unless defendant's attorney signs.)
`
`(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
`
`(SIGNATURE OF DEFENDANT OR ATTORNEY)
`
`(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
`
`(SIGNATURE OF DEFENDANT OR ATTORNEY)
`
`(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
`
`(SIGNATURE OF DEFENDANT OR ATTORNEY)
`
`VERIFICATION
`(Use a different verification form if the verification is by an attorney or for a corporation or partnership.)
`I am the defendant in this proceeding and have read this answer. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
`California that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Date: March 18, 2024
`
`Ra heel B. Stricker MD
`(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
`
`(SIGNATURE OF DEFENDANT)
`
`Date;
`
`Date:
`
`(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
`
`(SIGNATURE OF DEFENDANT)
`
`(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
`
`(SIGNATURE OF DEFENDANT)
`
`ANSWER—UNLAWFUL DETAINER
`UD-I 05 I Re v. J*o o a0 I, 2024)
`ff5'nd~sbTFd)yrtfS~EF 1&/
`
`Pose 4 oi 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket