throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 120-5 Filed 11/17/22 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:
`13153
`
`EXHIBIT R
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 120-5 Filed 11/17/22 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:
`13154
`I 1111111111111111 11111 111111111111111 111111111111111 IIIII IIIIII IIII IIII IIII
`
`US00986434 7B2
`
`c12) United States Patent
`Laux et al.
`
`(IO) Patent No.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 9,864,347 B2
`Jan.9,2018
`
`(54) METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING AN
`OPERATING FUNCTION OF A GROUND
`MILLING MACHINE AND GROUND
`MILLING MACHINE
`
`(71) Applicant: BOMAG GmbH, Boppard (DE)
`
`(72)
`
`Inventors: Robert Laux, Neuwied (DE); Marco
`Reuter, Emmelshausen (DE)
`
`(73) Assignee: BOMAG GmbH, Boppard (DE)
`
`( *) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 342 days.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 14/620,799
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Feb. 12, 2015
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Pub lication Data
`
`US 2015/0227120 Al
`
`Aug. 13, 2015
`
`(30)
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`Feb. 12, 2014
`
`(DE) ........................ 10 2014 001 885
`
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`
`(51) Int. Cl.
`E0JC 231088
`G0SB 13102
`E0JC 23112
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`CPC .......... G0SB 131021 (2013.01); E0JC 231088
`(2013.01); E0JC 231127 (2013.01)
`( 58) Field of Classification Search
`None
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`4,317,642 A *
`3/1982 Wirtgen ................ E0lC 23/065
`404/72
`4,946,307 A *
`8/1990 Jakob .................... E0lC 23/088
`404/90
`5,078,540 A * 1/1992 Jakob .................... E0lC 23/088
`299/39.8
`6,033,031 A *
`3/2000 Campbell ............. E0lC 23/085
`299/37.2
`5/2001 Page ..................... E0lC 23/088
`125/13.03
`
`6,227,620 Bl *
`
`(Continued)
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`DE
`DE
`
`10/2011
`102010050441 Al
`10/2013
`102012006189 Al
`(Continued)
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`ROADTEC RX-400 Milling Machine; Operation, Service & Main­
`tenance; 7 pages; printed from Internet on Feb. 28, 2017.*
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner - Ronald Hartman, Jr.
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm - Wood Herron & Evans
`LLP
`
`(57)
`ABSTRACT
`The present invention relates to a method for optimizing an
`operating function of a ground milling machine by way of
`the adaptation of operating parameters and to a ground
`milling machine which is implemented, in particular, for
`carrying out this method. In an essential aspect an operating
`parameter of a milling machine is provided starting from a
`starting value of the operating parameter to optimize an
`operating function of the ground milling machine in milling
`operation.
`
`15 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`28
`
`29
`
`34
`
`r-
`
`35
`______ /
`STOP 1
`
`1--
`
`REPEAT
`
`32
`
`33
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 120-5 Filed 11/17/22 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:
`13155
`
`US 9,864,347 B2
`Page 2
`
`(56)
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`References Cited
`8,128,177 B2*
`3/2012 Menzenbach ......... E01C 23/088
`299/1.5
`8,408,838 B2 *
`4/2013 Willis ................... E0 lC 23/088
`299/1.5
`8,632,132 B2 * 1/2014 Menzenbach ......... E0lC 23/088
`299/1.5
`8,967,506 B2 *
`3/2015 Pike, Sr .
`................. C04B 28/04
`241/30
`2005/0207841 Al*
`9/2005 Holl
`B28D 7/00
`404/94
`2006/0076821 Al*
`4/2006 Troudt .................... B24B 7/188
`299/39.2
`2008/0173740 Al*
`7/2008 Parker ................... E0lC 23/088
`241/33
`2009/0035064 Al* 2/2009 Holl
`B28D 7/00
`404/90
`2010/0014917 Al* 1/2010 Willis ................... E0lC 23/088
`404/93
`2010/0021234 Al * 1/2010 Willis
`B62D 7 /026
`404/90
`2011/0080034 Al*
`4/2011 Schonebeck .......... E0lC 23/088
`299/1.5
`2011/0272997 Al* 11/2011 Gaertner ............... E0lC 23/088
`299/1.5
`
`12/2011 Haubrich et al.
`2011/0298188 Al
`2013/0002002 Al* 1/2013 Menzenbach ......... E0lC 23/088
`299/1.5
`2013/0087172 Al
`4/2013 Roetsch
`2013/0300182 Al* 11/2013 Hammes ............... E0lC 23/088
`299/39.4
`2014/0070598 Al* 3/2014 von Schoenebeck . E0lC 23/088
`299/10
`2014/0093315 Al*
`4/2014 Sansone ................ E0lC 23/088
`404/91
`2014/0191560 Al*
`7/2014 Gaertner ............... E0lC 23/088
`299/1.5
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`2578749 A2
`4/2013
`2013143652 Al 10/2013
`
`EP
`WO
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Road Building Supplement; Equipment World; Feb. 28, 2007; 14
`pages; printed from Internet on Feb. 28, 2017. *
`Espacenet, English Machine Translation of German Application No.
`DE102012006189Al, published Oct. 2, 2013, retrieved from http://
`worldwide.espacenet com on Feb. 11, 2015 ( 14 pages).
`* cited by examiner
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 120-5 Filed 11/17/22 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:
`13156
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan.9,2018
`
`Sheet 1 of 4
`
`US 9,864,347 B2
`
`9
`
`Fig. 1
`
`12
`
`11
`
`Fig. 2
`
`10
`
`R
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 120-5 Filed 11/17/22 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:
`13157
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan.9,2018
`
`Sheet 2 of 4
`
`US 9,864,347 B2
`
`13
`
`16
`
`Fig. 3
`
`19
`
`24
`•
`,·-·
`25
`a +--
`
`I
`
`Fig. 4
`
`20
`7
`11
`20 ----..� :·············: I
`·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-· �:·-·1
`--------------
`·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-1
`� 17
`.
`��26
`21
`u !
`............................ ·
`22
`18
`
`· - ·r ·
`
`I --1
`
`4
`I l----- -
`13
`19
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 120-5 Filed 11/17/22 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:
`13158
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan.9,2018
`
`Sheet 3 of 4
`
`US 9,864,347 B2
`
`E
`
`C 30
`�
`Q) 20
`--E �
`<( 10
`C cu
`
`(.)
`
`> "'O
`
`\
`\\ \ •·
`
`..
`\ •· ...
`
`0
`
`150
`
`300 Milling depth [mm]
`
`Fig. 5
`
`27
`
`.. ····•••••••
`...
`..
`
`.. •
`... .,,,,
`.. �
`. �
`
`I
`
`I
`
`150
`
`300 Milling depth [mm]
`
`::c
`--.,
`
`Q) 200
`E �
`E 150
`C cu
`0) 100
`C � 50
`
`(.)
`
`I....
`
`Q)
`Q.
`
`Fig. 6
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 120-5 Filed 11/17/22 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:
`13159
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan.9,2018
`
`Sheet 4 of 4
`
`US 9,864,347 B2
`
`28 29
`30
`31
`
`32
`
`33
`
`p ➔ P'
`
`0
`
`Fig. 7
`
`•- -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 120-5 Filed 11/17/22 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:
`13160
`
`US 9,864,347 B2
`
`1
`METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING AN
`OPERATING FUNCTION OF A GROUND
`MILLING MACHINE AND GROUND
`MILLING MACHINE
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C.
`§119 of German Patent Application No. 10 2014 001 885.7,
`filed Feb. 12, 2014, the disclosure of which is hereby
`incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`The present invention relates to a method for optimizing
`an operating function of a ground milling machine and a
`ground milling machine which is implemented, in particular,
`for carrying out the method according to the present inven­
`tion.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`5
`
`2
`of a ground milling machine, and which is essentially only
`determined by factors which are intrinsic to the ground
`milling machine itself, i.e., are not influenced by the oper­
`ating conditions or usage conditions during the work opera-
`tion (for example, the milled material). The operating
`parameters can thus be selected and predefined indepen­
`dently of the work operation, for example, manually by the
`operator of the ground milling machine or by an automatic
`controller. Examples of operating parameters are,
`for
`10 example, the power of the drive unit of the milling drum, the
`milling depth, and the rotational speed of the milling drum,
`etc. A variable operating parameter is an operating parameter
`which can be varied over the work process for process
`optimization. This can be the power of the drive unit and/or
`15 the rotational speed of the milling drum, for example.
`Non-variable or constant operating parameters, in contrast,
`are operating parameters which are generally not varied
`within the respective work operation to optimize the work­
`ing mode of the ground milling machine, so that the most
`20 constant possible work result is finally obtained. For
`example, the milling depth is typically a non-variable or
`constant operating parameter, since the milling depth is
`generally predefined as a target variable to be set by the
`operator.
`In contrast, those variables which are determined in work
`operation for relevant parts by factors which are not intrinsic
`to the machine itself, but rather originate from the specific
`work operation, are referred to as operating functions. The
`operating functions are thus substantially determined in
`30 work operation, with uniform operating parameters, by the
`usage conditions during the work operation of the ground
`milling machine, for example, by the properties of the
`ground material or milled material (ground density, ground
`hardness, grain size, etc.). Examples of operating functions
`35 are, for example, the advance of the ground milling machine,
`the milling performance of the ground milling machine, or
`the milling performance efficiency of the ground milling
`machine. In this case, the actual value of such a variable is
`also comprised in the concept of the operating function, as
`40 is the deviation of the actual value of such a variable from
`a previously established target value, for example, a target
`advance velocity of a milling machine. In other words, an
`operating function is the result of at least one operating
`parameter.
`One aspect of the present invention is that in operation of
`the ground milling machine, carrying out a method is
`provided, during which an operating parameter of the
`ground milling machine, for example, the rotational speed of
`the milling drum, is varied in relation to a starting value, for
`50 example, a starting rotational speed, until an operating
`optimum is achieved. Such an operating optimum can be, for
`example, the maximum advance velocity of the ground
`milling machine, the maximum milling performance of the
`ground milling machine, or the maximum milling perfor-
`55 mance efficiency of the ground milling machine. It is,
`therefore, essential that an operating optimum is achieved by
`a systematic variation and adaptation of the variable oper­
`ating parameter, for example, the rotational speed of the
`milling drum, by this method for the respective milled
`60 material, the respective milling drum, the respective milling
`depth, and the respective further specific usage conditions.
`The operating optimum refers in this case to the value of a
`variable operating function, under which
`the milling
`machine fulfills a specific specification for its use in the best
`65 possible manner. In a specific exemplary application, the
`operating parameter can be the rotational speed of the
`milling drum, the operating function can be the milling
`
`Ground milling machines are used wherever the removal
`of ground subsoil material to a desired milling depth is
`required. Typical areas of application are, for example, in the 25
`form of road milling machines for the removal of road cover
`layers, in the form of so-called stabilizers and/or recyclers
`for road and pathway construction, and in the form of
`surface miners for extracting mineral resources. Generic
`ground milling machines are disclosed, for example, in the
`patent applications EP 2 578 749 A2 and DE 10 2010 050
`441 Al, to which reference is hereby made.
`The operation of such ground milling machines is com­
`paratively costly, so that the demand always exists for the
`most optimum possible machine operation, for example,
`with respect to the lowest possible fuel consumption and, at
`the same time, the highest possible milling performance.
`In the patent applications DE 10 2012 006 189.7 and
`PCT/EP2013/000686, which are hereby incorporated by
`reference, a drive device for a self-propelled construction
`machine, in particular, a ground milling machine, and also a
`method for setting a rotational speed ratio in such a drive
`device, are described. The present invention is suitable, in
`particular, for application with this drive device or this
`method. An essential aspect of this patent family is that a 45
`rotational speed variable operation of the milling drum is
`possible. In practical use of such machines, it has been
`shown that various operating optima, for example, the
`optimum of the milling performance, i.e., the milling vol­
`ume per unit of time, for example, in cubic meters per hour,
`and also the optimum of the milling performance efficiency,
`i.e., the milling performance per fuel consumption, are not
`always achieved with higher rotational speed of the milling
`drum. The rotational speed of the milling drum here refers
`to the number of revolutions of the milling drum about its
`axis of rotation per unit of time.
`An object of the present invention is therefore to specify
`a method for optimizing an operating function of a ground
`milling machine by way of adaptation of operating param­
`eters. A further object of the present invention is furthermore
`to specify a ground milling machine which enables carrying
`out such a method.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`An operating parameter is in this case a manipulated
`variable which is relevant for the respective work operation
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 120-5 Filed 11/17/22 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:
`13161
`
`US 9,864,347 B2
`
`3
`performance, and the specification can be that the advance
`velocity of the ground milling machine is to be maximum
`under the existing conditions. The advance velocity of the
`ground milling machine refers in this case to the forward
`movement of the ground milling machine in distance per 5
`unit of time (for example, in meters per second) in the
`working direction of the ground milling machine. The
`present invention is based in this case on the finding that the
`maximum possible milling performance for an available
`drive power is dependent as a whole on the three variables 10
`milling depth, advance velocity, and rotational speed of the
`milling drum. In particular, for the respective desired milling
`depth, a respective individual optimum rotational speed is
`available in this case, at which a maximum advance velocity
`of the ground milling machine is achievable. In this case, a 15
`variety of external factors ( operating conditions) influence
`this optimum, for example, the ground material to be milled,
`the milling drum used or the milling tools used, respectively,
`the milling depth, etc. Proceeding from this optimum rota­
`tional speed, variations of the rotational speed into higher or 20
`lower rotational speed ranges have a negative effect on the
`advance velocity of the ground milling machine, in contrast.
`It is apparent that the spectrum of the rotational speed
`variability is delimited by a maximum rotational speed and
`a minimum rotational speed, which can accordingly also 25
`represent the optimum in particular cases. The goal of the
`present invention is therefore, in particular, also to specify a
`method for how the optimum rotational speed of the milling
`drum can be found for a predefined milling depth at constant
`drive power. The constant drive power can be, in particular, 30
`the maximum drive power of the drive device in this case.
`This is specifically achieved according to the present
`invention in that the following method steps are executed
`during operation of the ground milling machine, in particu-
`lar, in succession: a) predefining a starting value for a 35
`variable operating parameter; b) establishing and setting the
`constant operating parameters; c) ascertaining the starting
`value of the operating function to be optimized; d) varying
`the value of the variable operating parameter to an alterna­
`tive value which is greater or less than the starting value of 40
`this parameter; e) checking whether the value of the oper­
`ating function increases or decreases; and f) repeating steps
`d) and e) until reaching the desired operating optimum, for
`example, the maximum advance velocity, the greatest
`machine efficiency, etc. The step which is essential accord- 45
`ing to the present invention is therefore varying the variable
`operating parameter and monitoring in what regard the
`respective variation of the value of the variable operating
`parameter has an effect on the operating function to be
`optimized, for example, the advance velocity of the ground 50
`milling machine, in relation to a starting value of the
`operating function, for example, the starting advance veloc-
`ity. The starting value of the operating function to be
`optimized is therefore the value of the operating function of
`the ground milling machine to be optimized, which is 55
`provided by the machine operator when beginning milling
`operation and before execution of steps d) to f). Accordingly,
`the starting value of the variable operating parameter is the
`value of the variable operating parameter with which the
`milling operation is initially started, before the variable 60
`operating parameter is varied according to steps d) to f).
`In one embodiment of the method according to the present
`invention, the rotational speed of the milling drum consti­
`tutes the variable operating parameter, while the advance
`velocity of the ground milling machine represents the aper- 65
`ating function to be optimized. By way of the variation of the
`rotational speed of the milling drum or ultimately the tool
`
`4
`velocity, respectively, specifically the cutting tool in the
`ground subsoil material to be milled, optimization of the
`advance velocity of the ground milling machine is thus
`performed. The advance velocity of the ground milling
`machine in work operation is delimited at the upper end by
`the maximum milling performance of the milling drum
`under the present operating conditions (for example, density
`of the ground material to be milled, sharpness of the cutting
`tools) and operating parameters which are variable and
`which are typically constant in work operation (for example,
`milling depth, rotational speed of the milling drum). The
`operator of the ground milling machine can thus drive it in
`work operation at most as rapidly as permitted by the
`maximum milling performance of the milling drum under
`the present parameter settings. By way of the variation of the
`rotational speed of the milling drum, the setting-related
`maximum milling performance also changes, and therefore
`also the setting-related maximum advance velocity. The
`variation of the rotational speed and milling operation
`toward an alternative rotational speed can be performed, for
`example, such that the rotational speed is first increased or
`decreased from the starting rotational speed of the milling
`drum. If this results in an increase in the advance velocity at
`constant drive power,
`the rotational speed is further
`increased or decreased until no further increase of the
`advance velocity is thus achieved. In contrast, if the advance
`velocity decreases due to the variation of the rotational
`speed toward the alternative rotational speed in milling
`operation, the rotational speed of the milling drum is not
`varied further in this direction, but is rather changed in the
`opposite direction. If the rotational speed was first increased
`in relation to the starting rotational speed and this increase
`had a negative effect on the advance velocity of the ground
`milling machine (i.e., the advance velocity decreases), a
`reduction of the rotational speed of the milling drum in
`relation to the starting rotational speed is performed as the
`next step and vice versa. A preferred embodiment provides,
`in other words, that by variation of the rotational speed, an
`ideal rotational speed is obtained at predefined milling depth
`and, in particular, constant, for example, maximum drive
`power and therefore a milling performance of the ground
`milling machine which is maximum for the respective drive
`power and milling depth is achieved. The rotational speed is
`therefore regulated on the basis of the effect on the advance
`velocity, and by means of this on the basis of the effect on
`the milling performance. In this manner, the respective
`optimum of the advance velocity and the rotational speed of
`the milling drum for the respective desired milling depth in
`the respective ground, material are obtained particularly
`effectively. Overall, the optimization of this operating func­
`tion for a predefined milling depth is accordingly performed
`empirically and adapted to the respectively provided ground
`conditions, so that the advantageous effects of the present
`invention are obtained over a particularly broad spectrum of
`ground characteristics, without a variety of individual usage
`conditions having to be determined for this purpose before­
`hand. Accordingly, this method is also usable on all ground
`subsoils to be milled and for all ground milling machines.
`It is fundamentally possible that the variation of the
`variable operating parameter, for example, the rotational
`speed, is performed continuously. According to the above­
`described preferred embodiment, in this way, in particular,
`with homogeneous ground conditions, optimal maximum
`advance velocities can be achieved. The ground subsoils to
`be processed are frequently comparatively heterogeneous,
`however, for example, with regard to their ground density
`and hardness of the ground materials to be milled. As a
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 120-5 Filed 11/17/22 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:
`13162
`
`US 9,864,347 B2
`
`6
`5
`operating range is always desired. Furthermore, transmis­
`result, the optimum rotational speed for obtaining the at least
`sions can principally be integrated in the drive train, for
`theoretically maximum advance velocity varies in a specific
`example, shift transmissions, so that continuous rotational
`range. To nonetheless enable comparatively continuous
`speed variability of the milling drum is not provided. The
`milling operation of the ground milling machine, it is
`therefore preferable if the variation of the rotational speed
`5 variation of the rotational speed is then performed in accor­
`dance with the shift stages of the shift transmission. How­
`according to step d) is performed at fixed rotational speed
`ever, it is particularly preferable if the variation of the
`intervals. In other words, this means that the variation of the
`rotational speed according to step d) of the milling drum is
`rotational speed is performed in steps, for example, in steps
`performed at least partially via a summation transmission, in
`of plus or minus ten revolutions per minute. The graduation
`of the variation steps is also dependent in this case, in
`10 particular, a planetary transmission, by variation of at least
`one input rotational speed of one of at least two drive units.
`particular, on the diameter of the milling drum. By way of
`Such an arrangement is specified, for example, in the patent
`a stepwise change of the rotational speed in milling opera­
`family of DE 10 2012 006 189.7, to which reference is made,
`tion, a comparatively coarser result is obtained with respect
`in particular, in this regard. Accordingly, a total of two drive
`to the maximum achievable advance velocity. However, in
`this way the overall process of steps a) to f) can be
`15 units are provided for the rotational drive of the milling
`drum, wherein the main drive unit runs at a comparatively
`substantially shortened. In summary, this means that the
`constant power level. The rotational speed variation is
`operating parameter, depending on the specific embodiment
`performed mainly via the second drive unit, which can be,
`of the present invention, can be varied either continuously or
`in particular, a lower-power auxiliary drive, in particular, an
`also at fixed intervals.
`For practical use, it has further proven to be advantageous 20 electric motor or hydraulic motor. The drive powers intro­
`duced via the two drive units are subsequently combined via
`if the checking according to step e) is performed in such a
`the summation transmission and transmitted to the milling
`manner that exceeding or falling below difference threshold
`drum via an output shaft, which is connected to the milling
`values is checked. The core element of this preferred refine­
`drum.
`ment is, therefore, that a decrease or increase of the oper­
`It is fundamentally possible to carry out the above-
`ating function to be optimized, for example, the advance 25
`velocity, is only assumed to be present if a minimum amount
`described method manually. Units are preferably provided
`of velocity change is present. This amount, which is referred
`for this purpose,
`for example, corresponding display
`to as a difference threshold, for example, in the magnitude
`screens, via which the operator of the ground milling
`of ±1 km/h, is also used for the purpose of enabling more
`machine can observe the effects of the variation of the value
`uniform milling operation under optimized operating con- 30
`of the variable operating parameter, for example, the rota­
`ditions and therefore to make the responsiveness of the
`tional speed, on the operating function to be optimized, for
`present present invention slower. It is thus ensured that not
`example, the advance velocity. However, it is preferable if
`every minimal change of the advance velocity results in a
`the method according to the present invention is executed in
`change of the rotational speed of the milling drum, but rather
`the framework of an automatic controller. Automatic con-
`this procedure is only triggered when the changes of the 35
`troller means in this case that, in particular, the steps a) to f)
`advance velocity exceed the predefined difference threshold
`and, if present, the method steps of the preferred refine­
`values.
`ments, are executed in a computer-assisted manner and
`Depending on the application, it can furthermore be
`without manual influence, i.e., automatically. The operator
`advantageous if the above-described method according to
`of the ground milling machine must then only activate or
`steps a) to f) is only carried out at the beginning of the 40
`deactivate this operating mode, without subsequently having
`milling operation and after reaching a termination criterion,
`to take care of a further regulation of the adaptation process
`for example, reaching the maximum advance velocity in
`between variable operating parameter and operating func­
`step f) for the first time, the milling operation is continued
`tion to be optimized. A corresponding control unit is pro­
`with the value of the variable operating parameter then
`vided for this purpose.
`ascertained. In this method, the above-described optimiza- 45
`A further essential aspect of the present invention is
`tion process is only carried out again in the event of a change
`furthermore a ground milling machine for milling off ground
`of the operating parameters which are constant with regard
`subsoil material, in particular, a ground milling machine for
`to the optimization method, for example, the milling depth,
`carrying out the method according to the present invention.
`and/or with the beginning of a new milling process. Alter­
`Generic ground milling machines comprise a machine
`natively, however, it can also be preferable if steps a) to f) 50
`frame, travel units connected to the machine frame, such as,
`are continued continuously over the entire milling process.
`in particular, crawler tracks and/or wheels, a drive unit, such
`In this refinement of the method according to the present
`as an internal combustion engine, in particular, and a milling
`invention, an adaptation of the operating parameter of the
`drum. The milling drum has, in addition to a hollow cylin­
`milling drum, therefore, takes place continuously, to achieve
`drical support tube, a plurality of chisel units arranged on the
`the respective operating optimum of the ground milling 55
`outer lateral surface of the support tube, as are already
`machine as much as possible over the entire milling process.
`described in the prior art. The milling drum is mounted
`Finally, it is also possible that the optimization process
`directly or indirectly on the machine frame so it is rotatable
`according to the present invention is carried out over the
`about a horizontal axis of rotation extending transversely to
`respective operating interval at regular time intervals and/or
`the working direction. Furthermore, a drive train is pro­
`according to established milling distance intervals covered. 60
`vided, which transmits drive energy from the drive unit to
`In the specific exemplary embodiment, the variation of
`the milling drum. This drive train can comprise multiple
`the rotational speed of the milling drum can be achieved in
`transmission steps, for example, a shift transmission and/or
`various ways. In the simplest case, for example, the starting
`a belt transmission or chain gear, etc. Furthermore, the
`rotational speed of the drive unit, for example, an internal
`ground milling machine has a unit for ascertaining and
`combustion engine, can be varied. However, this procedure 65
`monitoring an operating function to be optimized, for
`is disadvantageous in that the operation of the main drive
`example, the advance velocity. This unit is implemented
`unit in a comparatively constant and energetically optimum
`such that it either can directly measure the value of the
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 120-5 Filed 11/17/22 Page 11 of 14 PageID #:
`13163
`
`US 9,864,347 B2
`
`5
`
`7
`operating function to be optimized (for example, the
`advance velocity of the ground milling machine), or can
`measure a physical variable, which has a known relationship
`to the operating function to be optimized (for example, the
`rotational speed of the travel units). Such a unit can com­
`prise, for example, a unit for measuring the advance veloc-
`ity, i.e., for example, a rotational speed sensor on one of the
`travel units of the ground milling machine or also another
`unit, via which the travel velocity of the ground milling
`machine can be ascertained, for example, also on the basis
`of the ground subsoil. Depending on the specific operating
`function to be optimized, the unit for ascertaining and
`monitoring the operating function to be optimized can also
`comprise, for example, a sensor for the fuel consumption of
`the drive unit (for example, via measurement of the rota­
`tional speed of the drive motor). The unit for ascertaining
`and monitoring the operating function to be optimized can
`also comprise a data processing unit, which is suitable for
`the purpose of combining various signals recorded by sen- 20
`sors with one another, to calculate the operating function to
`be optimized therefrom, for example, by multiplying the
`ascertained advance velocity of the ground milling machine
`with the set milling depth and dividing by the ascertained
`fuel consumption of the ground milling machine, to ascer- 25
`tain the milling performance efficiency of the ground milling
`machine.
`What is essential for the implementation according to the
`present invention of the ground milling machine is that
`furthermore a control unit is provided for controlling the 30
`milling drum operation. The essential characteristic of this
`control unit is its implementation in such a manner that,
`proceeding from a predefined starting value, it varies at least
`one operating parameter of the ground milling machine, for
`example, the rotational speed of the milling drum, from a 35
`starting value to achieve a maximum operating function.
`Possible specific implementations of this variation accord-
`ing to the method has already been specified, for example,
`in the preceding statements on the method according to the
`present invention, to which reference is now also made with 40
`regard to the ground milling machine.
`Fundamentally, it is possible that the method is carried out
`solely via the tracking of the operating function to be
`optimized, for example, the advance velocity. However, it is
`ideal if the variable operating parameter, for example, the 45
`rotational speed of the milling drum, is also monitored by
`means of a suitable sensor, for example, a rotational speed
`sensor, and transmitted to the control unit.
`The control unit can be implemented in this case for
`manual operation, but also, preferably, for automatic control 50
`of the variable operating parameter of the milling drum in
`dependence on the operating function to be optimized.
`Reference is also made in this regard to the preceding
`statements. Accordingly,
`the ground milling machine
`according to the present invention is implemented, in par- 55
`ticular, in such a manner that it automatically or indepen­
`dently carries out a method according to the preceding
`statements on the method according to the present invention.
`The advantages of the present invention are particularly
`clear in the case of ground

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket