`
`: SUPERIOR COURT
`
`KYLE SMITH & KARLEY KEATING
`
`: JD. OF NORWALK/STAMFORD
`
`V.
`
`REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
`OF CONNECTICUT,P.C., ILLUME
`FERTILITY, PLLC, SPENCER RICHLIN
`
`: AT STAMFORD
`
`: MARCH 1, 2024
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`I. RELEVANT FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`1.
`
`2:
`
`3,
`
`Atall times relevant to this complaint, Plaintiff, KYLE SMITH,(Hereinafter “KYLE”) was a
`
`resident of the City of Norwalk, in the County of Fairfield, and the State of Connecticut.
`
`At all times relevant to this complaint, Plaintiff,KARLEY SMITH,wasa resident of the City
`
`of Norwalk, in the County of Fairfield, and the State of Connecticut.
`
`Atall times relevant to this complaint the Defendant, REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
`
`ASSOCIATES OF CONNECTCIUT,P.C. (RMA) was a Professional Corporation formed
`
`underthe laws of the State of Connecticut for the purpose of providinginfertility services
`
`including, but notlimited to assisted reproductive technologies including, but not limited to:
`
`intrauterine insemination,in-vitro fertilization, pre-implantation genetic screening, and the
`
`secure cryopreservation and storage of reproductive materials, such as human sperm and
`
`eggs.
`
`
`
`At all times relevant to this complaint the Defendant, ILLUME FERTILITY, PLLC
`
`(ILLUME)was a Professional Corporation formed under the lawsofthe State of
`
`Connecticut for the purpose of providinginfertility services including, but not limited to
`
`assisted reproductive technologies including, but notlimited to: intrauterine insemination,in-
`
`vitro fertilization, pre-implantation genetic screening, and the secure cryopreservation and
`
`storage of reproductive materials, such as human sperm and eggs.
`
`At all times relevant to this complaint the Defendant, SPENCER S. RICHLIN, MD
`
`(“RICHLIN”) was a board-certified reproductive endocrinologist and the Surgical Director of
`
`the Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,overseeing the cryopreservation of human
`
`reproductive materials.
`
`At all times relevant to this complaint, Defendant, RICHLIN,was a partner, manager,
`
`director, and/or owner of Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME.
`
`In or about August of 2018, Plaintiff, KYLE was diagnosed withtesticular cancerafter
`
`presenting to the Stamford Hospital Emergency Room forpain in his groin.
`
`Stamford Emergency personnel advised Plaintiff, KYLE, to consult with a urologist.
`
`In early SeptemberPlaintiff, KYLE, presentedto a urologist, Dr. Batter, who advised
`
`Plaintiff, KYLE, that they would have to remove theaffected testicle, and that following
`
`same they would know more aboutthe degree of his cancer.
`
`On September 19, 2018, Plaintiffs, KYLE and KARLEY were married.
`
`In or about October of 2018, Dr. Batter removed theaffected testicle from Plaintiff,KYLE.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`
`
`12.
`
`Followingthe surgery, Plaintiff,KYLE, learned from Dr. Batter that the cancer had spread
`
`beyondtheinitially affected, and now removedtesticle, to the chord, and Plainuff, KYLE,
`
`was advised to meet with an oncologist.
`
`13.
`
`In or about October of 2018 Plaintiff,KYLE, met with an oncologist, Dr. Frank, who
`
`advised thatthe testicular cancer had spreadto his cord, abdomen,and lungs.
`
`14.
`
`Dr. Frank inquired of Plaintiff, KYLE,if he had children and/or if he wanted to have
`
`children in the future.
`
`15.
`
`Plaintiff,KYLE, responded that he did notyet have children, and having just been married,
`
`wantedto start a family with his new wife.
`
`16.
`
`Dr. Frank explained that, due to the amount of chemotherapy that would be performed as
`
`treatment for the cancer, that Plaintiff,KYLE, should preserve sperm/semen cryogenically,
`
`for future attempts at pregnancy with his wife.
`
`17.
`
`PlaintiffsKYLE and KARLEYresearched reproductive facilities in the area which could
`
`offer the necessary retrieval, cryogenic freezing, storage, and ultimate fertility treatments that
`
`would be required to obtain a successful pregnancy, and decided that Defendants, RMA
`
`and/or ILLUMEwerethe best option for them given their geographic location, and other
`
`considerations.
`
`18.
`
`Plaintiff,KYLE, made an appointment to meet with a technician who was an agent,
`
`employee and/or assign of Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,to obtain a tourof the
`
`
`
`facilities within which Plaintiff,KYLE’S sperm/semen would be cryogenically preserved, and
`
`met with same in late October of 2018.
`
`19.
`
`In early Novemberof 2018, Plaintiff, KYLE,returned to Defendants, RMA and/or
`
`ILLUME’S, Norwalk facility to give his first sample of sperm/semen for cryopreservation to
`
`a technician, employee, agent, and/or assign of Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME.
`
`20.
`
`Later on November 14, 2018 Plaintiff,KYLE, went to Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME’S
`
`Norwalk, CT facility and executed a “Consent for Cryopreservation and/or storage of Semen,
`
`Epididymal, and/or Testicular Tissue;” and on same date KYLE gave his second sample to a
`
`technician, employee, agent, and/or assign of Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME;for
`
`cryopreservation by Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME.
`
`21.
`
`Plaintiff KYLE,successfully, deposited fourteen (14) “vials” of healthy sperm with
`
`Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME, and made know to Defendant(s), RMA and/or
`
`ILLUME,that he wasutilizing their services due to his upcoming chemotherapyfor testicular
`
`cancer.
`
`22.
`
`Pursuant to the November 14, 2018 “Consent for Cryopreservation and/or Storage...”
`
`agreement, Plaintiff,KYLE,receivedthefirst three (3) months of storage for free, and then
`
`paid fifty and 00/100 dollars ($50.00) per month for storage of his sperm/semen to
`
`Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME.
`
`
`
`23,
`
`In April 2019 Plaintiff,KYLE, had his sperm retested following his chemotherapy treatments
`
`and learned that he was rendered permanently infertile as a result of the chemotherapy
`
`treatments.
`
`2.4
`
`In August of 2019,Plaintiffs, KYLE and KARLEY,returned from their honeymoonto
`
`begin attempting to get pregnantfrom the cryopreserved sperm/semen being stored by
`
`Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,having explained to Defendants that Plaintiff,KYLE,
`
`was renderedinfertile as a result of his chemotherapytreatments. and Plaintiff,KARLEY,
`
`began testing to start attemptingfertility treatments.
`
`25:
`
`In August 2019, Plaintiff,KARLEY begantesting for fertility treatments by Defendant(s),
`
`RMA and/or ILLUME,andsaid testing uncovered the existence of a tumor within her ovary,
`
`which requited subsequent removal and treatments by a specialist.
`
`26.
`
`Following the removal of Plaintiff,KARLEY’S,ovary, and all necessary treatments, Plaintiffs
`
`KARLEYand KYLEpresented to Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,to continue attempts
`
`at using the sperm/semen ofPlaintiff, KYLE,currently being stored at Defendants, RMA
`
`and/or ILLUME.
`
`27.
`
`Unfortunately, as a result of the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Defendants, RMA
`
`and/or ILLUME,would not work with anyone who wasnotalready “pregnant,” so the
`
`Plaintiffs,KYLE and KARLEY,had to wait to undergofertility treatments in the effort to
`
`becomepregnant until such time as the pandemic guidelines had relaxed.
`
`
`
`28.
`
`In late April of 2020, PlaintiffsKYLE and KARLEY,returned to Defendants, RMA and/or
`
`ILLUME,and began the necessary procedures for assistive reproductive technologies,
`
`includingin-vitro fertilization, utilizing a portion of the cryopreserved sperm/semen from the
`
`Plaintiff,KYLE’S, November 2018 donations.
`
`29.
`
`In July of 2021, following the necessary treatments, and using the cryopreserved
`
`sperm/semen from Plaintiff,KYLE’S, pre-chemotherapy donations,Plaintiff,KARLEY was
`
`successfully implanted with two (2) embryos, by Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,both of
`
`which embryos successfully matured into, and resulted in, a healthy pregnancy with twins for
`
`Plaintiffs, KARLEY and KYLE.
`
`30.
`
`Following the successful in-vitro fertilization in July 2021 by Defendants, RMA and/or
`
`ILLUME,Plaintiff, KYLE,still had eight(8) vials of healthy sperm/semenin storage with
`
`Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,for which Plaintiffs,KYLE and KARLEY continued to
`
`pay the contractually agreed-upon monthly storage fees during the duration of the pregnancy.
`
`31.
`
`Plaintiff,KARLEY,successfully delivered healthy twins on April 22, 2022, without notable
`
`complication, making Plaintiffs,KYLE and KARLEY,parents oftheir first children.
`
`32.
`
`Plaintiffs,KYLE and KARLEY,hadpreviously expressed their desire(s) and intention(s) to
`
`continue having children beyond the twins to members, employees, agents, and/or assigns of
`
`Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,including, but not limited to Defendant, RICHLIN,
`
`during the aforementioned pregnancy.
`
`
`
`33.
`
`Theintention of Plaintiffs, KYLE and KARLEY,to continue conceiving and having children
`
`beyondthe twins was also evidenced by the Plaintiffs’ continued paymentof the contractually
`
`mandated storage fees for the remaining eight (8) vials of pre-chemotherapy sperm/semen
`
`being cryogenically preserved and/or stored by Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME.
`
`34.
`
`On May 22, 2022 Plaintiff,KYLE,received a voicemail on his phone from Defendant,
`
`RICHLIN,explaining that Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,haddestroyed the remaining
`
`healthy, viable, pre-chemotherapy sperm/semen from Plaintiff,KYLE, in March of 2022;
`
`resulting in the termination of any chanceof Plaintiffs,KYLE and KARLEY,ever
`
`conceiving, carrying, delivering, rearing, or raising any additional children which would be
`
`genetically related to Plaintiffs, or their exiting twins.
`
`35.
`
`Defendant, RICHLIN,sent the Plaintiffs an unsolicited, and unwelcomeletter, dated May 31,
`
`2022, enclosing a check for one-thousand-three-hundred-eight-seven and 00/100 DOLLARS
`
`($1,387.00) andstating that same was being provided as a “refundfor all andrology servicesat
`
`RMA of Connecticut.”
`
`36.
`
`The unsolicited May 31, 2022letter and check purported to be pursuant to a conversation
`
`between Plaintiff, KYLE and Defendant, RICHLIN,in which Defendant, RICHLIN was
`
`offering Plaintiffs a refund for all the monthly storage fees for the pre-chemotherapy, healthy
`
`sperm/semen ofPlaintiff, KYLE,that had been paid to Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME.
`
`Bs
`
`Plaintiffs,KYLE and KARLEY,never deposited the unsolicited May 31, 2022 check, and
`
`never received an independentrefundfor the storage fees paid to Defendants, RMA and/or
`
`
`
`ILLUME,for the months of March 2022 and April 2022, when the Defendants, RMA
`
`and/or ILLUME,had destroyed the Plaintiff, KYLE’S,healthy, pre-chemotherapy
`
`sperm/semen, without Plaintiff,KYLE’S, consent or knowledge, and PlaintiffsKYLE and
`
`KARLEYhad continued to pay Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,the contractual
`
`monthly storage fee, despite Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,havingalready destroyed
`
`the subjectofsaid storage fee.
`
`II]. PLAINTIFFS, KYLE SMITH’S, CLAIMS OF DAMAGES
`
`38.
`
`Plaintiff, KYLE, has experienced severe, constant and permanent damagessince learning
`
`that the healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm was destroyed by Defendants, RMA and/or
`
`ILLUME,without his knowledge or consent.
`
`39.
`
`Plaintiff,KYLE, continues to experience severe, constant, and permanent damages as a
`
`result of the terminationofhis ability to father any future children due to the destruction of
`
`his healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm/semen by Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,
`
`without his knowledge, consent or permission, from Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME’S,
`
`storage/cryopreservationfacility, and the manner in which he was informed of same by
`
`Defendant, RICHLIN.
`
`40.
`
`Plaintiff, KYLE,will continue to experience severe, constant, and permanent damages as a
`
`result of the termination of his ability to father any future children due to the destruction of
`
`his healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm/semen by Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,
`
`withouthis knowledge, consentor permission, from Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME’S,
`
`
`
`storage cryopreservation facility, and the manner in which he was informed of same by
`
`Defendant, RICHLIN.
`
`41.
`
`As a direct and proximate cause of the acts and/or omissions of the Defendants, RMA,
`
`ILLUMEand RICHLIN,Plaintiff, KYLE,has experienced the following serious, painful
`
`and permanentinjuries and/or conditions, someorall of which may be permanentin nature:
`
`a. Severe depression, with feelings of hopelessness, sadness, diminished purposein life and
`
`a decreased interest in the future and outlook onlife;
`
`b
`
`Severe anxiety, resulting in a decreasein social activities, interpersonal relationships, and
`
`self-esteem;
`
`c. Mental anguish and suffering resulting in sleeplessness, nightmares, and exhaustion; and
`
`d. Severe emotional distress, resulting in feelings of isolation, inadequacy, and decreased
`
`self-worth.
`
`42.
`
`As a result of the aforementioned conduct by the Defendants, Plaintiff,KYLE, has
`
`experienceda loss of the enjoymentoflife’s activities andis likely to experience a loss of
`
`enjoymentoflife’s future activities.
`
`43.
`
`As a further result of the aforementioned conduct by the Defendants, Plainuff, KYLE, has
`
`expendedlarge sums of money seeking medical care, andwill likely incur additional expenses
`
`for future medical care.
`
`
`
`44,
`
`Asa further result of the aforementioned conduct by the Defendants, Plaintuff, KYLE, has
`
`experienced the interruption and termination ofhis life’s goals, and will never be able to
`
`attempt to achieve those goals again.
`
`45.
`
`As a further result of the aforementioned conduct by the Defendants, Plaintiff,KYLE, has
`
`experienced a decreasein the activities in which he engages andis likely to experience a
`
`decrease in the activities in which he can/will engage in the future.
`
`PLAINTIFFS,KARLEY KEATING’S, CLAIMS OF DAMAGES
`
`46.
`
`Plaintiff, KARLEY,has experienced severe, constant and permanent damagessince learning
`
`that the healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm was destroyed by Defendants, RMA and/or
`
`ILLUME,withouthis knowledge or consent.
`
`47.
`
`Plaintiff,KARLEY, continues to experience severe, constant, and permanent damages as a
`
`result of the termination of herability to conceive any future children genetically-related to
`
`her husbandor existing children, due to the destruction ofthe healthy, pre-chemotherapy
`
`sperm/semen by Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,without her knowledge, consent or
`
`permission, from Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME’S,storage/cryopreservationfacility,
`
`and the manner in which she was informed of same by Defendant, RICHLIN.
`
`48.
`
`Plaintiff, KARLEY,will continue to experience severe, constant, and permanent damagesas
`
`a result of the termination ofher ability to conceive any future children genetically-related to
`
`her husbandorexisting children, due to the destruction of the healthy, pre-chemotherapy
`
`sperm/semen by Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,without her knowledge, consent or
`
`10
`
`
`
`permission, from Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME’S,storage cryopreservation facility,
`
`and the manner in which she was informed of same by Defendant, RICHLIN.
`
`49.
`
`As a direct and proximate cause of the acts and/or omissions of the Defendants, RMA,
`
`ILLUMEand RICHLIN,Plaintiff,KARLEY, has experienced the following serious, painful
`
`and permanentinjuries and/or conditions, someorall of which may be permanentin nature:
`
`a. Severe depression, with feelings of hopelessness, sadness, diminished purposein life and
`
`a decreased interest in the future and outlook onlife;
`
`b
`
`Severe anxiety, resulting in a decrease in social activities, interpersonalrelationships, and
`
`self-esteem;
`
`c. Mental anguish and suffering resulting in sleeplessness, nightmares, and exhaustion; and
`
`d. Severe emotionaldistress, resulting in feelings of isolation, inadequacy, and decreased
`
`self-worth.
`
`Asaresult of the aforementioned conduct by the Defendants, Plaintiff,KARLEY, has
`50.
`
`experiencedaloss of the enjoymentoflife’s activities andis likely to experience a loss of
`
`enjoymentoflife’s future activities.
`
`51
`
`As a further result of the aforementioned conduct by the Defendants, Plaintiff,KARLEY,
`
`has expendedlarge sums of money seeking medical care, and will likely incur additional
`
`expenses for future medicalcare.
`
`11
`
`
`
`52.
`
`As a further result of the aforementioned conduct by the Defendants,Plaintiff,KARLEY,
`
`has experiencedthe interruption and termination ofherlife’s goals, and will never be able to
`
`attemptto achieve those goals again.
`
`53.
`
`As a further result of the aforementioned conduct by the Defendants, Plaintiff,KARLEY,
`
`has experienced a decrease in theactivities in which she engagesandis likely to experience a
`
`decrease in the activities in which she can/will engage in the future.
`
`COUNT ONE: KYLE SMITHv. Defendants REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
`ASSOCIATES OF CONNECTICUT, P.C. and/or ILLUME FERTILITY PLLC - Breach
`of Contract
`
`1-37.
`
`Paragraphsone(1) through thirty-six (36), inclusive, of the Relevant Factual Allegationsare
`
`hereby re-alleged as paragraphs one (1) through thirty-six (36), inclusive of this, the First
`
`Count,as if fully set forth herein.
`
`38.
`
`A valid contract was formed between the Plaintiff, KYLE, and the Defendant(s) RMA
`
`and/or ILLUME,on or about July 14, 2018, when the Plaintiff paid monetary consideration
`
`in exchange for the Defendant(s) storing and maintainingthe Plaintiffs healthy, pre-
`
`chemotherapy sperm and/or semenfor future use in child conceiving attempts through
`
`Advanced Reproductive Technologies (ART).
`
`39.
`
`The aforementionedvalid contract existed at all relevant times herein, as the Defendant(s),
`
`RMA and/or ILLUME,were performing cryopreservation andstorge ofthe Plaintiff,
`
`KYLE'S,healthy, pre-chemotherapy, sperm and/or semen in exchange for monetary
`
`12
`
`
`
`consideration from the Plaintiff,KYLE,until the Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME
`
`destroyed said sperm and/or semen without the knowledge, consent, and/or permission of
`
`the Plaintiff,KYLE.
`
`40.
`
`Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME,breached the aforementioned contract, when they
`
`destroyed, discarded, or otherwise intentionally disposed ofall the healthy, pre-
`
`chemotherapy sperm and/or semen from the Plaintiff,KYLE, in March of 2022, without
`
`the knowledge, consent, permission, or any other existing authority to doso.
`
`41.
`
`Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME,further breached the aforementioned contract when
`
`they destroyed, discarded, or otherwise intentionally disposedofall the healthy, pre-
`
`chemotherapy sperm and/or semen from the Plaintiff,KYLE, in March of 2022, against the
`
`terms of Defendant(s)’ “Consent for Cryopreservation and/or Storage of Semen,
`
`Epididymal and/or Testicular” Agreement, and in contravention ofthe Plaintiff,KYLE’S,
`
`express wishes and desires.
`
`42.
`
`The Plaintiff,KYLE, performed completely under the terms of the aforementioned
`
`contract, when he gave the Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME,monetary consideration as
`
`required and requested by the contract and/or Defendants, for the continued
`
`cryopreservation and storage of his pre-chemotherapy, healthy sperm and/or semen.
`
`43,
`
`Plaintiff,KYLE, continued to perform after the breach by Defendant(s), RMA and/or
`
`ILLUME,of the aforementioned contract, due to the Defendant(s)’ failure to alert the
`
`Plaintiff, KYLE,of the destruction, discarding or otherwise intentional disposalofhis
`
`13
`
`
`
`healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm and/or semen for multiple increments of time which
`
`required performance bythe Plaintiff,KYLE, under the aforementioned contract.
`
`44-51. Paragraphs thirty-eight (38) through forty-five (45), inclusive, of the Plaintiff,KYLE’S,
`
`Claims of Damagesare hereby re-alleged as paragraphs forty-four (49) throughfifty-one
`
`(51), inclusive of this, The First Count,as if fully set forth herein.
`
`52.
`
`Defendant(s), RMA, and/or ILLUME,are responsible for the acts and/or omissions of
`
`their agents, assigns, employees, contractors and/or consultants, under the theory of
`
`respondeat superior.
`
`COUNT TWO: KYLE SMITHv. Defendants REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
`ASSOCIATES OF CONNECTICUT,P.C. and/or ILLUME FERTILITY PLLC —
`Negligence
`
`1-37.
`
`Paragraphs one(1) through thirty-seven (37), inclusive, of the Relevant Factual Allegations
`
`ate hereby re-alleged as paragraphs one (1) through thirty-seven (37), inclusive of this, the
`
`Second Count,as if fully set forth herein.
`
`38.
`
`Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME,assumeda duty to the Plaintiff,KYLE,to exercise
`
`reasonable care in the maintenance, care, and continuedstorage ofthe Plaintiff, KYLE’S,
`
`pte-chemotherapy, healthy sperm and/or semen when Defendant(s) voluntarily took
`
`possession of same, and owedthe Plaintiff, KYLE, said duty atall relevant times herein.
`
`39.
`
`Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME,intentionally disposed of the cryopreserved sperm
`
`and/or semen belonging to the Plaintiff,KYLE, in March 2022 underthe mistaken belief
`
`
`
`that same sperm/semen belonged to another customer,client, patron and/or beneficiary of
`
`the Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME’S,cryopreservation and storage services.
`
`40.
`
`Defendant(s), RMA, and/or ILLUME’S, negligence was a direct and proximate cause of the
`
`Plaintiff,KYLE’Sserious, painful and permanent injuries and other damagesset forth herein
`
`sustained by the Plaintiff,KYLE,in one or more of the following ways:
`
`a. In that they permanently destroyed, discarded, or otherwise disposed of the last remaining
`
`healthy, prechemotherapy sperm and/or semen of the Plaintiff,KYLE, withouttaking
`
`ptior precautions to ensure the Defendant(s) knew thecorrect identity of the donor of
`
`ctyopreserved and stored sperm and/or semento be destroyed, discarded, or otherwise
`
`disposed of;
`
`b. In that they failed to properly label, monitor, track, or otherwise monitor the Plaintiff,
`
`KYLE'S,healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm and/or semen while it was in their
`
`possession;
`
`c. In that they permanently destroyed, discarded, or otherwise disposed of the last remaining
`
`healthy, prechemotherapy sperm and/or semen of the Plaintiff,KYLE, without
`
`confirming the identity of the donor of same sperm and/or semen;
`
`d. In that they permanently destroyed, discarded or otherwise disposed ofthe last remaining
`
`healthy, prechemotherapy sperm and/or semen ofthe Plaintiff,KYLE, without
`
`consulting with the Plaintiff,KYLE,prior to destroying, discarding, or otherwise
`
`disposing of same sperm and/or semen;
`
`15
`
`
`
`e. In that they failed to take reasonable precautionsto ensure the identity of the donor of
`
`any particular sample(s) of cryopreserved and/or stored sperm and/or semen in their
`
`possession; and
`
`f.
`
`In that they failed to take reasonable steps to ensure the continued and/or constant
`
`preservation of cryopreserved and/or stored sperm and/or semen within their
`
`possession.
`
`41,
`
`As a direct and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of the Defendant(s),
`
`RMA and/or ILLUME,the Plaintiff,KYLE,suffered serious, severe, and permanent
`
`injuries as hereinafter set forth.
`
`42-49.
`
`Paragraphsthirty-eight (38) through forty-five (45), inclusive, of the Plaintiff,KYLE’S,
`
`Claims of Damagesare hereby re-alleged as paragraphs forty-two (42) through forty-nine
`
`(49), inclusive of this, The Second Count,asif fully set forth herein.
`
`50.
`
`Asa result of the negligence and carelessness of the Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME,
`
`Plaintiff,KYLE,has incurred significant medical expenses, and will continueto incur such
`
`expenses in the future.
`
`51.
`
`Asa result of the negligence and carelessness of the Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME,
`
`Plaintiff, KYLE’S, capacity to enjoy and participatein life’s daily activities has been
`
`significantly and permanently diminished and/or extinguished.
`
`COUNT THREE: KYLE SMITHv. Defendants REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
`ASSOCIATES OF CONNECTICUT,P.C. and/or ILLUME FERTILITY PLLC —
`NegligentInfliction of Emotional Distress
`
`16
`
`
`
`1-37.
`
`Paragraphs one (1) through thirty-seven (37), inclusive, of the Relevant Factual Allegations
`
`ate hereby re-alleged as paragraphs one (37) through thirty-seven (37), inclusive of this, the
`
`Third Count, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`38.
`
`Asa result of the aforementioned destruction of the Plaintiff,KYLE’S, healthy, pre-
`
`chemotherapy, sperm and/or semen in March 2022,the Plaintiff, KYLE,suffered extreme
`
`emotional distress and anguish, and suffered permanent damage to his ownself-image and
`
`mental outlook for his future as man anda father.
`
`39.
`
`Asa direct result of the acute emotional turmoil andstressinflicted on the Plaintiff,KYLE,
`
`by the Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME,Plaintiff has sought and obtained medical
`
`treatment to combatthe anxiety, depression, stress, sleeplessness, and sorrow associated and
`
`caused by the aforementioned destruction ofthe Plaintiff,KYLE’S, healthy, pre-
`
`chemotherapy sperm and/or semen.
`
`40-47.
`
`Paragraphs thirty-eight (38) through forty-five (45), inclusive, of the Plaintiff,KYLE'S,
`
`Claims of Damagesare hereby re-alleged as paragraphs forty (40) through forty-seven (47),
`
`inclusive of this, The Third Count, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`48.
`
`The March 2022 destruction, disposal or otherwise discarding of the Plaintiff,KYLE’S,
`
`healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm and/or semen created an unreasonable risk of causing the
`
`Plaintiff, KYLE, emotional distress
`
`
`
`49.
`
`The Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME,knew, or should have known,that the
`
`destruction, disposal and/or discarding of the Plainuff, KYLE’S,last remaining viable,
`
`healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm and/or semen, of which Defendant(s) had sole control,
`
`possession and physical custody over, would causethe Plaintiff,KYLE, emotional distress,
`
`as Plaintiff, KYLE, cannot conceive children without the aforementioned sperm and/or
`
`semen.
`
`50.
`
`The emotionaldistress experienced bythe Plaintiff, KYLE,as a result of the destruction,
`
`disposal and/or discarding of the Plaintiff, KYLE’S,last remaining viable, healthy, pre-
`
`chemotherapy sperm and/or semen by the Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME,was
`
`reasonably foreseeableto result in illness or bodily harm to the Plaintiff,KYLE, due to the
`
`severity of same emotional distress.
`
`51.
`
`The emotionaldistress experienced bythe Plaintiff, KYLE, as a result of the destruction,
`
`disposal and/or discarding of the Plaintiff,KYLE’S,last remaining viable, healthy, pre-
`
`chemotherapy sperm and/or semen by the Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME,resulted in
`
`illness or bodily harm to the Plaintiff,KYLE, due to the severity of same emotional distress.
`
`52.
`
`The destruction, disposal and/or discarding of the Plaintiff,KYLE’S,last remaining viable,
`
`healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm and/or semen by the Defendant(s), RMA and/or
`
`ILLUME,wasthe direct and proximate cause of the Plaintiff,KYLE’S, distress, damages
`
`and injuries, as set forth herein.
`
`18
`
`
`
`COUNT FOUR: KYLE SMITHv. Defendants REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
`ASSOCIATES OF CONNECTICUT, P.C. and/or ILLUME FERTILITY PLLC —
`Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
`
`1-37. Paragraphs one(1) through thirty-seven (37), inclusive, of the Relevant Factual Allegations
`
`ate herebyre-alleged as paragraphs one(1) through thirty-seven (37), inclusive ofthis, the
`
`Fourth Count, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`38.
`
`The Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME’S,actions by the March 2022 destruction,
`
`disposal or otherwise discarding of the Plaintiff,KYLE’S, healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm
`
`and/or semen was done without consent, permission, or authority of the Plaintiff,KYLE
`
`and was outrageous such that a reasonable person would be offended.
`
`39.
`
`The Defendant(s), RMA AND/OR ILLUME’S,May22, 2022 methodofinforming
`
`Plaintiff,KYLE,of the aforementioned destruction of his sperm by telephonecall and/or
`
`voice message was outrageous suchthat a reasonable person would be offended.
`
`40-47. Paragraphs thirty-eight (38) through forty-five (45), inclusive, of the Plaintiff, KYLE'S,
`
`Claims of Damagesare hereby re-alleged as paragraphsforty (148) through forty-seven (47),
`
`48.
`
`49.
`
`inclusive of this, The Third Count,asif fully set forth herein.
`
`The emotional distress was severe enoughtoresult in illness or bodily harm.
`
`As a result of the Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUMB'’S,intentional destruction of the
`
`Plaintiff,KYLE’S,last remaining healthy sperm and/or semen, as aforementioned,the
`
`Plaintiff,KYLE, has suffered severe emotional and psychological stress, distress, anxiety,
`
`19
`
`
`
`sleeplessness, feelings of dread, nightmares, sorrow, despair, and loss of the ability to enjoy
`
`life’s pleasures andactivities, now and in the future.
`
`50.
`
`The Plaintiff,KYLE, seeks damagesas a result of the Defendant(s)’, RMA and/or
`
`ILLUMBE’S,conduct.
`
`51.
`
`The Defendant(s)’ conduct created an unreasonable risk of causing emotional distress by
`
`permanently terminating any possibility of Plaintiff,KYLE, concetving children in the
`
`future.
`
`The Defendant(s)’ conduct was extreme and outrageous.
`
`The Plaintiffs Distress was foreseeable.
`
`The Plaintiff seeks damages asa result of the Defendant(s)’ conduct.
`
`52.
`
`53.
`
`54.
`
`COUNTFIVE: KYLE SMITHv. Defendants REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
`ASSOCIATES OF CONNECTICUT,P.C. and/ot ILLUME FERTILITY PLLC — Trespass
`to Chattels
`
`1-37. Paragraphs one (1) through thirty-seven (37), inclusive, of the Relevant Factual Allegations
`
`ate herebyre-alleged as paragraphs one(1) through thirty-seven (37), inclusive ofthis, the
`
`Fifth Count, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`38.
`
`The Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME,did intentionally dispossess the Plaintiff, KYLE,
`
`of his property, in the form ofhis healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm and/or semen when, in
`
`March of 2022 they did intentionally and permanently destroy, discard, and/or disposed of
`
`said property.
`
`20
`
`
`
`39.
`
`The Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,in March 2022, did permanently destroy, discard
`
`and/or dispose ofthe Plaintiff,KYLE’S,last remaining healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm
`
`and/or semen, withoutthe Plaintiff,KYLE’S, consent, permission, authority, and/or
`
`knowledge.
`
`40-47. Paragraphsthirty-eight (38) through forty-five (45), inclusive, of the Plaintiff,KYLE’S,
`
`Claims of Damagesare hereby re-alleged as paragraphsforty (148) through forty-seven (47),
`
`inclusive of this, The Fifth Count, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`48.
`
`The Plaintiff suffered permanent, andirreversible damages as a direct and proximateresult of
`
`the Defendant’s aforementioned actions.
`
`COUNTSIX: KYLE SMITHv. Defendants REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
`OF CONNECTICUT, P.C. and/or ILLUME FERTILITY PLLC — Trespass to Chattels
`
`1-37. Paragraphs one (1) throughthirty-seven (37), inclusive, of the Relevant Factual Allegations
`
`are hereby re-alleged as paragraphs one(1) through thirty-seven (37), inclusive of this, the
`
`Sixth Count, asif fully set forth herein.
`
`38.
`
`The Defendant(s), RMA and/or ILLUME,did intentionally assume exercise ownership over
`
`the Plaintiff, KYLE’S, property, in the form of his healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm and/or
`
`semen when, in March of 2022 they did intentionally and permanently destroy, discard,
`
`and/or disposed ofsaid property, to the exclusion ofthe Plaintiff,KYLE’S, ownership
`
`rights to same.
`
`21
`
`
`
`39.
`
`The Defendants, RMA and/or ILLUME,in March 2022, did permanently destroy, discard
`
`and/or dispose of the Plaintiff,KYLE’S, last remaining healthy, pre-chemotherapy sperm
`
`and/or semen, withoutthe Plaintiff,KYLE’S, consent, permission, authority, and/or
`
`knowledge.
`
`40-47. Paragraphsthirty-eight (38) through forty-five (45), inclusive, of the Plaintiff, KYLE’S,
`
`Claims of Damagesare hereby re-alleged as paragraphsforty (148) through forty-seven (47),
`
`inclusive of this, The Fourth Count,as if fully set forth herein.
`
`48.
`
`ThePlaintiff suffered permanent, andirreversible damagesas a direct and proximate result of
`
`the Defendant’s aforementioned actions.
`
`COUNT SEVEN: KYLE SMITHv. Defendants SPENCER RICHLIN - Intentional
`Infliction of Emotional Distress
`
`1-37. Paragraphs one(1) through thirty-seven (37), inclusive, of the Relevant Factual Allegations
`
`are hereby re-alleged as paragraphs one (1) through thirty-seven (37), inclusive ofthis, the
`
`Seventh Count, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`38.
`
`The Defendant, RICHLIN’S, May 22, 2022 methodof informing Plaintiff, KYLE,of the
`
`aforementioneddestruction ofhis sperm by telephonecall and/or voice message was
`
`outrageous such that a reasonable person would be offended.
`
`39.
`
`The Defendant, RICHLIN’S,aforementioned sending of a letter to Plaintiff,KYLE, dated
`
`May31, 2022, with an accompanying unwanted, unsolicited, and offensive check for the sum
`
`vi.
`
`
`
`paid by Plaintiff,KYLE, for cryopreservation and/or storage of his sperm and/or semen
`
`was outrageoussuch that a reasonable person would be offended.
`
`40-47. Paragraphsthirty-eight (38) through forty-five (45), inclusive, of the Plaintiff, KYLE’S,
`
`Claims of Damagesare herebyre-alleged as paragraphs forty (148) through forty-seven (47),
`
`48.
`
`49.
`
`50.
`
`51.
`
`52.
`
`53.
`
`inclusive of this, The Seventh Count,asif fully set forth herein.
`
`The emotional distress was severe enoughto result in illness or bodily harm.
`
`As a result of the Defendant(, RICHLIN’S,cavalier, careless, and callous method of
`
`informing the Plaintiff that he would never conceivechi