REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM
`DORMANCY DOCKET DISMISSAL
`JD-CL-71 Rev. 6-16
`P.B. § 14-3
`
`ADA NOTICE
`the State of
`The Judicial Branch of
`Connecticut complies with the Americans
`with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you need a
`reasonable accommodation in accordance
`with the ADA, contact a court clerk or an ADA
`contact person listed at www.jud.ct.gov/ADA.
`
`STATE OF CONNECTICUT
`SUPERIOR COURT
`www.jud.ct.gov
`
`Case caption
`American Advisors Group v Samir Sarkar, et al.
`Judicial district
`Stamford-Norwalk
`Request for Exemption From Dormancy Docket Dismissal
`The ☒Plaintiff(s)
`☐Defendant(s)
`in the above-captioned action seek(s) exemption from a Dormancy Docket dismissal
`and in support thereof represent(s) that the pleadings are not closed because: ("X" applicable box(es) and fill in appropriate information.)
`☐ A dispositive motion to strike has been argued and is awaiting decision by Judge
`
`(Name)
`
`.
`
`Docket Number
`FST-CV16-6030492-S
`
`☐ A dispositive motion to dismiss has been argued and is awaiting decision by Judge
`
`(Name)
`
`.
`
`☐ A dispositive motion for summary judgment has been argued and is awaiting decision by Judge
`
`.
`
`(Name)
`☐ The pleadings are closed as to the plaintiff's original complaint, and it is failure to close the pleadings as to a third party
`complaint filed by
`that is preventing the filing of a Certificate of Closed Pleadings (JD-CV-11).
`(Name)
`☐ A defendant has filed a counterclaim within the past 30 days, and the plaintiff(s) has/have not had time to file an answer or dispositive
`motion.
`☐ A bankruptcy proceeding is pending and an up-to-date affidavit as prescribed in Section 14-2 of the Connecticut Practice Book will be
`mailed to the court on
`I understand that this request will be considered incomplete until the affidavit is received in
`(Date)
`the clerk's office.
`☐ This is a receivership case filed under Chapter 664c of the Connecticut General Statutes and there has been compliance with
`Section 36a-231 of the Connecticut General Statutes.
`☐ This is a Lead Paint Litigation (LPL) case. By checking this box, counsel represents that (s)he has filed the face sheet and provided
`notice of the filing as noted in LPL Case Management Order No. 1, Section III.
`☐ This is a Complex Litigation Docket (CLD) case. By checking this box, counsel represents that an application for referral to the CLD
`has been filed by counsel or by the Presiding Judge and that it has been granted or is awaiting a decision.
`☐ This case has been referred to the Foreclosure Mediation Program.
`☒ Other The Motion for Judgment (129.00) was filed on 1/16/19. The Plaintiff has initiated an HECM Extension hold. The
`extension is set to expire on 2/22/24. The Plaintiff intends to proceed should there by no resolution met from the
`extension.
`This is the ☒ First ☐ Second ☐Third
`has been requested in this case.
`Note: A claim that the case has been effectively settled but that it can not be withdrawn because additional settlement payments need to be made
`is NOT a basis for exemption from a Dormancy Docket dismissal. The parties in such cases are urged to reach unambiguous settlement
`agreements, which may be put on record, if desired, and which may be enforced as judgments if one party defaults after the withdrawal is filed.
`See Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc., 225 Conn. 804, 626 A.2d 729 (1993).
`Party name(s) requesting exemption
`Signed (Attorney or Self-Represented Party)
`American Advisors Group
`/s/F. Erik Kaneko
`Name and address of Attorney/Self-Represented Party (Type or print legibly)
`F. Erik Kaneko, Esq McCalla Raymer, Leibert & Pierce, LLC, 50 Weston St, Hartford, CT 06120
`Certification
`I certify that a copy of this document was or will immediately be mailed or delivered electronically or non-electronically on
`(date) January 4, 2024 to all attorneys and self-represented parties of record and that written consent for electronic
`delivery was received from all attorneys and self-represented parties receiving electronic delivery.
`Name and address of each party and attorney that copy was mailed or delivered to*
` Attorney Robert Joseph Sciglimpaglia,101 Merrit Seven, Suite 300, Norwalk, CT 06851
`
`☐
`
`time an exemption from a Dormancy Docket dismissal
`
`*If necessary, attach additional sheet or sheets with name and address which the copy was mailed or delivered to.
`Signed
`Telephone number (with area code)
`860-808-0606
`/s/406646/
`
`