Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 25820
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 1 of 18 PagelD #: 25820
`
`EXHIBIT 22
`EXHIBIT 22
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 1 of 18 PagelD #: 25820
`
`EXHIBIT 22
`EXHIBIT 22
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 2 of 18 PageID #: 25821
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 1
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`________________________________
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC., )
` Plaintiff/Counter- ) Case No.
` Defendant, ) 1:17-cv-00770-JDW
` vs. )
`CATERPILLAR, INC., )
` Defendant/Counter- )
` Plaintiff. )
`________________________________)
` HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
` OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
` DEPOSITION OF CHRISTOPHER DAVID RAHN, Ph.D.
` WASHINGTON, D.C.
` AUGUST 14, 2023
`
`REPORTED BY: Tina Alfaro, RPR, CRR, RMR
`
`______________________________________________________
` DIGITAL EVIDENCE GROUP
` 1730 M Street, NW, Suite 812
` Washington, D.C. 20036
` (202) 232-0646
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 3 of 18 PageID #: 25822
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 134
` Q. Okay. So Dr. Rahn, if you look at element
`1C, it says "Supporting the subset of the
`components from the machine frame in a rigid manner
`or with a second spring stiffness" and it goes on
`from there; do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Do you view the terms "a rigid manner" and
`"a second spring stiffness" to be synonymous with
`one another?
` A. I'm sorry. The question again, please.
` Q. Do you view the terms "a rigid manner" and
`"a second spring stiffness" to be synonymous with
`one another?
` A. No.
` Q. And so the italicized language "in a rigid
`manner," you understand that was added in the
`reissue process?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So would you agree at least in that regard
`element 1C is broader because it provides the
`option of in a rigid manner or with a second spring
`stiffness whereas before the ratio it only had a
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 4 of 18 PageID #: 25823
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 135
`
`second spring stiffness?
` MR. YONAN: Objection, form.
` A. A second spring stiffness includes rigid
`manner. So an example of a second spring stiffness
`that's essentially rigid is one that has a very
`high or technically infinite stiffness.
` Q. So you're saying that you could never have
`a scenario where there would be a machine frame
`with a second -- strike that.
` In your view could there be a scenario
`where the machine frame is in a rigid manner but
`does not have a spring stiffness different than the
`first spring stiffness?
` MR. YONAN: Objection, form, improper
`hypothetical.
` A. Yeah. I'm not quite following you there.
` Q. Well, I think what you said was a rigid
`manner was subsumed within spring stiffness. So
`what I'm -- what I'm wondering is can you think --
`would there be any scenario where you could have a
`machine frame in a rigid manner but where the --
`where the second spring stiffness wasn't
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 5 of 18 PageID #: 25824
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 137
`
` MR. YONAN: Same objections.
` A. Yeah. Again, for some reason I'm just not
`catching your drift here.
` Q. Well, could -- so you have a first spring
`stiffness which -- which the claim requires and
`that's talking about an elastic attachment to the
`frame. I'll cut to the chase. In B it says
`"Supporting the drive engine components from the
`machine frame elastically with a first spring
`stiffness," right?
` A. I see the item B in claim 1, yes.
` Q. And then the second spring stiffness could
`be any spring stiffness that's higher than the
`first spring stiffness, right?
` MR. YONAN: Same objections.
` A. The claim requires a second spring
`stiffness being relatively higher than the first
`spring stiffness.
` Q. The second spring stiffness could be
`relatively higher than the first spring stiffness,
`yet not be rigid; is that right?
` A. So it's possible to have a stiffness --
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 6 of 18 PageID #: 25825
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 138
`say, for example, if the stiffness of the first
`spring was 5 and the second spring was 6, it's not
`rigid, but it is a stiffness that's relatively
`higher.
` Q. Okay. Are you aware that some road
`milling machines have tracks while others have
`wheels?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Are there any other options besides
`milling machines with tracks and those with wheels?
` MR. YONAN: Objection, beyond the scope.
` A. So I'm familiar with the tracks and
`wheels, at least that's what I've seen in most of
`the documents that I reviewed.
` Q. You can't think of a third option right
`now?
` A. Not -- not sitting here today.
` Q. Would you -- would you say there's wheels
`inside the tracks?
` MR. YONAN: Same objection.
` A. Are you referring to something
`specifically?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 7 of 18 PageID #: 25826
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 190
`
` A. Okay. You said 343.
` Q. Yes. And I think midway through that
`paragraph you wrote "In my experience taking the
`average of input values is a standard signal
`processing technique used to remove noise from the
`input data"; do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And generally can you explain how taking
`the average of input values would help remove noise
`from the input data?
` A. So if you have a sensor that is producing
`a signal of some kind, there's usually some sort of
`a noise on that signal. So you're not getting the
`exact or even close to the value that you're trying
`to measure. And by taking, say, three points and
`taking an average, so you take the current value,
`the previous value and the one before that, and you
`average those three numbers, it gets rid of the
`random variations between those to a certain
`extent. So it's an example of a filter.
` Q. And do you know what type of filter is
`used for the grade and slope sensors used in the
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 8 of 18 PageID #: 25827
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 191
`
`accused road milling machines?
` A. I remember seeing something about
`averaging, but I can't remember right now where --
`where that is in my report.
` Q. So you would do something like take the
`current value and the two previous values and then
`basically add those together and divide by three
`and that would give you a averaged value that
`effectively removes some of the noise?
` A. That's an example of, yeah, what is a
`typical signal processing filtering approach.
` Q. And would that -- would that typical
`signal processing filtering approach be done within
`the controller that's receiving the sensor input or
`done in the controller itself -- I mean, done in
`the sensor itself?
` A. So --
` MR. YONAN: Objection, form.
` THE WITNESS: Are you asking just like
`generally how it's done or specifically in the --
`in the accused machines?
` Q. Well, in the accused machines do you know
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 9 of 18 PageID #: 25828
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 192
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`how it would be done?
` A. Like I said, I recall something about
`averaging, but I don't -- I don't recall having
`details on how it's actually done.
` Q. In your view the filtered output could be
`the current actual value of a sensor?
` MR. YONAN: Same objection.
` A. So now you're talking about the claim
`language, right, the claim term "current actual
`value"; is that correct?
` Q. Yeah. And you have that here in the
`paragraph we were looking at where it says "The
`current actual values"?
` A. Yes. "Claim 1F requires that the control
`conditioned on set values" --
` THE REPORTER: I'm sorry. Claim 1F --
` THE WITNESS: "Claim 1F requires that the
`control is conditioned on set values and sensed
`current actual values," and I believe that second
`term has some claim construction associated with
`it.
` Q. But the filtered output you were talking
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 10 of 18 PageID #: 25829
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 193
`about in your view could constitute a current
`actual value of a sensor?
` A. Yes, because the claim requires that the
`control is conditioned on these values and signal
`conditioning filtering is an example of that.
` Q. Now, when the -- in the accused products
`-- strike that -- in the accused road milling
`machines when the current actual value is being
`displayed on the screen, do you know if the
`graphical user interface does any additional
`manipulation of the input number, like, for
`example, rounding or some other form of averaging?
` A. So you're asking about what's displayed on
`the screen and how that's -- how that's been
`processed before it gets to the screen essentially?
` Q. Yeah. My understanding is that the
`controller in the road milling machines would
`output this conditioned value that we were talking
`about to one of the user interface screens in the
`machine and then that would be displayed; is that
`right? If it's helpful, I mean, for example, just
`on page 222 in your report you capture kind of a I
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 11 of 18 PageID #: 25830
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 194
`guess screenshot from one of the user manuals and
`this depicts one of the screens in the road milling
`machines of Caterpillar; is that right?
` A. Correct.
` Q. Okay. And it's showing that on the
`left-hand portion of the screen there's a sonic
`sensor that's been engaged? Do you see that icon?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. And in this example it looks like
`the grade for the left would be set at either 2
`inches or 2 centimeters?
` A. It looks like 2 inches.
` Q. Oh, 2 inches. Okay. So the -- so the
`target value here would be 2 inches, right?
` A. Correct.
` Q. And the sensed -- or strike that.
` The measured value would be 2 inches as
`well in this example, right?
` A. The signal coming back from that sonic
`sensor is reading 2 as well, yes.
` Q. And I was -- and so what happens is the
`controller in the road milling machine outputs the
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 12 of 18 PageID #: 25831
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 195
`conditioned potentially averaged sensor reading to
`the screen, and then what I'm wondering is does
`this screen do anything with that sensor reading
`before displaying it on -- displaying it?
` A. So I think my understanding is that the --
`both the controller and the display are receiving,
`you know, at some point the measured value, and
`there may be some processing on those two -- you
`know, on those two numbers to produce what's
`actually displayed and/or used in a controller.
` Q. And do you know if all that processing
`would occur in the -- in the controller or the
`screen that we're looking at?
` MR. YONAN: Objection, form.
` (Witness reviewing document.)
` A. So my understanding is that both -- or
`based on what I've read I see that both the
`controller and the screen are getting that same
`measured data.
` Q. Okay. And that's -- and that's your
`understanding of how it operates?
` A. That's what I understand -- that's how I
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 13 of 18 PageID #: 25832
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 202
` Q. So in your opinion each of the screens in
`the accused road milling machines would be two
`indication and setting devices, right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And now, is it true there are some --
`strike that.
` If a user buys optional equipment
`including an additional display screen, isn't it
`possible that the user would have a sensor reading
`for one sensor, let's say the left -- the left-hand
`side sensor on one screen and then the right-hand
`side sensor on a second screen?
` A. I don't recall if that's possible.
` Q. Okay. So is it your understanding that
`you would -- on a given main display screen like
`what we see on page 215 you would always be
`displaying two sensors on that?
` MR. YONAN: Objection, form.
` A. So as I said, this one screen is
`indication and setting for both left and right
`sides of the machine.
` Q. Yeah. And my question was just -- it
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 14 of 18 PageID #: 25833
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 221
`
`machines?
` A. Well, a switch-over device does involve
`inputs through the user interface and there's
`definitely software involved.
` Q. But you would -- strike that.
` The switch-over device is not the screen
`overall that we're looking at on page 234, is it?
` A. It's not just the screen. There are other
`parts to it.
` Q. In your view is the switch-over device the
`screen plus various buttons that are displayed on
`the screen?
` A. So the switch-over device involves the
`screen, as you said, for input and these menus come
`down, so you have multiple inputs to do, and then
`you select okay to -- essentially all those things
`are part of that switch-over.
` MR. YONAN: Counsel, not to rush you, but
`if there's a good opportunity for a break.
` MR. SMITH: Yeah. Just a second.
`BY MR. SMITH:
` Q. So in order for these -- strike that.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 15 of 18 PageID #: 25834
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 222
` So when the machine is off, it's not
`running and the screen is blank with no power to
`it, would there be a switch-over device?
` MR. YONAN: Objection, form.
` A. Well, lots of things wouldn't happen if
`the machine was off.
` Q. So if the machine is off does the machine
`have a switch-over device?
` MR. YONAN: Same objection.
` A. So the switch-over device is to be used
`when the machine is on.
` Q. Does the switch-over device exist when the
`machine is off?
` A. There's certainly lines of software code
`that are still somewhere residing on that machine.
` Q. So is your -- is it your view that the
`switch-over device is lines of code?
` A. Software's part of it. It's not the whole
`thing.
` Q. And my question is just if the machine is
`off can you point to something and say this is the
`switch-over device?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 16 of 18 PageID #: 25835
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 223
`
` MR. YONAN: Asked and answered.
` A. If the machine is off all the displays are
`dead presumably and lots of the functionality of
`the machine you can't see it. Doesn't mean it's
`not there.
` Q. So when the machine is off can you
`point -- point me to something and say this is the
`switch-over device?
` MR. YONAN: Objection, asked and
`answered.
` A. I tried to explain what -- what's going on
`there if the machine is off.
` Q. And I'm still trying to understand can you
`identify or list what the switch-over device would
`be, if anything, in a scenario when the machine is
`off?
` A. So I mentioned that there's software code
`that's residing inside that memory bank somewhere
`of the microprocessor. That's part of it that you
`can point to even when the machine's off. In order
`for that software to run and display things and
`take input the machine has to be on. And so those
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 17 of 18 PageID #: 25836
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 224
`
`parts of the display -- those parts of the
`switch-over device are still there, but they're
`just not visible.
` Q. Yeah. And so if we look at your analysis
`for claim element 1G, which starts on page 232 of
`your opening report, and continues on to page --
`page 238, is it fair to say you don't cite any
`particular lines of source code?
` A. So I did talk to the source code expert,
`Dr. Valerdi. I had access to these flowcharts
`which are essentially the software in kind of
`graphical flowchart form. I understand those
`flowcharts and Dr. Valerdi confirmed that they
`actually do reflect what's happening in the source
`code. So while I didn't actually review the source
`code myself, I did see how it was structured and
`understand that the flowchart itself says how the
`machine works.
` Q. And I think my question -- and then we can
`wrap up for a break -- was really so what you're
`telling me is that when the machine is off the
`switch-over device is some lines of code somewhere,
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-22 Filed 10/25/23 Page 18 of 18 PageID #: 25837
`
`8/14/2023
`
`Christopher David Rahn, Ph.D.
`Wirtgen America Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Outside Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`Page 279
`
` C E R T I F I C A T E
` I, TINA M. ALFARO, Registered Professional
`Reporter, Certified Realtime Reporter, and
`Registered Merit Reporter, the officer before whom
`the foregoing deposition was taken, do hereby
`certify that the foregoing transcript is a true and
`correct record of the testimony given; that said
`testimony was taken by me stenographically and
`thereafter reduced to typewriting under my
`direction; that reading and signing was requested;
`and that I am neither counsel for, related to, nor
`employed by any of the parties to this case and
`have no interest, financial or otherwise, in its
`outcome.
` IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
`hand on this 23 day of August,
`2023.
`
`________________________________
`Tina M. Alfaro, RPR, CRR, RMR
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2023
`
`202-232-0646
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
