throbber
Case 3:20-cv-01383-KAD Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 1 of 13
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
`
`AWANO FOOD GROUP PTE LTD
`and BAALI INTERNATIONAL INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Civil No. ___________
`
`v.
`
`FAIRTRADE INTERNATIONAL, INC. and
`RODRIGO ECHEVERRIGARAY,
`
`Defendants.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiffs Awano Food Group Pte Ltd (“Awano”) and Baali International Inc. (“Baali”
`
`and together with Awano, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby state
`
`their complaint against Defendants FairTrade International, Inc. (“FairTrade”) and Rodrigo
`
`Echeverrigaray (“Rodrigo” and together with FairTrade, “Defendants”), and alleges as follows:
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`The backdrop for this action is the international meat importing industry, in which
`
`financiers and importers work together to acquire large quantities of meat produced in foreign
`
`countries and sell it to customers throughout the United States.
`
`2.
`
`These are large-scale transactions. The meat is shipped by boat in massive
`
`shipping containers that can contain upwards of $100,000 worth of meat, or more. The entire
`
`process—from the moment an order is placed with the “producer” to the ultimate sale to a
`
`customer—can take several months, and the supply chain involves numerous participants.
`
`3.
`
`Awano and FairTrade entered into a financing agreement whereby Awano (as the
`
`financier) agreed to extend to FairTrade (as the importer) a $10 million line of credit to purchase
`
`DB1/ 115377250.1
`
`20-1383
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-01383-KAD Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 2 of 13
`
`beef sourced from various countries, including Uruguay, New Zealand, Australia, Brazil and
`
`Argentina, to be imported and sold by FairTrade to U.S. customers.
`
`4.
`
`Awano also acquired 50% of FairTrade’s stock. The other 50% was owned by
`
`Rodrigo, who single-handedly controlled every aspect of FairTrade’s day-to-day operations and
`
`who had exclusive access to FairTrade’s internal business and financial records. Rodrigo also
`
`had key personal relationships with other players in the supply chain, such as the beef producers
`
`and U.S. customers.
`
`5.
`
`Under the Agreement, FairTrade would use the $10 million credit line to acquire
`
`beef. After FairTrade made a sale to a customer, Rodrigo was required to wire funds to Awano’s
`
`account so that the credit line was replenished, and so that Awano and FairTrade would split any
`
`profit or loss 50/50. For more than a year, the wire transfers from FairTrade to Awano were
`
`consistent, and the business was profitable.
`
`6.
`
`However, Rodrigo then used his complete control over FairTrade to: (a) make
`
`fraudulent transfers from FairTrade to his other company, Fairfield’s M.EAT Organic Beef, LLC
`
`(“M.EAT”); and (b) upon information and belief, used FairTrade’s funds for countless personal
`
`expenditures. Because Rodrigo had exclusive access to FairTrade’s internal records, these
`
`improper transfers and personal expenditures were hidden from Awano.
`
`7.
`
`Ultimately, the $10 million line of credit from Awano disappeared completely,
`
`despite FairTrade continuing to make sales of beef to customers in the U.S.
`
`8.
`
`Awano sought answers from Rodrigo. Eventually, in June of 2019, Rodrigo
`
`admitted that FairTrade had sold beef it had acquired with Awano’s funds, but, in breach of the
`
`Agreement, had not wired the appropriate funds to Awano’s account.
`
`DB1/ 115377250.1
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-01383-KAD Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 3 of 13
`
`9.
`
`Also, upon information and belief, Rodrigo had for years been using FairTrade’s
`
`funds and corporate accounts to make personal purchases having no relationship to the business.
`
`10.
`
`The parties agreed to a payment plan whereby FairTrade would make small
`
`weekly payments to Awano with the goal of replenishing the $10 million line of credit that had
`
`been extinguished. FairTrade failed to make the agreed upon payments.
`
`11.
`
`As a direct result of FairTrade’s breach of the Agreement, Awano lost its entire
`
`$10 million line of credit, plus interest and other costs. FairTrade’s breach was perpetrated by
`
`Rodrigo as part of a fraudulent scheme that benefitted Rodrigo personally and to the detriment of
`
`Awano.
`
`PARTIES
`
`12.
`
`Awano is a Singapore Private Limited Company with a principal place of
`
`business in Singapore. Awano is in the pork/beef trading business.
`
`13.
`
`Plaintiff Baali is a Taiwan corporation with a principal place of business in
`
`Taiwan. Baali is the assignee of an accounts receivable constituting the debt owed by FairTrade
`
`to Awano.
`
`14.
`
`Defendant FairTrade is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business
`
`in Connecticut. FairTrade is a meat importer.
`
`15.
`
`Defendant Rodrigo Echeverrigaray (“Rodrigo”), upon information and belief, is a
`
`citizen of Uruguay. Rodrigo is the part owner and President of FairTrade.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`16.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1332, because there is complete diversity of citizenship between Plaintiffs and Defendants and
`
`the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs.
`
`DB1/ 115377250.1
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-01383-KAD Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 4 of 13
`
`17.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) because a
`
`substantial part of the events giving rise to Plaintiffs’ claims occurred in this District.
`
`Alternatively, venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(3) because
`
`Defendants are subject to this Court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to this action.
`
`OVERVIEW OF THE INTERNATIONAL MEAT IMPORTING INDUSTRY
`
`18.
`
`Awano and FairTrade operate in the United States / international meat importing
`
`industry.
`
`19.
`
`In general, that industry operates as follows:
`
`a. Meat importers place orders for meat with meat producers, which can exist
`
`anywhere in the world.
`
`b. Producers put their product in large containers to be shipped to the United States
`
`on a cargo ship.
`
`c. Because of the high cost of each order (upwards of $100,000 or more), a
`
`financier—rather than the importer itself—pays the producer for its product, and
`
`the producer releases the container to the importer.
`
`d. The importer then seeks to sell the product to various buyers in the United States.
`
`e. The importer then pays back the financier according to whatever business
`
`arrangement is made between the importer and financier.
`
`f. The entire process outlined above takes months to complete.
`
`20.
`
`Because the price of meat (such as beef or pork) fluctuates on a daily basis, the
`
`price can vary greatly between the time the importer orders the meat from the producer, and the
`
`time the importer ultimately sells the meat to customers in the United States.
`
`DB1/ 115377250.1
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-01383-KAD Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 5 of 13
`
`21. Whether an order results in a profit or loss for the importer and financier,
`
`therefore, depends upon the prices paid by the United States customers several months after the
`
`initial order is placed from the producer.
`
`AWANO ENTERS INTO A FINANCING AGREEMENT
`WITH FAIRTRADE AND BECOMES A 50% SHAREHOLDER
`
`22.
`
`Awano began doing business with FairTrade (then known as Cibus North
`
`America Inc.) in 2016.
`
`23.
`
`Awano and FairTrade entered into an Agreement, pursuant to which they agreed
`
`to do business as follows:
`
`a. Awano agreed to act as financier.
`
`b. FairTrade agreed to act as importer, sourcing beef from Cibus SouthAmerica S.A.
`
`(“Cibus”), a Uruguay based broker that acquires meat from producers throughout
`
`the world.
`
`c. Awano extended to FairTrade a revolving line of credit of approximately $10
`
`million with interest at a rate of 6% per annum.
`
`d. Awano, as financier, would purchase beef from Cibus.
`
`e. FairTrade would, in turn, purchase the beef from Awano using its line of credit.
`
`f. Cibus, after being paid by Awano, would release the containers of beef to
`
`FairTrade, which would then seek to sell the product to various United States
`
`customers.
`
`g. Within 90 days after Awano’s purchase of beef from Cibus, FairTrade was
`
`required to wire to Awano’s account the funds FairTrade received from its sales
`
`to U.S. customers, replenishing the $10 million credit line.
`
`DB1/ 115377250.1
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-01383-KAD Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 6 of 13
`
`h.
`
`In addition, if FairTrade was able to sell the beef at a profit, FairTrade would wire
`
`50% of the profit to Awano, and FairTrade would retain the other 50%. If
`
`FairTrade sold the beef at a loss, FairTrade would wire funds to Awano such that
`
`they split the loss evenly.
`
`i. Awano would also front payments for “handling” charges, such as costs
`
`associated with customs, cold storage of the product, or delivery of the product by
`
`truck within the United States. FairTrade was responsible for reimbursing Awano
`
`for these charges.
`
`24.
`
`The parties also agreed that Awano would acquire from Rodrigo 50% of
`
`FairTrade’s stock, with the other 50% being retained by Rodrigo.
`
`25.
`
`Because FairTrade alone negotiated the transactions with the United States
`
`customers, Awano relied entirely upon FairTrade—i.e., Rodrigo—to disclose information about
`
`all sales FairTrade made.
`
`26.
`
`Rodrigo controlled and dominated every aspect of FairTrade’s day-to-day
`
`business. For example:
`
`a. Rodrigo made all decisions for FairTrade unilaterally.
`
`b. Rodrigo maintained the personal connections and relationships with other
`
`participants in the beef supply chain, such as producers and U.S. customers.
`
`c. Rodrigo had exclusive access to FairTrade’s business and financial records, such
`
`as bank statements, invoices, and inventory records.
`
`27.
`
`For more than a year, the Agreement appeared to be successful, as wire transfers
`
`from FairTrade to Awano were consistent, reflecting a steady stream of purchases from U.S.
`
`customers.
`
`DB1/ 115377250.1
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-01383-KAD Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 7 of 13
`
`FAIRTRADE’S PAYMENTS TO AWANO SLOW DRAMATICALLY IN 2018
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`Beginning in January 2018, FairTrade’s wire transfers to Awano began to slow.
`
`By June 2018, payments from FairTrade to Awano had decreased dramatically.
`
`Confused as to why the payments from FairTrade to Awano had decreased so
`
`severely, Awano personnel asked Rodrigo for an explanation.
`
`31.
`
`Rodrigo gave Awano several excuses as to why the wire transfers had become
`
`infrequent. For example, Rodrigo cited the ongoing trade war between the United States and
`
`China and its negative impact upon the meat importing industry.
`
`32.
`
`Awano asked Rodrigo to provide documentation to substantiate his statements. It
`
`requested on several occasions that Rodrigo provide Awano with financial documents such as
`
`monthly expense reports and bank statements—documents to which only Rodrigo had access—
`
`in order to increase transparency with regard to FairTrade’s business. He did not do so.
`
`33.
`
`By late 2018 and into early 2019, the business relationship between Awano and
`
`FairTrade unraveled, as Awano continued to seek payment and information from Rodrigo, and
`
`Rodrigo provided only excuses and empty promises.
`
`RODRIGO ADMITS THAT FAIRTRADE OWES PAYMENTS TO AWANO
`
`34.
`
`In June 2019, Awano personnel met with Rodrigo to discuss the status of
`
`FairTrade and the significant debt owed by FairTrade to Awano.
`
`35.
`
`During this meeting, Rodrigo admitted that FairTrade had sold beef it acquired
`
`from Awano to customers in the United States, but, in breach of the parties’ Agreement, had not
`
`wired the funds it received from those customers back to Awano’s account.
`
`36.
`
`Rodrigo gave several explanations for his conduct. For example, he claimed he
`
`was having difficulty collecting funds from FairTrade’s U.S. customers because his U.S.
`
`salesperson had resigned.
`
`DB1/ 115377250.1
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-01383-KAD Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 8 of 13
`
`37.
`
`Rodrigo also attempted to justify his failure to wire funds to Awano by claiming
`
`that he needed to retain the funds to “grow the business” (i.e., FairTrade).
`
`38.
`
`Also, upon information and belief, Rodrigo had for years been using FairTrade’s
`
`funds and corporate accounts to make personal purchases having no connection to the business.
`
`FAIRTRADE BREACHES PAYMENT PLAN AGREEMENT
`
`39.
`
`During the June 2019 meeting, Awano and FairTrade entered into an agreement
`
`with the goal of replenishing the $10 million credit line that had been depleted.
`
`40.
`
`The parties agreed that, beginning in July 2019, FairTrade would start paying
`
`back what it owed to Awano by wiring Awano $300,000 per week.
`
`41.
`
`42.
`
`FairTrade breached this agreement, too.
`
`Although some payments were made, they were sporadic, and smaller than the
`
`agreed upon amount.
`
`43.
`
`44.
`
`Eventually, the payments to Awano ceased altogether.
`
`Currently, the amount owed by FairTrade to Awano exceeds $11 million,
`
`including: (1) payment for the purchase and sale of beef; (2) handling charges; and (3) interest.
`
`AWANO ASSIGNS THE FAIRTRADE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE TO BAALI
`
`45.
`
`46.
`
`On September 27, 2019, Awano and Baali executed an Assignment agreement.
`
`Pursuant to the Assignment, Awano assigned to Baali all of Awano’s rights, titles,
`
`and interests in accounts owing, or that become owing, to Awano from FairTrade.
`
`PLAINTIFFS ARE ENTITLED TO PIERCE THE CORPORATE VEIL
`OF FAIRTRADE AND PROCEED AGAINST RODRIGO INDIVIDUALLY
`
`47.
`
`Plaintiffs are entitled to pierce the corporate veil of FairTrade and proceed with
`
`claims against Rodrigo individually.
`
`DB1/ 115377250.1
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-01383-KAD Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 9 of 13
`
`48.
`
`Rodrigo exercises complete domination and control over the business and affairs
`
`of FairTrade, and has commingled the assets of FairTrade with those of his own assets, in
`
`disregard of the corporate form and for his personal benefit, such that the corporate form of
`
`FairTrade should be disregarded.
`
`49.
`
`Rodrigo controls and dominates FairTrade such that FairTrade has no separate
`
`mind.
`
`50.
`
`51.
`
`FairTrade.
`
`Rodrigo owns 50% of FairTrade’s stock.
`
`Upon information and belief, Rodrigo is currently the only employee of
`
`52.
`
`Rodrigo is the only individual with access to FairTrade’s financial records, bank
`
`accounts, and other assets.
`
`53.
`
`FairTrade does not observe corporate formalities. FairTrade does not have a
`
`board of directors, let alone regularly scheduled board meetings.
`
`54.
`
`Rodrigo makes all decisions for FairTrade unilaterally, including all decisions
`
`with respect to FairTrade’s business dealings with Awano.
`
`55.
`
`Rodrigo has operated FairTrade such that FairTrade has breached its agreement
`
`with Awano to send funds received from United States customers back to Awano.
`
`56.
`
`Upon information and belief, Rodrigo has also used FairTrade’s funds and
`
`corporate accounts to make personal purchases.
`
`57.
`
`Rodrigo has used his control and domination over FairTrade to perpetrate a fraud
`
`against Awano, and otherwise cause Awano injury, such as, upon information and belief, using
`
`FairTrade’s funds and corporate accounts for his own personal use.
`
`DB1/ 115377250.1
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-01383-KAD Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 10 of 13
`
`58.
`
`Accordingly, Plaintiffs are entitled to pierce the corporate veil of FairTrade and
`
`proceed with claims as against Rodrigo individually.
`
`COUNT ONE: BREACH OF CONTRACT
`(Against FairTrade and Rodrigo Echeverrigaray)
`
`59.
`
`60.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reallege Paragraphs 1–58 above as if fully set forth herein.
`
`In 2016, Awano and FairTrade formed a contract to do business together in the
`
`manner set forth in Paragraph 25 above.
`
`61.
`
`Awano has performed fully under the contract, financing purchases of beef from
`
`Cibus and extending to FairTrade a revolving line of credit so that FairTrade could sell beef to
`
`United States customers. Awano has also paid the handling charges.
`
`62.
`
`FairTrade has breached the contract by acquiring the beef product using Awano’s
`
`revolving line of credit, selling the beef to customers in the United States, and failing to wire the
`
`funds received from the customers back to Awano’s account.
`
`63.
`
`FairTrade has also failed to pay Awano for handling charges, and the interest
`
`owed on its line of credit to Awano.
`
`64.
`
`As a direct and proximate cause of the above-referenced breach of contract,
`
`Plaintiffs have suffered damages.
`
`COUNT TWO: VIOLATION OF CONNECTICUT UNIFORM FRAUDULENT
`TRANSFER ACT, CONN. GEN. STAT. § 52-552, et seq.
`(Against FairTrade and Rodrigo Echeverrigaray)
`
`65.
`
`66.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reallege Paragraphs 1–64 above as if fully set forth herein.
`
`Rodrigo admitted that he caused FairTrade to transfer funds to M.EAT Organic
`
`Beef that should otherwise be paid to Awano per the Agreement between Awano and FairTrade.
`
`67.
`
`FairTrade’s transfers were fraudulent as to Awano.
`
`DB1/ 115377250.1
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-01383-KAD Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 11 of 13
`
`68.
`
`Awano’s claims against FairTrade arose before FairTrade made the transfers to
`
`M.EAT.
`
`69.
`
`The transfers from FairTrade to M.EAT were made with the actual intent to
`
`hinder, delay, or defraud Awano.
`
`70.
`
`The transfers from FairTrade to M.EAT were made without FairTrade receiving a
`
`reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer.
`
`71.
`
`FairTrade was engaged in business and transactions with Awano for which the
`
`remaining assets of FairTrade were unreasonably small in relation to such business and
`
`transactions.
`
`72.
`
`FairTrade intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that it
`
`would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay Awano as those debt became due.
`
`73.
`
`FairTrade and Rodrigo have thus violated the Connecticut Uniform Fraudulent
`
`Transfer Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-552, et seq.
`
`COUNT THREE: BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY
`(Against Rodrigo Echeverrigaray)
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reallege Paragraphs 1–73 above as if fully set forth herein
`
`FairTrade is a Delaware corporation.
`
`Rodrigo is a 50% shareholder of FairTrade.
`
`Rodrigo exercises complete control over the business affairs of FairTrade.
`
`Upon information and belief, Rodrigo is currently the only employee of
`
`74.
`
`75.
`
`76.
`
`77.
`
`78.
`
`FairTrade.
`
`79.
`
`Rodrigo is the only individual with access to FairTrade’s financial records, bank
`
`accounts, and other assets.
`
`DB1/ 115377250.1
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-01383-KAD Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 12 of 13
`
`80.
`
`FairTrade does not observe corporate formalities. FairTrade does not have a
`
`board of directors, let alone regularly scheduled board meetings.
`
`81.
`
`Rodrigo makes all decisions for FairTrade unilaterally, including all decisions
`
`with respect to FairTrade’s business dealings with Awano.
`
`82.
`
`83.
`
`As such, Rodrigo owes Awano fiduciary duties under Delaware law.
`
`Rodrigo breached his fiduciary duties to Awano by: (a) operating FairTrade in
`
`such a manner that it breached its financing Agreement with Awano; (b) transferring money out
`
`of FairTrade and into M.EAT without FairTrade receiving a reasonably equivalent value in
`
`exchange for the transfers; and (c) upon information and belief, using FairTrade for his own
`
`personal expenses.
`
`DB1/ 115377250.1
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-01383-KAD Document 1 Filed 09/15/20 Page 13 of 13
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully seek:
`
`1. Money damages;
`
`2. Punitive damages;
`
`3. Attorneys’ fees;
`
`4. Prejudgment interest;
`
`5. Post-judgment interest;
`
`6. Costs; and
`
`7. Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs demand a jury
`
`trial as to all issues triable by a jury.
`
`Dated: September 15, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Wayne E. George
`Michael D. Blanchard (ct25891)
`Christopher M. Wasil (ct28578)
`Wayne E. George (ct30754)
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`One State Street
`Hartford, CT 06103
`Phone: (860) 240-2700
`Fax: (860) 240-2701
`michael.blanchard@morganlewis.com
`christopher.wasil@morganlewis.com
`wayne.george@morganlewis.com
`Counsel for Plaintiffs Awano Food Group Pte Ltd
`and Baali International Inc.
`
`DB1/ 115377250.1
`
`13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket