throbber
ORDER 443517
`DOCKET NO: FBTCV256142373S SUPERIOR COURT
`DESOUZA, SERGIO ALVES JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF BRIDGEPORT
`V. AT BRIDGEPORT
`VALLEJO, BONILLA EtAl
`5/5/2025
`ORDER
`ORDER REGARDING:
`04/17/2025 108.00 MOTION TO CITE ADDITIONAL PARTY
`The foregoing, having been considered by the Court, is hereby:
`ORDER: GRANTED
`It is ordered that on or before 6/5/2025 the complaint be amended to state facts showing the interests of
`CN1 COMMUNICATIONS LLC and SECOND STREET LEASING LLC in this action and summon
`CN1 COMMUNICATIONS LLC and SECOND STREET LEASING LLC to appear as defendants in
`this action on or before the second day following 6/17/2025, by causing some proper officer to serve on
`the defendants in the manner prescribed by lawa true and attested copy of this order, a true and attested
`or certified copy of the complaint in this action as amended, and a Summons Civil Form JD-CV-1 and
`due return make.
`Judicial Notice (JDNO) was sent regarding this order.
`443517
`Judge: CHARLES P REED
`Processed by: Andrew Laroche
`This document may be signed or verified electronically and has the same validity and status as a document with a physical
`(pen-to-paper) signature. For more information, see Section LE. of the State ofConnecticut Superior Court E-Services
`Procedures andTechnical Standards (https://jud.ct. gov/external/super/E-Services/e-standards.pdf), section 51-193c of the
`Connecticut General Statutes and Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-4.
`FBTCV2561423738 5/5/2025 Page 1of 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SUMMONS- CIVIL For information on STATE OF CONNECTICUT
`JD-CV-1 Rev. 1-20 ADA accommodations f
`C.G.S. §§ 51-346, 51-347, 51-349, 51-350, 52-45a, 52-48, 52-259: contact a court clerk or SUPERIOR COURT \
`P.B. §§ 3-1 through 3-21, 8-1, 10-13 www.jud.ct.govgo to: www.jud.ct.gov/ADA.
`Instructions are on page 2.
`L_] Select if amount, legal interest, or property in demand, not including interest and costs, is LESS than $2,500.
`Select if amount, legal interest, or property in demand, not including interest and costs, is $2,500 or MORE.
`CJ Select if claiming other relief in addition to, or in place of, money or damages.
`TO: Any proper officer
`By authority of the State of Connecticut, you are hereby commanded to make due.and legal service of this summons and attached complaint.
`Address of court clerk (Number, street, town and zip code) Telephone number ofclerk Return Date (Must be a Tuesday)
`1061 Main Street, Bridgeport, CT 06604 (203 ) 579 —6527 6/17/2025
`Judicial District GA. At (City/Town) : Case type code (See list on page 2)
`(_] Housing Session [_] Number: Bridgeport . Major: V Minor: 01
`For the plaintiff(s) enter the appearance of:
`Name and address of attorney, law firm or plaintiff if self-represented (Number, street, town and zip code) Juris number (if attorney or law firm)
`The Flood Law Firm, LLC, 190 Washington Street, Middletown, CT 06457 433718
`Telephone number Signature of plaintiff (if self-represented)
`(860 ) 346 —2695
`The attorney or law firm appearing for the plaintiff, or the plaintiff if E-mail address for delivery of papers under Section 10-13 of the
`Connecticut Practice Book (if agreed)
`legaldocs@thefloodlawfirm.com
`self-represented, agrees to accept papers (service) electronically
`in this case under Section 10-13 of the Connecticut Practice Book. Yes L] No
`Parties Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) and address of each party (Number; street; P.O. Box; town; state; zip; country, ifnot USA)
`First Name: DeSouza, Sergio Alves P01
`plaintiff | Address: 27 Dogwood Lane, Monroe, CT 06468
`Additional | Name: P-02plaintiff Address:
`First Name: CN1 Communications LLC, 315 Riggs Street, Building B, Suite 6, Oxford, CT 06478 D-01
`defendant | Address: Agent: Brian Rodgers, 315 Riggs Street, Building B, Suite 6, Oxford, CT 06478
`Additional | Name: Second Street Leasing, LLC, 315 Riggs Street, Building B, Suite 7, Oxford, CT 06478 p-02
`defendant | Address:_ Agent: Matthew Zaloumis, 315 Riggs Street, Building A, Suite 6, Oxford, CT 06478
`Additional | Name: D-03defendant | Address:
`Additional | Name: D-04
`defendant | Address: .
`Total number of plaintiffs: 1 Total number of defendants:2 [_] Form JD-CV-2 attached for additional parties
`Notice to each defendant
`1. You are being sued. This is a summons in a lawsuit. The complaint attached states the claims the plaintiff is making against you.
`2. To receive further notices, you or your attorney must file an Appearance (form JD-CL-12) with the clerk atthe address above. Generally,
`it must be filed on or before the second dayafter the Return Date. The Return Date is not a hearing date. You do not have to come to
`court on the Return Date unless you receive a separate notice telling you to appear.
`3. Ifyou or your attorney do not file an Appearance on time, a default judgment may be entered against you. You can get an Appearance
`form at the court address above, or on-line at https://jud.ct.aov/webforms/.
`4. If you believe that you have insurance that may cover the claim being made against you in this lawsuit, you should immediately contact
`your insurance representative. Other actions you may take are described in the Connecticut Practice Book, which may be found ina
`superior court law library or on-line at httpe:/Avww.jue-tt.gov/pb.htm
`5. If you have questions about the summ nt, you should talk to an attorney.
`The court staff is not allowed to giy vice on legal matters.
`Date Signed (Sign and select pr enBox) Commissioner of Superior Court | Name of person signing
`5/7/2025 CT] Clerk | Brian M. Flood, Esquire
`If this summons is signed by a Clerk: ' For Court Use Only
`a. The signing has been done so that the plajatiff(s) will not be denied access to the courts. File Date
`b. It is the responsibility of the plaintiff(s) to-énsure that service is made in the manner provided by law.
`c. The court staff is not permitted to give any legal advice in connection with any lawsuit.
`d. The Clerk signing this summons at the request of the plaintiff(s) is not responsible in any way for any
`errors or omissions in the summons, any allegations contained in the complaint, or the service ofthe
`summons or complaint.
`I certify | have read and_| Signed (Self-represented plaintiff) Date Docket Number
`understand the above: FBT-CV-25-6142373-S
`intForm 1 Page 1of 2 ASAEEAE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCKET NO.: FBT-CV-25-6142373-S — : SUPERIOR COURT
`SERGIO ALVES DESOUZA : J.D. OF BRIDGEPORT
`V. : AT BRIDGEPORT
`BONILLA VALLEJO, ET AL : MAY 7, 2025
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`FIRST COUNT: (Sergio Alves DeSouza v. Bonilla Vallejo —Negligence)
`l. On February 6, 2024, at approximately 8:14 a.m., the plaintiff, Sergio
`Alves DeSouza, was the operator of a motor vehicle that was traveling north on
`Wallace Street, a public street or highway in Bridgeport, Connecticut.
`2. At the same time and place, the defendant, Bonilla Vallejo, was the
`operator ofa motor vehicle that was traveling south on Wallace Street.
`3. At the same time and place, the motor vehicle operated by the
`defendant, Bonilla Vallejo, suddenly and without warning entered the northbound
`lane oftravel on Wallace Street and collided with the motor vehicle operated by the
`plaintiff, Sergio Alves DeSouza, thereby causing him to suffer the injuries and
`losses set forth below.
`4. The collision was caused by the negligence ofthe defendant, Bonilla
`Vallejo, in one or more ofthe following ways:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`g)
`h)
`j)
`he failed to keep a reasonable and proper lookout
`for other vehicles on the road;
`he failed to turn or swerve so as to avoid the
`collision;
`he failed to apply the brakes in time to avoid the
`collision;
`he failed to sound the horn or give a timely
`warning of the impending collision;
`he failed to keep the vehicle under proper
`control;
`he was inattentive in the operation of the vehicle;
`he operated the vehicle at a rate of speed greater
`than was reasonable, having due regard to the
`width, traffic, and use of the highway, road, the
`intersection of streets and/or weather conditions,
`in violation of § 14-218a of the Connecticut
`General Statutes;
`he operated a vehicle so as to obstruct or impede
`traffic, in violation of § 14-240(c) of the
`Connecticut General Statutes;
`he failed to drive the vehicle to the right side of
`the roadway, in violation of § 14-230 of the
`Connecticut General Statutes;
`he failed to give the motor vehicle operated by
`the plaintiff at least one-half of the main traveled
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`portion of the road, in violation of § 14-231 of
`the Connecticut General Statutes;
`k) he drove the vehicle on the left side of the
`roadway when it was not safe to do so, in
`violation of § 14-235 ofthe Connecticut General
`Statutes; and/or
`l) he turned the vehicle left upon the roadway when
`it was unsafe to do so, in violation of § 14-242(a)
`of the Connecticut General Statutes.
`5. As a result of the collision, the plaintiff, Sergio Alves DeSouza,
`suffered the following injuries, some or all of which may be permanent in nature:
`a) headaches;
`b) cervical segmental dysfunction;
`c) cervical strain/sprain;
`d) neck pain;
`e) bilateral shoulder pain;
`f) bilateral arm pain;
`g) left flank pain;
`h) thoracic segmental dysfunction;
`i) thoracic strain/sprain;
`j) lumbar segmental dysfunction;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`k) lumbar sprain/strain;
`1) back pain; and
`m) pain and suffering, both mental and physical.
`6. As a further result of the collision, the plaintiff, Sergio Alves
`DeSouza, was forced to incur expenses for medical care and treatment and will
`likely be forced to incur additional expenses for medical care and treatment in the
`future.
`7. As a further result of the collision, the plaintiff, Sergio Alves
`DeSouza, was unable and remains unable to participate in and enjoy his usual
`activities.
`SECOND COUNT: (Sergio Alves DeSouza v. Zaloumis Contracting Service
`Inc.— Vicarious Liability)
`1-7. Paragraphs 1through 7 of the First Count are hereby incorporated and
`made corresponding paragraphs of this Second Count as if fully set forth herein.
`8. At all times mentioned herein, the defendant, Zaloumis Contracting
`Service Inc., was and is a Connecticut corporation with its business address located
`at 315 Riggs Street, Building A-Suite 6 in Oxford, Connecticut.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9. At all times mentioned herein, the defendant, Zaloumis Contracting
`Service Inc., owned the motor vehicle operated by Bonilla Vallejo.
`10. At all times mentioned herein, Bonilla Vallejo was operating the motor
`vehicle with the permission of the defendant, Zaloumis Contracting Service Inc.
`11. Atall times mentioned herein, Bonilla Vallejo was operating the motor
`vehicle as the agent, servant and/or employee of the defendant, Zaloumis Contracting
`Service Inc.
`12. Atall times mentioned herein, Bonilla Vallejo was operating the motor
`vehicle within the course and scope of his employment with the defendant, Zaloumis
`Contracting Service Inc.
`13. At all times mentioned herein, Bonilla Vallejo was operating the motor
`vehicle as the agent of the defendant, Zaloumis Contracting Service Inc., pursuant to
`Connecticut General Statutes § 52-183.
`THIRD COUNT: (Sergio Alves DeSouza v. CN1 Communications LLC —
`Vicarious Liability)
`1-7. Paragraphs 1through 7 of the First Count are hereby incorporated and
`made corresponding paragraphs of this Third Count as iffully set forth herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8. At all times mentioned herein, the defendant, CN1 Communications
`LLC, was and is a Connecticut limited liability company with its business address
`located at 315 Riggs Street, Building B-Suite 6 in Oxford, Connecticut.
`9. At all times mentioned herein, the defendant, CN1 Communications
`LLC, owned the motor vehicle operated byBonilla Vallejo.
`10. At all times mentioned herein, Bonilla Vallejo was operating the motor
`vehicle with the permission of the defendant, CN1 Communications LLC
`11. Atall times mentioned herein, Bonilla Vallejo was operating the motor
`vehicle as the agent, servant and/or employee of the defendant, CN1 Communications
`LLC
`12. At all times mentioned herein, Bonilla Vallejo was operating the motor
`vehicle within the course and scope of his employment with the defendant, CN1
`Communications LLC
`13. At all times mentioned herein, Bonilla Vallejo was operating the motor
`vehicle as the agent of the defendant, CN] Communications LLC, pursuant to
`Connecticut General Statutes § 52-183.
`FOURTH COUNT: (Sergio Alves DeSouza v. Second Street Leasing, LLC —
`Vicarious Liability)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1-7. Paragraphs | through 7 of the First Count are hereby incorporated and
`made corresponding paragraphs of this Fourth Count as if fully set forth herein.
`8. At all times mentioned herein, the defendant, Second Street Leasing,
`LLC, was and is a Connecticut limited liability company with its business address
`located at 315 Riggs Street, Building B-Suite 7, in Oxford, Connecticut.
`9. At all times mentioned herein, the defendant, Second Street Leasing,
`LLC, owned the motor vehicle operated by Bonilla Vallejo.
`10. At all times mentioned herein, Bonilla Vallejo was operating the motor
`vehicle with the permission ofthe defendant, Second Street Leasing, LLC.
`11. Atall times mentioned herein, Bonilla Vallejo was operating the motor
`vehicle as the agent, servant and/or employee ofthe defendant, Second Street Leasing,
`LLC.
`12. Atal times mentioned herein, Bonilla Vallejo was operating the motor
`vehicle within the course and scope of his employment with the defendant, Second
`Street Leasing, LLC.
`13. Atall times mentioned herein, Bonilla Vallejo was operating the motor
`vehicle as the agent of the defendant, Second Street Leasing, LLC, pursuant to
`Connecticut General Statutes § 52-183.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, the plaintiff claims:
`1. Monetary damages.
`THE PLAINTIFF,
`SERGIO ALVES DESOUZA
`Brian ML.Flo6d
`The Flood Law Firm, LLC
`190 Washington Street
`Middletown, CT 06457
`Phone: (860) 346-2695
`Juris # 433718
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCKET NO.: FBT-CV-25-6142373-S —: SUPERIOR COURT
`SERGIO ALVES DESOUZA : J.D. OF BRIDGEPORT
`V. : AT BRIDGEPORT
`BONILLA VALLEJO, ET AL : MAY 7, 2025
`STATEMENT OF AMOUNT IN DEMAND
`The amount of money damages claimed is greater than Fifteen Thousand
`Dollars ($15,000.00), exclusive of interest and costs.
`THE PLAINTIFF,
`SERGIO ALVES DESOUZA
`Bridn M. Flgod
`The Flood/Law Firm, LLC
`Middletown, CT 06457
`Phone: (860) 346-2695
`Juris #433718
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STATE MARSHAL RETURN
`STATE OF CONNECTICUT
`) ss: Oxford
`COUNTY OF NEW HAVEN
`May 16, 2025
`Then and there by virtue hereof and at the special direction of the plaintiff 's Attorney on
`May 16, 2025, I made due and legal service by leaving a true and attested copy of the within Order
`Regarding Motion to Cite Additional Party, Amended Writ, Summons, Complaint and Statement of
`Amount in Demand with my doings endorsed thereon at the usual place of abode of BRIAN RODGERS,
`AGENT FOR SERVICE for the within named defendant, CN1 COMMUNICATIONS LLC., who is duly
`authorized to accept service at 315 Riggs Street, Building B, Suite 6, Oxford, СT 06478.
`And afterwards on May 16, 2025, I made due and legal service by leaving a true and attested copy of the
`within Order Regarding Motion to Cite Additional Party, Amended Writ, Summons, Complaint and Statement
`of Amount in Demand with my doings endorsed thereon at the usual place of abode of MATTHEW
`ZALOUMIS, AGENT FOR SERVICE for the within named defendant, SECOND STREET LEASING, LLC..
`who is duly authorized to accept service at 6 Bonnie Lane, Oxford, CСТ.
`The within and foregoing is the original, Order Regarding Motion to Cite Additional Party, Amended
`Writ, Summons, Complaint and Statement of Amount in Demand with my doings endorsed hereon.
`ATTEST:
`Phoma
`THOMAS GAHAN STATE MARSHAL
`Fees:
`Basic: $ 100.00
`Travel: 32.00
`Copies: 22.00
`End 1.50
`Total: $ 155.50
`oe )
`, BG
`)
`™m 1a. 1 2 4 . * 4 - ae . wow - m sally
`Tv * 1 = a - - - A wie 1 “ eu Sat 8 OR BL,
`_ “- Reise tn.7™° se tee - A 1 es ~ 1a. a ‘ c
`A asec 2 A wai coe AL pte, bla = -f + tL Rowe te re
`A ONTTRTN T NRITN tt + 40a + TUNIS er rer nn en 4 .'
`a « “4 ee ey . anata es ~ tt se m 7 s. ie - mT ArAAO
`Awd ~~ 4d Ae Ai Ne he ae lca aa aa fo Bl 4 4 iA 4 ein Sn AMoe | ae
`ewSH fice Fa aS 1” ee tr ML bt tee _- i toawere. = A ae PROS
`-f a4 oon 4 oa = 6 - <4 aa wal + 4 - 4 - a“
`mR AS eeAe a sad “ a FURR a es
`fan 1 ° ae 1S ¢ ~it 7N_ * ~- - - ~~
`OP Ln setae need . Ms A coe * TNuAn. +” arise a.m: A a 40.6 _—
`SK Se — * 7 tm. . . ma a ® ™ 1 et - - ~ <-«
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket