STATE OF CONNECTICUT
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`ADAM P. MCNIECE,
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`STATE OF CONNECTICUT, ET AL
`
`Defendants
`
`IOOIII0000III!IO00CIll
`
`J.D. OF NEW LONDON
`
`AT NEW LONDON
`
`nun-cv)flT;o147s4-s
`W
`
`DATE: 07/22/2016
`
`MOTION TO RESPOND TO A REPLY
`
`The Plaintiff respectfully requests to submit evidence to
`
`support his claim,
`
`in response to the Ryan Ryan & Deluca,
`
`Memorandum in Motion for Summary Judgement (June 23, 2016) which
`
`in part states, ’..that the Plaintiff never told the Defendants
`
`that he suffered from chronic migraine headaches brought on by
`
`reading text and required a reasonable accommodation.’
`
`I seek to introduce to the Court of record both email
`
`correspondence,
`
`the Plaintiffs motions, and the Defendants
`
`objections to motions from other cases where these requests were
`
`made in the past, before this complaint was initiated.
`
`

`
`Also, I would like to point out that this is the first time,
`
`in
`
`this case, or any case that Ryan Ryan & Delcua has referenced an
`
`ADA Coordinator for the Town of Waterford.
`
`I wish to understand
`
`when this position was initiated, and why I was never directed
`
`there previously.
`
`(The Defendants, Memorandum in Support of
`
`Summary Judgement, June 23, 2016, EXHIBIT E Affidavit of Sally
`
`B. Ritchie, June 21, 2016).
`
`It is only through vigilance and access to the record, can the
`
`public trust be protected.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`PLAINTIFF,
`
`ADAM P. McNiece
`
`/\//I
`
`BY: Adam P. McNiece
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATION
`
`I hereby certify that on this date 07/22/2016, a copy of the
`foregoing motion has been sent via regular mail, postage prepaid
`on the following:
`
`Maura Murphy Osborne
`
`Assistant Attorney General
`55 Elm Street
`
`P.O. Box 120
`
`Hartford, CT 06141-0120
`
`Ryan Ryan Deluca, LLP
`707 Summer Street
`
`Stamford, CT 06901
`
`Thomas Clifford
`
`Assistant Attorney General
`55 Elm Street
`
`P.O. Box 120
`
`Hartford, CT 06141-120
`
`By: _.___k__/;
`
`Adam P. McNiece
`
`

`
`ORDER
`
`The following motion having been heard is hereby ordered
`
`Granted
`
`/ Denied.
`
`The Court,
`
`By Judge
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A
`
`

`
`7/22/2016
`
`Fwd: McNiece v. Waterford et al - KNL-CV13-50l452l—S — eacol]insll@gmail.com - Gmail
`
`Gmail
`
`More
`
`Fwd: McNiece v. Waterford et al - KNL-CV1 3-5014521—S
`
`inbox
`
`I
`
`lnbox (2,223)
`Starred
`important
`_
`Sent Mail
`
`Drafts (33)
`
`adam.mcniece@gmail...
`
`eacomns11@gma;._com
`
`N°teS
`
`3 Edwina
`
`Adam Gm"
`to me
`
`_
`Sent from my iPhone
`
`Begin fonivarded message:
`
`From: Adam Gmail <agam.mcniece@gmgil.gom>
`Date: October 26, 2015 at 11:07:04 AM EDT
`To: "Michael C. Barbarula" <mg_Qgrbaru|a@RygnDeluggLaw.gom>
`Subject: Re: McNiece v. Waterford et al - KNL-CV13-5014521-S
`
`Again as a municipal attorney you are required by law to afford me an audio ve:
`accommodation to the Americans with disabilities act when requested.
`
`Sent from my iPhone
`
`On Oct 23, 2015, at 3:09 PM, "Michael C. Barbarula" <mcbarb r
`
`la R nD I
`
`Mr. McNiece,
`
`N0 Ha”9°”ts C°”ta°tS
` fl§
`
`Attached please find the following Reply to Objection to Motion for Judgi
`this afternoon.
`
`Michael C. Barbarula, Esq.
`RIRID Ryan Ryan Deluca LLP
`707 Summer Street
`Stamford, CT 06901
`
`https://mail .google.com/mail/u/O/#inbox/ 1 55e639d65d987c5
`
`1/]
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT BEXHIBIT B
`
`

`
`D.N. KNL-CV13-5014521-S
`
`ADAM MCNIECE
`
`v.
`
`TOWN OF WATERFORD, DANIEL
`STEWARD,FRANK HOAGLAND III,
`THOMAS WAGNER, MICHAEL GLIDDEN,
`ROBERT AVENA
`
`E
`
`:
`
`3
`;
`;
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`J.D. OF NEW LONDON
`
`AT NEW LONDON
`
`JANUARY 31, 2014
`
`OB,|ECTION TO PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION TO HAVE ALL PROCEEDINGS
`PROPERLY RECORDED AND AVAILABLE ONLINE” AND “MOTION TO
`
`VIDEOTAPE AND POST ONLINE ALL DEPOSITIONS”
`
`The undersigned Defendants, Town of Waterford, Daniel Steward, Frank Hoagland III,
`
`Thomas Wagner, Michael Glidden, and Robert Avena, object to the plaintiff’s Motion to Have All
`
`Proceedings Properly Recorded and Available Online, dated January 21, 2014 (entry 146.00) and the
`
`plaintiff’s Motion to Videotape and Post Online All Depositions, dated January 21, 2014 (entry
`
`147.00).
`
`afl
`
`The laintiff does not have a “disabili ” as defined in the Americans with Disabilities
`
`
`Act and is thus not afforded its protections.
`
`
`
`The plaintiff requests, pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),
`
`that all court proceedings be recorded “and made available on the judicial website to make
`
`government more accessible to people with impairments such as myself.” In addition, the plaintiff
`
`- requests that all depositions be videotaped and posted online “in an effort to make governmental
`
`proceeding[s] more accessible.” “The [e']qual lpjrotection [c,]lause of the [flourteenth [a]mendment
`
`to the United States [fcilonstitution is essentially a direction that all persons similarly situated should
`
`be treated alike.” Brooks v. Sweeney, 299 Conn. 196, 218 (2010). The ADA,42 U.S.C.§ 1210] gt
`
`ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED
`
`TESTIMONY IS NOT REQUIRED
`
`

`
`se_q, which was passed using Congress’s power to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment, states that “no
`
`qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from
`
`participation in or be denied the benefits of services of the services, programs, or activities of a
`
`public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by such entity.” 42 U.S.C. § 12132. The ADA
`
`defines a “disability” as follows: “(A) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one
`
`or more major life activities of such individual; (B) a record of such an impairment; or (C) being
`
`regarded as having such an impairment.” 42 U.S.C. § 12102. “Major life activities include, but are
`
`not limited to, caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping,
`
`walking, standing, lifting, bending, speaking, breathing, learning, reading, concentrating, thinking,
`
`communicating, and working.” Lc_l_. Furthermore, “[a]n individual meets the requirement of ‘being
`
`regarded as having such an impairment’ if the individual establishes that he or she has been subjected
`
`to an action prohibited under this Act because of an actual or perceived physical or mental
`
`impairment whether or not the impairment limits or is perceived to limit a major life activity.” _I_d_,
`
`The plaintiff must establish three elements to prevail on a claim under Title II of the ADA:
`
`“(1) [that] he or she is a ‘qualified individual with a disability‘; (2) [that] he or she is being excluded
`
`from participation in, or being denied the benefits of some service, program, or activity by reason of
`
`his or her disability; and (3) [that] the entity [that] provides the service, program, or activity is a
`
`public entity.” Mercer v. Champion, 139 Conn. 216, 229 (2012). The plaintiff does not have a
`
`“disability” as defined in the ADA. He indicated that he filed these motions to make “government
`
`more accessible,” but this is not one of the major life events which would entitle the plaintiff to
`
`claim a “disability” under the ADA. Furthermore, the plaintiff has provided no proof that he has a
`
`2
`
`

`
`“disability” as defined in the ADA. Finally, he has not show that he has been denied the benefits of a
`
`service, program, or activity because of his disability. Accordingly, the defendants request that his
`
`motions be denied.
`
`b.
`
`Depositions are not judicial documents and are not to be disclosed.
`
`The defendants do not object to the plaintiff’s request to videotape all depositions. However,
`
`the defendants do object to the plaintiff’s request to post the depositions in this matter online. “[T]he
`
`public has a common law presumptive right of access to [judicial] documents. . .and likely a
`
`constitutional one as well.” Rosado V. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp, 276 Conn. 168 ,
`
`216-17 (2005). A judicial document “must be relevant to the performance of the judicial function
`
`and useful in the judicial process.” Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 292
`
`Conn. 1, 43 (2009); gag United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). The
`
`Practice Book indicates that documents filed with the court shall be presumptively available to the
`
`public. Practice Book § 1 1-20A(a). However, that right does not extend to documents that have not
`
`been filed with the court.
`
`In B_9_sagg, the Connecticut Supreme Court held that two deposition transcripts that were not
`
`filed in connection with any motion were not judicial documents and were exempt from disclosure.
`
`292 Conn. at 52-53. Here, the plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to publicize al_l_ depositions,
`
`although the depositions have yet to be taken and have not been used in support of or in opposition to
`
`any motion. As such, his motion should be denied.
`
`c.
`
`Conclusion
`
`The plaintiff has cited no authority for the proposition that the Court may issue an order
`
`3
`
`

`
`permitting the parties to post depositions or court proceedings online. Accordingly,the undersigned
`
`defendants respectfully request that the Court deny the plaintiff’s Motion to Have All Proceedings
`
`Properly Recorded and Available Online and the plaintiff’ s Motion to Videotape and Post Online All
`
`Depositions.
`
`THE DEFENDANTS,
`
`TOWN OF WATERFORD, DANIEL
`
`STEWARD, FRANK HOAGLAND III,
`
`THOMAS WAGNER, MICHAEL GLIDDEN,
`ROBERT AVENA
`
`/s/
`
`Michael T. Ryan, Esq.
`Ryan Ryan Deluca LLP
`707 Summer Street
`
`Stamford, CT 06901
`Juris No. 52525
`
`Phone No. 203-357-9200
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on January 31, 2014, a copy of the above was mailed to the following
`
`counsel and pro se parties of record:
`
`Adam P. McNiece
`
`11 Hathaway Road
`East Lyme, CT 06333
`Pro Se Plaintiff
`
`/s/
`
`Michael T. Ryan, Esq.
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT CEXHIBIT C
`
`

`
`DOCKET NO.: KNL-CV-13-5014521-S
`
`MCNIECE, ADAM
`
`vs.
`
`TOWN or WATERFORD,
`DANIEL STEWARD,
`FRANKHOAGLANDIII,
`moms WAGNER.
`MICHAEL GLIDDEN and
`ROBERT AVENA
`
`:
`
`E
`
`2
`
`’
`
`;
`:
`:
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`J.D.0i'-'NEWLONDON
`
`ATNEW LONDON
`
`D T;
`A A“
`.»——~
`
`THE’
`
`‘s
`
`_j.___:._ -_.
`
`____
`
`FOP.” Prxoooofioo.)
`M-9395
`f"\E‘Q\c,nL Cxpcgfisf
`09 [Tqg-'
`N
`\ ggucs
`_.__..
`114;‘ L1‘
`—.____._.--. ....____.__.-..-_.1R_'Q__._£1.u',-’.1wrg___g)‘_B'
`€’<._7,_T_t_>_gL_.,
`..__.__,__,__-C1Q£r_‘__ilY.‘f._-_.1‘.‘I!$:.’Q...i...(,2_!3 1;
`_-_1é.Rzgy ; g;I);~f _w,,__,Q3_“__
`._______j41.Q;L;2D-_‘c1r.2;cA»_\3_Q£_’___x:m_t4‘__AL>.L\_
`égggnm
`_._..__._i_[\_-_’_._(ALi::'.£‘_‘§:__I';';l'l~.!i\_FQ_‘-—(
`;;G__ .2;-;F__-;_1__Lj’r~1<J.'.'
`__(__,m,Q
`_____._._-_‘[B.C_"4 ..._Ds..' r22}__n;A__u.a.__Q'_c2y_§£&.' _
`imF.;n.I’m, F’;A
`__.__.__Ag:L_;<;.t’I~1~:_r;_«_.~cA11;,A;n)_§___~)Lsn;C2_zI_.¢ :4 7
`.R-.___-...---RR-....,....__R._T3i§_..-.,_R.£_mm I new 3
`_\g§lx;____g,_I_j_L_>:;___
`----—¥-—~—————---I-‘LC’-E-+—~—«C,3£~—[E\§LQ..____.lé_flZ4.1f*:D..S..-___(’4.L‘Li_£r.___f_’:lLZ.iif€
`__
`___.-__-.-_.J_.'?____C4t_E';3-_;<’_"l§_..__3.»~J%-W
`p:b33;,5',(;_.'?-L’ _ om fr: gi-,3;Tfl(,
`--,..,.-.__.
`m g£L\_r_?—_["_?:!}}j-.:__.-._..5.2:’_lZ‘.!£’.;JD!.__~.Lt_L_"TC.[‘:._.E2’_3_'§,' ‘~f‘~_._l«_z_.P§ ____,___,
` ug_p~r~T.g¢¢nfioRJ M; £55?
`~-——-——__£.\8«...(a9Q°‘«
`C7.L)x1$‘B.M"3 WT‘ - rm’. n_r_§__r_'t 5
`[).-J ./‘F,
`-\/:(,t5
`1
`I4 77'}:
`supgmgk COURLNEW LONDON
`
`(--
`
`QKIIL
`
`
`
`JUDICIAL DISIRICI AT NEW lONDO£.
`
`

`
`_____
`
`_.
`
`L
`
`Ta
`
`'
`
`___-.____-__._....___..
`C1
`4:.
`‘ 1
`QUAD 1*‘;
`fer
`‘J:
`5.-fgg
`g-,\_;Qe-ru
`__
`1:2
`
`
`‘Si-'_:-_.C2.Lu§.3J_4.:E_7$_i’Y2§2_~LT‘_..- ._ .M..___F_<.4_:_o’ _A_L_sssc'«c A 3;«::-‘
`
`_________
`__
`
`ggsmib
`EUOIO
`
`pu)gL.nrLg;
`1:-f‘~blNC—;'
`
`(yo:
`%.u
`
`II~JCLoQ[¥\}C9
`»c.=
`sad‘
`4:1-"<,.rz;ggC<a.
`
`______
`TT:‘(_,i1/u0bt)C>j
`pd?-0ru~q r0T»0r-J
`g.-Jg
`C)
`26 I
`'
`;4k_
`‘@323;
`‘M’
`Lav) 3.)‘.
`
`"27
`Uo’L'~—'v
`:
`c
`u
`120*!’ 3231’ a‘)t5i:1/
`-.«:_~_.:?..5__f.'.;~_.._7=_$_T.._sggz-4°»;
`.~~.‘“u*L_.._ 11’ _s..u._<>.'-.9.:;_(:.c;m-__.
`
`____
`%%%%_.__,_.
`
`F-'.>ro 1115.. ppvepafé’
`ew°'.€:/.°._.’:%g.~Z...T_’&l4.u9_c'%»~'>€>.
`_W_______M ,\1oJ0 £g’7fi\‘(’___ Ofi Mg 7’ cyubfl
`1’[_~'Jc£" Q(§: 33 LC!
`13.1‘ ppm,
`ALL (‘,¢’nz,a:NN@ 05 mctst?’
`wh’c-‘9
`Smfirg.
`
`.
`
`Adam McNiece
`
`ll Hathaway Road
`East Lyme, CT 06333
`PRO SE LITIGANT
`
`

`
`QRDEB
`
`The foregoing Motion having been heard, it is hereby ORDERED:
`
`GRANTED I DENIED
`
`THE COURT
`
`BY:
`
`JUDGE
`
`SZEBTESZAIIQE
`
`I certify that a copy of the foregoing Plaintifi’s Motion was sent via regular mail, postage
`
`prepaid, on
`
`1/
`
`‘ “ ) L?
`
`y no the following counsel ofrecord:
`
`Michael T. Ryan, Esq.
`Ryan Ryan Deluca LLP
`707 Summer Street
`
`Stamford, CT 06901
`Fax: 203-357-7915
`
`
`
`I'M/V {\\
`
`b
`
`[21
`Adam McNiece
`
`Pro Se Litigant
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT DEXHIBIT D
`
`

`
`_ .
`
`DOCKET No.: KNL-CV-13-5014521-S
`
`MCNIECE, ADAM
`
`vs.
`
`TOWN or WATERFORD,
`DANIEL STEWARD,
`FRANK HOAGLAND 111,
`THOMAS WAGNER,
`
`MICHAEL GLIDDENand
`
`ROBERT AVENA
`
`7
`
`:
`
`E
`
`2
`
`'
`
`.
`;
`
`:
`
`-
`__
`
`FILED
`
`I 2011:
`JAN
`SUPERIOR count
`‘Jew London Jutficiaj 13:33.4
`
`sumuon COURT
`
`J.D.OFNI-ZWLONDON
`
`AT NEW LONDON
`
`4*
`
`D“T‘5~-- Ji9aJ U ZNY
`
`‘
`
`mm '0 NW 31¢ Egwcrcrwbs
`_4@p mL£u M 5 WM.’ _
`..____.___._..._<_3_»:'__<;I_r_V_€___.._____,_
`__
`
`__._-~___,~_,%»_-.»-__E<Lr§.s:¢z42.r;17:_-__Fs3_..«.. A 3213
`
`I910 _$<r<,r.’o.o If
`
`

`
` _—<. _j___
`
`§ :::..—?_.-
`
`THE PLAINTIFF
`
`ADAM MCNIECE
`
`By:
`
`Lat
`Adam McNiece
`
`ll Hathaway Road
`East Lyme, CT 06333
`PRO SE LITIGANT
`
`

`
`QBDEB
`
`The foregoing Motion having been heard, it is hereby ORDERED:
`
`GRANTED / DENIED
`
`THE COURT
`
`BY:
`
`JUDGE
`
`fl
`
`I certify that a copy of the foregoing Plaintiffs Motion was sent via regular mail, postage
`
`prepaid,onW Jug ’L( 1421
`
`tothefollowingcounselofrecord:
`
`Michael T. Ryan, ‘Esq.
`Ryan Ryan Deiuca LLP
`707 Summer Street
`
`Stamford, CT 05901
`Fax:203-357-7915
`
`'
`
`O
`J &
`
`' Wf
`
`By:
`
`M
`Adam McNiece
`
`Pro Se Litigant
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT EEXHIBIT E
`
`

`
`DooK€T Xi C‘/“'15
`
`5’ WV»! 147,0’
`
`'
`
`Mc,“u‘_.’C.E I
`VS
`‘Zb(pN Qbfnfl OCLUG
`mucuwév P-V”)
`M :c.NM1"~— 5“ rL‘3UU.A
`
`A U-«P
`.
`
`% 5uPQ'n.1ofi.» C*°V‘{r
`J»: 9.: Na» *-v~°S*’
`1’ New L°"‘°0
`
`A
`
`t'Wofi0'J
`
`7
`‘ on’
`
`‘
`
`%
`
`~
`fiu’dW 77”"/‘-$¢
`
`nip’:
`
`IN
`
`a
`
`Tu
`
`em<.~r» our-W?
`,1,
`M cflfil/’oru‘r.
`17»: Am._m;u°~s NW“ P"'°8‘¢"7‘5 ’'‘’'/I'
`ésfrbrgdbgj
`f
`,qgQ.,;67V ‘Pzudzo I7Lr°U§0a/FE
`} J ,1 LL COUL7’ p’,L0(,.a_-s’b/A/6_f m 1731:’
`c,/oa’{
`0/
`1,
`,(/5uuL
`77¢.‘
`/Zefl/' nvnv‘-F30’-’:r
`/’6_,’,JA/oLoC>j
`W/1/I
`/=55“!
`77“: 00”“.
`[rJUz’V(’
`,(_-5
`‘/uOIL.;I°U MIf3’0"’
`‘III’:
`fix Mora?
`d/'78’/J
`Cut/IL-K)Q,b0*’¥'\
`/5
`Iirvzmfi
`/3 WW I°"'3°’°
`’“”°
`/4
`am’?
`A:
`» ~~°‘?1LED
`
`.
`
`MAYl42gu,
`w“$3“m%';:‘f.w?m,
`
`P(;
`
`l O;$
`
`©ru«L.
`
`I°r\.ouE’mt.’N(
`
`12.6%)‘-’7’5T‘:0
`
`

`
`ADAM P\°NM°»'.0r
`#14:’ PLMNFLFF
`(FAST. L"1I‘f\‘U
`.
`
`H H Af(qpwh
`Pm; $2.’
`L!“2“‘-"°'*3T.)
`
`orwerri,
`Fo_.;y;c_,¢_,,,.J_(_, Mvbfiors)
`fi¢‘,_r_—
`(5 u.e:n.:8u§ .-~0VLDt.=?'1‘~.5.'D
`‘Fur
`2-.000-T
`
`gt‘
`
`GEEK) N.‘-‘MF4D
`.l'Jl\\/£v\}L__,
` %G"~/‘.'~“*7D / DENIED
`
`B-.3
`
`Janet
`
`_
`
`OcrL‘l’¢FL_b,31/,D/Q _
`f>ov'UCC7on\}(:-
`fivf
`ofi
`.fI’m A
`xvnryplj
`E
`C/may
`,,¢_,,,,\,1fp7f’5 __mpfit>N was 5:311’. vm lZ‘C‘°°£-ML “’W(——
`P05!/A56’
`Pdcpohwo
`orJ_
`Draft Np»;/‘{¢”"qTc'>
`1745'
`Focwwwc
`oowsa-L.
`uP'
`rz‘rc»0"~£> W3 /4’{\»’”‘’‘'"
`lZL1KI~)"Q.l/ION De;-LUCJQ LL-P_
`‘Z07 SUm*":5'rL Sf $1/A’“F"’2*9-
`oT-
`oeao:
`20¢ 7,
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT FEXHIBIT F
`
`

`
`DocA<:T it CV/"’5O(L{7’3 5
`—-
`
`WT J
`E’
`
`uadcz
`
`1
`
`.
`me/UHECJE I ADAM
`v S
`(1.1 ‘N Q./M‘) 9c(_uc,A LLP F I L
`P’HLN?\EK/
`DJ(T°'\-)
`JUN 5 0 20”
`M ‘OMAEL
`6 A (L GUU-A
`sUPEFuORCOURT-NEWLONDON
`,umcmL otsTmcTATNEwymoN
`DA (J? $1:UDlNQ
`FOIL \/ALIOMU
`
`~
`If
`Supgruon. Court.
`J D °F /Um LWDW
`Maw Lor~\D.0IQ
`
`g-y‘°‘\’,D,,J.
`
`c«/I350/‘/5%!
`cu5oH‘%3=S
`
`‘
`JUNE.’ 7.€.\"(/m.z,u€_‘)
`QC‘)
`Rgfllwsf
`N($(DQJ’(J‘£/
`
`’°""*")
`ocnvsfi’ D1600!-‘D
`JAN 13 3”] .
`T1»);/(,1
`uwsgj E rut:
`17u»o,?7D¢3
`/5190
`"J
`vvzposr 0? mr Fmwgs
`
`
`
`c,o%NC:‘l“'»"55 W041‘
`/W0 CDNJWT 05
`[Q
`?7L)1ou7/cDt~Npf/
`$880.55’
`015 IN/3/Hbfbr’
`1'
`
`znarm/Li7<a«\T('
`
`{Tenn}
`
`

`
`[J\)GLtL.’$ l’71,u5-‘I’ N 1-pt-— fnUN)c,r,hLfi9
`0? mt
`/MD €,0>J5£‘NT’
`E.
`_.,/J ‘
`uluc/Lo
`/‘,p‘("
`'3;
`new Sea)
` Fm mr w,W,m[mUt, up
`m{_
`a .
`{mougfmxj
`.
`.
`INSWL N9?
`PM-‘N51;
`CJ0:v‘$LD'C'VL.— mtg
`nfaucgr ‘from’
`A -Vn<.C»«ot\p0)31’(D~S
`
`T
`
`{hint Fr“!
`
`/3
`
`.2
`
`""0 "“"E "'5{7’?—‘E"Wf”l/A/(>"': ma"
`I
`
`L-/f$r.‘Dow\
`
`.
`
`-
`
`n"""5(/U E
`up mg
`C
`
`‘V
`
`c:
`
`
`]vF%%nsr[ »s%r.7,x;<;m:;;u.+*]T A"
`'3‘7 T”-' UM-~s
`.
`_
`..
`._ _/‘.'‘’:9_
`UH”
`_
`“"“'“‘“‘ ’ AAA
`N
`T
`177*? Pt-%~TeFF
`I4{3.NV\.
`.I‘V".‘.’I,\)u1‘.‘_LI.',’
`l.MTt~l,8.v,~’.7\!?’ %r2.I)% t.’«'A.$T' L-v‘_1_:~_-xV§_ J @§_33_‘}__
`4:
`«mo saf
`9» ~caé§>T
`..
`.
`
`714
`
`’(
`
`(S Q/;~Q’U¢5
`
`.
`
`T39‘-'
`‘I-— ~‘—5 '~*'»17‘-U-'£‘73“§
`1k’nc
`
`T
`L
`
`c2a4o:rLL%
`V'ADT:.Df\.)..l"’Ii\,\/.lV.\’¢.a. mien tJ_C4srLD
`L
`D.!*.‘A)tz§_D A
`
`u.>ur>3'
`
`i
`
`V
`
`I353-
`
`Jun 51»?
`
`
`
`-
`
`
`
`%
`
` %-C<cr¢u>.z,,.s<L»,§‘_ %
`
`
`
`T
`
`
`
`
`
`F°1°.':°W:5“A:TMv??%'>r9-was 2;_ur-m} 11:29:-9I..NFL._mn:C..
`ID
`7
`JD“
`e,pu~sr<, 915 Q;g_,.;_n._-_> 5;)
`f'o.Lg.45‘<.J.INV.(.>
`‘1a. ,
`/0630!-I
`-
`
`'zo7 summfn-.« sf snmfomp
`R nIs3.'fZL1orx)gD LUCA (_L,P
`
`.
`
`'
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT GEXHIBIT G
`
`

`
`Doc,{<€T
`
`T1
`
`C,\/./(.150! L-(713-S
`
`DnT{ OH? Low}
`
`pqcwzics I ADAM
`
`5up€fUD“-«
`
`6'00“-"I
`
`{zgtpw Q“/Mo Qcgogn L,.LP
`m:c.N';~€v
`m{m\)
`Mzounff‘-— '3MU3v<—‘-A
`
`fii’ Maw LUNDOIO
`T
`FILED
`
`*2
`
`515:4
`
`.‘
`
`"°”' M‘ "5Js":§::%7s°Te.::;*,;:°.%:u~2s3:e:,.
`“‘°“°“’
`OF Nam rLCom,g,»I<>5°
`‘
`
`- .{
`
`'
`
`3:
`
`Fvprfi-L»
`
`1'3 m«5s:oz«~\
`
`S17-Vzmcui
`
`TN? C4):/rLT
`p,cauc’§\/
`/Z€SpEZJ«/FJUI7
`J:
`opuxl
`{lCc.¢’I~§t.’
`H/5
`rLvL'(,on.0n~/c_5
`op
`pQU6a,CD’Né5
`ID
`VNC’
`raufgtlo
`Counj/r),U0,v3
`L
`IN KJNO
`f;
`UT-‘Ll
`figa-gt’
`/"’
`/f>I2£pv°/M (on)
`76°/L
`7/ILIAL,
`[$7
`
`L15/f~;Jm/(,
`
`‘
`f 'I([
`81 (7/47).
`W
`/Z£‘[ofL{_v;¢7J{/I
`
`P40090045 Mo w,cm.r{,/
`AGCE’
`5<—CI_/
`
`/91¢
`
`pc,
`
`‘ of
`
`0rz.»L.
`
`flmoufmtwf
`
`¢Lg<.gué:’5T7;'D
`
`50:0.’
`
`145V 17”-'5:
`
`

`
`Cor~4p(/N"J7"‘
`
`Face’
`
`,a
`
`$£73‘5>bo(?
`
`TN/2.»:/cw
`
`WTLOC/Cb://)_g-3.
`Coo/27’
`
`/0410 at
`
`0
`
`-
`CDUQ/3{"D’J
`
`04‘ ll;
`I
`U/QC”""T; 7/7%
`
`*
`
`‘
`
`.2’
`
`»
`
`T
`
`” 095'
`
`/W9 ma’
`
`M/k
`1.’mrl }. %m»~»/¢$/~:V,3_UC)
`apt» /wp
`flL\,,z",\"37*€’
`PLMM1/«FF
`ADAM m<«r\).{:¢,{,’
`H tW7~*I°w7~\?_% 1:10
`EAST ”1".\t: J @533}
`Pm) s< L.»
`.c,mT J}
`
`c2r<»oé=T‘L
`
`it
`
`INC F<.>.J1»tfc.ou~?(; Mvhord Hm/mg,
`.255, uq.r;D
`Is
`14:11:89‘ —orLm:?!7.::.’D
`Lc,;u~T;_;,/Dm.,gD_
`THC eourfl’
`:
`_
`
`‘
`
`8&3 dunes?
`
`jJ»
`
`.Q5."§r!."~eL_A_l/~oN
`4T’ma”r. A. copy of
`
`aofi’
`
`PbP.¢Nm.’7:5’.-MDr?°=“...WF$ H.101’ vm :za:<eoc~r1%mmc.
`:o5I’nc,c;
`(.)fLCPOrn9
`0"). D"? €177/U,;fl-;
`r~_F
`"°C-U’W'~’(>
`oouwsa-L.
`oi’: Q;n*_.o_r2__r> 9;]
`,¢( lg
`lZ‘1Jq:E)A:{Ll.[I°I‘\3
`LL.P__ 70’? SvM¢\)E—fL
`S-Uqmpomg
`
`G ‘
`
`oeaoz
`
`.
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT HEXHIBIT H
`
`

`
`D.N. KNL-CV14-5014713-S
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`ADAM P. MCNIECE
`
`J .D. OF NEW LONDON
`
`V.
`
`AT NEW LONDON
`
`RYAN RYAN DELUCA LLP, ET AL
`
`SEPTEMBER 26, 2014
`
`OB,[ECTION TO MOTION FOR RELEASE OF AUDIO RECORDINGS
`
`The undersigned defendants, Ryan Ryan Deluca LLP, Michael T. Ryan, and Michael C.
`
`Barbarula, object to the plaintiff, Adam P. McN'iece’s, Motion for Release of Audio Recordings,
`
`dated September 17, 2014 (entry 126.00).
`
`The plaintiff argues that the Court should release the “recordings of open to the public
`
`courtroom proceedings” to him so that he can prepare for trial and so that he “will better be able to
`
`self represent.” It appears to defense counsel that the plaintiff has requested that the court release the
`
`recordings of all court proceedings. This motion, therefore, seeks relief which the court is not
`
`empowered to give. There is nothing in the case law, Connecticut General Statutes, or the Practice
`
`Book which permits a court to release audio recordings of courtroom proceedings on motion.
`
`Accordingly, the defendants respectfully request that the Court deny the plaintiff’s motion.
`
`ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED
`
`TESTIMONY IS NOT REQUIRED
`
`

`
`THE DEFENDANTS,
`
`RYAN RYAN DELUCA LLP, MICHAEL T.
`RYAN AND MICHAEL C. BARBARULA
`
`By:
`
`/s/
`Michael T. Ryan, Esq.
`Ryan Ryan Deluca LLP
`707 Summer Street
`
`Stamford, CT 06901
`Juris No. 52525
`
`Phone No. 203-357-9200
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on September 26, 2014, a copy of the above was mailed to the
`
`following counsel and pro se parties of record:
`
`Adam P. McNiece
`
`11 Hathaway Road
`East Lyme, CT 06333
`Pro Se Plaintiff
`
`/s/
`
`Michael T. Ryan, Esq.
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT IEXHIBIT I
`
`

`
`DooKcT T‘
`
`c\//az5oIL(7z3—s
`
`om: mm L773
`
`[HE/RJIECE I
`vs
`
`(VHC,N’/\(;k/
`i"HountT’L..
`
`
`OCLUQ/«X
`p.,k{m\)
`l3nrgc3u¢__L./_\
`
`V
`
`5uP¢'n_1on_, Courfr
`J15 or Um Luwoo/J
`
`.
`
`_
`APRl72m5 '_
`
`_
`
`b
`
`SUPERIORCOUB?-.‘”Zs-'.'_
`JUD!CW.DlSTRlC" 1
`
`’.
`
`mofiod
`
`Fun.
`
`(‘,(,<‘fL1(,nL _
`
`77*\"7~5
`"
`L’ A Qt§>ux:;.SV
`D¢,¥,K;::
`Juooé’
`’°"’°”7”g”~
`TM.‘ aw?
`M '1
`nPPU'—5
`Fa mtg»... (ins?
`.1. M50
`MWULST
`/«LL
`/wow FIFNSCJKIIA-E
`Of
`("€‘hQM/Q3
`
`PI;
`
`| or‘
`
`€)FU‘L.-
`
`FPLUUEfifiN( A‘!’z__(_¢,aU,~sf5‘[’,3_'Q
`
`5::¢' Qéu o:fL${.'
`
`

`
`41L/mflw
`.77‘“r
`IDLAINEFF
`Aggy‘ mpwmg-AL’
`H Mfwnwmg
`:19
`cm?‘ I-‘jmt: J @4733}
`P_n,0 §( ALI‘
`tc-_>noJ—(+
`
`cqmocri,
`
`_
`
`UN.’
`I5
`
`it
`
`|:<.J.~.O.1.‘?€>oz:~?C2 Mohon) Hm/zvdc,
`rgfeid
`(.)<.‘;_g,r;D
`N..CFU."3.‘.-1 . ~0fLDLg?fL1S'D
`T
`C_5ru_\~T'.c:D_/ DENIED
`1740
`€-.«_>ur_>3_'
`A
`A
`133.
`Jdoeé’
`
`.
`
`V
` THM’T A copy
`V
`Jv
`Pb_P..¢N7.17.‘7:/5"'..:,-5“D.770N was é_t'_—'.zU‘l..’
`v/In
`
`fl‘)?
`01.‘
`lZ.E<2UU°I’L.mn:C..
`
`,4.
`(5-3
`cpuwsrc. 9F Q_(g,qn_._')
`"'<.).CL6L/.”_".(=.
`'Zt1”_'£.);_'fl't/’°~..D‘7(—QCJ9 LLP. 707 Sum!‘-;E’f7.-« Sf sfiqmfipmp
`
`0 '
`
`06?0;
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT JEXHIBIT J
`
`

`
`I LoZ3.Q©
`
`DOCKET # KNL-CV—14—50l4713—S
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`ADAM P. MCNIECE
`
`J.D. OF NEW LONDON
`
`v.
`
`AT NEW LONDON
`
`RYAN RYAN DELUCA LLP
`
`DATE: A 8/5.016’
`
`MOTION
`
`OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR JUDGEMENT
`
`I object to this motion because it is based upon multiple
`
`motions to strike. This case centers around a municipal
`
`attorneys duty to inform the public and has survived
`
`previous motions to dismiss, and motions to strike.
`
`I
`
`rewrote a portion at the courts direction. Did the court
`
`purposefully mislead me? Fundamentally, motions to strike
`
`are unjust because they impact a citizens right of free
`
`speech. This Judge would have me rewrite the complaint
`
`over and over until it is diluted to the point of nonsense.
`
`I have a visual defect as a result of the aging
`
`process.
`
`I request the audio transcript of the entire case
`
`which is known to be the publics domain. This impairment or
`
`handicap makes my life difficult because I struggle to read
`
`the tape measure or follow the path of the saw. when I work
`
`atop the 40ft ladder I realize I am not as agile as I was
`
`25 years ago. At dinner,
`
`I have menu's read to me, and eat
`
`without seeing the food with clarity. This is a physical
`
`defect which is readily self identifiable. Other defects of
`
`

`
`the mind are not so easily identified.
`
`I have great respect for all Judges whom have a most
`
`arduous task usually late in life's journey.
`
`I have
`
`concerns that the explanation for this Judge allowing
`
`multiple motions to strike may be diminished capacity as
`
`evidenced by his unintelligible written decisions which are
`
`devoid of logic.
`
`As a pro—se I would never be allowed multiple motions
`
`to strike.
`
`I have also been denied my right of discovery
`
`and deposition, as the Judge has obviously hobbled this
`
`case.
`
`I ask how Honorable Chase T. Rogers in her
`
`administrative capacity what safeguards are in place to
`
`protect the public from the ravages of time, and is this a
`
`indication of when retirement is overdue? As a ordinary
`
`carpenter I realize my prospects dim as my vision fails,
`
`and shortly will hang my belt on the peg I built for that
`
`purpose.
`
`I generally consider myself a likable fellow but some
`
`dislike me for my outspoken words of progress for humanity.
`
`Perhaps the Judge has a pro—se bias. We all know that the
`
`brotherhood of a reluctant self regulating profession
`
`dislike pro—se parties immensely.
`
`It could be that the Judge has been directed from above
`
`to short change justice. It's no secret that I advocate for
`
`CT Judicial to evolve quickly to catch up to other States
`
`by using court monitors over reporters, and allowing
`
`citizens to seek supreme justice as a constitutional
`
`

`
`birthright. This Judge may harbor resentment because I gave
`
`CT first opportunity to address these issues.
`
`I did not
`
`name him in the Federal complaint, and publicly apologize
`
`to Judge Moukawaser for errors I committed as an
`
`inexperienced pro-se.
`
`I hope to be better in my new career
`
`for I continue to learn much since I started,
`
`to protect
`
`the public in Waterford from unannounced warrantless
`
`administrative searches.
`
`In conclusion,
`
`I would prefer not to appeal this case
`
`and be afforded a full and fair hearing.
`
`Perhaps the Judge
`
`did not realize the case has survived a motion to dismiss,
`
`and a previous motion to strike in which I made changes to
`
`my complaint under objection,
`
`to comply with the courts
`
`direction. Why would he grant a subsequent motion to strike
`
`all counts? Either he will correct his error, or the next
`
`court will find this procedure unjust.
`
`In any case,
`
`I
`
`predicted his decision and included it in the Federal
`
`Complaint so hopefully there will be a discussion on free
`
`speech in a valid complaint to advance human jurisprudence.
`
`In service of Truth.
`
`Adam P. McNiece
`
`PLAINTI§F
`
`T
`
`
`ADAM P. MCNIECE
`
`BY: ADAM P MCNIECE
`
`3
`
`

`
`ORDER
`
`The foregoing Motion having been heard, it is hereby
`ORDERED:
`GRANTED / DENIED
`
`THE COURT
`
`BY:
`
`JUDGE
`
`CERTIFICATION
`
`I certify that a copy of the foregoing Defendants
`
`motion was sent via regular mail, postage prepaid on
`
`to the following counsel of record:
`
`RYAN RYAN DELUCA LLP
`
`707 SUMMER STREET
`
`STAMFORD, CT 06901
`
`By: Adam P. McNiece
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT KEXHIBIT K
`
`

`
`DOCKET NO.: KNL-CV14-5014784-S
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`ADAM P. MCNIECE
`
`v.
`
`STATE 015 CONNECTICUT ET AL.
`
`.I.D. OF NEW LONDON
`
`AT NEW LONDON
`
`/{u 0, O
`MOTION Fe. 4,
`nu?7o~5 ,
`,,,1’c,Wg,,;r.,m{5 mm c>f?..0U’2.$
`
`DIITZ
`
`Dz-L 6} Zuz ‘-|
`
`fl.t.‘hL:l'(1
`~1‘“"
`Sl’{:.vLbLL“ WHTJ
`_M L.
`/‘M ~/\/ OQ,(nl/
`of-' ml” Nvmmo
`c,u:~JmUb<J
`0:47
`/iéikb, I
`i9zF9:L.viSK/
`.(Lm~9Iv~J5
`.,u~I9 m/ NA-Jbwflwfiuio gvffimg
`,.,c,so,1:
`nravzsl’
`/ILL Mbfiowj mom 30171
`WM’ SW:
`rwo
`’F~>w
`fir /afamzo /1; mr
`'” W /w0n_3V__
`véorun wf
`fir-.5!’ 0!/Lefléb
`fijf pcoumbijfl/jaw cur}
`o£P»u.% L./1~:€n(
`/up c,o-W9
`U,,;;rL~r<5
`./A1’ 114:’
`oéfimcv
`(D
`flap 77¢
`11:)?’ 5
`71¢
`(A-“.uLg NCT
`0(*z,1oI\hn__/
`/_
`.
`J’) wwcy
`52./box’ $2’
`0'~’f"?25’ D0“/5
`_${<y)Oé’
`0/L
`uoucty
`UL.’ M4
`/‘Coon.-,»g'i9I79J
`011571»
`wm7”r’ax/
`Iufinucflrzm ,c;3‘
`I
`/3-c'¢n:v2.’.
`TZHJC’ half’
`/Icwm oonfvn/5
`wmplq V
`
`./’%LLw—JCl9
`
`,(,/«loan, N9/o nf’£e:’LI
`
`lCCL€§~~5 LL’
`
`‘
`
`~
`DEC09201§
`
`NOBOCNIHT-PEWLCIDON
`
`:'LmmmAmEwLmm
`
`c)r2.A<,
`
`1°/{6o&:""'hz:NT' Qc'Qog'§7:’v)
`
`

`
`/
`
`.
`
`,.w~.>~/I-O.
`
`’179.«.w_'lL
`
`fi,.*\m.T
`
`'3v\7“ .
`
`3
`
`I3.-,,J:~)
`
`_,...:.1«5:
`
`gfzfg 3
`
`.1,..;.W.b.9 Hm/e."..
`
`_
`
`‘MC-U1 pr~§_15.‘“’.'.J.
`
`..
`
`LN}
`
`.3 oi7it‘fLS
`
`1
`
`.
`3.1.)...
`T[Q{§_(
`I«J*fi‘ 3 6
`M3
`mj .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`._:..FfL.ur'\
`,9,;§A3.:(_)u,1_,7.1l/{,.5......
`3
`.3
`.
`1_Th(>._.-_..(7]:,.....--»:fi-U—0l-C£—]-hL€,...- 65.«15t’g«v:.,...-..;wzu;:~)
`Z» _M,~<.6«:69 MIN...
`.1)»./L(‘Lu’n-T/—-—-—»p1/51-««'.-U-~-VIGGVQL‘),
`0/L Té» ..C»_r_u,=..».z<v=19...
`/3f€z>.rL,utx3.‘§3
`A
`3
`ll
`6
`_
`f’.9.’.’»
`(lrmla.k_{.
`,.6,~3.33_ n3.666r?>u2r.:ueJ
`.I'l'{."l‘«”~—1>.§’23-11,.‘ 17>
`./J"z»C.-J‘ 6T3’N._»;i. SK~{€2f7>.¢y
`17>,
`l’LI.C>‘Hf-4 05.
`. C42t'z.'e:N3-3
`-3'
`/“(J)”-”7“‘--~-6 nv-ff
`‘
`L,;_5\_?__«m5l1.
`BU.-.‘.L.0(lw.’.Q,..
`c.)Fe*'L.a(’.¥JK-S_..,_....V!..2'.‘.7r3'‘‘)
`/1.
`.....yq1))u_,L(,3.,'I€)\C_.».
`y0rf’(_).¢'1.r:?
`.. Q.p..B.?1.A.
`in/)THa~,/7
`.O6.-._.cmJnz°_v’\).7.’5.6 __..6_.c<..mms
`6.6-?’1.~n5.3
`C/_.,W‘.5t:-,\;‘z‘7
`..
`....5?r.‘i.C.2->.>.J.Q.
`_.,’3zfz‘../.
`-- 57”"""3~J
`3.
`.. ,.., ,V,z:1’_ .. uuv.uc.o-.A .N’~.?T..
`imubl’:/.9 L5
`1/H12_77u1J5 61¢: .
`cjf.’L,..._/.1-€f_t._/,~’S£'..
`rr-'7
`,;,,a,n-1
`[mus/7‘ _/54'.
`..
`_,./,4_0’,l5Ef
`..or‘
`.fT.7/</.
`
`.
`
`.§l<:VJg ..
`
`,CuL6»x.:zv3r2..c.7 ur\J9~afl.ST§.A1v.M../C>...
` at Mo _/9.2.2./4/=:6t>3.S(
`5 ofF3..1‘7*F
`,p4;;;f.;r‘ ci-oak
`I/(<§’<=?U”"’~'3/—"""‘—"‘/I?
`T(§Ifl,0 L/DH
`/30.1329 C’
`
`THE PLAINTIFF;-,
`
`By:
`
`ADAMP. ZCNTECE
`
`‘*3
`P. McNiece
`A
`11 Hathaway Road, East Lyme, CT 06333
`860-460-9636
`
`1Cj(7’
`
`adam.mcniece@gmaiI.com
`Pro Se Litigant
`
`

`
`ORDER
`
`The foregoing having been heard is hereby ORDERED:
`
`GRANTED / DENIED
`
`BY THE COURT,
`
`JUDGE / ASSISTANT CLERK .
`
`CERTIFICATION
`
`I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent via regular mail to the following counsel of
`record on
`may
`7 u)"°(
`
`MAURA BRIDGET MURPHY-OSBORNE, ESQ.
`' AG—SPECIAL LIT 2ND FL
`
`55 ELM ST PO BOX 120
`
`HARTFORD, CT 061410120
`
`RYAN RYAN DELUCA LLP
`
`707 SUMIVIER STREET
`
`STAMFORD, CT 06901
`
`AAG THOMAS P CLIFFORD II, ESQ.
`AG-WORKERS COMP/LABOR
`
`PO Box 120
`
`HARTFORD, CT 061410120
`
`by ;{/~\___
`
`Adam P. McNiece
`
`Pro Se Litigant