`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 307-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 1 of 5 PagelD #: 30472
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 8
`EXHIBIT 8
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 307-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 30473
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v. )
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`CATERPILLAR INC.,
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`)
`________________________________
`)
`
`C.A. No. 17-770-JDW
`
`REBUTTAL EXPERT REPORT OF JOSEPH RAKOW, Ph.D., P.E., F.A.S.M.E.
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 307-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 30474
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`using a tilt table.135 Testimony supports this understanding of the document from which
`
`Dr. Lumkes extracted Figure 20.136
`
`Figure 21. Additional context provided in the remainder of the document referenced
`by Dr. Lumkes regarding the alleged diamond-shaped stability pattern.
`
`75.
`
`Dr. Lumkes’ analysis lacks valid references and calculations regarding the nature, shape,
`
`and placement of the stability pattern of the Accused Products. Accordingly, Dr. Lumkes
`
`has not shown that the Large Milling Machines practice each and every element of Claim
`
`29 for at least the reasons described above.
`
`135 CAT_00055857, p. 8/13.
`136 Deposition of Jeffrey Hoyle, taken March 16, 2023, p. 167:15-19.
`40
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`2111403.000 - 1791
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 307-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 30475
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`VI. Non-Infringing Alternatives
`
`76.
`
`I understand that that the International Trade Commission found that Caterpillar infringed
`
`Claims 29 and 36 of the ’309 Patent137,138 and issued a Limited Exclusion Order139
`
`preventing Caterpillar from importing PM600 and PM800 series machines that possessed
`
`the Ride Control feature. I understand that the International Trade Commission found that
`
`Caterpillar did not infringe Claim 10 of the ’309 Patent.140
`
`77.
`
`I understand that Caterpillar considered two alternatives to comply with the exclusion
`
`order. The first alternative involved adding accumulators to the hydraulic circuit.141 The
`
`second alternative involved removal of the hydraulic circuit components that enact the Ride
`
`Control feature.142
`
`78.
`
`I understand that Caterpillar chose the second alternative and removed the Ride Control
`
`feature. I understand that the Ride Control feature was removed during production of the
`
`02A build of the PM600 and PM800 series machines.143,144 I understand that Wirtgen
`
`America is not asserting that the PM600 and PM800 series machines without Ride Control
`
`infringe Claims 10 and 29 of the Asserted Patent. I inspected Caterpillar PM600 and
`
`PM800 series build 02B machines produced without Ride Control,
`
`including
`
`Representative Product PM622 02B. See Section IV.A.2.
`
`137 Eric Engelmann Exhibit 36, p. 79/446.
`138 Eric Engelmann Exhibit 36, p. 84/446.
`139 EXPONENT_0005572.
`140 Eric Engelmann Exhibit 36, p. 72/446.
`141 Deposition of Eric Engelmann Vol. II, taken March 17, 2023, p. 364:2-7.
`142 Deposition of Eric Engelmann Vol. II, taken March 17, 2023, p. 367:12-16.
`143 Deposition of Eric Engelmann Vol. I, taken March 16, 2023, p. 31:5-12.
`144 Jeffrey Hoyle Exhibit 1.
`
`41
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`2111403.000 - 1791
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 307-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 30476
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`VIII. Conclusion
`
`90.
`
`For at least the reasons stated above, it is my opinion that that the Accused Products do not
`
`infringe on the Asserted Claims based on the evidence provided by Dr. Lumkes in his
`
`Initial Expert Report.
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on June 16, 2023 at Menlo Park, California
`
`Joseph Rakow, Ph.D., P.E., F.A.S.M.E.
`
`48
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`2111403.000 - 1791
`
`