throbber
Case 1:15-cv-00350-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`AGINCOURT GAMING, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`)
`)
`
`)
`
`) Civil Action No. __________
`
`)
`) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`COMPLAINT
`
`For its Complaint, Plaintiff Agincourt Gaming, LLC ("Agincourt Gaming"), by and
`
`through the undersigned counsel, alleges as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Agincourt Gaming is a Delaware limited liability company with a place of
`
`business located in Plano, Texas.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. is a Delaware corporation with, upon information
`
`and belief, a place of business located in Redwood City, California.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`This action arises under the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
`
`Subject matter
`
`jurisdiction
`
`is proper
`
`in
`
`this Court under 28 U.S.C.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`§§ 1331 and 1338.
`
`5.
`
`Venue is proper in this district.
`
`THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`6.
`
`On October 23, 2001, United States Patent No. 6,306,035 (the '035 patent") was
`
`duly and legally issued for an invention entitled "Graphical User Interface For Providing Gaming
`
`And Prize Redemption Capabilities." A true and correct copy of the '035 patent is attached as
`
`

`
`Case 1:15-cv-00350-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 2
`
`Exhibit A.
`
`7.
`
`On June 3, 2013, United States Patent No. 8,454,432 (the "'432 patent"), entitled
`
`"Method for Providing Network Gaming System," was duly and lawfully issued by the U.S.
`
`Patent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the '432 patent is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit B.
`
`8.
`
`The '035 patent and the '432 patent issued from a series of applications extending
`
`back to November 14, 1996.
`
`9.
`
`Agincourt Gaming was assigned the '035 patent and the '432 patent, and continues
`
`to hold all rights and interest in the patents.
`
`10.
`
`Defendant designs, makes, markets, uses, offers for sale, and/or sells the
`
`following products that infringe the '035 patent: Origin.
`
`11.
`
`Defendant designs, makes, markets, uses, offers for sale, and/or sells the
`
`following products that infringe the '432 patent: Origin-enabled games, including, but not
`
`limited to, Mass Effect 3 and FIFA 15.
`
`12.
`
`To redress Defendant's infringement of the '035 patent and the '432 patent,
`
`Agincourt Gaming seeks actual damages.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`13.
`
`Agincourt Gaming was formed in April 2011. Agincourt Gaming provided online
`
`social network games. Its business plan focused on developing its own online social network
`
`games and then launching the games for play online.
`
`14.
`
`In 2013, Agincourt Gaming launched its online social network game, Battle
`
`Conquest. Battle Conquest incorporates strategy, simulation, and role-play elements in an online
`
`platform that utilizes social interaction to enhance the gaming experience. As players interact
`
`with the game, they have opportunities to make in-game purchases of virtual goods and other
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 1:15-cv-00350-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 3
`
`game-related items. To date, Battle Conquest has been played over one million times. In
`
`addition.
`
`15.
`
`Agincourt Gaming's patents-in-suit, which claim priority to 1996, were both far
`
`ahead of their time in anticipating the development of credits-based online gaming. Long before
`
`the explosion of online games, Agincourt Gaming's patents-in-suit recognized that allowing
`
`online gamers to earn and redeem prizes – including, in particular, game enhancements – based
`
`on the outcome of game play would be desirable to players but difficult for game providers to
`
`effectively maintain and display.
`
`COUNT I – INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,306,035
`
`16.
`
`Agincourt Gaming repeats and realleges the allegations of paragraphs 1 through
`
`15 as if fully set forth herein.
`
`17.
`
`Defendant has been and still is infringing the '035 patent, literally or under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, importing, offering to sell, and/or selling certain
`
`software products, including, but not limited to the products identified in paragraph 10 above.
`
`18.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's acts of infringement, Agincourt
`
`Gaming has been, is being, and will be damaged. Defendant's infringement of Agincourt
`
`Gaming's exclusive rights under the '035 patent will continue to damage Agincourt Gaming.
`
`19.
`
`Agincourt Gaming also is entitled to recover from Defendant the damages
`
`sustained by Agincourt Gaming as a result of Defendant's wrongful acts in an amount subject to
`
`proof at trial.
`
`COUNT II – INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,454,432
`
`20. Agincourt Gaming repeats and realleges the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 19
`
`as if fully set forth herein.
`
`3
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 1:15-cv-00350-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 4
`
`21.
`
`Defendant has been and still is infringing the '432 patent, literally or under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, importing, offering to sell, and/or selling certain
`
`software products, including, but not limited to the products identified in paragraph 11 above.
`
`22.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's acts of infringement, Agincourt
`
`Gaming has been, is being, and will be damaged. Defendant's infringement of Agincourt
`
`Gaming's exclusive rights under the '432 patent will continue to damage Agincourt Gaming.
`
`23.
`
`Agincourt Gaming also is entitled to recover from Defendant the damages
`
`sustained by Agincourt Gaming as a result of Defendant's wrongful acts in an amount subject to
`
`proof at trial.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`Agincourt Gaming hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`Agincourt Gaming respectfully requests entry of judgment in its favor and against
`
`Defendant as follows:
`
`A.
`
`Declaring that Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe the '035 and '432
`
`patents;
`
`B.
`
`Awarding actual damages arising out of Defendant's infringement of the '035 and
`
`'432 patents, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, in an amount according to
`
`proof and an accounting of all infringing acts including, but not limited to, those acts not
`
`presented at trial;
`
`C.
`
`Awarding attorney's fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 or as otherwise permitted
`
`4
`
`by law; and
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 1:15-cv-00350-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 5
`
`D.
`
`Awarding such other costs and further relief as the Court may deem just and
`
`
`
`
`
`STAMOULIS & WEINBLATT LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Richard C. Weinblatt
`Stamatios Stamoulis #4606
`Richard C. Weinblatt #5080
`Two Fox Point Centre
`6 Denny Road, Suite 307
`Wilmington, DE 19809
`Telephone: (302) 999-1540
`Facsimile: (302) 762-1688
`stamoulis@swdelaw.com
`weinblatt@swdelaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Agincourt Gaming, LLC
`
`5
`
`proper.
`
`
`Dated: May 1, 2015

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket