throbber

`
`
`
`DOCKET NO. HHB-CV22-6072948-S
`
`:
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`J.D. OF NEW BRITAIN
`
`
`AT NEW BRITAIN
`
`MARCH 20, 2024
`
`:
`CAROLINE SKUDLAREK, EXECUTOR
`OF THE ESTATE OF ALFONS SKUDLAREK :
`HANNELORE SKUDLAREK
`:
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`DR. JEFFREY GOLDBERG
`:
`
`PROHEALTH PHYSICIANS, INC.
`:
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Practice Book § 10-44, the Plaintiffs in the above-captioned action hereby
`
`give notice that they have filed a second amended complaint in this matter. Said second amended
`
`complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THE PLAINTIFFS,
`
`
`__/s/ 421138___________
`Brennen Maki
`Maki Law, LLC
`Their Attorneys
`
`
`
`
`♦1♦
`
`MAKI LAW, LLC
`467 Naubuc Ave. ♦ Glastonbury, CT 06033 ♦ 860.269.5780 ♦ Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION
`
`I certify that a copy of this document was or will immediately be mailed or delivered
`
`electronically or non-electronically this 20th day of March, 2024, to all attorneys and self-
`
`represented parties of record and to all parties who have not appeared in this matter and that
`
`written consent for electronic delivery was received from all attorneys and self-represented
`
`parties receiving electronic delivery.
`
`Edward William Mayer Jr., Esq.
`Gfeller Laurie LLP
`977 Farmington Avenue Suite 200
`West Hartford CT 06107
`emayer@gllawgroup.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ 421138
`_____________________
`Brennen Maki
`Commissioner of the Superior Court
`
`
`
`
`♦2♦
`
`MAKI LAW, LLC
`467 Naubuc Ave. ♦ Glastonbury, CT 06033 ♦ 860.269.5780 ♦ Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`DOCKET NO. HHB-CV22-6072948-S
`
`:
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`DR. CAROLINE SKUDLAREK, EXECUTOR :
`OF THE ESTATE OF ALFONS SKUDLAREK :
`HANNELORE SKUDLAREK
`:
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`DR. JEFFREY GOLDBERG
`:
`PROHEALTH PHYSICIANS, INC.
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`J.D. OF NEW BRITAIN
`
`
`AT NEW BRITAIN
`
`MARCH 20, 2024
`
`SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`Count One: (By the Plaintiff, the Estate of Alfons Skudlarek, as Against the Defendant, Dr.
`Jeffrey Goldberg)
`
`
`At all times relevant to this complaint the Plaintiff, Dr. Caroline Skudlarek, was and
`
`1.
`
`is a resident of Jamestown, Rhode Island.
`
`2. Dr. Caroline Skudlarek is the daughter of Alfons Skudlarek, who died on November
`
`11, 2020. On December 11, 2020, Dr. Caroline Skudlarek was duly appointed the Executor of the
`
`Estate of Alfons Skudlarek, and brings this action in said capacity.
`
`3. At all times relevant to this complaint, Alfons Skudlarek was a resident of Bristol,
`
`Connecticut.
`
`4. On October 31, 2020, Mr. Skudlarek had an annual physical, including routine
`
`bloodwork, with Dr. Goldberg at the Prohealth office at 25 Collins Road, Bristol, Connecticut.
`
`Mr. Skudlarek’s present and past conditions along with comorbidities were noted in the note,
`
`which included an incorrect measurement of the patient’s height, which affected his reported
`
`BMI.
`
`
`
`
`♦3♦
`
`MAKI LAW, LLC
`467 Naubuc Ave. ♦ Glastonbury, CT 06033 ♦ 860.269.5780 ♦ Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`5. On the evening of November 1, 2020, Mrs. Skudlarek contacted her husband’s
`
`primary care physician, Dr. Jeffrey Goldberg of ProHealth Physicians, Inc. that he had complaints
`
`of fever, chills and difficulty with walking for one day. Mr. Skudlarek was scheduled for a Covid
`
`test for the next day November 2, 2020.
`
`6. On November 2, a Covid test was performed on him to determine whether he had
`
`contracted SARS-CoV-19. He was required to wait outside in the extreme cold for approximately
`
`thirty minutes. All testing performed indicated he was positive for Covid-19.
`
`7. On November 2, 2020, Mr. Skudlarek was 79 years old, and had comorbidities including
`
`obesity, hypertension and cardiovascular disease.
`
`8. On November 2, 2020 Mr. Skudlarek was advised that he was positive for SARS-CoV-
`
`19 by personnel at ProHealth; despite this, no medication was provided to him, nor was he
`
`advised as to what symptoms to watch for to indicate escalated medical care would be warranted.
`
`Instead, ProHealth personnel advised him to go home and take over-the-counter medicine to
`
`relieve his fever.
`
`9. [Stricken after Request to Revise.]
`
`10.
`
`Within hours of testing positive for SARS-CoV-19, Mr. Skudlarek began
`
`exhibiting clear signs and symptoms of serious decompensation, including persistent fever of over
`
`103 degrees despite medication, ataxia, neurologic difficulties, problems walking and debilitation
`
`so severe he was unable to speak with ProHealth medical personnel via telephone, and instead
`
`relied on his wife to relay his condition to them.
`
`11.
`
`
`
`
`Mrs. Skudlarek phoned Dr. Goldberg several times on November 2, 2020, due to
`♦4♦
`
`MAKI LAW, LLC
`467 Naubuc Ave. ♦ Glastonbury, CT 06033 ♦ 860.269.5780 ♦ Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Mr. Skudlarek’s worsening symptoms without Dr Goldberg calling back. On the evening of
`
`November 2, 2020 she again called Prohealth and at that time, she informed the on-call nurse that
`
`Mr. Skudlarek was suffering from a persistent fever of approximately 103 degrees, was having
`
`difficulty walking, and was debilitated to the point that he could not speak with the nurse by
`
`phone.
`
`12.
`
`Mrs. Skudlarek specifically requested of the on-call nurse that Dr. Goldberg call
`
`her to discuss her husband’s condition and/or that medication be provided to her husband, and
`
`was promised that a phone call would be made to her by the doctor the following day. Despite
`
`this promise, neither Dr. Goldberg nor anyone from ProHealth contacted her.
`
`13.
`
`Later in the evening on November 2, 2020 the Dr. Skudlarek phoned ProHealth
`
`and spoke with the on-call nurse. As a practicing physician herself, Plaintiff noted that given Mr.
`
`Skudlarek’s age and comorbidities his persistent fever of 103 degrees alone was clinically
`
`significant, requested medication for her father, and further requested Dr. Goldberg contact the
`
`family to discuss his care and escalation of care to an emergency room. Dr. Skudlarek was also
`
`told that Dr. Goldberg would call her in the morning to address her father’s condition. Like Mrs.
`
`Skudlarek, Dr. Skudlarek never received a phone call from any doctor or medical professional
`
`from ProHealth as had been promised.
`
` 14. On November 3, 2020, having received no callback, Mrs. Skudlarek attempted to
`
`contact ProHealth again about her husband’s condition, but no one was answering the office
`
`phone. At one point, she reached someone who told her that “she was on the list for a phone call,”
`
`but no one called. Hours later, in desperation, Mrs. Skudlarek began trying random extensions in
`♦5♦
`
`MAKI LAW, LLC
`467 Naubuc Ave. ♦ Glastonbury, CT 06033 ♦ 860.269.5780 ♦ Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`the phone system, eventually reaching a bookkeeper whom she told again that her husband’s
`
`condition was continuing to deteriorate. She again requested medication, to speak with Dr.
`
`Goldberg, and/or for an office visit to assess his condition and treat him. ProHealth personnel
`
`instructed Mrs. Skudlarek to bring her husband to their walk-in clinic for assessment.
`
`15. Mrs. Skudlarek immediately contacted ProHealth’s walk-in clinic to schedule her
`
`husband’s appointment, only to be told that he would not be allowed in the clinic due to his
`
`infection. Mrs. Skudlarek was further told to wait until the end of the day on November 3, 2020
`
`for a phone call from the on-call physician’s assistant.
`
`16. At approximately 6:00 p.m. on November 3, 2020, Mrs. Skudlarek was contacted
`
`by a physician’s assistant from ProHealth. She relayed that her husband continued to suffer from
`
`high fevers, difficulty walking and severe debilitation, and that his condition appeared to be
`
`worsening. The ProHealth physician’s assistant told her there was nothing she could do to help,
`
`no medication she could prescribe, and that Mr. Skudlarek would have to remain home without
`
`treatment as Mr. Skudlarek could have these symptoms for 3 weeks. No information was
`
`provided to Mrs. Skudlarek in terms of what signs or symptoms to watch for that would indicate
`
`hospitalization was necessary.
`
`17. During the aforementioned phone call, Mrs. Skudlarek again requested the
`
`opportunity to speak with Dr. Goldberg about her husband’s condition. This request was refused.
`
`18. On the morning of November 4, 2020 Mrs. Skudlarek again called Prohealth to
`
`speak with Dr. Goldberg and was hung up on. She then called back and was told by a ProHealth
`
`staff member, “Can you handle it? They are not going to bother with him!”
`♦6♦
`
`MAKI LAW, LLC
`467 Naubuc Ave. ♦ Glastonbury, CT 06033 ♦ 860.269.5780 ♦ Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`19. Mrs. Skudlarek then transferred the care of her husband to Dr. Guardino, a
`
`Concierge physician in Farmington, who immediately gave him medication and shortly thereafter
`
`admitted Mr. Skudlarek emergently to the University of Connecticut with a diagnosis of COVID-
`
`19 pneumonia.
`
`20. Mrs. Skudlarek then called and spoke with the medical director of ProHealth about
`
`her husband’s condition and the Defendant’s lack of response. The medical director indicated
`
`two doctors had recently quit and their office “was in turmoil and disarray”. She apologized and
`
`said that now that Mr. Skudlarek had a Concierge physician, he should be fine.
`
`21. On November 5, 2020, Dr. Skudlarek called the medical director as the hospital
`
`was unable to get Mr Skudlarek’s records from Prohealth. The Director had the records
`
`prepared by the office and they were picked up by Mrs. Skudlarek.
`
`22. On November 11, 2020 and at approximately 4:04 A.M., after suffering numerous
`
`COVID-related medical setbacks and complications, Mr. Skudlarek died of SARS-CoV-19.
`
`23. Mr. Skudlarek’s injuries and death were proximately caused by the gross
`
`negligence of Dr. Goldberg in one or more of the following ways:
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`In that at the time of Mr. Skudlarek’s Covid-19 diagnosis, the standard of care for
`treatment of Covid-19 patients was risk assessment, close monitoring, supportive
`care, and immediate hospitalization if a high risk patient is decompensating, none
`of which was followed by Dr. Goldberg.
`
`In that he failed to provide the decedent or his family with appropriate advice
`regarding the decedent’s infection;
`
`In that he failed to provide the decedent or his family with appropriate treatment
`regarding the decedent’s infection;
`
`
`
`
`
`♦7♦
`
`MAKI LAW, LLC
`467 Naubuc Ave. ♦ Glastonbury, CT 06033 ♦ 860.269.5780 ♦ Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`D.
`
`
`E.
`
`F.
`
`G.
`
`H.
`
`I.
`
`J.
`
` In that he failed to provide the decedent or his family with a single callback
`despite repeated requests;
`
`In that he failed to escalate the decedent’s care despite repeated clear and obvious
`signs and symptoms of rapidly worsening infection;
`
`In that he failed to provide the decedent with appropriate medication regarding the
`decedent’s infection;
`
`In that he failed to properly advise the decedent and/or his family to seek a higher
`level of care for his infection despite clear and obvious signs he should do so;
`
`In that he failed to properly supervise his medical staff to ensure patients suffering
`from SARS-CoV-19, such as the decedent, received appropriate attention;
`
`In that he failed to properly instruct his medical staff on how to monitor, address
`and advise patients suffering from SARS-CoV-19;
`
`In that he failed to identify the decedent as a high-risk patient and treat him
`accordingly.
`
`24. As a further direct and proximate result of the gross negligence of Dr. Goldberg,
`
`Mr. Skudlarek and/or his estate were forced to expend money on doctors, hospitals and the like,
`
`up to the time of his death.
`
`25. As a further direct and proximate result of the gross negligence of Dr. Goldberg,
`
`Mr. Skudlarek was deprived of his ability to pursue and enjoy life’s pleasures.
`
`26. As a further direct and proximate result of the gross negligence of Dr. Goldberg,
`
`Mr. Skudlarek missed work and lost wages, and has suffered a complete destruction of his
`
`earning capacity, all to his financial detriment.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`♦8♦
`
`MAKI LAW, LLC
`467 Naubuc Ave. ♦ Glastonbury, CT 06033 ♦ 860.269.5780 ♦ Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Count Two: (By the Plaintiff, the Estate of Alfons Skudlarek, as Against the Defendant,
`ProHealth Physicians, Inc.)
`
`
`1-22. Paragraphs one through twenty-two (22) of Count One of this complaint are
`
`hereby incorporated as paragraphs one through twenty-two (22) of this Count Two as if fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`23. At all times relevant, Dr. Goldberg was acting as an agent, apparent agent, servant
`
`and/or employee of the Defendant, ProHealth Physicians, Inc.
`
`24. At all times relevant, all medical staff referenced in the aforementioned paragraphs
`
`were agents, apparent agents, servants and/or employees of the Defendant, ProHealth
`
`Physicians, Inc., and were acting in their capacity as such.
`
`25. Mr. Skudlarek’s injuries and death were proximately caused by the gross
`
`negligence of ProHealth Physicians, Inc. through its agents, apparent agents, servants and/or
`
`employees in one or more of the following ways:
`
`A.
`
`In that they failed to provide the decedent or his family with appropriate advice
`
`regarding the decedent’s infection;
`
`B.
`
`In that they failed to provide the decedent or his family with appropriate treatment
`
`regarding the decedent’s infection;
`
`C.
`
`In that they failed to provide the decedent or his family with a single callback from
`
`a doctor despite repeated requests;
`
`D.
`
`In that they failed to escalate the decedent’s care despite repeated clear and
`
`obvious signs and symptoms of rapidly worsening infection;
`
`
`
`
`♦9♦
`
`MAKI LAW, LLC
`467 Naubuc Ave. ♦ Glastonbury, CT 06033 ♦ 860.269.5780 ♦ Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`E.
`
`In that they failed to provide the decedent with appropriate medication regarding
`
`the decedent’s infection;
`
`F.
`
`In that they failed to properly advise the decedent and/or his family to seek a
`
`higher level of care for his infection despite clear and obvious signs he should do
`
`so;
`
`G.
`
` In that they failed to properly supervise their medical staff to ensure patients
`
`suffering from SARS-CoV-19, such as the decedent, received appropriate
`
`attention;
`
`H.
`
`In that they failed to properly instruct their medical staff on how to monitor,
`
`address and advise patients suffering from SARS-CoV-19;
`
`I.
`
`In that they failed to identify the decedent as a high-risk patient and treat him
`
`accordingly.
`
`26. As a direct and proximate result of the gross negligence of ProHealth Physicians,
`
`Inc., Mr. Skudlarek suffered injury and death.
`
`
`
`27. As a further direct and proximate result of the gross negligence of ProHealth
`
`Physicians, Inc., Mr. Skudlarek and/or his estate were forced to expend money on doctors,
`
`hospitals and the like, up to the time of his death.
`
`
`
`28. As a further direct and proximate result of the gross negligence of ProHealth
`
`Physicians, Inc., Mr. Skudlarek was deprived of his ability to pursue and enjoy life’s pleasures.
`
`
`
`
`♦10♦
`
`MAKI LAW, LLC
`467 Naubuc Ave. ♦ Glastonbury, CT 06033 ♦ 860.269.5780 ♦ Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`29. As a further direct and proximate result of the gross negligence of ProHealth
`
`Physicians, Inc., Mr. Skudlarek missed work and lost wages, and has suffered a complete
`
`destruction of his earning capacity, all to his financial detriment.
`
`
`
`Count Three: (By the Plaintiff, Hannelore Skudlarek, as Against the Defendant, Dr. Jeffrey
`Goldberg)
`
`
`1.-26. Paragraphs one through twenty-six (26) of Count One of this complaint are hereby
`
`incorporated as paragraphs one through twenty-four (26) of this Count Three as if fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`27. At all times relevant to this complaint, the Plaintiff, Hannelore Skudlarek, was and
`
`remains a resident of Bristol, Connecticut.
`
`28. At all times relevant to this complaint, the Plaintiff was the wife of Alfons
`
`Skudlarek, and at the time of his death had been married to him for approximately fifty-eight (58)
`
`years.
`
`29. As a direct and proximate result of the gross negligence of the Defendant, Dr.
`
`Jeffrey Goldberg, the Plaintiff has been permanently and forever deprived of the love, society and
`
`companionship of her husband, Alfons Skudlarek.
`
`30. The Plaintiff, Hannelore Skudlarek, brings this action pursuant to, and in
`
`accordance with, Connecticut General Statutes 52-555a.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`♦11♦
`
`MAKI LAW, LLC
`467 Naubuc Ave. ♦ Glastonbury, CT 06033 ♦ 860.269.5780 ♦ Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Count Four: (By the Plaintiff, Hannelore Skudlarek, as Against the Defendant, ProHealth
`Physicians, Inc.)
`
`
`1.-29. Paragraphs one through twenty-nine (29) of Count Two of this complaint are
`
`hereby incorporated as paragraphs one through twenty-nine (29) of this Count Four as if fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`30. At all times relevant to this complaint, the Plaintiff, Hannelore Skudlarek, was and
`
`remains a resident of Bristol, Connecticut.
`
`31. At all times relevant to this complaint, the Plaintiff was the wife of Alfons
`
`Skudlarek, and at the time of his death had been married to him for approximately fifty-eight (58)
`
`years.
`
`32. As a direct and proximate result of the gross negligence of the Defendant,
`
`ProHealth Physicians, Inc., the Plaintiff has been permanently and forever deprived of the love,
`
`society and companionship of her husband, Alfons Skudlarek.
`
`33. The Plaintiff, Hannelore Skudlarek, brings this action pursuant to, and in accordance
`
`with, Connecticut General Statutes 52-555a.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`♦12♦
`
`MAKI LAW, LLC
`467 Naubuc Ave. ♦ Glastonbury, CT 06033 ♦ 860.269.5780 ♦ Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs claim:
`
`1. Monetary damages;
`
`2. Costs of suit;
`
`3. Such other relief as in law or equity may appertain.
`
`
`
`
`
`THE PLAINTIFFS,
`
`
`__/s/ 421138____________
`Brennen Maki
`Maki Law, LLC
`Their Attorneys
`
`
`
`
`
`
`♦13♦
`
`MAKI LAW, LLC
`467 Naubuc Ave. ♦ Glastonbury, CT 06033 ♦ 860.269.5780 ♦ Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`
`
`

`

`DOCKET NO, HHB-CV22-6072948-S
`
`:
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`DR. CAROLINE SKUDLAREK, EXECUTOR:
`OF THE ESTATE OF ALFONS SKUDLAREK:
`
`HANNELORE SKUDLAREK
`
`J.D. OF NEW BRITAIN
`
`AT NEW BRITAIN
`
`DR. JEFFREY GOLDBERG
`PROHEALTH PHYSICIANS, INC.
`
`;
`:
`
`JULY 20, 2022
`
`STATEMENT OF AMOUNT IN DEMAND
`
`The amount, legal interest or property in demand is greater than Fifteen Thousand Dollars
`
`($15,000.00).
`
`THE PLAINTIFFS,
`
`_/sf 421138
`Brennen Maki
`Maki Law, LLC
`Their Attorneys
`
`[4
`
`467 Naubuc Ave.
`
`MAKI LAW, tic
`+ Glastonbury, CT 06033 + 860.269.5780 + Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Juris No. 437597
`
`

`

`DOCKET NO. HHB-CV22-6072948-S
`
`;
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`DR. CAROLINE SKUDLAREK, EXECUTOR :
`OF THE ESTATE OF ALFONS SKUDLAREK:
`
`HANNELORE SKUDLAREK
`
`J.D. OF NEW BRITAIN
`
`AT NEW BRITAIN
`
`DR, JEFFREY GOLDBERG
`PROHEALTH PHYSICIANS, INC.
`
`:
`:
`
`JULY 20, 2022
`
`CERTIFICATE OF GOOD FAITH
`
`This is to certify that 1 have made reasonable inquiry as permitted by the circumstances to
`
`determine that there are grounds for a good faith belief that there has been negligence in the care
`
`and treatment of Alfons Skudlarek. This reasonable inquiry gives rise to a good faith belief that
`
`grounds exist for an action against the named Defendants. Attached hereto is a redacted opinion
`
`letter concerning the plaintiff pursuant to C.G.S. § 52-190a.
`
`‘THE PLAINTIFFS,
`
`_fs/ 421138
`Brennen Maki
`Maki Law, LLC
`Their Attorneys
`
`+]5°
`
`467 Naubuc Ave.
`
`MAKILAW,Lic
`+ Glastonbury, CT 06033 + 860.269.5780 + Facsimile: 860.221.3947
`Jutis No. 437597
`
`

`

`
`
`EXPERT REPORT IN THE MATTER OF ALFONS SKUDLAREK
`
`Background and Qualifications
`
`lam a medical doctor currently licensed to practice medicine in the state of California
`(California Medical License: JMB. | have been practicing medicine for 19 years in the
`hospital and outpatient setting.
`| am certified by the American Board of Family Medicine with
`no interruption In certification or licensure. | received my medical degree from George
`Washington University Medical School, Washington, D.C.
`in 2002. | have also received a Master
`of Public Health degree from Boston University. i completed a residency in Family Medicine at
`University ofME Vedical Center. | am currently a Family Physician & Chief
`Executive Officer at
`California. From August 2020 to August
`2021, | served as a Telemedicine Family Physician forP| treating over 1,000
`patients with Covid-19 and related complications. (have also served as a Family Physiclan &
`Chief Executive Officer atis 3\ifornia. Copies of
`my current curriculum vitae and fee schedules are attached hereto. All the opinions expressed
`below are based on my medical training, education, and experience.
`
`Case Summary
`
`Alfons Skudlarek was 79-year-old obese male with a history of hypertension, coronary
`artery disease, gout, predlabetes, and polymyalgla rheumatica. At baseline, he was a
`physically active and mentally astute individual leadinga full life. He was diagnosed with
`Covid-19 on November 2, 2020 at the ProHealth Physician Clinic in Bristol, Connecticut.
`At time of his diagnosis, he was discharged home without follow up or home care
`instructions or precautions. He began to decompensate that same night with neurologic
`symptoms of weakness and ataxia. Calls to ProHealth Physicians by his family on his
`behalf, were repeatedly made, requesting a physician callback which never came.
`Instead, he was told by ProHealth Physician Clinic RNs and PAs that this was normal, and
`nothing could be done. After 48 hours without appropriate clinical follow up,his
`condition had severely deteriorated warranting urgent emergency room evaluation. He
`was admitted to the hospital and due to his already decompensated state, suffered a
`cascade of further complications which ultimately resulted In his death on November
`11, 2020.
`
`[1]
`
`

`

`Timeline of Events
`
`1. October 27, 2020 - Mr. Skudlarek completed a routine annual physical exam with Or.
`Jeffery Goldberg at the ProHealth Physicians Clinic. He was noted to be obese with
`previously diagnosed prediabetes, gout, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. He
`was taking Allopurinol, Tenormin, and a baby aspirin. His only complaint at this visit was
`of allergic rhinitis for which he was prescribed Ipratropium nasal spray.
`2. November 1, 2020- Mr. Skudlarek began experiencing shaking chills and developed a
`fever of 103 degrees, His wife called the ProHeaith Physicians Clinic and scheduled a
`Covid test for him the following day. This encounter is documented by PA, Brooke
`Kokus,
`3. November 2, 2020- Mr. Skudlarek presented to the ProHealth Physicians Clinic for an
`ID NOW rapid antigen Covid test and was noted to be positive, A PCR test was also done
`at this time. It is unclear from the ProHealth Physician Clinic records who communicated
`these positive test results to him. The note from that visit was unsigned and showed an
`incompletelist of Mr. Skudlarek’s comorbidities. He was only noted to have
`hypertension, His history of cardiovascular disease and obesity were omitted. No home
`care instructions or precautions are documented as being given to the patient.
`
`10:38pm — Mr. Skudlarek began having difficulty walking and continued to have
`a high fever. His wife called the ProHealth Physictans Clinic to ask for advice. She
`spoke with Catherine O'Neill, RN. Ms, O'Neill documented that Mr. Skudlarek
`was too sick to come to the phone and she could not speak with him directly.
`The patient’s wife explained that he was off balance, febrile and experiencing
`shaking chills as well as congestion. She asked about a 2-pak and was told to take
`Tylenol and that the on-call MD would call back, Also advised to call the clinic for
`an in-person appointment the next day.
`
`10:55pm — Mr, Skudlarek’s daughter called ProHealth Physician Clinic and spoke
`with Erica Baisvert, RN. She was concerned that her father was off balance when
`walking after being diagnosed with Covid earller that day. She asked about
`possibility of prescribing 2-pak as he may have had sinus symptoms prior to
`diagnosis. The patient’s daughter also reminded the nurse of Mr. Skudlarek’s
`history of polymyalgia rheumatica. The patient’s daughter was told that the on-
`call MD would call back with further advice. According to the nursing notes, the
`on-call MD wascalled but there is no documentation of a conversation with the
`MD, The note was electronically signed by Dr, Munish Shasirl at 7:56am the
`follawing morning. However, Dr. Shasiri did not return a call to the family or
`patient that evening or the following morning. No physician from ProHealth
`Physicians Clinic called the Mr. Skudlarek or his family after his Covid diagnosis
`despite multiple requests.
`
`[2)
`
`

`

`November 3, 2020 —Mr. Skudlarek’s wife called ProHealth Physicians Clinic to speak with
`Dr. Goldberg, his PCP, multiple times with no call back. She then called to schedule an
`appointment as had been recommended the previous evening. She was told he needed
`to be seen in the walk-in clinic but was later told he could not comeinto the clinic with
`Covid and a PA would call at 6pm that evening.
`6:03pm -- Katherine Voss, PA-C called and only spoke with Mr. Skudlarek’s wife
`because he wastooill to come to the phone, She described his continued high
`fever, shaking chills, and walking off balance. There was discussion of 2-pak for
`sinus infection, but she was told by Ms. Vossthatit was not indicated. The
`patient’s wife was told there was no treatment and thatit could take weeksto
`recover. Ms, Voss documentedif pulse oximeter 94% for 30 minutes, patient
`should go to hospital. Mr. Skudlarek’s
`
`November4, 2020 ~ Mr. Skudlarek’s condition continued to decompensate,
`characterized by sustained fever, chills, and difficulty walking. His wife called the
`ProHealth Physicians Clinic multiple times request a physician call back and did not
`receive one. Mrs. Skudlarek spoke withclinic director, Tracy Weber, who told her the
`office was in turmoil.
`
`Mr, Skudlarek’s daughtervisited him at his home and determined he should be
`taken to the emergency room, He was brought to the University of Connecticut
`Medical Center that evening and admitted. On admission, he was observed as
`being weak and ataxic and noted to have bilaterally ng infiltrates consisted with
`Covid-related pneumenia as well as new thrombocytopenia.
`November5, 2020 - Mr. Skudlarek suffered a series of complications and rapid
`decompensation while at UCONN hospital ultimately requiring intubation and maximal
`pressor support.
`November 10, 2020 — Due to the severity of his condition, Mr, Skudlarek was
`transferred to St. Francis hospital for consideration of extracorporeal membrane
`oxygenation.
`November11, 2020 - Mr. Skudlarek failed to respondto treatment. While undergoing
`dialysis catheter placementfor continuous renal replacement therapy, Mr. Skudiarek
`experienced an unrecoverable cardiac asystole and died.
`
`Failure to Meet Standard of Care
`
`ProHealth PhysiciansClinic failed to meet the standard of care in the treatment and
`management of Mr. Skudlarek beginning with his diagnosis of Covid-19 on the morning
`November2, 2021 and every subsequentinteraction until his delayed hospitalization on
`evening of November 4, 2020.
`
`(3]
`
`

`

`Provider Responsibility When Ordering Diagnostic Tests
`
`Physicians and clinical providers have a wide range of available diagnostic tests are their
`disposal when trying to evaluate patients. When ordering diagnostic tests, the standard of care
`requires physicians and clinical providers to know how to manage the abnormal results of those
`tests. This may include treatment or referral, In the case of Mr. Skudtarek, ProHealth Physicians
`Clinic demonstrateda clear lack of knowledge in managing high-risk Covid-19 patients by not
`adequately treating Mr. Skudlarek,
`
`Disseminating Results and Instructions for Covid-19 Care
`
`Whenever a clinician provides results to a patient, the standard of care requires a documented
`explanation of what the results mean, the expected length and course of treatment as well as
`passible complications and how to best manage them. This is especially true of Covid-19 cases
`where thereis a high degree of patient anxiety due to knownrisks of the disease. No such
`information was provided to Mr. Skudlarek or his family members at the time of his diagnosis.
`He did not know how to managehis condition at home and he was notgiven information on
`what to do if his condition worsened.
`
`Risk Stratification
`
`By the time Mr. Skudlarek was diagnosed with Covid-19 in November 2020, there was clearly
`established criteria for risk stratification regarding Cavid-19 disease severity. Besides advancing
`age, numerous comorbidities have been proven to increase the risk severe Covid-19 with
`complications as seen in the table on the next page.
`
`Severeillness can occur in otherwise healthy individuals of any age, but it predominantly occurs
`in adults with advanced age or certain underlying medical comorbidities. Specific demographic
`features and laboratory abnormalities have also been associated with severe disease.
`
`The standard of care requires the treating provider to assessthe risks to the patient and
`determine appropriate and timely follow-up. In this case, Mr, Skudlarek would have metcriteria
`as a high-risk patient warranting closer follow up and a lower threshold for referral to a higher
`level of care in a hospital setting. Had Mr. Skudlarek been admitted to the hospital 48 hours
`earlier, more likely not he would have received lifesaving antibiotics, steroids and Remdesivir
`and his untimely death could have been prevented.
`
`Mortality in COVID-19 patients has been linked to the presence of the so-called “cytokine
`storm” induced by the virus usually occurring about 7-10 days after exposure. Excessive
`production of proinflammatory cytokines leads to ARDS aggravation and widespreadtissue
`damage resulting in multi-organ failure and death, Targeting cytokines early during the
`management of COVID-19 patients improves survival rates and reduces mortality. The key to
`survival is rapid Identification of high-risk patients in order to treat this process early before the
`body is overwhelmed,
`
`[4]
`
`

`

`Comorbidities the COC classifies as risk facters for severe COVID- 19"[1,2]
` PETE PLANEPSLSTRaeaearlroetaLePdED
`
`1, Established and probable risk factors (comorbidities that have heen aassociated with severe COVID-19
`in at least 1 meta-analysis or systematic review (starred conditions], or in observational studies)
`
`
`= Cancer*
`
`
`Cerebrovascular disaase™
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a Children with certain underlying conditions*
`« Chroni¢ kidney disease™
`wn COPD* and other lung disease (including interstitial king disease, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary
`hyperterision)
`« Diabetes mellitus, type 1" and type 2"
`a Down syndrome
`= Heart conditions (such as heart failure, coronary artery disease, or cardiomyopathies)*
`e HIV
`
`® Neurologic conditions, including dementia
`» Obesity™ (8MI 230 kg/m?) and overweight (OM] 25 to 29 kg/m?)
`= Pregnancy"
`# Smoking” (current and former)
`s Sickle cell disease
`
`
`
`
`
`» Solid organ or bload stemcell transplantation
`® Substance use disorders
`
`
`
`Use of corticosteroids or ather immunosuppressive medications
`
`
`Possible risk factors (supported by mostly case series, case reports, or, if other study design, the
`sample size is small)
`
`
`e Cystic fibrosis
`« Thalassemia
`
`
`
`Possible risk factors but evidence is mixed (comorbidities have been associated with severe COVID-19
`in at least 1 meta-analysis or systematic review, but other studies had reached different conclusions)
`
`» Asthma
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`® Hypertension

`Jmmune deficiencies
`« Liver disease
`
`COVIO-19: coronavirus disease 2019; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Pravention; COPD: chronic
`obstructive pulmonary disaase; 8MI: body mass index.
`* These comorbidities are associated with severe COVID-19 in adults of all ages, Risk of severe disease also
`rises steadily with age, with more than 60% of deaths occurring in adults older than age 65, People of color
`are also at incr

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket