throbber
LawOflices0f
`
`
`
`
`
`LAMPERT,TOOHEY&RUCCI,LLC
`
`46MainStreet,NewCanaan,CT06840
`
`
`
`(203)972-8100FAX(203)972-8716
`
`
`
`
`
`RETURN DATE: MARCH 7, 2017
`
`: SUPERIOR COURT
`
`CANAAN DISTRIBUTORS CORP.
`
`: ].D. OF STAMFORD/ NORWALK
`
`VS.
`
`: AT STAMFORD
`
`PARISH MILLWORK, LLC
`
`: FEBRUARY 10, 2017
`
`FIRST COUNT: Breach of Contract
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`1.
`
`At all times mentioned within this Complaint, the plaintiff, Canaan
`
`Distributor Corp. is a Corporation organized and existing under the law of the State of
`
`Connecticut with it’s principle place of business at New Canaan, Connecticut.
`
`2.
`
`The defendant, Parich Millwork, LLC is a limited liability company
`
`organized and existing under the law of the State of Connecticut with a principle place
`
`of business at Ridgefield, Connecticut.
`
`3.
`
`On or about April 21, 2016, the defendant ordered metal hinges and
`
`subsequently ordered additional metal hinges on August 19, 2016 and September 22,
`
`2016.
`
`4.
`
`The first set of metal hinges were shipped out by United Parcel Service
`
`(hereinafter "U.P. S.) to the defendant's place of business, and the second shipment
`
`
`
`IurisNo.420060
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`were sent UPS directly to the jobsite on September 22, 2017. They were inspected and
`
`accepted by the defendant as in satisfactory condition and in compliance with the
`
`specifications of the orders.
`
`5.
`
`Pursuant to the Contract, the purchase price for metal hinges on all
`
`orders totaled was $21,215.84.
`
`6.
`
`The parties agreed and subsequently did an accounting of all goods
`
`ordered and accepted, and thereafter agreed the total amount due was $21, 215.84.
`
`7.
`
`After repeated written demand for payment from the plaintiff, the
`
`defendant has failed refused or otherwise neglected to pay the plaintiff the full
`
`purchase price in accordance with the Contract.
`
`8.
`
`The defendant has breached to terms of the Contract, and the plaintiff
`
`has suffered monetary damages.
`
`9.
`
`Pursuant to the terms and conditions of paragraph 10E of the Contract,
`
`the plaintiff is entitled to reasonable costs, expenses and attorney fees as a result of the
`
`defendant breach of the Contract.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`1-9.
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 9 of the First Count are hereby re-alleged and
`
`incorporated as Paragraphs 1 through 9 of the Second Count as if fully alleged and set
`
`forth herein.
`
` SECOND COUNT: Unjust Enrichment
`
`10.
`
`As a direct result of the foregoing actions by the defendant and it’s default of
`
`the terms of the Contract, the defendant has been unjustly enriched and benefited
`
`from its failure to pay the full purchase price for the goods delivered in Violation of
`
`the Contract.
`
`11.
`
`As a direct result of the defendant’s failure to the plaintiff in default of the
`
`Contract, the plaintiff has suffered substantial damages and financial losses all to the
`
`plaintiff’s detriment.
`
`THIRD COUNT: QUANTUM MERUIT
`
`1-9.
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 9 of the First Count are hereby re-alleged and
`
`incorporated as Paragraphs 1 through 9 of the Second Count as if fully alleged and set
`
`forth herein.
`
`10.
`
`The defendant knowingly utilized, ordered and accepted the metal hinges as
`
`the parties had agreed, used them in the project and demanded the payment from
`
`their customer.
`
`

`

`11.
`
`The defendant represented to the plaintiff they would be compensated under
`
`the Agreement described above, which was evidenced by the course of conduct of the
`
`parties as it relates to the ordering and delivery of the metal hinges.
`
`12.
`
`The defendant has received the benefit of the metal hinges delivered by the
`
`plaintiff, for which has yet to be paid in full.
`
`13. The defendant has failed to pay Columbus the reasonable value of said services.
`
`14. Accordingly, the defendant has been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial.
`
`WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully prays for the following relief:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Money Damages;
`
`Interest pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. §37—3a
`
`Costs of this action; and
`
`Such other and further relief as to equity may pertain.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`THE PLAINTIFF,
`
`
`
`
`a
`BY
`Jason P. WV
`
`
`Imupert, oohey & Rucci, LLC
`46 Main Street
`
`New Canaan, CT 06840
`Tel. 203-972-8100
`
`Juris No. 420060
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`IurisNo420060
`
`RETURN DATE: MARCH 7, 2017
`
`: SUPERIOR COURT
`
`CANAAN DISTRIBUTORS CORP.
`
`: ].D. OF STAMFORD/ NORWALK
`
`VS.
`
`: AT STAMFORD
`
`PARISH MILLWORK, LLC
`
`: FEBRUARY 10, 2017
`
`STATEMENT OF AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY
`
`The Plaintiff claims money damages of more than Fifteen Thousand
`
`($15,000.00) Dollars, exclusive of interest and costs.
`
`THE PLAINTIFF,
`
`("L one, E q.
`
`a Toohey & ucci, LLC
`
`46 Main Street
`New Canaan, CT 0
`Tel. (203) 972-8100
`Juris No. 420060
`
`LawOfiicesof
`
`
`
`
`
`LAMPERT,TOOI-lEY&RUCCI,LLC
`
`
`
`46MainStreet,NewCanaan,CT06840
`
`
`
`(203)972-8100FAX(203)972—8716
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket