throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 185 Filed 04/10/23 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 15528
`
`
`
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff and Counterclaim
`Defendant,
`
`
`v.
`
`CATERPILLAR INC.,
`
`Defendant and Counterclaim
`Plaintiff.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`C.A. No. 17-770-JDW-MPT
`)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`)
`
`)
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`)
`
`
`
`STIPULATION TO STAY PATENTS FOR CASE NARROWING PURPOSES
`AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant Wirtgen America, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Wirtgen
`
`America”), and Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff Caterpillar Inc. (“Defendant” or “Caterpillar”)
`
`hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA’S ASSERTED PATENTS
`
`WHEREAS, Wirtgen America’s Amended Complaint [D.I. 33] asserts the following 13
`
`patents against Caterpillar:
`
`Wirtgen Asserted Patents
`7,530,641
`7,828,309
`7,946,788
`8,118,316
`8,113,592
`8,424,972
`8,511,932
`8,690,474
`9,010,871
`9,656,530
`9,879,390
`9,879,391
`RE48,268
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 185 Filed 04/10/23 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 15529
`
`
`WHEREAS, in July and August 2022, Caterpillar filed petitions for inter partes review
`
`(“IPR”) with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“Patent Office”) for Wirtgen’s
`
`Asserted ’972, ’390, and ’391 Patents;
`
`WHEREAS, on January 23, 2023, the Patent Office instituted IPR proceedings on all
`
`claims of the ’390 Patent that Wirtgen America asserts against Caterpillar in this case;
`
`WHEREAS, on January 31, 2023, the Patent Office instituted IPR proceedings on all
`
`claims of the ’391 Patent that Wirtgen America asserts against Caterpillar in this case;
`
`WHEREAS, on February 7, 2023, the Patent Office instituted IPR proceedings on claims
`
`1-10, 12, 15, 16, 22, 23, 25-27, 30, 31, 33, 34, and 36-40 of the ’972 Patent;
`
`WHEREAS, the IPR proceedings for the ’972 Patent include all but one claim that
`
`Wirtgen America asserts against Caterpillar in this case, and Caterpillar did not request IPR
`
`institution of asserted ’972 claim 13;
`
`CATERPILLAR’S ASSERTED PATENTS
`
`WHEREAS, Caterpillar’s First Amended Answer to Amended Complaint and
`
`Counterclaims [D.I. 62] asserts the following 3 patents against Wirtgen America:
`
`Caterpillar Asserted Patents
`7,523,995
`9,975,538
`9,371,618
`
`
`WHEREAS, on August 10, 2022, Wirtgen America filed IPR petitions with the Patent
`
`Office for Caterpillar’s Asserted ’995, ’538, and ’618 Patents;
`
`WHEREAS, on March 9, 2023, the Patent Office denied Wirtgen America’s petition
`
`regarding the ’618 Patent;
`
`WHEREAS, on March 10, 2023, the Patent Office instituted IPR proceedings on all
`
`claims of the ’995 Patent that Caterpillar asserts against Wirtgen America in this case;
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 185 Filed 04/10/23 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 15530
`
`
`WHEREAS, on March 14, 2023, the Patent Office instituted IPR proceedings on all
`
`claims of the ’538 Patent that Caterpillar asserts against Wirtgen America in this case;
`
`CASE NARROWING
`
`WHEREAS, during the January 25, 2023, claim construction hearing, the parties
`
`discussed with the Court case narrowing and reducing the number of asserted claims in this
`
`litigation;
`
`WHEREAS, following the claim construction hearing, the parties met and conferred and
`
`agreed to limit the number of asserted claims to no more than eight per patent;
`
`WHEREAS, subsequent to that initial case narrowing, the parties again met and
`
`conferred regarding further narrowing of the scope of issues for trial by staying those patents
`
`subject to pending IPR proceedings before the Patent Office;
`
`WHEREAS, the IPR proceedings currently pending for the Patent Office will not all
`
`conclude prior to the February 2024 trial date in this case;
`
`WHEREAS, the parties agreed that because all asserted claims of the ’538, ’995, ’390,
`
`and ’391 Patents are each subject to pending IPR proceedings in the Patent Office, staying those
`
`patents would likely (1) substantially narrow the disputed issues for trial, (2) substantially reduce
`
`the burden of litigation on the parties (including, without limitation, reducing the amount of fact
`
`discovery needed regarding the parties’ respective contentions and also reducing the amount of
`
`expert discovery needed), and (3) realize significant judicial economies (by, for example,
`
`reducing the amount of dispositive motions filed with the Court as well as likely eliminating
`
`patents from the case entirely);
`
`WHEREAS, the parties both strongly desire to have a jury trial in February of 2024 and
`
`in no way seek to delay resolution of the dispute between the parties;
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 185 Filed 04/10/23 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 15531
`
`
`WHEREAS, the parties disagree as to whether the ’972 Patent should be stayed and
`
`propose addressing such as described below;
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed that:
`
` The ’538, ’995, ’390, and ’391 Patents should be stayed pending the conclusion of
`
`all pending IPRs;
`
` Following the conclusion of all IPRs on the ’538, ’995, ’390, and ’391 Patents,
`
`the parties will submit a joint notice to the Court proposing a plan for lifting the
`
`stay and proceeding on those patents if necessary; and
`
` The parties will submit a joint letter to the Court regarding their respective
`
`positions on staying the ’972 Patent no later than 14 days after filing this
`
`Stipulation with the Court.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 185 Filed 04/10/23 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 15532
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 10, 2023
`/s/ Adam W. Poff
`
`Adam W. Poff (No. 3990)
`Samantha G. Wilson (No. 5816)
`YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
`Rodney Square
`1000 North King Street
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`(302) 571-6600
`apoff@ycst.com
`swilson@ycst.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Ryan D. Levy
`Seth R. Ogden
`William E. Sekyi
`Dominic A. Rota
`Mark A. Kilgore
`Patterson Intellectual Property Law, P.C.
`Roundabout Plaza
`1600 Division Street, Suite 500
`Nashville, Tennessee 37203
`(615) 242-2400
`
`
`
`Daniel E. Yonan
`Paul A. Ainsworth
`R. Wilson Powers III
`Kyle E. Conklin
`Deirdre M. Wells
`Joseph H. Kim
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC
`1100 New York Ave., NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant
`Wirtgen America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Andrew L. Brown
`Bindu A. Palapura (#5370)
`Andrew L. Brown (#6766)
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor
`1313 N. Market Street
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`Tel: (302) 984-6000
`bpalapura@potteranderson.com
`abrown@potteranderson.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`James C. Yoon
`Christopher D. Mays
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, California 94304
`Tel: (650) 493-9300
`
`Ryan R. Smith
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104
`Tel: (206)-883-2500
`
`Lucy Yen
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor
`New York, New York 10019
`Tel: (212) 999-5800
`
`Attorneys for Defendant and
`Counterclaimant Caterpillar Inc.
`
`SO ORDERED this _____ day of _________________, 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10736293
`
`______________________________________
`The Honorable Joshua D. Wolson
`United States District Judge
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket