throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 196 Filed 05/01/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 15630
`
`May 1, 2023
`
`VIA ECF/CM
`
`The Honorable Joshua D. Wolson
`12613 U.S. Courthouse
`601 Market Street
`Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106
`
`Re: Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc., C.A. No. 17-770-JDW
`
`Dear Judge Wolson:
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s April 21, 2023 Order (D.I. No. 191), the parties write to provide an
`update regarding Caterpillar’s Motion to Exclude (D.I. No. 188).
`
`The parties have met and conferred regarding Wirtgen America’s identification of Günter
`Hähn and Christian Berning as individuals whom Wirtgen America may use to support its claims
`or defenses. On May 1, 2023, Wirtgen America served its most recent amended Initial Disclosures,
`which removes Mr. Berning and narrows Dr. Hähn’s “Connection to Case and Subject Matter of
`Discoverable Information,” as follows:
`
`Third Amended Initial Disclosures
`
`Current Amended Initial Disclosures
`
`Named inventor with knowledge of the U.S.
`Patent Nos. 7,946,788; 8,511,932; 8,690,474;
`as well as Wirtgen America’s technologies
`incorporating the foregoing
`
`Managing director at Wirtgen GmbH with
`knowledge of Wirtgen GmbH’s patent
`protection policies as well as written
`communications with Caterpillar regarding
`Wirtgen America’s patents.
`
`The parties have agreed that in connection with Dr. Hähn’s potential testimony, Wirtgen
`America will not be relying on any documents produced after the close of fact discovery on March
`31, 2023.
`
`The parties have further agreed that Wirtgen America will not rely on Dr. Hähn in support
`of any of the following topics:
`
`The conception and/or the reduction to practice of any Asserted Patent;
`The infringement of any Asserted Patent;
`
`1.
`2.
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW-MPT Document 196 Filed 05/01/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 15631
`
`
`The Honorable Joshua D. Wolson
`May 1, 2023
`Page 2
`
`
`3.
`4.
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`The validity of any Asserted Patent;
`Any alleged prior art Wirtgen-branded products;
`Any alleged copying of any Asserted Patent and/or Wirtgen-branded product by
`Caterpillar;
`Any competition between any Wirtgen Entity, Caterpillar, and/or other companies,
`such as Roadtec or BOMAG;
`Any sales, profits, losses, damages, and/or competitive harm relating to any claim
`by Wirtgen America against Caterpillar;
`Patent licensing, royalty rates, and/or any intellectual property agreements;
`The economic value of any individual features found in products that Wirtgen
`America asserts practice the claimed inventions of the Asserted Patents; and
`10. Manufacturing capacity and/or supply chain issues.
`
`8.
`9.
`
`In consideration of the above, the parties have agreed that no additional ESI search needs
`to be undertaken by Wirtgen America as a result of the Court’s April 21, 2023 Order.
`
`Finally, the parties are working to find a mutually agreeable date for a deposition of Dr.
`Hähn in Delaware.
`
`The parties are available if the Court has any additional questions or concerns regarding
`the above matters.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`30343264.1
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Adam W. Poff (No. 3990)
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`
`Andrew L. Brown (No. 6766)
`
`Counsel for Defendant
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket