throbber
SUMMONS - CIVIL For information on ADA STATE OF CONNECTICUT
`JD-CV-1 Rev. 2-25 accommodations, contact JUDICIAL BRANCH /=5
`C.G.S. §§ 51-346, 51-347, 51-349, 51-350, 52-45a, 52-48, 52-259; the Centralized ADA Office SUPERIOR COURT \"
`P.B. §§ 3-1 through 3-21, 8-1, 10-13 at 860-706-5310 or go to: jud.ct.gov
`
`Instructions are on page 2.
`
`www.jud.ct.gov/ADA/
`
`D Select if amount, legal interest, or property in demand, not including interest and costs, is LESS than $2,500.
`
`[XI Select if amount, legal interest, or property in demand, not including interest and costs, is $2,500 or MORE.
`
`|:| Select if claiming other relief in addition to, or in place of, money or damages. fl %z }é M/[ _ él/ZSf K 07( Zfl { '
`
`TO: Any proper officer
`By authority of the State of Connecticut, you are hereby commanded to make due and legal service of this summons and attached complaint.
`
`Address of court clerk (Number, street, town and zip code) Telephone number of clerk Return Date (Must be a Tuesday)
`70 Huntington Street, New London, CT 06320 (860 ) 447 — 5363 01/13/2026
`
`E Judicial District GA. At (City/Town) Case type code (See list on page 2)
`
`[C] Housing Session [ Number: New London Major: T Minor: 12
`
`For the plaintiff(s) enter the appearance of:
`
`Name and address of attorney, law firm or plaintiff if self-represented (Number, street, town and zip code) Juris number (if attorney or law firm)
`Conway, Londregan, Sheehan & Monaco, 38 Huntington Street, New London, CT 06320 010792
`
`Telephone number
`
`(860 ) 447 - 3171
`
`Signature of plaintiff (if self-represented)
`
`The attorney or law firm appearing for the plaintiff, or the plaintiff if self-represented, agrees E-mail address for delivery of papers under Section
`
`to accept papers (service) electronically in this case. Any attorney who is not exempt from
`e-filing is required to accept electronic delivery. (Practice Book Section 10-13) D Yes D No
`
`10-13 of the Connecticut Practice Book
`efiling@clsmlaw.com
`
`Parties Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) and address of each party (Number; street; P.O. Box; town; state; zip; country, if not USA)
`First Name: Daniels, Erika P-01
`plaintiff | Address: 607 Norwich Avenue, Apartment 441, Taftville, CT 06380
`Additional | Name: o
`plaintiff Address:
`First Name: Ponemah Riverbank, LLC, 241 HUDSON STREET, HACKENSACK, NJ 07601 D-01
`defendant | Address: Agent for Service: Paula O'Neill, 607 Norwich Avenue, Taftville, CT 06380
`Additional |[Name: Ponemah Riverbank Holdings, LLC, 241 HUDSON STREET, HACKENSACK, NJ 07601 D-02
`defendant | Address: Agent for Service: Paula O'Neill, 607 Norwich Avenue, Taftville, CT 06380
`Additional |Name: Ponemah Riverbank Managing Member, LLC, 241 HUDSON STREET, HACKENSACK, NJ 07601 D-03
`defendant | Address: Agent for Service: Paula O'Neill, 607 Norwich Avenue, Taftville, CT 06380
`Additional |Name: Ponemah Riverbank Unit A North, LLC, 241 HUDSON STREET, HACKENSACK, NJ 07601 D-04
`defendant | Address: Agent for Service: Paula O'Neill, 607 Norwich Avenue, Taftville, CT 06380
`Total number of plaintiffs: 1 Total number of defendants: 7 [x] Form JD-CV-2 attached for additional parties
`
`Notice to each defendant
`
`1. You are being sued. This is a summons in a lawsuit. The complaint attached states the claims the plaintiff is making against you.
`
`2. To receive further notices, you or your attorney must file an Appearance (form JD-CL-12) with the clerk at the address above. Generally,
`it must be filed on or before the second day after the Return Date. The Return Date is not a hearing date. You do not have to come to
`court on the Return Date unless you receive a separate notice telling you to appear.
`
`3. If you or your attorney do not file an Appearance on time, a default judgment may be entered against you. You can get an Appearance
`form at the court address above, or on-line at hitps:/jud.ct.gov/iwebforms/.
`
`4. If you believe that you have insurance that may cover the claim being made against you in this lawsuit, you should immediately contact
`your insurance representative. Other actions you may take are described in the Connecticut Practice Book, which may be found in a
`superior court law library or on-line at https://www.jud.ct.gov/pb.htm.
`
`5. If you have questions about the summons and complaint, you should talk to an attorney.
`
`The court staff is not allowed to give advice on legal matters.
`
`Date Signed (Sign and select proper box, @ Commissioner of Superior Court Name of person signing
`12/15/2025 4 O cierk | Eric J. Garofano
`
`If this summons is signed by a Clerk: For Court Use Only
`a. The signing has been done so that the plaintiff(s) will not be denied access to the courts. File Dete
`b. Itis the responsibility of the plaintiff(s) to ensure that service is made in the manner provided by law.
`c. The court staff is not permitted to give any legal advice in connection with any lawsuit.
`d. The Clerk signing this summons at the request of the plaintiff(s) is not responsible in any way for any
`errors or omissions in the summons, any allegations contained in the complaint, or the service of the
`summons or complaint.
`| certify | have read and Signed (Self-represented plaintiff) Date Docket Number
`understand the above: 12/15/2025
`
`Print Form_] Page 1 of 2 [_Reset Form |
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL SUMMONS
`
`CONTINUATION OF PARTIES
`JD-CV-2 Rev. 9-12
`
`STATE OF CONNECTICUT
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`First named Plaintiff (Last, First, Middle Initial)
`Daniels, Erika
`
`First named Defendant (Last, First, Middle Initial)
`Ponemah Rlverbank, LLC
`
`Additional Plaintiffs
`
`Name (Last, First, Middle Initial, if individual) Address (Number, Street, Town and Zip Code) CODE
`03
`04
`05
`06
`07
`08
`09
`10
`11
`12
`13
`Additional Defendants
`Name (Last, First, Middle Initial, if individual) Address (Number, Street, Town and Zip Code) CODE
`Ponemah Riverbank Unit A South LLC 241 Hudson St, Hackensack, NJ 07601 05
`Agent for service: Paula O'Neill, 607 Norwich Ave Taftville, CT 06380 | og
`Ponemah Riverbank Unit B-2, LLC 241 Hudson St, Hackensack, NJ 07601 07
`Agent for Service: Paula O'Neill, 607 Norwich Ave Taftville, CT 06380 | o8
`Konover Residential Corporation 342 North Main Street, Suite 200, West Hartford, CT 06117 09
`Agent for Serviqe: The Simon Konover Company, 342 North Main 10
`Street, Suite 200, West Hartford, CT 06117
`11
`FOR COURT USE ONLY - File Date
`12
`13
`14 I Socketnumber
`
`CIVIL SUMMONS-Continuation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONAcoO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. P.O. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320
`
`(860) 447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`RETURN DATE: JANUARY 13 2025
`
`DOCKET NO.: KNL-CV25-6076207-S SUPERIOR COURT
`ERIKA DANIELS : J.D. OF NEW LONDON
`VS. : AT NEW LONDON
`PONEMAH RIVERBANK LLC, DECEMBER 15, 2025
`PONEMAH RIVERBANK HOLDINGS LLC,
`PONEMAH RIVERBANK MANAGING
`MEMBER LLC, PONEMAH RIVERBANK
`UNIT A NORTH LLC, PONEMAH RIVERBANK
`UNIT A SOUTH LLC, PONEMAH RIVERBANK
`UNIT B-2 LLC, KONOVER RESIDENTIAL
`CORPORATION
`
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`COUNT ONE: Negligence against Ponemah Riverbank LLC
`
`1. At all times relevant hereto, the Plaintiff, Erika Daniels, was and is a resident of
`Taftville, Connecticut.
`
`2. The Defendant, Ponemah Riverbank LLC, at all relevant times hereto, was and
`is a limited liability company duly formed and organized in the State of New Jersey, and owned,
`possessed, leased, rented, controlled, maintained and/or were responsible for the maintenance,
`supervision and safety of the apartment complex known as “Lofts at Ponemah Mills” located at
`607 Norwich Avenue, Taftville, Connecticut.
`
`3. The Defendant, Ponemah Riverbank Holdings LLC, at all relevant times
`hereto, was and is a limited liability company duly formed and organized in the State of New
`
`Jersey, and owned, possessed, leased, rented, controlled, maintained and/or were responsible for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONAcCO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. P.O. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860)447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`the maintenance, supervision and safety of the apartment complex known as “Lofts at Ponemah
`Mills” located at 607 Norwich Avenue, Taftville, Connecticut.
`
`4. The Defendant, Ponemah Riverbank Managing Member LLC, at all relevant
`times hereto, was and is a limited liability company duly formed and organized in the State of
`New Jersey, and owned, possessed, leased, rented, controlled, maintained and/or were
`responsible for the maintenance, supervision and safety of the apartment complex known as
`“Lofts at Ponemah Mills” located at 607 Norwich Avenue, Taftville, Connecticut.
`
`5. The Defendant, Pone_ghah Riverbank Unit A North LLC, at all relevant times
`hereto, was and is a limited liability company duly formed and organized in the State of New
`Jersey, and owned, possessed, leased, rented, controlled, maintained and/or were responsible for
`the maintenance, supervision and safety of the apartment complex known as “Lofts at Ponemah
`Mills” located at 607 Norwich AvenuF, Taftville, Connecticut.
`
`6. The Defendant, Ponemah Riverbank Unit A South LLC, at all relevant times
`hereto, was and is a limited liability company duly formed and organized in the State of New
`Jersey, and owned, possessed, leased, rented, controlled, maintained and/or were responsible for
`the maintenance, supervision and safety of the apartment complex known as “Lofts at Ponemah
`Mills” located at 607 Norwich Avenue, Taftville, Connecticut.
`
`7. The Defendant, Ponemah Riverbank Unit B-2 LLC, at all relevant times hereto,
`was and is a limited liability company duly formed and organized in the State of New Jersey, and
`
`owned, possessed, leased, rented, controlled, maintained and/or were responsible for the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONAco, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. PO. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860)447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`maintenance, supervision and safety of the apartment complex known as “Lofts at Ponemah
`Mills” located at 607 Norwich Avenue, Taftville, Connecticut.
`
`8. On or about August 30, 2023, the Plaintiff was walking out of her building
`towards the building’s parking lot whereupon she slipped and fell on stones that where in the
`walkway, which caused the injuries and damages as hereinafter set forth.
`
`9. The stones had come from landscaping beds near the walkway that did not have
`any landscaping edging or other barrier to prevent the stones from coming out of the beds and
`into the walkway.
`
`10. The Defendants were in ownership, possession, control and/or maintained the
`subject landscaping beds.
`
`11. The Defendant, Ponemah Riverbank LLC, through its agents, employees, and/or
`representatives was negligent and careless in one or more of the following respects in that it:
`
`a. Maintained landscaping beds filled with stones without any
`landscaping edging or other barrier to prevent the stones from coming out
`of the beds and into the walkway;
`
`b. allowed the aforesaid defective and unreasonably dangerous
`condition to exist near the subject walkway for such a period of time that
`the Defendant knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have
`known of the existence of such defective and unreasonably dangerous
`
`condition and yet failed to remedy and correct the same;
`
`c. failed to properly inspect its property to ascertain that it was
`reasonably safe to use;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONAcCO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. P.O. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860) 447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`12.
`
`allowed this hazardous condition to develop over a
`significant period of time during which the Defendant had ample
`opportunity to repair the defect;
`
`failed to place barriers around the landscaping beds to
`prevent stones from moving into the walkway;
`
`failed to place warning signs around the walkway so as to
`warn and protect lawful users from the defective and unreasonably
`dangerous condition;
`
`failed to adequately train its employees regarding safe practices for
`maintaining the subject landscaping beds and removing debris such as
`stones from the subject walkway;
`
`failed to remove or hire someone to properly maintain the
`landscaping beds and to remove accumulated debris from the subject
`walkway; and
`
`Knew or should have known that having landscaping beds
`filled with stones that did not have any barrier around them would cause
`stones to be scattered across the subject walkways.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of the
`
`Defendant, as aforesaid, the Plaintiff fell hard to the ground causing injuries including but not
`
`limited to her right foot, including a fracture of her fifth metatarsal, right ankle, right arm and
`
`right knee. To treat these injuries, the Plaintiff was placed upon a substantial program of physical
`
`therapy and was prescribed various types of medication. The injuries sustained by the Plaintiff
`
`will necessitate further care and are permanent in nature. Moreover, it is likely that the injuries to
`
`the Plaintiff will be the source of continuing pain and disability.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONACO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. PO. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860) 447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`13. As a further result of the negligence and carelessness of the Defendant, as
`
`aforesaid, the Plaintiff was required to spend substantial sums of money for medical care,
`
`services, treatment, x-rays, drugs and other treatment necessitated by her injuries.
`
`COUNT TWO: Negligence against Ponemah Riverbank Holdings LL.C
`
`1-10. Paragraphs 1 through. 10 of Count One are hereby incorporated and re-alleged as
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 10 of Count Two as though fully set forth in Count Two.
`
`11. The Defendant, Ponemah Riverbank Holdings LLC, through its agents,
`
`employees, and/or representatives was negligent and careless in one or more of the following
`
`respects in that it:
`
`a.
`
`Maintained landscaping beds filled with stones without any landscaping
`edging or other barrier to prevent the stones from coming out of the beds
`and into the walkway;
`
`allowed the aforesaid defective and unreasonably dangerous condition to
`exist near the subject walkway for such a period of time that the
`Defendant knéw, or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known
`of the existence of such defective and unreasonably dangerous condition
`and yet failed to remedy and correct the same;
`
`failed to properly inspect its property to ascertain that it was reasonably
`safe to use;
`
`allowed this hazardous condition to develop over a significant period of
`time during which the Defendant had ample opportunity to repair the
`defect;
`
`failed to place barriers around the landscaping beds to prevent stones from
`moving into the walkway;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONAcoO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. P.O.BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860)447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`f. failed to place warning signs around the walkway so as to warn and
`protect lawful users from the defective and unreasonably dangerous
`condition;
`
`g. failed to adequately train its employees regarding safe practices for
`
`maintaining the subject landscaping beds and removing debris such as
`stones from the subject walkway;
`
`h. failed to remove or hire someone to properly maintain the landscaping
`beds and to remove accumulated debris from the subject walkway; and
`
`i. Knew or should have known that having landscaping beds filled with
`stones that did not have any barrier around them would cause stones to be
`scattered across the subject walkways.
`
`12. As adirect and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of the
`Defendant, as aforesaid, the Plaintiff fell hard to the ground causing injuries including but not
`limited to her right foot, including a fracture of her fifth metatarsal, right ankle, right arm and
`right knee. To treat these injuries, the Plaintiff was placed upon a substantial program of physical
`therapy and was prescribed various types of medication. The injuries sustained by the Plaintiff
`will necessitate further care and are permanent in nature. Moreover, it is likely that the injuries to
`the Plaintiff will be the source of continuing pain and disability.
`
`13. As a further result of the negligence and carelessness of the Defendant, as
`
`aforesaid, the Plaintiff was required to spend substantial sums of money for medical care,
`
`services, treatment, x-rays, drugs and other treatment necessitated by her injuries.
`
`COUNT THREE: Negligence against Ponemah Riverbank Managing Member LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONACcO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. PO. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860)447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`1-10.
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 10 of Count One are hereby incorporated and re-alleged as
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 10 of Count Three as though fully set forth in Count Three.
`
`11.
`
`The Defendant, Ponemah Riverbank Managing Member LLC, through its agents,
`
`employees, and/or representatives was negligent and careless in one or more of the following
`
`respects in that it:
`
`a.
`
`Maintained landscaping beds filled with stones without any landscaping edging or
`other barrier to prevent the stones from coming out of the beds and into the
`walkway;
`
`allowed the aforesaid defective and unreasonably dangerous condition to exist
`near the subject walkway for such a period of time that the Defendant knew, or in
`the exercise of reasonable care, should have known of the existence of such
`defective and unreasonably dangerous condition and yet failed to remedy and
`correct the same;
`
`failed to properly insbect its property to ascertain that it was reasonably safe to
`use;
`
`allowed this hazardous condition to develop over a significant period of time
`during which the Defendant had ample opportunity to repair the defect;
`
`failed to place barriers around the landscaping beds to prevent stones from
`moving into the walkway;
`
`failed to place warning signs around the walkway so as to warn and protect lawful
`users from the defective and unreasonably dangerous condition;
`
`failed to adequately train its employees regarding safe practices for maintaining
`the subject landscaping beds and removing debris such as stones from the subject
`walkway;
`
`failed to remove or hire someone to properly maintain the landscaping beds and to
`remove accumulated debris from the subject walkway; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONACO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. P.O. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860)447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`i. Knew or should have known that having landscaping beds filled with stones that
`did not have any barrier around them would cause stones to be scattered across
`the subject walkways.
`
`12. As adirect and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of the
`Defendant, as aforesaid, the Plaintiff fell hard to the ground causing injuries including but not
`limited to her right foot, including a fracture of her fifth metatarsal, right ankle, right arm and
`right knee. To treat these injuries, the Plaintiff was placed upon a substantial program of physical
`therapy and was prescribed various types of medication. The injuries sustained by the Plaintiff
`will necessitate further care and are permanent in nature. Moreover, it is likely that the injuries to
`the Plaintiff will be the source of continuing pain and disability.
`
`13. As a further result of the negligence and carelessness of the Defendant, as
`aforesaid, the Plaintiff was required to spend substantial sums of money for medical care,
`
`services, treatment, x-rays, drugs and other treatment necessitated by her injuries.
`
`COUNT FOUR: Negligence against Ponemah Riverbank Unit A North LL.C
`
`1-10. Paragraphs 1 through 10 of Count One are hereby incorporated and re-alleged as
`Paragraphs 1 through 10 of Count Four as though fully set forth in Count Four.
`
`11. The Defendant, Ponemah Riverbank Unit A North LLC, through its agents,
`employees, and/or representatives was negligent and careless in one or more of the following
`respects in that it:
`
`a. Maintained landscaping beds filled with stones without any landscaping edging or
`
`other barrier to prevent the stones from coming out of the beds and into the
`walkway;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONACO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. PO. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860)447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`12.
`
`allowed the aforesaid defective and unreasonably dangerous condition to exist near
`the subject walkway for such a period of time that the Defendant knew, or in the
`exercise of reasonable care, should have known of the existence of such defective
`and unreasonably dangerous condition and yet failed to remedy and correct the
`same;
`
`failed to properly inspect its property to ascertain that it was reasonably safe to use;
`
`allowed this hazardous condition to develop over a significant period of time during
`which the Defendant had ample opportunity to repair the defect;
`
`failed to place barriers around the landscaping beds to prevent stones from moving
`into the walkway;
`
`failed to place warning.signs around the walkway so as to warn and protect lawful
`users from the defective and unreasonably dangerous condition;
`
`failed to adequately train its employees regarding safe practices for maintaining the
`subject landscaping beds and removing debris such as stones from the subject
`walkway;
`
`failed to remove or hire someone to properly maintain the landscaping beds and to
`remove accumulated debris from the subject walkway; and
`
`Knew or should have known that having landscaping beds filled with stones that did
`not have any barrier around them would cause stones to be scattered across the
`
`subject walkways.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of the
`
`Defendant, as aforesaid, the Plaintiff fell hard to the ground causing injuries including but not
`
`limited to her right foot, including a fracture of her fifth metatarsal, right ankle, right arm and
`
`right knee. To treat these injuries, the Plaintiff was placed upon a substantial program of physical
`
`therapy and was prescribed various types of medication. The injuries sustained by the Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONACO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. P.O. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860) 447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`will necessitate further care and are permanent in nature. Moreover, it is likely that the injuries to
`the Plaintiff will be the source of continuing pain and disability.
`
`13. As a further result of the negligence and carelessness of the Defendant, as
`aforesaid, the Plaintiff was required to spend substantial sums of money for medical care,
`services, treatment, x-rays, drugs and other treatment necessitated by her injuries.
`
`COUNT FIVE: Negligence against Ponemah Riverbank Unit A South LL.C
`
`1-10. Paragraphs 1 through 10 of Count One are hereby incorporated and re-alleged as
`Paragraphs 1 through 10 of Count Five as though fully set forth in Count Five.
`
`11. The Defendant, Ponemah Riverbank Unit A South LLC, through its agents,
`employees, and/or representatives was negligent and careless in one or more of the following
`respects in that it:
`
`a. Maintained landscaping beds filled with stones without any landscaping
`edging or other barrier to prevent the stones from coming out of the beds
`and into the walkway;
`
`b. allowed the aforesaid defective and unreasonably dangerous condition to
`exist near the subject walkway for such a period of time that the
`Defendant knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known
`of the existence of such defective and unreasonably dangerous condition
`
`and yet failed to remedy and correct the same;
`
`c. failed to properly inspect its property to ascertain that it was reasonably
`safe to use;
`
`d. allowed this hazardous condition to develop over a significant period of
`
`time during which the Defendant had ample opportunity to repair the
`defect;
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONAcO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. P.O.BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860)447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`12.
`
`failed to place barriers around the landscaping beds to prevent stones from
`moving into the walkway;
`
`failed to place warning signs around the walkway so as to warn and
`protect lawful users from the defective and unreasonably dangerous
`condition;
`
`failed to adequately train its employees regarding safe practices for
`maintaining the subject landscaping beds and removing debris such as
`stones from the subject walkway;
`
`failed to remove or hire someone to properly maintain the landscaping
`beds and to remove accumulated debris from the subject walkway; and
`
`Knew or should have known that having landscaping beds filled with
`stones that did not have any barrier around them would cause stones to be
`scattered across the subject walkways.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of the
`
`Defendant, as aforesaid, the Plaintiff fell hard to the ground causing injuries including but not
`
`limited to her right foot, including a fracture of her fifth metatarsal, right ankle, right arm and
`
`right knee. To treat these injuries, the Plaintiff was placed upon a substantial program of physical
`
`therapy and was prescribed various types of medication. The injuries sustained by the Plaintiff
`
`will necessitate further care and are permanent in nature. Moreover, it is likely that the injuries to
`
`the Plaintiff will be the source of continuing pain and disability.
`
`13.
`
`As a further result of the negligence and carelessness of the Defendant, as
`
`" aforesaid, the Plaintiff was required to spend substantial sums of money for medical care,
`
`services, treatment, x-rays, drugs and other treatment necessitated by her injuries.
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONACO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. P.O. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860)447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`COUNT SIX: Negligence against Ponemah Riverbank Unit B-2 LL.C
`
`1-10. Paragraphs 1 through 10 of Count One are hereby incorporated and re-alleged as
`Paragraphs 1 through 10 of Count Six as though fully set forth in Count Six.
`
`11. The Defendant, Ponemah Riverbank Unit B-2 LLC, through its agents,
`employees, and/or representatives was negligent and careless in one or more of the following
`respects in that it:
`
`a. Maintained landscaping beds filled with stones without any landscaping
`edging or other barrier to prevent the stones from coming out of the beds
`and into the walkway;
`
`b. allowed the aforesaid defective and unreasonably dangerous condition to
`exist near the subject walkway for such a period of time that the
`Defendant knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known
`of the existence of such defective and unreasonably dangerous condition
`
`and yet failed to remedy and correct the same;
`
`c. failed to properly inspect its property to ascertain that it was reasonably
`safe to use;
`
`d. allowed this hazardous condition to develop over a significant period of
`time during which the Defendant had ample opportunity to repair the
`defect;
`
`e. failed to place barriers around the landscaping beds to prevent stones from
`
`moving into the walkway;
`
`f. failed to place warning signs around the walkway so as to warn and
`protect lawful users from the defective and unreasonably dangerous
`condition;
`
`g. failed to adequately train its employees regarding safe practices for
`
`maintaining the subject landscaping beds and removing debris such as
`stones from the subject walkway;
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONACO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. P.O. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320
`
`(860) 447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`h. failed to remove or hire someone to properly maintain the landscaping
`beds and to remove accumulated debris from the subject walkway; and
`
`i Knew or should have known that having landscaping beds filled with
`stones that did not have any barrier around them would cause stones to be
`scattered across the subject walkways.
`
`12. As adirect and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of the
`Defendant, as aforesaid, the Plaintiff fell hard to the ground causing injuries including but not
`limited to her right foot, including a fracture of her fifth metatarsal, right ankle, right arm and
`right knee. To treat these injuries, the Plaintiff was placed upon a substantial program of physical
`therapy and was prescribed various types of medication. The injuries sustained by the Plaintiff
`will necessitate further care and are permanent in nature. Moreover, it is likely that the injuries to
`the Plaintiff will be the source of continuing pain and disability.
`
`13. As a further result of the negligence and carelessness of the Defendant, as
`
`aforesaid, the Plaintiff was required to spend substantial sums of money for medical care,
`
`services, treatment, x-rays, drugs and other treatment necessitated by her injuries.
`
`COUNT SEVEN: Negligence as to Konover Residential Corporation
`
`1-10. Paragraphs 1 through 10 of Count One are hereby incorporated and re-alleged as
`Paragraphs 1 through 10 of Count Seven as though fully set forth in Count Seven.
`
`11. The Defendant, Konover Residential Corporation, is a Connecticut corporation
`with a business address of 342 North Main Street, Suite 200, West Hartford, CT 06117
`
`authorized to conduct business in the State of Connecticut and the Defendant Konover
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONACO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. P.O. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860) 447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`Residential Corporation had a contract with Defendants Ponemah Riverbank LLC, Ponemah
`Riverbank Holdings LLC, Ponemah Riverbank Managing Member LLC, Ponemah Riverbank
`Unit A North LLC, Ponemah Riverbank Unit A South LLC, and Ponemah Riverbank Unit B-2
`LLC for property management on the subject premises where the Plaintiff fell.
`
`8. The Defendant, Konover Residential Corporation, through its agents, employees,
`and/or representatives was negligent and careless in one or more of the following respects in that
`it:
`
`a. Maintained landscaping beds filled with stones without any landscaping
`edging or other barrier to prevent the stones from coming out of the beds and
`into the walkway;
`
`b. allowed the aforesaid defective and unreasonably dangerous condition to exist
`near the subject walkway for such a period of time that the Defendant knew,
`or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known of the existence of
`such defective and unreasonably dangerous condition and yet failed to remedy
`
`and correct the same;
`
`c. failed to properly inspect its property to ascertain that it was reasonably safe
`to use;
`
`d. allowed this hazardous condition to develop over a significant period of time
`during which the Defendant had ample opportunity to repair the defect;
`
`e. failed to place barriers around the landscaping beds to prevent stones from
`moving into the walkway;
`
`f. failed to place warning signs around the walkway so as to warn and protect
`lawful users from the defective and unreasonably dangerous condition;
`
`g. failed to adequately train its employees regarding safe practices for
`
`maintaining the subject landscaping beds and removing debris such as stones
`from the subject walkway;
`
`14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONAco, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. P.O. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860)447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`h. failed to remove or hire someope to properly maintain the landscaping beds
`and to remove accumulated debris from the subject walkway; and
`
`i. Knew or should have known that having landscaping beds filled with stones
`that did not have any barrier around them would cause stones to be scattered
`across the subject walkways.
`
`9. As a direct a proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of the Defendant,
`as aforesaid, the Plaintiff fell hard to the ground causing injuries including but not limited to a
`fractured finger. To treat these injuries, the Plaintiff was placed upon a substantial program of
`physical therapy and was prescribed various types of medication. The injuries sustained by the
`Plaintiff will necessitate further care and are permanent in nature. Moreover, it is likely that the
`injuries to the Plaintiff will be the source of continuing pain and disability.
`
`10. As a further result of the negligence and carelessness of the Defendant, as
`aforesaid, the Plaintiff was required to spend substantial sums of money for medical care,
`services, treatment, x-rays, drugs and other treatment necessitated by her injuries.
`
`11. As a further direct and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of the
`
`Defendant, as aforesaid, the Plaintiff was in the past unable to pursue her usual course of
`
`employment, thereby sustaining substantial financial loss.
`
`15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONWAY, LONDREGAN, SHEEHAN & MONACO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`38 HUNTINGTON ST. P.O. BOX 1351 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 (860) 447-3171
`
`JURIS # 10792
`
`WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully prays for:
`1. Fair, just and reasonable

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket