throbber

`
`DOCKET NO.: HHB-CV-l 6-6032122-8
`
`ANGELINA GONZALEZ
`
`UDOLF ENTERPRISES, LLC
`A/K/A UDOLF PROPERTIES, ET AL.
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`.I.D. OF NEW BRITAIN
`
`AT NEW BRITAIN
`
`JULY 18, 2017
`
`MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT AT THE CLOSE OF ALL EVIDENCE
`
`Pursuant to Connecticut Practice Book § 15-8 et. seq., Defendant, Udolf Enterprises, LLC
`
`a/k/a Udolf Properties, LLC, moves for a directed verdict at the close of all evidence.
`
`A directed verdict is warranted if Plaintiff fails to make out a prima facie case of negligence.
`
`In all negligence cases, a plaintiff must meet all of the essential elements of the tort in order to
`
`prevail, including duty, breach of that duty, causation, and actual injury. RK Constructors, Inc. v.
`
`Fusco Corp, 231 Conn. 381, 384 (1994). For the plaintiff to recover for the breach of a duty owed
`
`to her, it is incumbent upon her to prove that the defendant had notice of the presence of the alleged
`
`unsafe condition. DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLC, 306 Conn. 107, 116-17 (2012). The
`
`notice, whether actual or constructive, must be notice of the very defect which occasioned the injury
`
`and not merely of conditions naturally productive of that defect even though subsequently in fact
`
`producing it. Kelly V. Stop & Shop, Inc., 281 Conn. 768, 776, 918 A.2d 249, 255 (2007).
`
`In the present matter, Plaintiff has failed to produce any evidence to show that Defendant
`
`had either actual or constructive notice of the specific defect alleged.
`
`In addition, Plaintiff has also
`
`failed to prove that a specific defective condition caused her injuries.
`
`Plaintiff cannot make out a prima facie case of negligence, and Defendant is entitled to a
`
`dismissal of the action.
`
`WHEREFORE, Defendant, Udolf Enterprises, LLC a/k/a Udolf Properties, LLC,
`
`respectfully requests that this Court enter a judgment of dismissal due to Plaintiffs failure to make
`
`

`

`out a prima facie case of negligence.
`
`RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
`
`THE DEFENDANT,
`
`UDOLF ENTERPRISES, LLC, A/K/A
`UDOLF PROPERTIES, ET Al.
`
`BY ITS ATTORNEYS,
`
`ls/437188
`
`Timothy R. Scannell, Esq.
`tscannell@bsctrialattorneys.com
`Christopher J. Farrell, Esq.
`cfarrell@bsctrialatt0rneys.com
`Boyle Shaughnessy Law, RC.
`280 Trumbull Street, 22“ Floor
`Hartford, CT 06103
`
`Tel: (860) 952-9800
`Fax: (860) 278-7757
`
`CERTIFICATION
`
`This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was or will immediately be mailed or
`delivered electronically or non—electronically on July 18, 2017 to all counsel and self-represented
`parties of record and that written consent for electronic delivery was received from all counsel
`and self-represented parties of record who were or will immediately be electronically served.
`
`Bartlett Legal Group, LLC
`126 Elm Street
`
`PO BOX 130
`
`Cheshire, CT 06410
`
`/s/437188
`
`Christopher J. Farrell, Esq.
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket