throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00585-CFC-SRF Document 165 Filed 06/25/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 5250
`Case 1:17-cv-00585-CFC-SRF Document 165 Filed 06/25/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 5250
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`UNIVERSAL SECURE REGISTRY, )
`LLC,
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`) Civ. No. 17-585-CFC-SRF
`)
`)
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`ORDER
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC., VISA INC. and
`VISA USA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`At Wilmington this Twenty-fifth day of June in 2020:
`
`WHEREAS, Defendants moved to transfer this action to the Northern
`
`District of California (D1. 21);
`
`WHEREAS, in a Report and Recommendation (D.I. 137) issued
`
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Magistrate Judge recommended that the
`
`Court deny Defendants’ motion to transfer;
`
`WHEREAS, Defendants filed objections to that recommendation (D.I.
`
`147);
`
`WHEREAS, a motion to transfer is not a dispositive motion for
`
`purposes of § 636(b)(1) and is reviewed under the deferential “clearly
`
`erroneous or contrary to law” standard set forth in § 63 6(b)(1)(A), Agincourt
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00585-CFC-SRF Document 165 Filed 06/25/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 5251
`Case 1:17-cv-OO585-CFC-SRF Document 165 Filed 06/25/20 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #: 5251
`
`Gaming LLC v. Zynga Inc, No. CV 11-720-RGA, 2013 WL 3936508, at *2
`
`(D. Del. July 29, 2013); and
`
`WHEREAS, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation
`
`and Defendants’ objections and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s
`
`determination that, considered in their totality, the factors set forth in Jumara
`
`v. State Farm, Ins. Co., 55 F.3d 873 (3d Cir. 1995), weigh against transfer;l
`
`NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`1. The Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that the Court deny the
`
`transfer motion is ADOPTED;
`
`2. Defendants’ objections to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation
`
`that the Court deny the transfer motion are OVERRULED; and
`
`3. Defendants’ motion to transfer (D.I. 21) is DENIED.
`
`United States Districtgge
`
`1 The Court notes that Plaintiff’s forum choice should have been given
`“paramount consideration” and, therefore, that its choice of venue weighed
`strongly, as opposed to slightly, against transfer. See Realtime Data LLC v.
`Egnyte, Inc., 2018 WL 5724040 (D. Del. Nov. 1, 2018); VLSI Tech LLC v. Intel
`Corp., 2018 WL 5342650 (D. Del. Oct 29, 2018).
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket