throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 230-15 Filed 10/05/23 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 24130
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 92
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 230-15 Filed 10/05/23 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 24131
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00770-JDW
`
`CONTAINS INFORMATION
`MARKED
`CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,
`
`
`
`CATERPILLAR INC.,
`
` Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.
`
`
`v.
`
`REBUTTAL EXPERT REPORT OF DR. CHRISTOPHER RAHN
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 230-15 Filed 10/05/23 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 24132
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`trains included “a coaxial, rigidly supported arrangement” of shafts which connected
`
`the drive train components. ’268 Patent, 1:45-50. Skilled artisans would have
`
`understood that coaxial arrangements of shafts such as these would have been
`
`aligned within manufacturing tolerances, not aligned perfectly.
`
`97. A skilled artisan would also have understood that although some drive
`
`train components could be attached to the machine frame using rubber isolators, the
`
`isolators would be designed to maintain alignment when the machine is not in
`
`operation. This includes the proper design of the isolator to maintain creep within
`
`acceptable limits during the service life and maintenance and replacement of aged
`
`isolators with excessive creep.
`
`98. A skilled artisan would have further understood that the claims require
`
`that the “articulated coupling accommodates a lack of alignment between the output
`
`axis of the drive engine and the input axes of the hydraulic pump drive and the drive
`
`pulley due to dynamic movement of the first subset relative to the second subset
`
`during operation of the construction machine.” See e.g., ’268 Patent, Claim 14, 7:43-
`
`49, 9:39-44, 11:37-42; see also ’268 Patent, 5:17-25.
`
`99.
`
`I disagree with Dr. Klopp’s opinion at paragraph 47 of his report that
`
`claim was broadened to include more than one torque. Klopp Rpt, ¶47. A skilled
`
`artisan would have understood that Claim 14 of the ’268 Patent was amended to
`
`recite “a clutch for switching a torque” instead of “a clutch for switching the torque”.
`
`57
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 230-15 Filed 10/05/23 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 24133
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`A skilled artisan would have understood that in both the original and the amended
`
`phrase, the clutch switches the torque that the engine generates by engaging to
`
`transmit the engine’s torque to the working drum, or disengaging to disconnect the
`
`working drum from the engine.
`
`100. A working drum is driven mechanically by a drive train that comprises
`
`a drive engine, a pump transfer case, a clutch and a belt drive. The direct mechanical
`
`drive of the working drum, which consists of a milling drum, can be engaged or
`
`disengaged again by means of the clutch. ’268 Patent, 1:37-41.
`
`“The drive train 8 further shows a device for switching the torque 14,
`which is arranged in the drive train 8 between the drive engine 10 and
`the working drum 6 and preferably consists of a clutch.”
`’268 Patent 4:51-54. Both phrases require a clutch that switches the same torque –
`
`the engine torque. For at least this reason, I disagree with Dr. Klopp that the amended
`
`phrase broadens the meaning of the claim to include more than one torque.
`
`101. I disagree with Dr. Klopp’s opinion at paragraph 48 of his report that a
`
`skilled artisan would have understood claim 30 to require the articulated coupling to
`
`extend within the oil-lubricated space interior to the gearbox. Klopp Rpt, ¶48; see
`
`Section V.B.2. A skilled artisan would have understood that claim 30 specifies that
`
`an “articulated coupling extends into the interior space of the hydraulic pump drive”
`
`which is a separate space from and not inside the gearbox casing of the hydraulic
`
`pump drive. A skilled artisan would have read the claim in the context of the
`
`58
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 230-15 Filed 10/05/23 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 24134
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`Conclusion
`
`This report contains my complete opinions as of today based on discovery
`
`provided by Caterpillar. I reserve the right to amend, modify, or supplement this
`
`Report in the event additional discovery is provided by Caterpillar, including any
`
`expert opinions offered by Caterpillar.
`
`Dated: June 16, 2023
`
`_______________________
`Christopher Rahn, Ph.D.
`
`151
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket