throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 215 Filed 10/05/23 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 16467
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
`
`Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,
`
`v.
`
`CATERPILLAR INC.
`
`Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`C.A. No. 17-770-JDW
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`REDACTED -
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE
`PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Ryan D. Levy
`Seth R. Ogden
`William E. Sekyi
`Dominic A. Rota
`Mark A. Kilgore
`PATTERSON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY LAW, P.C.
`1600 Division Street, Suite 500
`Nashville, Tennessee 37203
`(615) 242-2400
`rdl@iplawgroup.com
`sro@iplawgroup.com
`wes@iplawgroup.com
`dar@iplawgroup.com
`mak@iplawgroup.com
`
`-and-
`
`Daniel E. Yonan
`Paul A. Ainsworth
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
`1100 New York Ave., NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`dyonan@sternekessler.com
`painsworth@sternekessler.com
`
`YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT &
`TAYLOR, LLP
`Adam W. Poff (No. 3990)
`Samantha G. Wilson (No. 5816)
`Rodney Square
`1000 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 571-6600
`apoff@ycst.com
`swilson@ycst.com
`
`Attorneys for Wirtgen America, Inc.
`
`Dated: October 5, 2023
`
`

`

`
`CATERPILLAR INC.
`
`
`v.
`
`Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 17-770-JDW
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 215 Filed 10/05/23 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 16468
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
`
`
`Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE PARTIES’
`JOINT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`
`Wirtgen America, Inc. (“Wirtgen”) seeks to redact from the public record limited
`
`portions of four of the exhibits filed in support of Caterpillar’s Motion to Exclude Wirtgen’s
`
`expert testimony. The information in these exhibits was designated confidential and produced
`
`pursuant to the Protective Order in this case. Caterpillar does not oppose the relief sought herein.
`
`Courts have long recognized that commercial litigation in general—and patent litigation
`
`in particular—compels parties to disclose their most confidential information to their most
`
`threatening competitors. For discovery in such cases to work, parties must be able to rely on
`
`protective orders and the ability to seal confidential information. See Lunareye, Inc. v. Gordon
`
`Howard Assocs., Inc., 78 F.Supp.3d 671, 676 (E.D. Tex. 2015) (“compliance with protective
`
`orders is essential to modern discovery practices”); Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., No.
`
`CV 11–01846 LHK, 2013 WL 9768650, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2013) (“Time and again in
`
`competitor patent cases, parties resist producing confidential information to their adversaries’
`
`lawyers. . . . Yet time and again, the court assuages these fears with assurances that a protective
`
`order will keep the information out of the competitors’ hands.”).
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 215 Filed 10/05/23 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 16469
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 215 Filed 10/05/23 Page 3 of 6 PagelD #: 16469
`
`Asitemized below,the portions of the exhibits that Wirtgen seeks to seal are the numbers
`
`reflecting Wirtgen’s lost profits, net revenues, and unit sales. The public interest in knowing
`
`these specific numbers is minimal and is greatly outweighed bythe sensitivity ofthis financial
`
`information to Wirtgen. See Ex. A, Decl. of Jim McEvoy(attesting to the sensitivity and
`
`confidential nature of the material sought to be redacted). The impact of these redactions on the
`
`readability of the motion is likewise minimal, and the completeness of the public record created
`
`by the briefing and resolution of this motion will not be underminedbythese small but essential
`
`redactions. This is the type of information that Courts routinely allow parties to file underseal.
`
`[Exhibit|Description|Cite__|
`|| Wirtgen’s lost profits.
`Wiutgen’s unit sales of
`practicing products.
`Wiutgen’s net revenues.
`
`i
`
`Excerpts of Seth
`Opening Report
`
`Wiutgen unit sales
`
`Industry sales—indicative of
`Wirtgen unit sales.
`Wiutgen’s lost profits.
`
`i
`
`Table 4,
`Page 78 of
`
`Figures*
`
`Wiutgen’s annual lost profits
`per accused machine.
`
`*All Lost Profits ||Justification
`
`Excerpts of Seth
`
`Wittgen’s lost profits.
`Wiutgen’s lost profits.
`Wittgen’s lost profits.
`Wiutgen’s lost profits.
`Wiutgen’s lost profits.
`Wiutgen’s lost profits.
`Wittgen’s lost profits.
`Wiutgen’s lost profits.
`Wiutgen’s lost profits.
`
`Wirtgen’s lost profits.
`Wiutgen’s lost profits.
`Wirtgen’s lost profits.
`Wittgen’s lost profits.
`Wirtgen’s lost profits.
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 215 Filed 10/05/23 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 16470
`
`3
`
`Excerpts of Seth
`Reply Report
`
`4
`
`Seth Dep. Errata
`
`Table 11,
`Page 45 of
`48
`
`115:14
`
`116:4
`
`116:9
`
`116:16-17
`
`Row [9]
`
`Wirtgen’s lost profits.
`
`Wirtgen’s lost profits for
`“Large, Vibration Mounting
`and Parallel to Surface.”
`Wirtgen’s lost profits for
`“Large, Vibration Mounting
`and Parallel to Surface.”
`Wirtgen’s lost profits for
`“Large, Vibration Mounting
`and Parallel to Surface.”
`Wirtgen’s lost profits.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Wirtgen asks that the Court grant the parties’ joint motion for
`
`
`
`leave to file under seal the above-listed exhibits to Caterpillar’s Motion to exclude Wirtgen’s
`
`expert testimony.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 215 Filed 10/05/23 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 16471
`
`
`
`YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT &
`TAYLOR, LLP
`
`/s/ Adam W. Poff
`Adam W. Poff (No. 3990)
`Samantha G. Wilson (No. 5816)
`Rodney Square
`1000 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 571-6600
`apoff@ycst.com
`swilson@ycst.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Wirtgen America, Inc.
`
`
`Dated: October 5, 2023
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Ryan D. Levy
`Seth R. Ogden
`William E. Sekyi
`Dominic A. Rota
`Mark A. Kilgore
`PATTERSON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY LAW, P.C.
`1600 Division Street, Suite 500
`Nashville, Tennessee 37203
`(615) 242-2400
`rdl@iplawgroup.com
`sro@iplawgroup.com
`wes@iplawgroup.com
`dar@iplawgroup.com
`mak@iplawgroup.com
`- and -
`Daniel E. Yonan
`Paul A. Ainsworth
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
`1100 New York Ave., NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`dyonan@sternekessler.com
`painsworth@sternekessler.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 215 Filed 10/05/23 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 16472
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Adam W. Poff, Esquire, hereby certify that on October 5, 2023, I caused the foregoing
`
`document to be served by email upon the following counsel:
`
`Bindu A. Palapura
`Andrew L. Brown
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON, LLP
`1313 N. Market Street, 6th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`bpalapura@potteranderson.com
`abrown@potteranderson.com
`
`James C. Yoon
`Ryan R. Smith
`Christopher Mays
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`jyoon@wsgr.com
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`cmays@wsgr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lucy Yen
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`1301 Avenue of the Americas
`40th Floor
`New York, NY 10019
`lyen@wsgr.com
`
`caterpillar@wsgr.com
`
`
`YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT &
`TAYLOR, LLP
`
`/s/ Adam W. Poff
`Adam W. Poff (No. 3990)
`Samantha G. Wilson (No. 5816)
`Rodney Square
`1000 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 571-6600
`apoff@ycst.com
`swilson@ycst.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket