`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
`NEW HAVEN DIVISION
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Defendants.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`Case No. 20-cv-01602
`
`Judge Stefan R. Underhill
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`YOUT LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`THE RECORDING INDUSTRY
`ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. and
`DOE RECORD COMPANIES 1-10,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`NOW COMES THE PLAINTIFF YOUT LLC (“Yout” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its
`
`attorneys, Mudd Law, and complains of DEFENDANTS THE RECORDING INDUSTRY
`
`ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. and DOE RECORD COMPANIES 1-10 (collectively,
`
`“Defendants”), upon personal information as to the Plaintiff’s own activities, and upon
`
`information and belief as to the activities of others and all other matters, and states as follows:
`
`NATURE OF ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for 28 U.S.C. § 2201 declaratory relief relating to 17 U.S.C. §
`
`1201; violation of 17 U.S.C. § 512(f); business disparagement; and, defamation per se.
`
`PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Yout LLC is a Connecticut limited liability company with its principal place of
`
`business in Hartford, Connecticut.
`
`3.
`
`The Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. (“RIAA”) is a trade
`
`organization incorporated under the laws of the State of New York, headquartered in
`
`Washington, D.C., and can be served through its Chairman and CEO, Mitch Glazier at 1000 F
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 2 of 35
`
`Street NW, Floor 2, Washington, D.C. 20004.
`
`4.
`
`The RIAA states that it “supports and promotes the creative and financial vitality
`
`of the major music companies.”1
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`Doe Record Companies 1-10 are member companies of Defendant RIAA.2
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, this Court has original jurisdiction over Yout’s
`
`federal declaratory judgment and § 512(f) claims.
`
`7.
`
`This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Yout’s state law claims pursuant to
`
`28 U.S.C. § 1367.
`
`8.
`
`As to Yout’s declaratory judgment action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, an actual
`
`controversy exists within this Court’s jurisdiction.
`
`9.
`
`Yout has its principal place of business in Connecticut.
`
`10. Moreover, a substantial part of the causes of action herein arose in the District of
`
`Connecticut.
`
`11.
`
`Additionally, the Defendants engaged in conduct within Connecticut that
`
`benefited them under the laws of this jurisdiction.
`
`12.
`
`Specifically, the RIAA engaged in efforts to protect it and its members within
`
`Connecticut.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`In fact, the RIAA filed previous civil actions in the District of Connecticut.
`
`The Defendants Doe Record Companies 1-10 conduct business and product sales
`
`
`1 See RIAA website available at https://www.riaa.com/.
`2 The true names of Doe Record Companies 1-10 are unknown to the Plaintiff at the present time and, therefore, the
`Plaintiff sues such Defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will seek leave of Court to amend the Plaintiff’s
`Complaint with Doe Record Companies 1-10 true names and capacities when ascertained.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 3 of 35
`
`in the District of Connecticut.
`
`15. With respect to Yout, the Defendants knew that it is a Connecticut limited liability
`
`company with its principal place of business in Hartford, Connecticut.
`
`16.
`
`The Defendants directed conduct against Yout knowing the harm of such conduct
`
`would be felt by Yout in Connecticut.
`
`17.
`
`As an example, the Defendants’ directed their conduct toward Yout in the State of
`
`Connecticut by publishing takedown notices with the purpose of interfering with Yout’s business
`
`operations in the State of Connecticut.
`
`18.
`
`The Defendants knew that their conduct would cause notices to be sent to Yout in
`
`the State of Connecticut
`
`19.
`
`Thus, the Defendants knew that such and other conduct against Yout (described
`
`more fully below) would impact it in the State of Connecticut.
`
`20.
`
`To be sure, Yout has suffered harm from the Defendants’ conduct in the State of
`
`Connecticut.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`The Defendants’ intentional conduct has harmed the Plaintiff.
`
`Based on the foregoing, an actual controversy exists between Yout and the
`
`Defendants in the State of Connecticut.
`
`23. Moreover, based on the foregoing, the Defendants are subject to specific personal
`
`jurisdiction within the State of Connecticut. As such, this Court may exercise personal
`
`jurisdiction over them.
`
`24.
`
`Further, venue is proper in the District of Connecticut pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`
`§1391(b).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 4 of 35
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`Internet and Content
`
`25.
`
`The Internet contains diverse types of content that can be accessed by persons
`
`using web browsers and other diverse tools such as email and ftp (file transfer protocol) clients,
`
`to name a few.
`
`26.
`
`This lawsuit involves Internet content that can be accessed using a web browser
`
`(“Web Content”) using a unique hyperlink, uniform resource locator (commonly referred to as
`
`“url”), or “web address” that directs computing devices to such content, respectively, on the
`
`Internet.
`
`27.
`
`Some Web Content exists behind a pay-wall such that a person can only access
`
`the content after paying for the specific content or a broader subscription (eg iTunes).
`
`28.
`
`This lawsuit does not involve Web Content behind a pay-wall. Rather, this
`
`lawsuit involves content publicly accessible to anyone with a web browser and Internet
`
`connection.
`
`29.
`
`At times, hosts or providers of Web Content will encrypt certain content to protect
`
`it from unauthorized access.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`This lawsuit does not involve any encrypted Web Content.
`
`Similarly, this lawsuit does not involve any Web Content that must be
`
`descrambled or decoded to view its content.
`
`32.
`
`As a corollary, this lawsuit does not involve any Web Content that has been
`
`hidden from view by use of a cipher or other means of concealing content or meaning.
`
`33.
`
`Again, quite simply, this lawsuit involves Web Content publicly accessible by
`
`anyone with an Internet connection and a web browser.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 5 of 35
`
`Yout Platform
`
`34.
`
`Yout created and operates a service by which a person can enter a url linked to
`
`publicly accessible, unencrypted Web Content in certain limited formats and create a personal
`
`copy on the person’s computing device.
`
`35.
`
`In facilitating this service, Yout does not store any of the Web Content on its
`
`platform or service.
`
`36. When one visits Yout’s website at the domain yout.com, Yout presents a very
`
`straightforward homepage that invites a person to insert a url to Web Content.
`
`
`
`37. When a person pastes a hyperlink into the applicable field, Yout presents options
`
`to the person relating to the Web Content:
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 6 of 35
`
`38.
`
`If the person seeks only audio content, the person can choose the MP3 format. In
`
`such a case, Yout’s software platform facilitates a user preserving an audio portion of streamed
`
`sound or video content by storing it locally on the user’s computer in the form of an MP3 file.
`
`39.
`
`If the person seeks video and audio, the person can choose the MP4 format.
`
`40. When choosing either format, Yout provides a selection of qualities from which
`
`the person can choose.
`
`41.
`
`Of the video qualities available, Yout provides HD formats only to those who
`
`
`
`become paid subscribers.
`
`42.
`
`43.
`
`The large majority of Yout users do not become paid subscribers.
`
`In either case, the person obtains a copy of the Web Content stored on their local
`
`personal computer. When this occurs, the Web Content originates from source url and becomes
`
`saved as a file on the person’s local personal computer.
`
`44.
`
`As such, the person can thereby listen or view the locally stored content when not
`
`connected to the Internet and without the necessity of visiting the website on which the original
`
`content resides.
`
`45.
`
`Yout only facilitates the saving of such Web Content on the person’s local
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 7 of 35
`
`computer.
`
`46.
`
`47.
`
`In essence, Yout allows a user to time shift content.
`
`Yout never saves or retains its users’ time-shifted content on its own servers.
`
`Diverse Web Content
`
`48.
`
`A person can use Yout with respect to a wide-range diverse Web Content across
`
`multiple platforms.
`
`49.
`
`As an example, Mudd Law hosts Web Content on the online video platform
`
`operated by Google, LLC at the domain YouTube.com (“YouTube”).
`
`50.
`
`A particular video can be accessed at the url:
`
`https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7Sgsj4Xb5U:
`
`
`
`51.
`
`52.
`
`The particular video provides instruction on how to utilize a government website.
`
`A person could use Yout to save this recording on their personal computer for
`
`later viewing. For example, before a long flight, a person could store this recording for use
`
`without an Internet connection robust enough to provide streaming content.
`
`53.
`
`Of course, the Defendants focus upon a limited universe of Web Content on
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 8 of 35
`
`YouTube in which sound recordings owned or licensed by one or more of its member record
`
`companies may be heard.
`
`54.
`
`Putting aside the small percentage of Web Content related to the Defendants on
`
`YouTube, much less the Internet, the Web Content on YouTube associated with the Defendants
`
`at issue in this Lawsuit can be publicly accessed without the use of any circumvention.
`
`No Decryption, Descrambling, or Similar Circumvention
`
`Necessary to Download YouTube Content
`
`55.
`
`As stated above, YouTube is one of the platforms through which Yout enables
`
`persons to obtain a local copy of publicly accessible, unencrypted Web Content.
`
`56.
`
`Although clearly provided in a cleaner and easier format, Yout enables a person to
`
`interact with Web Content in a manner enabled by YouTube and popular web browsers.
`
`57.
`
`Unlike the Digital Rights Management (“DRM”) mechanisms commonly used to
`
`encrypt and protect media such as, for example, DVD content, YouTube has no such
`
`mechanisms.
`
`58.
`
`Rather, YouTube content plays on any HTTP user agent with a JavaScript
`
`interpreter, not on “authorized players” alone.
`
`59. When YouTube provides the content, it is merely checking for a browser with a
`
`JavaScript interpreter, and that includes Yout and youtube-dl and thousands of other software
`
`programs that have no relationship with YouTube or the record labels.
`
`60.
`
`By way of comparison, a DVD player has a secret key embedded in it that must
`
`be obtained from the rightsholders pursuant to a license, but a browser does not. YouTube
`
`doesn’t license browsers to play YouTube.
`
`61.
`
`Therefore, even if the YouTube player source code is “a process or a treatment,”
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 9 of 35
`
`it doesn’t require “the authority of the copyright owner” as required by the statute because it’s
`
`already been provided to everyone in the world.
`
`62.
`
`If someone accesses YouTube with the web browser Google Chrome (“Chrome”),
`
`you can search for and view any number of publicly accessible videos.
`
`63.
`
`For example, one can search for Taylor Swift and find a number of her music
`
`videos.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 10 of 35
`
`64.
`
`If one chooses to view “The Lakes (Original Version),” the music video can be
`
`viewed at a specific url.3
`
`
`
`65.
`
`Selecting “View” from the Chrome menu bar on a MacOS system, a menu item
`
`exists for “Developer” which has a sub-menu that includes “Developer Tools”.
`
`
`
`
`3 The choice of Taylor Swift and “The Lakes” reflects the most sincere appreciation intended of her music.
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 11 of 35
`
`66.
`
`Selecting “Developer Tools” opens up several new frames within the browser
`
`window.
`
`67.
`
`From here, we can sort the files listed in the main window by file size in the
`
`
`
`“Size” column.
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 12 of 35
`
`68.
`
`After Chrome sorts the files, we can the highlight the first of the largest files,
`
`observe the “Request URL,” and copy it.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 13 of 35
`
`69.
`
`One can then past the “Request URL” into a new Chrome window or tab. Toward
`
`the end of the “Request URL” exists a sequence of numbers following the text “range=” that can
`
`be modified to begin at 0 and end at a much larger number.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 14 of 35
`
`70. When one then clicks “return” or “enter” on their computer to access the modified
`
`“Request URL,” a full-size video, albeit without sound, appears within the Chrome window and
`
`begins to play.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 15 of 35
`
`71.
`
`Additionally, YouTube provides a menu to the right of the play bar identified by
`
`three vertical dots that includes a “Download” option.
`
`
`
`
`
`72.
`
`By clicking “Download,” YouTube - through the Google Chrome browser - then
`
`downloads a file entitled “videoplayback.mp4” that, when opened, plays the full music video
`
`(again, albeit without sound).
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 16 of 35
`
`73.
`
`If one desires the audio, one need only return to the Developer Tools provided by
`
`Google Chrome and, among the large files, search the large files until the length of the Request
`
`URL changes to a shorter URL. Following this, the process described above can be repeated
`
`which results in the separate audio file that can, again, be downloaded.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 17 of 35
`
`74.
`
`Here, when one selects “Download,” the audio opens in a new browser tab and
`
`downloads the file to the local computer. The name of the file on the local computer reflects in
`
`the URL window.
`
`
`
`75.
`
`To some, this could appear complicated. But, countless websites provide
`
`instructions on how to accomplish this.
`
`76.
`
`For example, an article in Business Insider entitled “2 easy ways to download
`
`YouTube videos onto a computer to watch or share anytime” walks you through the exact
`
`process described above. https://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-download-youtube-videos.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 18 of 35
`
`77.
`
`Additionally, hongkiat.com gives detailed instructions for downloading content
`
`from YouTube using both Chrome and the Firefox browser at
`
`https://www.hongkiat.com/blog/download-youtube-media-without-tools/:
`
`78.
`
`Likewise, a simple Google search produce countless videos showing how to
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 19 of 35
`
`accomplish this same task using Chrome and other common web browsers:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 20 of 35
`
`Yout’s Actual Service v. the RIAA’s Accusations
`
`79.
`
`Yout’s software platform enables a person to complete the process described
`
`above, but in fewer steps.
`
`80. Many content creators use Yout’s service to record their own original videos.
`
`81.
`
`Further, many content creators encourage their audience and fans to use Yout to
`
`record and play back their original content.
`
`82.
`
`In fact, the sound recordings the RIAA alludes to (it does not name any specific
`
`sound recordings) via its anti-circumvention notices detailed below, represent a very small
`
`percentage of the available media on YouTube.
`
`83.
`
`On October 25, 2019, RIAA, on behalf of Doe Record Companies 1-10, sent an
`
`anti-circumvention notice under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3) to Google with the purpose of causing
`
`Google to delist Yout’s software platform, rendering it undiscoverable for many Internet users to
`
`record content stored on YouTube.
`
`84.
`
`The October 25, 2019 notice reads as follows:
`
`To our knowledge, the URLs provide access to a service (and/or software)
`that circumvents YouTube’s rolling cipher, a technical protection measure,
`that protects our members’ works on YouTube from unauthorized
`copying/downloading.
`
`circumvention content: The services provided at the URLs indicated
`circumvent YouTube's technological protection measures.
`
`circumvention mechanism: To our knowledge, the URLs provide access to
`a service (and/or software) that circumvents YouTube’s rolling cipher, a
`technical protection measure, that protects our members’ works on
`YouTube from unauthorized copying/downloading.
`
`October 25, 2019, DMCA notice (attached hereto as Exhibit A).
`
`85.
`
`On October 26, 2019, RIAA, on behalf of Doe Record Companies 1-10, sent a
`
`second DMCA notice to Google with the purpose of causing Yout’s URL to be delisted
`
`
`
`20
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 21 of 35
`
`rendering it undiscoverable to Yout’s user audience.
`
`86.
`
`The October 26, 2019 notice reads as follows:
`
`To our knowledge, the URLs indicated provide access to a service (and/or
`software) that circumvents YouTube’s rolling cipher, a technical protection
`measure, that protects our members’ works on YouTube from unauthorized
`copying/downloading circumvention mechanism: To our knowledge, the URLs
`indicated provide access to a service (and/or software) that circumvents
`YouTube’s rolling cipher, a technical protection measure, that protects our
`members’ works on YouTube from unauthorized copying/downloading.
`
`October 26, 2019, DMCA notice (attached hereto as Exhibit B).
`
`87.
`
`On June 22, 2020, RIAA, on behalf of Doe Record Companies 1-10, sent a third
`
`anti-circumvention notice to Google with the purpose of causing Yout’s URL to be delisted,
`
`rendering it undiscoverable to Yout’s user audience.
`
`88.
`
`The June 22, 2020 notice reads as follows:
`
`To our knowledge, the URLs indicated provide access to a service (and/or
`software) that circumvents YouTube’s rolling cipher, a technical protection
`measure, that protects our members’ works on YouTube from unauthorized
`copying/downloading circumvention mechanism: To our knowledge, the URLs
`indicated provide access to a service (and/or software) that circumvents
`YouTube’s rolling cipher, a technical protection measure, that protects our
`members’ works on YouTube from unauthorized copying/downloading.
`
`June 22, 2020, DMCA notice (attached hereto as Exhibit C).
`
`89.
`
`Essentially, the foregoing DMCA notices sent to Google by the RIAA on behalf
`
`of all Defendants (“Defendants’ DMCA Notices”) allege violations of 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a)
`
`which prohibits circumventing a technological protection measure put in place by a copyright
`
`owner to control access to a copyrighted work.
`
`90.
`
`The Notices fail to separate the ability to download a video from the Internet from
`
`actual DMCA violations.
`
`91.
`
`Indeed, Yout’s software platform employs the same simple process of a manual
`
`
`
`21
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 22 of 35
`
`download described above.
`
`92.
`
`And, any digital rights management (“DRM”) or other technical protection
`
`measure utilized by copyright owners in their videos render the videos unavailable to download
`
`via Yout.
`
`93.
`
`Contrary to Defendants’ allegations, Yout’s software platform is not designed to
`
`descramble, decrypt, avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or impair any technical protection
`
`measure or any technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected by the
`
`Copyright Act
`
`94.
`
`In fact, any digital mechanism in place designed as anti-circumvention
`
`technology4 stops Yout users from recording and saving that protected work, thereby
`
`demonstrating Yout’s compliance with any anti-circumvention protections in place.
`
`95.
`
`Yout does not violate Section 1201 of the DMCA because it does not circumvent
`
`any technological measure on YouTube videos.
`
`96.
`
`Similarly, the “rolling cipher” mechanism that the RIAA argues is employed by
`
`YouTube does not prevent copying of videos or other digital media.
`
`97.
`
`The term “rolling cipher” is a misnomer and a term likely coined and relied upon
`
`by Defendants to argue that services like Yout are somehow breaching a protection that doesn’t
`
`exist.
`
`98.
`
`Yout’s software platform works the same way as a browser when it encounters
`
`the signature mechanism: it reads and interprets the JavaScript program sent by YouTube. That
`
`program, which is sent to anyone who requests it without prior authorization, derives a signature
`
`value [referred to by RIAA as a “rolling cipher”], and sends that value back to YouTube to
`
`
`4 Commonly referred to as “digital rights management” (“DRM”) tools, or “technical protection measures”
`(“TPM”).
`
`
`
`22
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 23 of 35
`
`initiate the video stream.
`
`99.
`
`Yout’s software platform contains no password, key, or other secret knowledge
`
`that is required to access YouTube videos. It simply uses the same mechanism that YouTube
`
`presents to each and every user who views a video using any user-side software.
`
`100. Yout cannot “circumvent” the rolling cipher as that term is defined in 17 U.S.C. §
`
`1201 because YouTube provides the means of accessing these video streams to anyone who
`
`requests them and one cannot “circumvent” an access control by using means that are available
`
`to all without the authority of the copyright owner.5
`
`101. As a result, the purported “rolling cipher” promulgated by the RIAA is not a
`
`DRM and is not a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected by
`
`the Copyright Act.
`
`102. Yout merely automates the process already available using common web
`
`browsers and simple publicly available instructions.
`
`103. Yout simply allows its users to record publicly available media content already on
`
`the Internet for their own personal, time-shifted viewing and listening.
`
`104. Such downloading, absent specific circumvention of technological copyright
`
`protections, cannot be the basis for an alleged violation of 17 U.S.C. § 1201.
`
`105. Yout does not violate 17 U.S.C. § 1201.
`
`Public Perception
`
`106. As a result of the wide accessibility of this information within the public domain,
`
`the public perceives the technology utilized by websites such as Yout as already legal, prior to
`
`
`5 Paragraphs 70-77 are partially derived from an explanation published by the Electronic Frontier Foundation in a
`letter to GitHub dated November 15, 2020, [https://www.eff.org/document/eff-letter-github-youtube-dl-takedown]
`which illustrates the operation of the youtube-dl tool. Yout’s software platform operates using configured version of
`youtube-dl with ffmpeg to ensure that no storage of content occurs as seen in the terms of service and FAQ.
`
`
`
`23
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 24 of 35
`
`the Defendants’ DMCA Notices.
`
`107. Similar to how a VHS tape may record music videos played on MTV, or it may
`
`be used to record an educational lecture on PBS for later viewing, the broader form of the
`
`technology employed by Yout does not in itself constitute a DMCA violation.
`
`108. However, the Defendants’ DMCA Notices now caused third parties to believe
`
`Yout engaged and continues to engage in illegal and unlawful conduct.
`
`109. Yout does not engage in illegal and unlawful conduct.
`
`110. Defendants’ DMCA Notices have caused Yout’s customers to cancel
`
`subscriptions after receiving notice via Google when searching for “yout.com” that “In response
`
`to multiple complaints we received under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have
`
`removed 2 results from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaints that caused
`
`the removals at LumenDatabase.org: [links to Defendants’ DMCA notices].”
`
`111. On information and belief, Defendants’ DMCA notices have caused PayPal to
`
`shut down Yout’s account, causing Yout further significant monetary and reputational damage.
`
`Intent and Actual Malice
`
`112. The Defendants acted with intent and actual malice when they engaged in the
`
`foregoing conduct because they intended to harm the Plaintiffs.
`
`113. The Defendants either knew or should have known that the ability to download
`
`Internet videos for personal use is legally accessible across multiple channels, not only through
`
`Yout.
`
`114. The foregoing wrongful conduct engaged in by the Defendants shall hereinafter
`
`be referred to as the “Wrongful Conduct.”
`
`
`
`
`
`24
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 25 of 35
`
`COUNT ONE
`AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`DECLARATORY RELIEF UNDER 17 U.S.C. §1201
`115. The Plaintiffs hereby incorporate by reference Paragraphs 1 through 114 above in
`
`this First Count as though fully set forth herein.
`
`116. Yout’s software platform is not designed to descramble, decrypt, avoid, bypass,
`
`remove, deactivate, or impair any technological measure.
`
`117. Yout’s software platform is not primarily designed or produced for the purpose of
`
`circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a copyrighted work, or
`
`that protects the right of a copyright owner.
`
`118.
`
`In fact, any digital mechanism in place designed as anti-circumvention technology
`
`stops Yout users from recording and saving that protected work.
`
`119. As such, Yout complies with any and all anti-circumvention protections in place.
`
`120. Yout’s software platform has commercially significant purposes and uses other
`
`than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a copyrighted
`
`work or that protects the right of a copyright owner.
`
`121. For example, Yout’s software platform allows its users to record publicly
`
`available media content already on the Internet for their own personal, time-shifted viewing and
`
`listening, such as when its users are offline.
`
`122. Yout’s software platform has not been marketed for use in circumventing a
`
`technological measure that effectively controls access to a copyrighted work, or that protects the
`
`right of a copyright owner.
`
`123. Rather, Yout’s software platform allows its users to record publicly available
`
`media content already on the Internet, without any anti-circumvention protection, for their own
`
`
`
`25
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 26 of 35
`
`personal, time-shifted viewing and listening.
`
`124. Based on the foregoing, Yout requests a judicial determination and declaration
`
`that Yout’s software platform does not violate 17 U.S.C. § 1201.
`
`125. Such a judicial determination and declaration is necessary to protect Yout from
`
`the Defendants’ DMCA Notices, which are causing Yout injury by, among other things,
`
`damaging its goodwill and disrupting its business.
`
`126. By serving Defendants’ DMCA Notices under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3) to Google,
`
`with the purpose of causing Yout’s URL to be delisted and its software platform undiscoverable
`
`to its users and/or potential users, Defendants have directly interfered with Yout’s relationships
`
`with its customers and partners.
`
`127. Without the requested declaration that it does not violate 17 U.S.C. § 1201, the
`
`Defendants will continue to harm Yout, jeopardize Yout’s interests, and attempt to terminate
`
`Yout’s business operations.
`
`128. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment from this Court:
`
`(a)
`
`Determining and adjudicating the rights and liabilities of the parties with respect
`
`to Yout’s non-circumventing software platform;
`
`(b)
`
`Holding that Yout and its software platform does not violate the provisions of 17
`
`U.S.C. § 1201 as alleged by Defendants’ DMCA Notices;
`
`(c)
`
`Holding that Yout and its software platform does not violate the Defendants’
`
`rights; and,
`
`(d)
`
`Granting Yout such other and further relief that this Court deems proper under the
`
`facts and circumstances.
`
`
`
`
`
`26
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 27 of 35
`
`COUNT TWO
`AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`VIOLATIONS OF 17 USC § 512(f)
`129. The Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 114 above in
`
`this Second Count as though fully set forth herein.
`
`130.
`
`In the Defendants’ DMCA Notices to Google, the Defendants alleged Yout’s
`
`software platform is designed to descramble, decrypt, avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or
`
`impair the YouTube rolling cypher technology.
`
`131. Contrary to Defendants’ allegations, Yout’s software platform is not designed to
`
`descramble, decrypt, avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or impair the YouTube rolling cypher
`
`technology.
`
`132. Yout’s software platform does not descramble, decrypt, avoid, bypass, remove,
`
`deactivate, or impair the YouTube rolling cypher technology.
`
`133.
`
`In fact, any digital mechanism in place designed as anti-circumvention technology
`
`prevents any user of Yout and its software platform from recording and saving works protected
`
`by such technology.
`
`134. As such, Yout’s software platform complies with any anti-circumvention
`
`protections in place.
`
`135. The Defendants failed to determine whether Yout’s software platform would, in
`
`fact, circumvent such digital mechanism by testing the platform with any of the Doe Record
`
`Companies 1-10 works protected by such digital mechanisms.
`
`136. Further, by the Defendants’ DMCA Notices, the Defendants very clearly accuse
`
`Yout of secondary copyright infringement for contributory copyright infringement and/or
`
`vicarious copyright infringement.
`
`
`
`27
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 28 of 35
`
`137. Specifically, the DMCA Notices state “To our knowledge, the URLs provide
`
`access to a service (and/or software) that circumvents YouTube’s rolling cipher, a technical
`
`protection measure, that protects our members’ works on YouTube from unauthorized
`
`copying/downloading,” thereby alleging contributory copyright infringement and/or vicarious
`
`copyright infringement.
`
`138.
`
`In so doing, the Defendants misrepresented that Yout’s software platform
`
`circumvents digital copyright mechanisms and infringes the Defendants’ rights.
`
`139. Alternatively, the Defendants knew Yout’s software platform does not circumvent
`
`digital copyright mechanisms under the law and does not infringe the Defendants’ rights—via
`
`secondary copyright infringement or otherwise—but chose to send the Defendants’ DMCA
`
`Notices anyway.
`
`140.
`
`In any case, the Defendants knowingly misrepresented the nature of Yout’s
`
`services by and through distribution and publication of the Defendants’ DMCA Notices in which
`
`it claims Yout’s software platform circumvents digital copyright mechanisms and infringes the
`
`Defendants’ rights.
`
`141. The Defendants, by serving Defendants’ DMCA Notices under 17 U.S.C. §
`
`512(c)(3) to Google, with the purpose of causing Yout’s URL to be delisted and its software
`
`platform undiscoverable to its users, have directly interfered with Yout’s relationships with its
`
`customers, partners, and potential users.
`
`142. Google relied on the Defendants’ misrepresentations.
`
`143. Google delisted Yout based on the Defendants’ misrepresentations.
`
`144. The Defendants’ misrepresentations injured Yout and caused it to suffer damages
`
`and harm.
`
`
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01602-SRU Document 45 Filed 09/14/21 Page 29 of 35
`
`145. By such conduct, the Defendants have caused Yout monetary damages.
`
`146. As the Defendants knowingly misrepresented circumvention of digital copyright
`
`mechanisms and infringement of the Defendants’ rights, the Defendants violated 17 U.S.C. §
`
`512(f).
`
`147. As the Defendants violated 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), Yout is entitled to recovery of
`
`damages. Yout is also entitled to its costs and attorney’s fees.
`
`148. WHEREFORE, based upon the Defendants’ violation of 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), the
`
`Plaintiff Yout LLC seeks an award of compensatory damages as well as its costs and attorney’s
`
`fees.
`
`COUNT THREE
`AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
`BUSINESS DISPARAGEMENT
`149. The Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 114 above in
`
`this Second Count as though fully set forth herein.
`
`150.
`
`In the Defen