throbber
4/27/2022
`
`James R. Cummins, Esq. (State Bar No. 268376)
`iim@bdslawinc.corn
`Jullian S. Sekona, Esq. (State Bar No. 332572)
`jullian@bdslawinc.corn
`Barulich Dugoni & Suttmann Law Group, Inc.
`577 Airport Boulevard, Suite 400
`Burlingame, CA 94010
`Telephone No.: 650.292.2900
`Facsimile No.:
`650.292.2901
`
`Attorneys for Defendants, Allison Lim
`and Chong Kwan Tan
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
`
`Case No. 21CIV04197
`
`NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER
`
`KHOR CHIN LIM,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`ALLISON MEOW SIAM LIM, CHONG
`KWAN TAN, AND DOES 1-19,
`
`Defendants
`
`TO PERSONS INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED MATTER AND TO THEIR
`
`ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
`
`NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on April 26, 2022, the Court, by Hon. Robert D.
`
`Foiles, entered its Order to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint filed without Court permission by
`declared vexatious litigant. A copy of the Order is attached as Exhibit "A."
`
`Dated: April 27, 2022
`
`Barulich Dugoni & Suttmann Law Group, Inc.
`
` KIIIF-
`
`James R. Cummins, Esq.
`Jullian S. Sekona, Esq.
`Attorneys for Defendants
`Allison Lim and Chong Kwan Tan
`
`NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`PROOF OF SERVICE
`[C.C.P.ttt'I 1013, 1013A]
`
`The undersigned declares:
`
`I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California.
`I am over the age of 18
`years and not a party to the within action; I am employed by the Barulich Dugoni Br Suttmann
`Law Group, Inc., 577 Airport Boulevard, Suite 400, Burlingame, California 94010.
`
`On April 27, 2022, I served the foregoing document(s) described as follows:
`
`NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER
`
`on all parties in said action by causing a true copy thereof to be
`
`Transmitted via facsimile to the facsimile number set forth below before 5:00 p.m, on this
`date;
`
`[XX] Placed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid in the designated area for
`outgoing mail;
`
`[
`
`]
`
`Sent via ovcniight delivery by depositing in/at the appropriate facility for said service;
`
`Transmitted by sending a file of the above documents(s) via electronic transmission
`(e-mail) using my business c-mail address () to thc e-mail address designated for each
`I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission,
`party identified below.
`any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful.
`
`addressed to the person(s) on whom it is to be served, whose name(s) and address(es) is as
`follows:
`
`Khor Chin Lim
`4048 Ingram Drive
`Janesville, WI 53546
`Kc53546 hotmail.corn
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under thc laws of the State of California that the
`foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on April 27, 2022, at Burlingame, California.
`
`Kevin Sar
`
`NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER
`
`9
`
`10
`
`12
`
`14
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`
`EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A
`.X::::::4. '.'
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`FILESI
`
`SAN MATEO COUNTY
`APR 2 6 2022
`O~IIII ~gOIQOEII
`~agflllVOBBE
`
`James R. Cummins, Esq. (State Bar No, 268376)
`iimubdslawinc.corn
`Jullian S. Sekona, Esq. (State Bar No. 332572)
`iullian&bdslawinc.corn
`Barulich Dugoni & Sutmtann Law Group, Inc.
`577 Airport Boulevard, Suite 400
`Burlingame, CA 94010
`Telephone No.: 650.292.2900
`650.292.2901
`Facsimile No.:
`
`Attorneys for Defendants, Allison Lim
`and Chong Kwan Tan
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
`
`KHOR CHIN LM,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`ALLISON MEOW SIAM LIM, CHONG
`KWAN TAN, AND DOES 1-19,
`
`Defendants
`
`Case No. 21CIV04197
`
`~ISPBSED] ORDER RE: EXPARTE APPLICATION
`TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED WITHOUT
`COURT PERMISSION BY DECLARED VEXAT IOUS
`LITIGANT
`
`Date: April 26, 2022
`Time: 2:00 p.m.
`Dept.:
`I
`
`Defendants Allison Meow Siam Lim and Chong Kwan Tan's Motion to Dismiss
`Complaint For (I) Breach of Fiduciary Duty; (2) Deceit; (3) Knowing Assistance in BIeach of
`Fiduciary Duty; (4) Conspiracy to Defraud; (5) Unjust Enrichment; and (6) Coriversion'"Ex
`Parte Motion") came on for an ex parte hearing in Department 1 of this Court on April 26, 2022.
`Having read and considered the foregoing Ex Parte Motion and the supporting documents,
`
`l
`
`1
`
`and good cause appearing therefore, the motion is GRANTED.
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`This litigation has been initiated by a vexatious litigant without the equisite
`
`permission from the Presiding Judge; and,
`
`l.
`lPRDPosEDl ORDER RE: Ex PARTE APPLIcATloN To DlsMlss CoMPLAINT FILED WITHoUT CoURT PERMIss
`BY DEcLARATIDN VEEATIUUs LITIGANT
`
`ION
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`lg
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`4
`
`10
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`p
`This action is hereby DISMISSED with„prejudice for Plaintiff s failure to obtain
`
`2.
`
`an Order from the Presiding Justice permitting him to maintain this action.
`
`Dated:
`
`/j2&/2~2+
`/
`
`I
`
`GE OF THE SUPQ+R COURT
`
`RCSERFO.'FO(LBSI
`
`2.
`[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION To DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED WITHOUT COURT PER
`BY DECLARATION VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
`
`SION
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket