throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00386-VAC-CJB Document 47 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 369
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`TECHNO VIEW IP, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`OCULUS VR, LLC, and
`FACEBOOK, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 17-cv-386-VAC-CJB
`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`
`O’KELLY ERNST & JOYCE, LLC
`Sean T. O’Kelly (# 4349)
`Daniel P. Murray (#5785)
`901 N. Market Street, Suite 1000
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 778-4000
`sokelly@oelegal.com
`dmurray@oelegal.com
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Techno View IP, Inc.
`
`
`Dated: March 23, 2018
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Karen Jacobs (#2881)
`Jennifer Ying (#5550)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`kjacobs@mnat.com
`jying@mnat.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Oculus VR, LLC and
`Facebook, Inc.
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00386-VAC-CJB Document 47 Filed 03/23/18 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 370
`
`Pursuant to Paragraph 12 of the Scheduling Order (D.I. 20) and the parties’ subsequent
`
`stipulations (D.I. 43, 44, 46), the parties hereby submit their Joint Claim Construction Chart (Ex.
`
`A) for claim construction proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 7,666,096 (“the ’096 Patent”) (Ex. B)
`
`and U.S. Patent No. 8,206,218 (“the ’218 Patent”) (Ex. C).
`
`In addition to setting forth the parties’ agreed-upon proposed constructions, the Joint
`
`Claim Construction Chart identifies the disputed claim terms and the parties’ proposed
`
`constructions of those terms and supporting intrinsic evidence. Citations to patent column and
`
`line numbers are in column:line format. Each citation to a figure incorporates by reference, as if
`
`fully set out herein, any associated description or discussion of the figure. Similarly, each citation
`
`to a description or discussion of any figure incorporates by reference each figure described or
`
`discussed as if fully set out herein.
`
`Each party reserves the right to rely on other portions of the intrinsic record to refute
`
`positions taken by the other party during the Markman proceedings.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00386-VAC-CJB Document 47 Filed 03/23/18 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 371
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`/s/ Jennifer Ying
`
`
`
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Jennifer Ying (#5550)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`jying@mnat.com
` Attorneys for Defendants
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Heidi L. Keefe
`Mark R. Weinstein
`Elizabeth L. Stameshkin
`Philip H. Mao
`COOLEY LLP
`3175 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`(650) 843-5000
`
`DeAnna Allen
`COOLEY LLP
`1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20004-2400
`(202) 842-7800
`
`
`
`
`
`
`O’KELLY ERNST & JOYCE, LLC
`
`/s/ Sean T. O’Kelly
`
`
`
`
`Sean T. O’Kelly (# 4349)
`Daniel P. Murray (#5785)
`901 N. Market Street, Suite 1000
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 778-4000
`sokelly@oelegal.com
`dmurray@oelegal.com
` Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Michael K. Botts
`HARRY JERNIGAN CPA ATTORNEY, P.C.
`5101 Cleveland Street, Suite 200
`Virginia Beach, VA 23462
`
`Thomas F. Meagher
`A. Christopher Pattillo
`MEAGHER EMANUEL LAKS GOLDBERG
` & LIAO, LLP
`One Palmer Square, Suite 325
`Princeton, NJ 08542
`
`March 23, 2018
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket