`
`MBEH 14 NCM, LLC
`
` V.
`VEGA, JOSE
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`HOUSING SESSION
` AT HARTFORD
`
`1/24/2024
`
`ORDER 409859
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDER REGARDING:
`12/22/2023 108.00 MOTION TO OPEN JUDGMENT AFTER DEFAULT OR NONSUIT (SUMMARY
`PROCESS/EVICTION) JD-HM-042
`
`The foregoing, having been considered by the Court, is hereby:
`
`ORDER: DENIED
`
`After the motion was referred to mediation and the defendant failed to appear, the court denies the
`motion to open. Pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-212 and P.B. § 17-43, the court cannot find that the
`defendant made a showing that a good cause of action existed and that he was prevented from asserting a
`valid defense due to the type of accident or mistake that courts have interpreted as a sufficient ground for
`opening a judgment pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-212 and P.B. § 17-43. See Segretario v. Stewart-
`Warner Corp., 9 Conn. App. 355, 363, 519 A.2d 76 (1986). Accordingly, the motion is denied.
`
`409859
`
`Judge: JAMES T GRAHAM
`
`This document may be signed or verified electronically and has the same validity and status as a document with a physical
`(pen-to-paper) signature. For more information, see Section I.E. of the State of Connecticut Superior Court E-Services
`Procedures and Technical Standards (https://jud.ct.gov/external/super/E-Services/e-standards.pdf), section 51-193c of the
`Connecticut General Statutes and Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-4.
`
`HFHCV236027713S 1/24/2024
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
