throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00450-RGA Document 12 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 590
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`PURDUE PHARMA L.P.,
`PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS L.P.,
`THE P.F. LABORATORIES, INC. and
`RHODES TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`ABHAI, LLC and KVK-TECH, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) C.A. No. 17-450 (RGA)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`CONSENT JUDGMENT
`BETWEEN
`PURDUE PHARMA L.P., THE P.F. LABORATORIES, INC.,
`PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS L.P.,
`RHODES TECHNOLOGIES,
`AND ABHAI, LLC and KVK-TECH, INC.
`
`On consent of Purdue Pharma L.P., The P.F. Laboratories, Inc., Purdue
`
`Pharmaceuticals L.P. and Rhodes Technologies, and Abhai, LLC and KVK-Tech, Inc., and as
`
`settlement of this action between and among those parties, PURDUE PHARMA L.P., a limited
`
`partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having a place of
`
`business at One Stamford Forum, 201 Tresser Boulevard, Stamford, Connecticut 0690 l, THE
`
`P.F. LABORATORIES, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State
`
`of New Jersey, having a place of business at One Stamford Forum, 201 Tresser Boulevard,
`
`Stamford, Connecticut 06901, PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS L.P., a limited partnership
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having a place of business at
`
`4701 Purdue Drive, Wilson, North Carolina 27893 and RHODES TECHNOLOGIES, a general
`
`partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal
`
`place of business at 498 Washington Street, Coventry, Rhode Island 02816 (collectively, the
`
`"Purdue Companies"), and ABHAI, LLC, a limited liability company organized and existing
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00450-RGA Document 12 Filed 12/28/17 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 591
`
`under the laws of the State of Florida, having a place of business at 194 Inlet Drive, St.
`
`Augustine, FL 32080, and KVK-TECH, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the
`
`laws of the State of Pennsylvania, having a place of business at 110 Terry Drive, Suite 200,
`
`Newton, PA 18940 (collectively, the "Defendants") (the Plaintiffs and the Defendants being
`
`sometimes referred to herein individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties"), it is
`
`Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Terms used in this Consent Judgment and not otherwise defined shall have
`
`the meanings ascribed thereto in the Settlement Documents, dated as of December 22, 2017, by
`
`and among the Plaintiffs and the Defendants (the "Settlement Documents").
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 9,492,389, 9,492,391, 9,492,392, 9,492,393 and 9,522,919
`
`(collectively, the "Specified Patents") are valid and enforceable with respect to any Oxycodone
`
`Products and any ANDA or 505(b)(2) Application for such products and, except for activities
`
`expressly permitted by the License granted pursuant to the Patent License Agreement, the
`
`Specified Patents are infringed by the Abhai ANDA and the Abhai Products.
`
`Unless otherwise expressly permitted pursuant to the terms of the Settlement
`
`Documents, the Defendants will not, prior to the Terminal Date, directly or indirectly, alone or in
`
`cooperation with any other person, make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, market,
`
`distribute, participate in the profits of or indemnify others with respect to, any Oxycodone
`
`Product in the Territory.
`
`Except as provided for or may be agreed to in writing by the Plaintiffs and the
`
`Defendants in the Settlement Documents, from and after the Signing Date, the Defendants and
`
`their Associated Companies are enjoined from infringing the Specified Patents with respect to
`
`the Abhai ANDA and Abhai Products in the Territory.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00450-RGA Document 12 Filed 12/28/17 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 592
`
`Civil Action No. 17-450 (the "Action"), including all claims and counterclaims, is
`
`hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Defendants waive any possible antitrust or other claims
`
`against the Plaintiffs based on conduct or events that have occurred prior to the Signing Date
`
`relating to the Abhai ANDA and the Abhai Products and the Specified Patents, as well as any
`
`claims or counterclaims that could have been pleaded in the Action.
`
`Except for the rights, agreements, covenants, waivers and releases specifically
`
`granted pursuant to the Settlement Documents, no other right, written or oral license or
`
`sublicense, covenant not to sue, waiver or release of future infringement or other written or oral
`
`authorization is or has been granted or implied by this Consent Judgment.
`
`Except as the Parties have heretofore expressly provided for in writing, by virtue
`
`of this Consent Judgment, all claims and demands for relief prayed for by the Plaintiffs and the
`
`Defendants in the Action are deemed to be satisfied.
`
`Subject to the provisions of the Settlement Documents, in addition to remedies for
`
`contempt of this Consent Judgment which the Plaintiffs or the Defendants, as the case may be,
`
`have, in the event of breach or violation by the other parties of the terms of this Consent
`
`Judgment, the non-breaching parties are entitled to appropriate injunctive relief against the
`
`breaching parties with respect to the breaching conduct solely upon a showing of a likelihood of
`
`success of establishing that such a breach occurred. The Parties agree that jurisdiction and venue
`
`for such an action exist in this District Court, and waive any and all defenses based on personal
`
`jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction and venue.
`
`This Consent Judgment is entered pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of
`
`Civil Procedure, and the Action is hereby dismissed without costs or attorney's fees, save that
`
`this District Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Action, including, without limitation, over
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00450-RGA Document 12 Filed 12/28/17 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 593
`
`implementation of, or disputes arising out of, this Consent Judgment or the settlement of the
`
`Action. A prevailing party shall be entitled to recover attorney's fees in any such proceeding
`
`occurring after the entering of this Consent Judgment in which the case is found to be an
`
`exceptional one.
`
`Defendants may maintain or file Paragraph IV certifications
`
`in ANDA
`
`No. 207493 under 21 U.S.C. § 355U)(2)(A)(vii)(IV) (as amended or supplemented) consistent
`
`with the Settlement Documents.
`
`[remainder of this page intentionally left blank]
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00450-RGA Document 12 Filed 12/28/17 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 594
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`KLEHR HARRISON HARVEY BRANZBURG LLP
`
`/s/ 1?,pdger <D. Smitfi II
`
`/s/ Saffy P.. o/egfite
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Rodger D. Smith II (#3778)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`rsmith@mnat.com
`
`David S. Eagle (#3387)
`Sally E. Veghte (#4762)
`919 N. Market Street
`Suite 1000
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 552-5508
`deagle@klehr.com
`sveghte@klehr.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`John J. Normile
`Pablo D. Hendler
`Kelsey I. Nix
`Gasper J. LaRosa
`Kenneth S. Canfield
`Sarah A. Geers
`Lisamarie LoGiudice
`JONES DAY
`250 Vesey Street
`New York, NY 10281-1047
`(212) 326-3777
`
`Jason G. Winchester
`JONES DAY
`77 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601
`
`Chad Landmon
`Edward M. Mathias
`Matthew S. Murphy
`AXINN, VEL TROP & HARKRIDER LLP
`90 State House Square
`Hartford, CT 06103
`(860) 275-8170
`
`Dan Feng Mei
`AXINN, VEL TROP &HARKRIDER LLP
`114 West 47th Street
`New York, NY 10036
`(212) 728-2200
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs Purdue Pharma L.P.,
`Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P., The P.F.
`Laboratories, Inc., and Rhodes Technologies
`
`December 22, 2017
`
`SO ORDERED this l[' day o~, 2017.
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket