throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-88 Filed 10/25/23 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 28916
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-88 Filed 10/25/23 Page 1 of 6 PagelD #: 28916
`
`EXHIBIT 85
`EXHIBIT 85
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-88 Filed 10/25/23 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 28917
`
`815104
`
`I Of
`
`ratAtobiumwsitrininstt pimgEnsi simmArlonght
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`September 21 2021
`
`THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ANNEXED IS A TRUE COPY FROM THE
`RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE OF THE FILE WRAPPER AND CONTENTS
`OF
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER 15934603
`FILING DATE March 23 2018
`PATENT NUMBER RE48268
`ISSUE DATE October 20 2020
`
`avr oF
`
`Certified by
`
`Under Secretary of Commerce
`for intellectual Property
`and Director of the United States
`Patent and Trademark Office
`
`WA
`
`0007038
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-88 Filed 10/25/23 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 28918
`
`Reissue Of 8408659
`Issued April 2 2013
`Customer No 23456
`
`date of the 659 patent a routine matter for a POSITA See Yur
`
`Declaration at paragraph 46 and the supporting evidence cited
`
`therein See Busley Declaration at paragraphs 3138
`
`5 A POSITA would have understood the disclosure as describing an
`
`example of supports of higher spring stiffness as a rigid
`
`mounting This would be understood by a POSITA as describing
`
`the typical rigid mounting of drive train components by bolting
`
`those components to the machine frame without
`
`the use of an
`
`elastomeric element See Yur Declaration at paragraph 45 and 47
`
`48 and the supporting evidence cited therein See Busley
`
`Declaration at paragraphs 2627
`
`Again it must be remembered that the issues raised by the written
`
`description rejection are determined by what a POSITA would have understood
`
`from the original disclosure Both Mr Busley and Mr Yur have provided
`
`substantial
`
`information about
`
`the background knowledge of the POSITA that would
`
`influence the POSITAs understanding of the disclosure found in the 659 patent
`
`See citations to the Busley and Yur declarations in the summary above
`
`It is also significant
`
`to note that Mr Busleys testimony and corroborating
`
`documents referred to by him clearly show that the inventors were in actual
`
`possession of the invention as claimed and that these features were included in
`
`54
`
`WA
`
`0012890
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-88 Filed 10/25/23 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 28919
`
`ApplicationControl Number 15934603
`Art Unit 3993
`
`Page 3
`
`Add the following new paragraph between lines 42 and 43 of column 5
`
`As shown in Fig 2 an output axis of the drive engine 10 is aligned with an input
`
`axis of the clutch 14 and with an input axis of the drive pulley 11 prior to operation of
`
`the construction machine The articulated coupling device 20 accommodates a lack of
`
`precise alignment between the output axis of the drive engine 10 and the input axes of
`
`the clutch 14 and the drive pulley 11 due to dynamic movement of the drive engine
`
`10 relative to the second group 5 during operation of the construction machine
`
`IN THE CLAIMS
`
`Amend claims 1 8 12 14 22 29 30 32 33 and 35 as follows
`
`1
`
`Four Times Amended A method of operating a construction machine the
`
`construction machine including a machine frame carried by a chassis a working drum
`and a drive train the drive train including at least a drive engine component a traction
`for driving the working drum a clutch component and a hydraulic
`
`drive component
`
`pump drive component and a traction drive for driving the working drum including a
`
`drive pulley a driven pulley attached to the working drum and a drive belt connecting
`
`the pulleys the method comprising
`a driving a subset of the components of the drive train from the drive engine
`component with an articulated coupling connected between the drive engine
`
`component and the subset of the components
`
`the subset
`
`including at least the
`
`drive pulley of the traction drive component for driving the working drum
`
`the dutch component and the hydraulic pump drive component with the
`
`clutch component beiktglocated between the hydraulicaump drive component
`
`and the drive pulley
`
`b supporting the drive engine component
`
`from the machine frame elastically
`
`with a first spring stiffness and
`c supporting the subset of the components from the machine frame in a rigid
`manner or with a second spring stiffness the second spring stiffness being
`
`relatively higher than the first spring stiffness
`
`WA
`
`0014045
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-88 Filed 10/25/23 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 28920
`Application No 15934603
`Continuation Sheet PTOL413B
`
`Continuation of Substance of Interview including description of the general nature of what was agreed
`to if an agreement was reached or any other comments
`
`The examiner explained that the amendments filed with the request for continued examination RCE
`to overcome all of a the rejections under 35 USC 112 and b the objections to
`on 13 July 2020 fail
`the specification The examiner suggested amendments to the specification and the claims in order to
`place the application in condition for allowance See the Attachment
`to Interview Summary which
`shows the amendments suggested by the examiner together with an explanation of the reasons for
`these suggested amendments
`
`Applicants representative approved the suggested amendments for entry via Examiners Amendment
`The applicants amendments to the specification filed on 13 July 2020 will not be entered since
`alternative amendments to the specification are included in the Examiners Amendment
`
`WA
`
`0014057
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 250-88 Filed 10/25/23 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 28921
`
`EXPLANATION
`
`The applicants response filed on July 13 2020including the claim amendments and the
`
`evidence submitted in the form of two Rule 132 declarations overcomes a number of the
`
`rejections set forth in the final Office action mailed on January 29 2020 However from the
`
`examiners viewpoint
`
`the applicants response fails to overcome the following matters
`
`I The issue of new matter recited in the new paragraph added to the specification after line
`2 of column 5 ie the parallel and coaxial
`in the claims and now added to the specification In order to resolve this issue the
`
`relationships of axes previously recited
`
`suggested amendments add two paragraphs to the specification that more closely follow
`
`the original disclosure of the invention including the disclosure found at column 2 lines
`2844 and at column 4 line 52 to column 5 line 2
`2 The issue of new matter recited in independent claims 1 12 14 and 15 ie the
`parallel and coaxial relationships of axes previously recited in these claims In order
`
`to resolve this issue the suggested amendments amend independent claims 1 12 14 and
`
`35 in order to more closely follow the original disclosure of the invention including the
`disclosure found at column 2 lines 2844 and at column 4 line 52 to column 5 line 2
`3 The contradictory definitions in independent claims 1 and 12 of the traction drive
`component as a being a part of the subset of components supported with a second
`spring stiffness and b including the driven pulley which is not disclosed as being
`
`supported with a second spring stiffness In order to resolve this issue the suggested
`amendments amend independent claims 1 and 12 to define a a traction drive including
`a drive pulley a driven pulley and a drive belt connecting the pulleys and b the drive
`
`pulley as being part of the subset of components supported with a second spring
`
`stiffness Corresponding changes are made to claims 8 32 and 33
`4 The contradictory definitions of the subset of components as being supported with a
`spring stiffness in independent claim 1 but as being supported rigidly in dependent
`
`claim 3 In order to resolve this issue the suggested amendments amend independent
`
`claim 1 to define the support as being either in a rigid manner or with a spring stiffness
`A similar alternative limitation is already found in independent claims 14 and 35
`
`WA
`
`0014081
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket