throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`J.D. OF LITCHFIELD
`
`AT TORRINGTON
`
`DECEMBER 22, 2022
`
`DOCKET NO.: LLI-CV22-6031774-S
`
`MARY GRYNIUK
`
`
`VS.
`
`
`THE ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD
`a/k/a THE HARTFORD ROMAN CATHOLIC
`DIOCESAN CORPORATION, ET AL.
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS’ SECOND
` MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
`
`
`
`
`The Plaintiff, in the above-entitled matter, hereby objects to the Defendants’, Archdiocese of
`
`Hartford a/k/a The Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation, Leonard P. Blair and
`
`Emmanuel Ihemedu, second Motion For Extension of Time dated December 21, 2022 for the
`
`following reasons:
`
`
`
`1.
`
`On September 16, 2022, the Plaintiff served the Writ, Summons and Complaint dated
`
`September 15, 2022 with a return date of October 25, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`On October 27, 2022, an appearance was filed on behalf of the Defendants.
`
`On November 14, 2022, the Defendants filed a Motion for Extension of Time for
`
`thirty (30) days to file a responsive pleading to the Plaintiff’s Complaint until December 27, 2022
`
`(see attached Exhibit A).
`
`
`MANCINI LAW
`777 Echo Lake Road • Suite G • Watertown, CT 06795• Office: (860) 215-8969• Fax: (860) 470-8205
`Juris # 439563
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`4.
`
`On December 21, 2022, the Defendants again asked for an additional thirty (30) days
`
`extension of time to file a responsive pleading to the Plaintiff’s Complaint until January 26, 2023 (see
`
`attached Exhibit B).
`
`
`
`The Defendants have had more than enough time to formulate a response to the Plaintiff’s
`
`Complaint.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court sustain this Objection to the
`
`Defendants’ second Motion for Extension of Time dated December 21, 2022, and that the Defendants
`
`be ordered file a responsive pleading to the Plaintiff’s Complaint dated September 15, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THE PLAINTIFF,
`MARY GRYNIUK
`
`BY:__/S/ 431884__________________
` Nicholas R. Mancini, Esq.
`
` Mancini Law
` 777 Echo Lake Road, Suite G
` Watertown, CT 06795
` Juris No.: 439563
` (860) 215-8969
` Her Attorneys
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 2 of 3
`
`MANCINI LAW
`777 Echo Lake Road • Suite G • Watertown, CT 06795• Office: (860) 215-8969• Fax: (860) 470-8205
`Juris # 439563
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I certify that a copy of this document was or will immediately be mailed or delivered
`electronically or non-electronically on December 22, 2022 to all attorneys and self-represented
`parties of record and that written consent for electronic delivery was received from all attorneys
`and self-represented parties who were or will immediately be electronically served.
`
`Jacob P. Riley, Esq.
`Cooney, Scully & Dowling
`Hartford Square North
`10 Columbus Boulevard
`Hartford, CT 06106
`jriley@csd-law.com
`
`Matthew D. Popilowski, Esq.
`Lynch Traub Keefe & Errante PC
`52 Trumbull Street
`P.O. Box 1612
`New Haven, CT 06506
`MPopilowski@LTKE.com
`
`
`
`
`/S/ 431884
`
`Nicholas R. Mancini, Esq.
`Commissioner of the Superior Court
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 3 of 3
`
`MANCINI LAW
`777 Echo Lake Road • Suite G • Watertown, CT 06795• Office: (860) 215-8969• Fax: (860) 470-8205
`Juris # 439563
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`HARTFORD SQUARE NORTH • 10 COLUMBUS BOULEVARD • HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06106 • (860) 527-1141 • (860) 247-5215 fax • JURIS NO. 10872
`
`
`
`LAW OFFICES • COONEY, SCULLY AND DOWLING
`
`
`
`MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
`
`Defendants, Archdiocese of Hartford a/k/a The Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.,
`
`Leonard P. Blair and Emmanuel Ihemedu hereby move for an extension of thirty (30) days, until
`
`December 27, 2022, within which to file a pleading in response to the Complaint in this case. In support
`
`of this motion, the defendants represent that such time is necessary in order to properly investigate and
`
`respond to the plaintiff’s claims.
`
`DEFENDANTS, Archdiocese of Hartford
`a/k/a The Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan
`Corp., Leonard P. Blair and Emmanuel Ihemedu
`
`
`BY:
`
`
`
`/s/ Jacob P. Riley – Juris No. 431972
`Jacob P. Riley
`Cooney, Scully and Dowling
`Hartford Square North
`10 Columbus Boulevard
`Hartford, Connecticut 06106-1944
`(860) 527-1141 / Juris No. 10872
`
`
`{W0745537.1}
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NO. LLI-CV22-6031774-S
`
`GRYNIUK, MARY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VS.
`
`
`
`
`THE ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD
`a/k/a THE HARTFORD ROMAN CATHOLIC
`DIOCESAN CORPORATION, ET AL.
`
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
`LITCHFIELD
`
`AT TORRINGTON
`
`
`
`
`
` NOVEMBER 14, 2022
`
`:
`
`:
`:
`
`:
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATION
`
`I certify that a copy of the above was or will immediately be mailed or delivered electronically or
`
`non-electronically on November 14, 2022 to all counsel and self-represented parties of record and that
`
`written consent for electronic delivery was received from all counsel and self-represented parties of record
`
`who were or will immediately be electronically served.
`
`For the Plaintiff
`Nicholas R. Mancini, Esq.
`Mancini Law
`777 Echo Lake Road
`Suite G
`Watertown, CT 06795
`alex@mancinilaw.net
`
`For the Defendant Mauricio Galvis
`Matthew D. Popilowski, Esq.
`Lynch, Traub, Keefe & Errante, PC
`52 Trumbull Street
`P. O. Box 1612
`New Haven, CT 06506
`MPopilowski@LTKE.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jacob P. Riley – Juris No. 431972
`Jacob P. Riley
`
`HARTFORD SQUARE NORTH • 10 COLUMBUS BOULEVARD • HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06106 • (860) 527-1141 • (860) 247-5215 fax • JURIS NO. 10872
`
`
`
`LAW OFFICES • COONEY, SCULLY AND DOWLING
`
`
`
`{W0745537.1}
`
`2
`
`

`

`11/14/22, 12:24 PM
`
`You have successfully e-filed!
`
` Attorney/Firm: COONEY SCULLY & DOWLING (010872)
`You have successfully e-filed!
`Hide Instructions
`
`E-Mail: bgustafson@csd-law.com Logout
`
`Instructions: The information about the item you filed is on this confirmation page. You must print a copy of this page for your records.
`Choose Print This Page at the top of the page to print your copy.
`
`Choose E-File Another Pleading/Motion/Other on this Case to go back to the Select a Motion page to choose another document
`name and file another document.
`
`Choose Return to Superior Court E-Filing Menu to go back to the menu page.
`
`Choose Return to Case Detail to look at the documents filed in this case or to file a reclaim in this case.
`
`
`
`
`
`Print This Page
`
`Confirmation of E-filed Transaction (print this page for your records)
`Docket Number:
`LLI-CV-22-6031774-S
`GRYNIUK, MARY v. ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD A/K/A THE HARTFORD
`Case Name:
`ROMAN C Et Al
`Type of Transaction:
`Pleading/Motion/Other document
`Date Filed:
`Nov-14-2022
`Motion/Pleading by:
`COONEY SCULLY & DOWLING (010872)
`Document Filed:
`102.00 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
`
`Date and Time of Transaction:
`
`Monday, November 14, 2022 12:24:49 PM
`
`
`
`
`E-File Another Pleading/Motion/Other document on this Case
`
`
`
`Return to Case Detail
`
`Return to Civil / Family Menu
`
`
`
`
`
`Copyright © 2022, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch
`
`https://efile.eservices.jud.ct.gov/motion/EFileConfirmation.aspx?crn=4686688&UnID=613669915&Auth=594082b7ff514412926db73da9192831
`
`1/1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`EXHIBIT B
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NO. LLI-CV22-6031774-S
`
`GRYNIUK, MARY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VS.
`
`
`
`
`THE ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD
`a/k/a THE HARTFORD ROMAN CATHOLIC
`DIOCESAN CORPORATION, ET AL.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
`LITCHFIELD
`
`AT TORRINGTON
`
`
`
`
`
`DECEMBER 21, 2022
`
`:
`
`:
`:
`
`:
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
`
`Defendants, Archdiocese of Hartford a/k/a The Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.,
`
`Leonard P. Blair and Emmanuel Ihemedu hereby move for an extension of an additional thirty (30)
`
`days, until January 26, 2023, within which to file a pleading in response to the Complaint in this case. In
`
`
`
`support of this motion, the defendants represent that such time is necessary in order to properly investigate
`
`and respond to the plaintiff’s claims.
`
`DEFENDANTS, Archdiocese of Hartford
`a/k/a The Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan
`Corp., Leonard P. Blair and Emmanuel Ihemedu
`
`
`BY:
`
`
`
`/s/ Jacob P. Riley – Juris No. 431972
`Jacob P. Riley
`Cooney, Scully and Dowling
`Hartford Square North
`10 Columbus Boulevard
`Hartford, Connecticut 06106-1944
`(860) 527-1141 / Juris No. 10872
`
`
`{W0747720.1}
`
`1
`
`HARTFORD SQUARE NORTH • 10 COLUMBUS BOULEVARD • HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06106 • (860) 527-1141 • (860) 247-5215 fax • JURIS NO. 10872
`
`LAW OFFICES • COONEY, SCULLY AND DOWLING
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATION
`
`I certify that a copy of the above was or will immediately be mailed or delivered electronically or
`
`non-electronically on December 21, 2022 to all counsel and self-represented parties of record and that
`
`written consent for electronic delivery was received from all counsel and self-represented parties of record
`
`who were or will immediately be electronically served.
`
`For the Plaintiff
`Nicholas R. Mancini, Esq.
`Mancini Law
`777 Echo Lake Road
`Suite G
`Watertown, CT 06795
`alex@mancinilaw.net
`
`For the Defendant Mauricio Galvis
`Matthew D. Popilowski, Esq.
`Lynch, Traub, Keefe & Errante, PC
`52 Trumbull Street
`P. O. Box 1612
`New Haven, CT 06506
`MPopilowski@LTKE.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jacob P. Riley – Juris No. 431972
`Jacob P. Riley
`
`HARTFORD SQUARE NORTH • 10 COLUMBUS BOULEVARD • HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06106 • (860) 527-1141 • (860) 247-5215 fax • JURIS NO. 10872
`
`LAW OFFICES • COONEY, SCULLY AND DOWLING
`
`
`
`{W0747720.1}
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
ÿ ÿ

ÿ
`   ÿÿ
`D6ZÿcVd9ÿ[Z^^9[[\ZWW:ÿ9T\=W9_e
`CTUV=W?ÿXYZ[5V\[68]^[_TWV`a^6>ÿG6Y6Z5
`ÿ4556789:;<=7>?ÿ@AABCDÿE@FGGDÿHÿIAJGKBLÿMNONPQRS
`b=_9ÿK8[57Z^5=68[
`K8[57Z^5=68[?ÿf ÿ!   !ÿ0
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿÿÿ !ÿ ÿ !  !ÿÿ
`
ÿ
ÿ!ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ
ÿ 
`$ ÿg7=85ÿhc=[ÿgVY9ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ!ÿ
ÿ 
`$ ÿCT<=W9ÿ4865c97ÿgW9V_=8Y;U65=68;A5c97ÿ68ÿ5c=[ÿ@V[9ÿ ÿ ÿ0iÿ ÿ ÿE9W9^5ÿVÿU65=68ÿÿ ÿ ÿ!  ÿ 
!
`! ÿ!ÿÿ!  ÿ 
!
`$ ÿj95Z78ÿ56ÿEZk97=67ÿ@6Z75ÿCT<=W=8YÿU98Zÿ ÿ ÿ0iÿ ÿ ÿ !
ÿ
`$ ÿj95Z78ÿ56ÿ@V[9ÿI95V=Wÿ ÿ iÿÿ ÿ 
!ÿÿ!ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿÿ ÿ!ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
`l!ÿf ÿl
`@68\=7>V5=68ÿ6\ÿCT\=W9_ÿh7V8[V^5=68ÿÿMk7=85ÿ5c=[ÿkVY9ÿ\67ÿ:6Z7ÿ79^67_[S
`ÿ
`I6^m95ÿBZ>X97?
`nn,$o (211p
`qr
`s,+t ÿ r
`ÿÿr$u-,v$"p"ÿv#ÿurf#vr-ÿtÿfu"ÿurf#vr-
`@V[9ÿBV>9?
`rv sÿ$ÿ"ÿ
`h:k9ÿ6\ÿh7V8[V^5=68?
`l!  !v ÿ 
!
`IV59ÿ<=W9_?
`-  
`U65=68;gW9V_=8YÿX:?
`$vvs"
`ÿp$+nn
`ÿ*ÿ-vwn,sqÿx)1 y
`I6^Z>985ÿ<=W9_?
`ÿ vf,vsÿ#vrÿ"zf"sp,vsÿv#ÿf, "ÿfvÿln"-
`IV59ÿV8_ÿh=>9ÿ6\ÿh7V8[V^5=68? w! ÿ- 0ÿ ÿ  ÿ.2ÿ
`ÿÿÿÿÿ
`ÿ
`"#ÿ!  ÿl!  !v ÿ 
!ÿ !ÿ ÿ$
`r
!ÿ ÿ$ÿÿ# ÿ !
ÿ
`r
!ÿ ÿ$ÿ-
`$  ÿ{ÿ  ÿpÿ ÿ$ !!
ÿ|
ÿ}!
` 
   !"#$ !  !%&!'()(())*+!,-'( )./*
 '.(01(2/)
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket