`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
`
`
`Civil Action No. ___________________________
`
`
`
`
`THE HERSHEY COMPANY and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HERSHEY CHOCOLATE & CONFECTIONERY CORPORATION,
`
`
`
` Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` v.
`
`TINCTUREBELLE, LLC and
`
`TINCTUREBELLE MARIJUANKA LLC,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR MONEY DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE RELIEF
`
`
`
`ACTION FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, TRADEMARK DILUTION, FALSE
`DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN, UNFAIR COMPETITION AND PASSING OFF
`
`Plaintiffs The Hershey Company and its subsidiary, Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery
`
`Corporation (together referred to as “Hershey”), for their complaint against defendants
`
`TinctureBelle, LLC and TinctureBelle Marijuanka LLC (together, “TinctureBelle” or
`
`“defendants”) for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, false designation of origin, unfair
`
`competition and passing off, state as follows:
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`This action is brought by Hershey to stop the unauthorized use of a number of
`
`famous and well-known Hershey trademarks to sell chocolate candy that contains cannabis
`
`and/or tetrahydrocannabinol. Hershey’s REESE’S®, HEATH®, ALMOND JOY® and YORK®
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 22
`
`
`
`products are among the top-selling candy brands in the United States, and both the brand names
`
`and the trade dresses used in connection with these brands are extremely famous and well-known
`
`among United States consumers. Defendants, who are well aware of the fame and popularity of
`
`these Hershey products and marks, are manufacturing and selling cannabis- and/or
`
`tetrahydrocannabinol-laced chocolate and candy products using names, marks and designs that
`
`are knock-offs of Hershey’s famous REESE’S, HEATH, ALMOND JOY and YORK trademarks
`
`and trade dresses, in order to increase sales of defendants’ cannabis and tetrahydrocannabinol
`
`candy products, draw additional attention to their products, confuse consumers as to the source
`
`of their products, call to consumers’ minds Hershey’s famous and beloved brands, and otherwise
`
`to trade on the goodwill of Hershey and its brands.
`
`2.
`
`In doing so, defendants are not merely causing a likelihood of consumer
`
`confusion with Hershey’s marks and products, and diluting and tarnishing Hershey’s marks by
`
`creating an association in consumers’ minds with products containing cannabis and/or
`
`tetrahydrocannabinol. Defendants’ unauthorized conduct also creates a genuine safety risk with
`
`regard to consumers, including children, who may not distinguish between Hershey’s candy
`
`products and defendants’ cannabis- and/or tetrahydrocannabinol-based products, and may
`
`inadvertently ingest defendants’ products thinking that they are ordinary chocolate candy.
`
`NATURE AND BASIS OF THE ACTION
`
`3.
`
`This is an action for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, false designation
`
`of origin, unfair competition and other unlawful conduct under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 1051 et seq., and state law, seeking preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement
`
`of profits, compensatory damages, punitive damages and other relief relating to defendants’
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 22
`
`
`
`manufacture, distribution and sale of products that infringe and dilute certain well-known
`
`trademarks owned or licensed by Hershey.
`
`4.
`
`Hershey is a leading manufacturer of chocolate and confectionery products in the
`
`United States and worldwide. For many years, Hershey has manufactured and sold REESE’S,
`
`HEATH, ALMOND JOY and YORK candy and confections using the trademarks and trade
`
`dresses alleged herein.
`
`5.
`
` As set forth more fully below, Hershey owns or licenses the exclusive rights to
`
`use the various REESE’S, HEATH, ALMOND JOY and YORK trademarks and trade dresses
`
`alleged herein. Notwithstanding Hershey’s exclusive rights, defendants manufacture, distribute
`
`and sell cannabis and cannabis-related products using packaging, trademarks, and terminology
`
`that infringe those trademarks and trade dresses. Defendants are intentionally trading on the
`
`established goodwill of Hershey and its various products and brands in order to enhance the sales
`
`and profits associated with their Infringing Products.
`
`6.
`
`Defendants’ actions have caused, and will continue to cause, consumer confusion
`
`as to the source, sponsorship, and/or affiliation of their goods and services as being connected
`
`with Hershey. Moreover, defendants’ actions have caused, and will continue to cause, the
`
`dilution of Hershey’s trademarks and trade dresses, including, but not limited to, the Hershey
`
`Trademarks.
`
`7.
`
`Unless such acts of trademark infringement, trademark dilution, false designation
`
`of origin, unfair competition and passing off are enjoined, plaintiffs will suffer irreparable injury
`
`for which there is no adequate remedy at law.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 22
`
`
`
`PARTIES
`
`8.
`
`Plaintiff The Hershey Company is a Delaware corporation with an address at 100
`
`Crystal A Drive, Hershey, PA 17033. The Hershey Company is a major manufacturer and seller
`
`of chocolate, confectionery and snack products, which are sold throughout the United States and
`
`this judicial district. The Hershey Company is the exclusive United States licensee or
`
`sublicensee of the trademarks and trade dresses asserted by plaintiffs in this lawsuit.
`
`9.
`
`Plaintiff Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery Corporation (“HCCC”) is a
`
`Delaware corporation with an address at 4860 Robb Street, Suite 204, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033.
`
`HCCC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Hershey Company, the owner of the REESE’S-
`
`related trademarks and trade dresses asserted by plaintiffs in this lawsuit and the exclusive
`
`United States licensee of the HEATH-related trademarks and trade dresses asserted by plaintiffs
`
`in this lawsuit.
`
`10.
`
`Hershey is informed and believes that defendant TinctureBelle, LLC is a
`
`Colorado limited liability corporation, doing business in Colorado, with a registered address at
`
`62 Mount View Lane, Unit B, Colorado Springs, CO 80907.
`
`11.
`
`Hershey is informed and believes that defendant TinctureBelle Marijuanka LLC is
`
`a Colorado limited liability corporation, doing business in Colorado, with a registered address at
`
`36 North Fabrication #C, Pueblo West, CO 81007.
`
`12.
`
`On information and belief, TinctureBelle Marijuanka LLC and TinctureBelle,
`
`LLC are affiliated companies and/or are under common ownership and control, and are acting in
`
`concert with one another in connection with the conduct described herein.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 22
`
`
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`13.
`
`The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Hershey’s federal law claims for
`
`trademark and trade dress infringement, trademark and trade dress dilution, false designation of
`
`origin, and unfair competition under Section 39 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1121, and under
`
`28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) & (b). The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Hershey’s
`
`state law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
`
`14.
`
`The Court has personal jurisdiction over defendants because, upon information
`
`and belief, defendants are present and doing business in the State of Colorado and this judicial
`
`district either directly or through their agents, and have distributed their infringing products to,
`
`and offered their infringing products for sale in, the State of Colorado and this judicial district.
`
`15.
`
`Venue is appropriate in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because
`
`defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this judicial district and because a substantial
`
`part of the events giving rise to plaintiffs’ claims occurred in this judicial district.
`
`ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO ALL CLAIMS
`
`HERSHEY AND ITS FAMOUS AND VALUABLE BRANDS AND TRADEMARKS
`
`16.
`
`The Hershey Company is a world famous producer of, among other things,
`
`chocolate, candy, and snack products.
`
`17.
`
`Founded in 1894, Hershey is one of the oldest and largest chocolate
`
`manufacturers in the United States and the largest chocolate manufacturer in North America.
`
`18.
`
`Since its founding, Hershey has had a commitment to quality and safety. As a
`
`result of this commitment, individuals and families the world over trust Hershey and its various
`
`brands as signifying safe and delicious treats for people of all ages. No product manufactured,
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 22
`
`
`
`distributed or sold by Hershey contains, or has ever contained, cannabis and/or
`
`tetrahydrocannabinol.
`
`19.
`
`Among Hershey’s famous and well-known brands in the United States are the
`
`following:
`
`The REESE’S
`Peanut Butter Cup
`
`
`The HEATH Bar
`
`
`The ALMOND JOY
`Bar
`
`
`The YORK
`Peppermint Patty
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`20.
`
`Hershey is the owner or exclusive licensee of numerous federally registered
`
`trademarks relating to the foregoing brands, including ALMOND JOY, REESE’S, HEATH and
`
`YORK, as well as registered and unregistered design marks and trade dresses for use in
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 22
`
`
`
`connection with candy as well as other goods and services.
`
`21.
`
`The following is a non-exhaustive list of federally-registered Hershey trade
`
`dresses and trademarks owned by or exclusively licensed to Hershey, including the relevant dates
`
`of first use and covered goods:
`
`Reg. No.
`(Date of
`First use)
`
`3601728
`(12-31-1958)
`
`0925609
`(12-15-1969)
`
`3631320
`(02-28-2003)
`
`4,330,229
`(2008)
`
` 2,256,226
`(12-15-1969)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mark
`
`Goods and Services
`
`
`
`Peanut butter, peanut butter toppings
`
`Candy, candy bars, confectionery
`chips for baking, peanut butter
`confectionery chips
`
`Peanut butter cups
`
`Candy, confectionery chips for baking
`
`Candy
`
`
`
`
`
`(orange-colored background
`covering the entirety of the
`packaging for the goods)
`
`
`candy and confectionery chips for
`baking with peanut butter as the
`characterizing flavor or one of various
`characterizing flavors
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0443802
`(12-10-1945)
`
`4125366
`(05-31-2005)
`
`1404302
`(03-01-1932)
`
`3840907
`(01-23-1989)
`
` 564,557
`(01-28-1922)
`
`1,644,557
`(01-28-1922)
`
`
`Candy
`
`Candy
`
`HEATH
`
`HEATH
`
`Candy and ice cream
`
`Candy for use as an ingredient in ice
`cream and baked products
`
`PEPPERMINT PATTIE MINT
`(CANDY)
`
`candy
`
`
`
`
`
`(See Exhibit A, registration certificates.) The foregoing federally registered trademarks, along
`
`with the unregistered trademarks and trade dresses owned by or exclusively licensed to Hershey
`
`pertaining to these brands (including without limitation the trademarks and trade dresses depicted
`
`in Paragraph 19, supra) are individually and collectively referred to herein as the “Hershey
`
`Trademarks.”
`
`22.
`
`Each of the Hershey Trademarks has been continuously used in commerce in the
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 22
`
`
`
`United States since at least as early as 2006, and in some cases as early as 1922.
`
`23.
`
`Each of the Hershey Trademarks was used in United States commerce prior to
`
`any infringing use that is the subject of this litigation. Hershey has priority of use over
`
`defendants with respect to the Hershey Trademarks.
`
`24.
`
`Each of the Hershey Trademarks has been extensively advertised and used
`
`throughout the United States. The Hershey Company has spent hundreds of millions of dollars
`
`on advertising for products sold under these marks, and has sold billions of dollars of products
`
`under the Hershey Trademarks.
`
`25.
`
`Through substantial use, sales and promotion of products bearing the Hershey
`
`Trademarks by Hershey and its predecessors in interest, each of the Hershey Trademarks has
`
`become extremely well known and famous for use in connection with candy and confectionery
`
`products, has become distinctive of these products and has come to identify and indicate the
`
`source of these products to consumers and the trade.
`
`26.
`
`In light of the distinctiveness of the Hershey Trademarks, as well as the duration
`
`and extent of Hershey’s sales, marketing and use of these marks throughout the United States,
`
`the Hershey Trademarks are distinctive and famous among consumers in the State of Colorado
`
`and throughout the United States.
`
`27.
`
`Each of the federally registered Hershey Trademarks is incontestable and in full
`
`force and effect.
`
`28.
`
`The Hershey Trademarks have become immensely valuable due, at least in part,
`
`to the significant goodwill and recognition earned as a result of Hershey’s long history of sales
`
`and successful advertising efforts under these marks.
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ UNLAWFUL AND INFRINGING USE OF THE
`HERSHEY TRADEMARKS TO SELL CANNABIS PRODUCTS
`
`29.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendants are engaged in the business of, among
`
`other things, manufacturing, packaging, distributing and selling chocolate and confectionery
`
`products that include, contain, or incorporate cannabis and/or tetrahydrocannabinol, including
`
`under the Hershey Trademarks or marks that constitute confusingly similar and dilutive
`
`imitations of the Hershey Trademarks, throughout the State of Colorado.
`
`30.
`
` Upon
`
`information and belief, defendants have manufactured, packaged,
`
`distributed and sold several lines of the Infringing Products described in the foregoing paragraph
`
`since at least as early as January 2014.
`
`31.
`
`Defendants’ Infringing Products include, but are not limited to the following
`
`products shown in the left column of the following table (with examples of some corresponding
`
`Example of Hershey Products
`
`
`
`
`
`Hershey’s products shown in the right column):
`
`Defendants’ Infringing
`Marks and Products
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 22
`Case 1:l4—cv—O1564—WYD—MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`Examples of online advertising and promotion of some of defendants’ Infringing Products are
`
`attached as Exhibit B.
`
`32.
`
`Defendants have not received permission from Hershey to use the Hershey
`
`Trademarks, or marks confusingly similar to the Hershey Trademarks.
`
`33.
`
`Defendants openly and intentionally have offered for sale and sold the Infringing
`
`Products in commerce.
`
`34.
`
`Defendants’ trademarks and trade dresses for their Infringing Products are
`
`extremely similar to the Hershey Trademarks, as shown above, and are used by defendants in
`
`connection with chocolate and confectionery products, the same products on which the Hershey
`
`Trademarks are used.
`
`35.
`
`Accordingly, defendants’ sale of the Infringing Products inevitably will cause
`
`confusion among consumers as to the origin, source or sponsorship of the products offered by
`
`defendants, and cause many potential purchasers to mistakenly believe that such products are the
`
`same as those offered by Hershey, or that they are in some way authorized or licensed by the
`
`source of the products sold under the Hershey Trademarks.
`
`36.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendants have willfully and intentionally engaged
`
`in the foregoing activities with the knowledge that the Hershey Trademarks were used, owned,
`
`registered and/or licensed by Hershey and that the advertisement, sale and marketing of the
`
`Infringing Products was unauthorized.
`
`37.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendants’ unauthorized advertisement, sale and
`
`marketing of products using the Hershey Trademarks, or marks confusingly similar to the
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 22
`
`
`
`Hershey Trademarks, is, and has been, a deliberate attempt to trade on the valuable trademark
`
`rights and goodwill established by Hershey in the Hershey Trademarks.
`
`38.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendants engaged in the foregoing actions with
`
`the intent that defendants’ use of the Hershey Trademarks, or marks confusingly similar to the
`
`Hershey Trademarks, would cause confusion, mistake or deception among members of the
`
`general public.
`
`39.
`
`Defendants have improperly traded on, and profited from, the goodwill and
`
`reputation established by Hershey in the Hershey Trademarks.
`
`COUNT I: TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
`
`40.
`
`Hershey incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-39
`
`above as if separately repeated here.
`
`41.
`
`The marks and designs used by defendants, as described above, are confusingly
`
`similar to, and are colorable imitations of, the federally registered and unregistered Hershey
`
`Trademarks, and infringe those respective trademarks.
`
`42.
`
`Defendants’ unauthorized use of the aforementioned marks and designs is likely
`
`to cause confusion and mistake and to deceive the public as to the approval, sponsorship, license,
`
`source or origin of defendants’ products.
`
`43.
`
`Defendants’ conduct as described herein violates 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1), which
`
`specifically forbids defendants to:
`
`use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable
`a.
`imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale,
`distribution, or advertising of any goods or services on or in connection with
`which use is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive, or
`
`b.
`
`reproduce, counterfeit, copy, or colorably imitate a registered mark and
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 14 of 22
`
`
`
`apply such reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation to labels, signs,
`prints, packages, wrappers, receptacles or advertisements intended to be used in
`commerce upon or in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or
`advertising of goods or services on or in connection with which such use is likely
`to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.
`
`Defendants’ conduct also constitutes common law trademark infringement and
`
`44.
`
`trade dress infringement.
`
`45.
`
`Defendants’ wrongful acts were committed with knowledge that such imitation,
`
`as described herein, was intended to cause confusion, reverse confusion, mistake, or deception.
`
`46.
`
`As a result of defendants’ conduct, Hershey has been damaged and is entitled to
`
`damages, including but not limited to, defendants’ profits from the sale of all infringing goods,
`
`actual damages, statutory damages, treble damages, corrective advertising damages, costs of
`
`litigation, and attorneys’ fees.
`
`47.
`
`Hershey has been, and will continue to be, damaged by defendants’ infringement
`
`of the Hershey Trademarks, damage that cannot fully be measured or compensated in economic
`
`terms. Such irreparable harm will continue unless defendants’ acts are restrained and/or enjoined
`
`during the pendency of this action and thereafter.
`
`COUNT II: FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN
`
`48.
`
`Hershey incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-39
`
`above as if separately repeated here.
`
`49.
`
`By their unauthorized use of the marks and designs described above, defendants
`
`have infringed the Hershey Trademarks, falsely designated the origin of their products, and
`
`competed unfairly with plaintiffs, all in violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1125(a).
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 15 of 22
`
`
`
`50.
`
`Hershey has been damaged and/or is likely to be damaged by the wrongful
`
`conduct of defendants.
`
`51.
`
`Defendants’ violations of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) entitle Hershey to recover
`
`damages, including but not limited to, defendants’ profits from the sale of all infringing goods,
`
`actual damages, treble damages, corrective advertising damages, litigation costs, and attorneys’
`
`fees.
`
`52.
`
`Hershey has been, and will continue to be, damaged by defendants’ actions of
`
`false designation of origin, damage that cannot fully be measured or compensated in economic
`
`terms. Such irreparable harm will continue unless defendants’ acts are restrained and/or enjoined
`
`during the pendency of this action and thereafter.
`
`COUNT III: DILUTION
`
`53.
`
`Hershey incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-39
`
`above as if separately repeated here.
`
`54.
`
`As a result of many decades of use, promotion, advertising, and sales, the Hershey
`
`Trademarks are distinctive and famous within the meaning of Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act,
`
`15 U.S.C. § 1125(c), are famous in the State of Colorado, and were distinctive and famous prior
`
`to the date of defendants’ conduct challenged herein.
`
`55.
`
`Defendants’ conduct, as described above, is likely to dilute and is diluting the
`
`distinctive quality of the famous Hershey Trademarks, in that defendants’ challenged marks and
`
`trade dresses are likely to create and have created an association between defendants’ marks and
`
`trade dresses and the famous Hershey Trademarks, which impairs the distinctiveness of those
`
`famous marks and lessens the capacity of those famous marks to identify and distinguish
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 16 of 22
`
`
`
`products marketed and sold by plaintiffs under those marks.
`
`56.
`
`Defendants’ actions also have tarnished and are likely to tarnish the Hershey
`
`Trademarks and the goodwill associated therewith.
`
`57.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendants willfully intended to trade on Hershey’s
`
`reputation and to cause the dilution of the Hershey Trademarks in violation of the Lanham Act,
`
`15 U.S.C. § 1125.
`
`58.
`
`Hershey has been, and will continue to be, damaged by defendants’ dilution of the
`
`Hershey Trademarks, damage that cannot fully be measured or compensated in economic terms.
`
`Defendants’ actions have damaged, and will continue to damage, Hershey’s business, market,
`
`reputation, and goodwill, and may discourage current and potential customers from dealing with
`
`Hershey. Such irreparable harm will continue unless defendants’ acts are restrained and/or
`
`enjoined during the pendency of this action and thereafter.
`
`COUNT IV: UNFAIR COMPETITION
`
`59.
`
`Hershey incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-39
`
`above as if separately repeated here.
`
`60.
`
`Defendants’ unlawful and unauthorized use of the Hershey Trademarks, or marks
`
`confusingly similar to the Hershey Trademarks, constitutes unfair competition with Hershey in
`
`violation of state law. Defendants’ conduct was, and continues to be, designed to cause
`
`confusion in the public mind as to the source and origin of the Infringing Products.
`
`61.
`
`Defendants’ conduct was, and continues to be, calculated to cause damage to
`
`Hershey in its lawful business and has been done with the unlawful purpose of causing such
`
`damage without right or justifiable cause.
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 17 of 22
`
`
`
`62.
`
`Defendants’ conduct as described herein has directly and proximately caused
`
`Hershey to incur substantial monetary damages.
`
`63.
`
`Defendants have acted willfully and maliciously and with full knowledge of the
`
`adverse effect of their wrongful conduct upon Hershey and with conscious disregard for the
`
`rights of Hershey.
`
`64.
`
`Defendants’ unfair competition entitles Hershey to recover damages including,
`
`but not limited to, defendants’ profits from the sale of the infringing products, actual damages,
`
`corrective advertising damages, costs of suit, and attorneys’ fees.
`
`65.
`
`Hershey has been, and will continue to be, damaged by defendants’ actions of
`
`unfair competition, damage that cannot fully be measured or compensated in economic terms.
`
`Such irreparable harm will continue unless defendants’ acts are restrained and/or enjoined during
`
`the pendency of this action and thereafter.
`
`COUNT V: COLORADO CONSUMER PROTECTION
`C.R.S. §§ 6-1-101 ET SEQ
`
`Hershey incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-39
`
`66.
`
`above as if separately repeated here.
`
`67.
`
`Defendants, in the course of their regular business, have knowingly passed off the
`
`Infringing Products as originating from, having been sourced from, or being affiliated with
`
`Hershey.
`
`68.
`
`Defendants, in the course of their regular business, have, by selling, promoting,
`
`advertising, and marketing the Infringing Products, knowingly made a false representation as to
`
`the source, sponsorship, or approval of the Infringing Products by Hershey.
`
`69.
`
`Defendants, in the course of their regular business, have, by selling, promoting,
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 18 of 22
`
`
`
`advertising, and marketing the Infringing Products, knowingly made a false representation as to
`
`their affiliation, connection, or association with Hershey, thereby significantly and negatively
`
`impacting the general consuming public and potential purchasers of Hershey’s goods.
`
`70.
`
`Absent injunctive relief, defendants are likely to continue offering for sale,
`
`selling, advertising, and promoting the Infringing Products. Such acts will cause continued and
`
`irreparable harm to Hershey.
`
`71.
`
`72.
`
`The aforementioned conduct was, and is currently being, carried out in bad faith.
`
`Defendants’ violations of C.R.S. §§ 6-1-101 et seq. entitle Hershey to recover
`
`damages including, but not limited to, actual damages, attorneys’ fees, and treble damages.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Hershey seeks the following relief:
`
`a.
`
`A judgment that defendants have:
`
`
`
`(i)
`
`Violated 15 U.S.C. § 1114 and other statutory and common law authority
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by infringing upon the Hershey Trademarks; and
`
`
`
`
`
`(ii)
`
`Violated 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) and other statutory and common law
`
`authority by falsely designating the origin of goods or engaging in false or misleading
`
`descriptions or representations of fact with respect to the origin of goods in a manner likely to
`
`cause confusion, mistake or deception among consumers as to the affiliation, connection or
`
`association of defendants and the Infringing Products with Hershey; and
`
`
`
`
`
`(iii) Violated 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c) and other statutory and common law
`
`authority by diluting the Hershey Trademarks and damaging Hershey and its associated brands,
`
`and
`
`
`
`18
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 19 of 22
`
`
`
`(iv)
`
`Engaged in unfair competition by causing confusion in the minds of
`
`consumers and general public as to the source and sponsorship of goods sold by
`
`defendants; and
`
`
`
`
`
`(iv)
`
`Engaged in violations of C.R.S. §§ 6-1-101 and other statutory and
`
`common law authority by unfairly competing with Hershey; and
`
`
`
` b.
`
`That, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1116, defendants and their owners, members,
`
`partners, officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, representatives, licensees, subsidiaries,
`
`manufacturers and distributors, jointly and severally, be enjoined throughout the world during
`
`the pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter from:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(i)
`
`Infringing on the Hershey Trademarks in any manner;
`
`(ii) Manufacturing, marketing, advertising, selling, promoting, licensing,
`
`exhibiting or displaying any product or service using the Hershey Trademarks, the marks, and
`
`trade dresses and designs of defendants described herein, or any confusingly similar marks, trade
`
`dresses or designs; and
`
`
`
`
`
`(iii) Using any false description, representation, or designation, or otherwise
`
`engaging in conduct that is likely to create an impression that defendants’ goods are endorsed or
`
`authorized by Hershey or any related company, are sponsored by Hershey or any related
`
`company, or are connected in any way with Hershey or any related company; and
`
`
`
`
`
`(iv) Using the Hershey Trademarks, the marks, and trade dresses and designs
`
`of defendants described herein, or any confusingly similar marks, trade dresses or designs, in
`
`promotional literature or materials, including those posted on the Internet.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(v)
`
`Holding themselves out as a licensee or otherwise authorized users of the
`
`19
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 20 of 22
`
`
`
`Hershey Trademarks; and
`
`
`
`
`
`(vi) Using the Hershey Trademarks, or any marks, trade dresses or designs
`
`confusingly similar to the Hershey Trademarks, in any manner whatsoever;
`
`
`
`c.
`
`That, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117 and state law, Hershey be awarded such
`
`damages as are available under the Lanham Act and state law, including but not limited to actual
`
`damages, statutory damages, defendants’ profits and treble damages;
`
`
`
`d.
`
`Ordering an accounting of all gains, profits, savings and advantages realized by
`
`defendant from its aforesaid acts of trademark infringement, trademark dilution, false
`
`designation of origin, and unfair competition and other violations of federal and state law, and
`
`awarding treble profits pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) on the ground that defendants engaged in
`
`its wrongful acts with knowledge or bad faith or under other circumstances warranting treble
`
`profits;
`
`
`
`e.
`
`That this case be declared an exceptional case pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117 and
`
`state law, because of the willful and deliberate nature of defendants’ acts of trademark and trade
`
`dress infringement, trademark and trade dress dilution, false designation of origin, and unfair
`
`competition, entitling plaintiffs their reasonable attorneys’ fees;
`
`
`
`f.
`
`That plaintiffs be awarded their costs and expenses of this action;
`
`g.
`
`Awarding plaintiffs punitive damages in an amount to be determined by the trier
`
`of fact for defendants’ willful and knowing trademark infringement and unfair competition,
`
`pursuant to the common law; and
`
`
`
`h.
`
`Ordering defendants to recall from all chains of distribution all goods, product
`
`packaging, product displays, promotional materials, advertisements, commercials, infomercials
`
`
`
`20
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01564-WYD-MJW Document 1 Filed 06/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 21 of 22
`
`
`
`and other items, the dissemination by defendant of which would violate the injunction herein
`
`requested;
`
`i.
`
`Ordering defendants to deliver up for destruction any and all goods, product
`
`packaging, product displays, promotional materials, advertisements, commercials and other
`
`items in the possession, custody or control of defendants which, if sold, displayed, or used,
`
`would violate the injunction herein granted, and to disable all web sites to the extent they contain
`
`any content, the display or use of which would violate the injunction herein requested;
`
`
`
`j.
`
`That defendants be required to assign and transfer to Hershey the rights to any
`
`domain name that includes or is confusingly similar to or dilutive of any of the Hershey
`
`Trademarks;
`
`
`
`k.
`
`That Hershey be awarded its corrective advertising damages and all other
`
`damages arising from the unlawful and unauthorized advertisements and publications related to
`
`the Infringing Products;
`
`
`
`l.
`
`Ordering defendants to pay for and cause to be disseminated to each distributor
`
`and reseller of defendants’ Infringing Products a notice advising said persons of defendants’ acts
`
`of trademark infringement and dilution, false designation of origin, and unfair competition and
`
`advising of the issuance and content of the injunction herein requested;
`
`
`
`m.
`
`Ordering that, pursuant to Section 34(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a),
`
`defendants shall serve upon plaintiffs within thirty (30) days after service on defendants of an
`
`order granting an injunction, or