`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 92
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 230-15 Filed 10/05/23 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 24131
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00770-JDW
`
`CONTAINS INFORMATION
`MARKED
`CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,
`
`
`
`CATERPILLAR INC.,
`
` Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.
`
`
`v.
`
`REBUTTAL EXPERT REPORT OF DR. CHRISTOPHER RAHN
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 230-15 Filed 10/05/23 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 24132
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`trains included “a coaxial, rigidly supported arrangement” of shafts which connected
`
`the drive train components. ’268 Patent, 1:45-50. Skilled artisans would have
`
`understood that coaxial arrangements of shafts such as these would have been
`
`aligned within manufacturing tolerances, not aligned perfectly.
`
`97. A skilled artisan would also have understood that although some drive
`
`train components could be attached to the machine frame using rubber isolators, the
`
`isolators would be designed to maintain alignment when the machine is not in
`
`operation. This includes the proper design of the isolator to maintain creep within
`
`acceptable limits during the service life and maintenance and replacement of aged
`
`isolators with excessive creep.
`
`98. A skilled artisan would have further understood that the claims require
`
`that the “articulated coupling accommodates a lack of alignment between the output
`
`axis of the drive engine and the input axes of the hydraulic pump drive and the drive
`
`pulley due to dynamic movement of the first subset relative to the second subset
`
`during operation of the construction machine.” See e.g., ’268 Patent, Claim 14, 7:43-
`
`49, 9:39-44, 11:37-42; see also ’268 Patent, 5:17-25.
`
`99.
`
`I disagree with Dr. Klopp’s opinion at paragraph 47 of his report that
`
`claim was broadened to include more than one torque. Klopp Rpt, ¶47. A skilled
`
`artisan would have understood that Claim 14 of the ’268 Patent was amended to
`
`recite “a clutch for switching a torque” instead of “a clutch for switching the torque”.
`
`57
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 230-15 Filed 10/05/23 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 24133
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`A skilled artisan would have understood that in both the original and the amended
`
`phrase, the clutch switches the torque that the engine generates by engaging to
`
`transmit the engine’s torque to the working drum, or disengaging to disconnect the
`
`working drum from the engine.
`
`100. A working drum is driven mechanically by a drive train that comprises
`
`a drive engine, a pump transfer case, a clutch and a belt drive. The direct mechanical
`
`drive of the working drum, which consists of a milling drum, can be engaged or
`
`disengaged again by means of the clutch. ’268 Patent, 1:37-41.
`
`“The drive train 8 further shows a device for switching the torque 14,
`which is arranged in the drive train 8 between the drive engine 10 and
`the working drum 6 and preferably consists of a clutch.”
`’268 Patent 4:51-54. Both phrases require a clutch that switches the same torque –
`
`the engine torque. For at least this reason, I disagree with Dr. Klopp that the amended
`
`phrase broadens the meaning of the claim to include more than one torque.
`
`101. I disagree with Dr. Klopp’s opinion at paragraph 48 of his report that a
`
`skilled artisan would have understood claim 30 to require the articulated coupling to
`
`extend within the oil-lubricated space interior to the gearbox. Klopp Rpt, ¶48; see
`
`Section V.B.2. A skilled artisan would have understood that claim 30 specifies that
`
`an “articulated coupling extends into the interior space of the hydraulic pump drive”
`
`which is a separate space from and not inside the gearbox casing of the hydraulic
`
`pump drive. A skilled artisan would have read the claim in the context of the
`
`58
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 230-15 Filed 10/05/23 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 24134
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`Conclusion
`
`This report contains my complete opinions as of today based on discovery
`
`provided by Caterpillar. I reserve the right to amend, modify, or supplement this
`
`Report in the event additional discovery is provided by Caterpillar, including any
`
`expert opinions offered by Caterpillar.
`
`Dated: June 16, 2023
`
`_______________________
`Christopher Rahn, Ph.D.
`
`151
`
`