`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 56 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
`
`E-NUMERATE SOLUTIONS, INC. and
`E-NUMERATE, LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`C.A. No. 19-859-RTH
`
`v.
`
`THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`Defendant.
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND THE
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`Plaintiffs e-Numerate Solutions, Inc., and e-Numerate, LLC (collectively “e-Numerate” or
`
`“Plaintiffs”) hereby moves this Court to amend the current Scheduling Order (D.I. 54) in this
`
`matter to provide Plaintiffs additional time to review and consider Defendant the United States of
`
`America’s (the “Government”) invalidity contentions in this matter. The parties met and conferred
`
`and the Government does not oppose this motion. In support thereof, Plaintiffs aver as follows.
`
`WHEREAS this litigation involves eight United States Patents and multiple claims within
`
`each patent;
`
`WHEREAS Plaintiffs served their preliminary infringement contentions in this matter on
`
`December 15, 2020, when this litigation involved seven patents;
`
`WHEREAS Plaintiffs served supplemental preliminary infringement contentions on
`
`February 26, 2021;
`
`WHEREAS Plaintiffs amended the Complaint on April 27, 2021, to assert United States
`
`Patent 10,423,708;
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 56 Filed 07/19/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`WHEREAS Plaintiffs served its Second Supplemental Preliminary Infringement
`
`Contentions on June 8, 2021 alleging infringement of over ninety (90) claims across eight patents;
`
`WHEREAS the Government served its preliminary invalidity contentions (“invalidity
`
`contentions” on July 6, 2021;
`
`WHEREAS the Government’s invalidity contentions set forth 62 separate invalidity
`
`contentions based on alleged prior art either alone or in combination;
`
`WHEREAS the Government additionally advanced three invalidity contentions based on
`
`obviousness-type double patenting that also includes alleged prior art;
`
`WHEREAS the Government also advanced multiple invalidity theories under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`112;
`
`WHEREAS the Government has agreed to supplement aspects of its invalidity contentions
`
`and to supplement its cover pleading to avoid motion practice;
`
`WHEREAS Plaintiffs agree not to engage in motion practice regarding Defendant’s
`
`invalidity contentions including with respect to their adequacy or conformance with this Court’s
`
`rules (however, this agreement does not preclude Plaintiffs moving for summary judgment and/or
`
`Daubert and/or motions in limine regarding the substance of the contentions and does not signify
`
`agreement by Plaintiffs that the asserted claims are invalid); and
`
`WHEREAS Plaintiffs require additional time to consider the multiplicity of invalidity
`
`theories advanced by the Government as well as the Government’s supplemental invalidity
`
`contentions before engaging in claim construction in this matter;
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully move this Court to amend the Scheduling Order as
`
`follows, which the Government does not oppose:
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 56 Filed 07/19/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`EVENT
`
`PRIOR DEADLINE
`
`NEW DEADLINE
`
`Defendant supplements its
`invalidity contentions
`Parties exchange claim terms
`for construction
`Parties exchange proposed
`claim construction
`Parties disclose extrinsic
`evidence they may rely upon
`for claim construction
`Deadline to meet and confer to
`narrow terms in dispute and
`exchange revised claim
`constructions
`Plaintiffs file their opening
`claim construction brief
`The Government files its
`responsive claim construction
`brief
`Plaintiffs file their reply claim
`construction brief
`The Government files it sur-
`reply claim construction brief
`The parties submit the joint
`claim construction statement
`and propose dates for the
`Markman hearing in the first
`half of January
`If desired, parties may submit
`joint technical tutorial to the
`Court
`Markman Hearing
`
`Deadline for the government
`to produce technical
`documents for additional
`agencies named in the second
`amended complaint.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 19, 2021
`
`-
`
`20 July 2021
`
`3 August 2021
`
`July 26, 2021
`
`3 September 2021
`
`17 September 2021
`
`10 August 2021
`
`24 September 2021
`
`17 August 2021
`
`1 October 2021
`
`24 August 2021
`
`8 October 2021
`
`14 September 2021
`
`29 October 2021
`
`28 September 2021
`
`12 November 2021
`
`12 October 2021
`
`3 December 2021
`
`19 October 2021
`
`10 December 2021
`
`26 October 2021
`
`17 December 2021
`
`To be scheduled
`
`To be scheduled
`
`30 November 2021
`
`31 January 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 56 Filed 07/19/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Sean T. O’Kelly
`Sean T. O’Kelly
`Gerard M. O’Rourke
`O’KELLY & O’ROURKE, LLC
`824 N. Market Street, Suite 1001A
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`302-778-4000
`sokelly@okorlaw.com
`gorourke@okorlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 56 Filed 07/19/21 Page 5 of 5
`Case 1:19—cv-00859—RTH Document 56 Filed 07/19/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`