throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 238 Filed 10/19/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 24292
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`CATERPILLAR INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 17-770-JDW-MPT
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF ASHA T. MEHROTRA
`IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION TO SEAL
`
`I, Asha T. Mehrotra, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am Assistant General Counsel of Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff
`
`Caterpillar Inc. (“Caterpillar”). I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein, and if called
`
`as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto.
`
`2.
`
`I am submitting this supplemental declaration in support of the parties’ Joint
`
`Motion to Seal (“Motion to Seal”) in connection with the parties’ oppositions to motions for
`
`summary judgment and Daubert motions.
`
`3.
`
`Through this Motion to Seal, Caterpillar seeks leave to file under seal three types
`
`of Caterpillar confidential information: (i) sensitive financial data; (ii) Caterpillar’s business plans
`
`and strategy; and (iii) the identity, locations, and purchases of specific Caterpillar customers.
`
`
`
`-1-
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 238 Filed 10/19/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 24293
`
`4.
`
`First, Caterpillar seeks to seal certain financial information referenced in an internal
`
`presentation and one of the reports of Dr. Seth, Wirtgen America’s damages expert in this matter.1
`
`Such sensitive financial information includes Caterpillar’s non-public sales data such as costs,
`
`revenue, and profit. As I explained in my previous declaration, Caterpillar, like most businesses,
`
`considers this type of sales data to be confidential because it represents the core of our business
`
`operations and ultimately, our ability to generate profits. Public disclosure of otherwise
`
`confidentially-maintained financial information would result in substantial economic and
`
`competitive harm to Caterpillar, including by damaging our negotiating position with customers,
`
`parts suppliers, and competitors in the industry. For example, if these counterparties had access
`
`to Caterpillar’s financial information, they could use it to press Caterpillar during negotiations for
`
`discounts and other favorable treatment. Specific to this case, if Wirtgen America gained access
`
`to Caterpillar’s confidential financial data, it could leverage this information to gain an advantage
`
`in reaching out to our customers, pricing its own products, and offering discounts to secure sales.
`
`I understand that the Court has already granted Caterpillar’s prior motion to seal this type of
`
`financial information.
`
`5.
`
`Second, Caterpillar seeks to seal certain documents containing its confidential
`
`planning and strategy, including strategies on how to expand our business and gain market share
`
`(Wirtgen America Exhibit D); compete with our competitors, including Wirtgen America (Wirtgen
`
`America Exhibit D); and address intellectual property issues, including those at issue in this matter
`
`(Wirtgen America Exhibit J). Other strategy documents include information regarding the
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The expert report at issue also contains one passage containing the confidential information of CTCT,
`which is a joint venture between Caterpillar and Trimble Inc. that develops digital solutions. I explained
`in my October 5, 2023 declaration how information from CTCT is confidential, and I understand the Court
`previously granted Caterpillar’s motion to seal that information. This new passage in Dr. Seth’s Report is
`the same type of CTCT information the Court previously sealed.
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 238 Filed 10/19/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 24294
`
`planning and development of new products and builds, including discussion comparing these
`
`products to our competitors (Wirtgen America Exhibits G, H, K, and P). These are some of
`
`Caterpillar’s most sensitive documents because their disclosure would harm our competitive
`
`standing, especially in relation to Wirtgen America, who is one of Caterpillar’s biggest
`
`competitors. In particular, these documents would provide competitors with direct insight into our
`
`competitive strategies and future plans. These competitors could then exploit this information to
`
`gain an advantage over Caterpillar in the market. For example, they could adopt strategies that
`
`would directly counteract our confidential business plans or modify their competing products to
`
`better compete with our planned machines and updates.
`
`6.
`
`These specific strategy documents are also sensitive because they are related to this
`
`lawsuit. For example, the document titled “Exhibit J” directly includes Caterpillar’s internal
`
`strategies to address patents in this lawsuit, including confidential cost information for design-
`
`arounds in response to allegations of infringement. If Wirtgen America saw this document, it
`
`could use it to its competitive advantage in the market and during settlement negotiations.
`
`Similarly, these strategy documents address Caterpillar’s plans regarding the Accused Products in
`
`this case. If these documents were filed publicly, Wirtgen America could use Caterpillar’s
`
`confidential information about the Accused Products to gain an advantage in this lawsuit and
`
`competing in the market.
`
`7.
`
`Finally, Caterpillar seeks to seal three spreadsheets that contain vast amounts of
`
`internal and confidential information. In particular, they contain data from a set of surveys that
`
`Caterpillar commissioned on our customers, which we called “Voice of the Customer” or
`
`“VOC.” The survey data includes specific customer names, locations, dealers, and products
`
`purchased. They also list the customers’ opinions about Caterpillar and its competitors’ products,
`
`including features that they like and dislike. This data should be sealed because (i) it is the private
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 238 Filed 10/19/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 24295
`
`information of individuals and companies that are not involved in this lawsuit, and (ii) disclosing
`
`it to the public would greatly harm Caterpillar competitively. Indeed, if this information were
`
`public, our competitors, such as Wirtgen America, could use it to solicit Caterpillar’s customers
`
`with respect to specific products or otherwise gain an advantage in the market. Our customers’
`
`opinions regarding our products would be particularly useful for a competitor because they reveal
`
`the features the customers like and dislike about the machines at issue. A competitor like
`
`Wirtgen America could use this opinion data to capture market share and outright solicit our
`
`customers by (i) identifying which customers are dissatisfied with Caterpillar’s products and (ii)
`
`tailoring its sales pitches to those customers’ specific preferences. This information would also
`
`be useful for competitors to guide future product development, at Caterpillar’s expense.
`
`8.
`
`These spreadsheets also contain other sensitive Caterpillar information, such as
`
`product development timelines and goals. This information relates directly to Caterpillar’s
`
`product planning and strategies, and should be protected for the same reasons I discussed above.
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
`
`foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Executed in Illinois on October 19, 2023.
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`Asha T. Mehrotra
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket