Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 34425
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`CATERPILLAR INC.
`
`v.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Case No. 17-770-JDW
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF PALLAVI SETH, PH.D.
`IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR PREJUDGMENT INTEREST
`
`
`
`YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT &
`TAYLOR, LLP
`
`Adam W. Poff (No. 3990)
`Samantha G. Wilson (No. 5816)
`Rodney Square
`1000 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 571-6600
`apoff@ycst.com
`swilson@ycst.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Wirtgen America, Inc.
`
`Dated: April 26, 2024
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Ryan D. Levy
`Seth R. Ogden
`William E. Sekyi
`Mark A. Kilgore
`PATTERSON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY LAW, P.C.
`1600 Division Street, Suite 500
`Nashville, Tennessee 37203
`(615) 242-2400
`rdl@iplawgroup.com
`sro@iplawgroup.com
`wes@iplawgroup.com
`mak@iplawgroup.com
`
`
`- and -
`
`
`Daniel E. Yonan
`Paul A. Ainsworth
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1101 K Street, NW, 10th Floor
`Washington, DC 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`dyonan@sternekessler.com
`painsworth@sternekessler.com
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 2 of 21 PageID #: 34426
`
`1.
`
`I am a Principal at The Brattle Group, Inc. (“Brattle”) and Co-Chair of Brattle’s
`
`Intellectual Property Practice. Much of my practice involves analyzing various economic issues
`
`related to intellectual property. I have consulted on behalf of clients in intellectual property
`
`matters before United States District Courts, including on the topics of patent damages and
`
`economic injury from misappropriation of trade secrets. I have also consulted on behalf of clients
`
`in Section 337 matters before the U.S. International Trade Commission. I also specialize in
`
`applying the tools of economic analysis to policy questions and have performed numerous policy
`
`analyses across various industries. I received my Ph.D. in Economics from Boston College. I
`
`also hold an A.B. in Economics and Mathematics magna cum laude from Mount Holyoke
`
`College. I have provided economic expertise in numerous cases in courts throughout the country.
`
`2.
`
`In February 2024, I provided trial testimony in the above-referenced matter on
`
`behalf of Wirtgen America, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Wirtgen”) on the topic of economic damages. I
`
`understand that, following trial in this matter, the jury determined that Caterpillar willfully
`
`infringed five of Wirtgen’s patents and awarded a verdict in favor of Wirtgen for $12.9 million.1
`
`I understand the Court has not yet entered judgment.
`
`3.
`
`For this declaration, I have been asked by Patterson Intellectual Property Law,
`
`P.C. and Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C., counsel for Wirtgen, to provide economic
`
`input into the calculation of prejudgment interest.
`
`I.
`
`PREJUDGMENT INTEREST
`
`4.
`
`I understand that an award of prejudgment interest is at the discretion of the Court
`
`and that Wirtgen is requesting prejudgment interest at the Bank Prime Loan Rate compounded
`
`quarterly. As such, I calculated prejudgment interest starting from April 29, 2016 for the ’309,
`
`
`1 D.I. 346, Redacted Jury Verdict (Feb. 22, 2024).
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 3 of 21 PageID #: 34427
`
`’641, and ’788 patents; May 23, 2017 for the ’530 patent; and September 2, 2021 for the ’972
`
`patent, using the per annum Bank Prime Loan Rate reported at the quarterly average level by the
`
`St. Louis Federal Reserve, compounded quarterly and using a mid-period convention.2
`
`5.
`
`I have been directed to use the Bank Prime Loan Rate as published by the St.
`
`Louis Federal Reserve, which is used for bank borrowing and represents a lower-end commercial
`
`lending rate. This interest rate compensates Wirtgen, as the patent holder, for the borrowing risk
`
`inherent in a damages amount that has, in effect, been held at risk by Caterpillar over the
`
`duration of the damages period. The nature of this risk is that Caterpillar would be unable to pay
`
`its obligations. This risk is priced by markets in what it requires Caterpillar to pay to borrow
`
`money. The Bank Prime Loan Rate is standing in as a proxy for Caterpillar’s cost of debt. This
`
`interest rate is greater than the risk-free rate, which does not compensate Wirtgen for the risk of
`
`held funds, and is lower than a weighted average cost of capital interest rate, which would
`
`compensate Wirtgen for alternative uses of the funds. I understand that the Bank Prime Loan
`
`Rate has been used in other cases in the District of Delaware.3
`
`6.
`
`For the relevant time period up to the date of the jury verdict, I used annual
`
`prejudgment interest rates reported on a quarterly basis ranging from 3.25% to 8.50% between
`
`2016 Q2 and 2024 Q1 applicable to the jury’s award of $12.9 million in reasonable royalty
`
`
`2 For infringement dates, see Expert Report of Dr. Pallavi Seth, Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc., May 19,
`2023, ¶¶ 134, 306, 315.
`3 See e.g. ArcherDX, LLC v. Qiagen Sciences, LLC, 2022 WL 4597877, at pp. 17–18 (D. Del. Sept. 30, 2022); Bayer
`Healthcare LLC v. Baxalta Inc., 2019 WL 4016235, at p. 7 (D. Del. Aug. 26, 2019), aff’d, Bayer Healthcare LLC v.
`Baxalta Inc., 989 F.3d 964 (Fed. Cir. 2021); Idenix Pharms. LLC v. Gilead Sciences, Inc., 271 F. Supp. 3d 694, 705
`(D. Del. Sept. 22, 2017) (“As requested by Idenix, the Court will apply the prime rate. This is by far the most
`common practice in the District of Delaware.”) (citation omitted); Comcast IP Holdings I, LLC v. Sprint
`Communications Company L.P, 2015 WL 4730899, at p. 10 (D. Del. Aug. 10, 2015) (“The Court agrees with
`Comcast that the appropriate interest rate is the prime rate, compounded quarterly.”) (citation omitted), aff’d sub
`nom., Comcast IP Holdings I LLC v. Sprint Communications Company, L.P., 850 F.3d 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2017).
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 4 of 21 PageID #: 34428
`
`damages.4 At present, I have calculated prejudgment interest based on the awarded verdict of
`
`approximately $12.9 million—which is premised on Caterpillar’s sales data produced before
`
`trial. First, I calculated the effective damages in each quarter based on the jury verdict awarding
`
`a reasonable royalty of $12.9 million.5 Next, I calculated prejudgment interest in each quarter
`
`based on a mid-period sales convention, assuming the sales occurred at the middle of each period
`
`and compounding quarterly through the date of the jury verdict based on the interest rate
`
`described above.6 In total, I calculated prejudgment interest through the date of the verdict on the
`
`jury verdict amount based on Caterpillar’s currently produced sales data to be equal to
`
`$2,920,084.65.7
`
`7.
`
`When the Court enters judgment, I am also available to calculate prejudgment
`
`interest on the jury verdict amount ($12.9 million) from the date of the verdict up to the date the
`
`Court enters judgment.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4 See Table 1. 1 – Table 1. 6 and Table 2.
`5 D.I. 346, Redacted Jury Verdict (Feb. 22, 2024).
`6 See Table 1. 1 – Table 1. 6 and Table 2.
`7 See Table 1. 1., column [G].
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 5 of 21 PageID #: 34429
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
`
`true and correct.
`
`Executed this 26th day of April 2024, at Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pallavi Seth, Ph.D.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 6 of 21 PageID #: 34430
`
`Table 1. 1: Prejudgment Interest Calculations (Awarded Verdict) – All Infringed Patents
`
`Prejudgment
`Interest on Ending
`Balance
`
`Ending Balance
`
`Total Prejudgement
`Interest
`
`Year/Quarter
`
`Bank Prime Loan
`Rate (Nominal
`Quarterly %)
`
`[A]
`
`2016 Q2
`2016 Q3
`2016 Q4
`2017 Q1
`2017 Q2
`2017 Q3
`2017 Q4
`2018 Q1
`2018 Q2
`2018 Q3
`2018 Q4
`2019 Q1
`2019 Q2
`2019 Q3
`2019 Q4
`2020 Q1
`2020 Q2
`2020 Q3
`2020 Q4
`2021 Q1
`2021 Q2
`2021 Q3
`2021 Q4
`2022 Q1
`2022 Q2
`2022 Q3
`2022 Q4
`2023 Q1
`2023 Q2
`2023 Q3
`2023 Q4
`2024 Q1
`Total
`
`0.86%
`0.86%
`0.87%
`0.94%
`1.00%
`1.05%
`1.06%
`1.11%
`1.18%
`1.23%
`1.29%
`1.35%
`1.35%
`1.30%
`1.19%
`1.08%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.81%
`0.97%
`1.32%
`1.66%
`1.87%
`1.98%
`2.04%
`2.06%
`2.06%
`
`Period Awarded
`Verdict
`
`[B]
`$52,080.04
`$234,360.18
`$156,240.12
`$234,360.18
`$364,560.28
`$426,403.33
`$187,161.64
`$316,545.49
`$700,631.79
`$611,975.55
`$597,897.19
`$420,623.60
`$969,291.72
`$834,940.22
`$254,620.48
`$474,086.05
`$924,248.77
`$607,703.28
`$303,119.45
`$302,428.24
`$556,357.52
`$187,713.01
`$299,723.98
`$194,625.65
`$467,396.27
`$418,963.88
`$204,445.26
`$307,654.38
`$629,444.98
`$396,380.18
`$354,222.26
`$0.00
`$12,990,204.96
`
`Prejudgment
`Interest on Period
`Awarded Verdict
`
`[C]
`
`$155.71
`$1,012.14
`$683.34
`$1,097.23
`$1,816.50
`$2,230.03
`$988.89
`$1,762.09
`$4,127.53
`$3,761.01
`$3,869.03
`$2,833.99
`$6,530.69
`$5,432.54
`$1,511.62
`$2,562.75
`$3,709.85
`$2,439.26
`$1,216.69
`$1,213.92
`$2,233.17
`$685.18
`$1,203.06
`$791.74
`$2,262.19
`$2,758.92
`$1,699.94
`$2,876.97
`$6,231.79
`$4,052.14
`$3,649.27
`$0.00
`$77,399.19
`
`Period Awarded
`Verdict and
`Prejudgment
`Interest
`[D]
`$52,235.75
`$235,372.32
`$156,923.46
`$235,457.41
`$366,376.78
`$428,633.36
`$188,150.53
`$318,307.58
`$704,759.32
`$615,736.55
`$601,766.23
`$423,457.59
`$975,822.41
`$840,372.76
`$256,132.10
`$476,648.80
`$927,958.62
`$610,142.54
`$304,336.14
`$303,642.16
`$558,590.68
`$188,398.18
`$300,927.04
`$195,417.39
`$469,658.46
`$421,722.80
`$206,145.20
`$310,531.35
`$635,676.77
`$400,432.32
`$357,871.53
`$0.00
`$13,067,604.15
`
`[E]
`
`$0.00
`$451.18
`$2,519.73
`$4,190.25
`$6,847.74
`$11,091.25
`$15,851.86
`$18,972.20
`$24,052.19
`$34,049.44
`$44,261.85
`$54,790.15
`$61,234.63
`$72,629.68
`$77,110.52
`$73,814.83
`$59,229.37
`$67,154.33
`$72,591.54
`$75,617.45
`$78,662.07
`$83,777.82
`$85,962.80
`$90,269.61
`$110,164.78
`$157,522.68
`$208,533.06
`$242,282.02
`$267,456.00
`$294,630.79
`$311,238.76
`$135,724.88
`$2,842,685.47
`
`[F]
`$52,235.75
`$288,059.25
`$447,502.44
`$687,150.10
`$1,060,374.62
`$1,500,099.23
`$1,704,101.61
`$2,041,381.40
`$2,770,192.91
`$3,419,978.91
`$4,066,006.99
`$4,544,254.74
`$5,581,311.77
`$6,494,314.21
`$6,827,556.83
`$7,378,020.46
`$8,365,208.44
`$9,042,505.31
`$9,419,432.99
`$9,798,692.60
`$10,435,945.36
`$10,708,121.36
`$11,095,011.20
`$11,380,698.20
`$11,960,521.44
`$12,539,766.92
`$12,954,445.18
`$13,507,258.56
`$14,410,391.33
`$15,105,454.44
`$15,774,564.73
`$15,910,289.61
`$241,270,848.91
`
`[G]
`
`$155.71
`$1,463.32
`$3,203.07
`$5,287.48
`$8,664.24
`$13,321.28
`$16,840.74
`$20,734.29
`$28,179.73
`$37,810.45
`$48,130.88
`$57,624.14
`$67,765.31
`$78,062.22
`$78,622.14
`$76,377.58
`$62,939.22
`$69,593.59
`$73,808.23
`$76,831.36
`$80,895.24
`$84,463.00
`$87,165.86
`$91,061.36
`$112,426.97
`$160,281.60
`$210,233.00
`$245,158.99
`$273,687.80
`$298,682.93
`$314,888.03
`$135,724.88
`$2,920,084.65
`
`
`
`Sources and Notes:
`Trial damages are based on the jury verdict in this matter. See D.I. 346, Redacted Jury Verdict (Feb. 22, 2024).
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 7 of 21 PageID #: 34431
`
`The jury verdict covers Caterpillar’s infringing sales based on the most recent financial data provided by Caterpillar in Ex. 3322.
`Supplemental Damages for sales not included in Ex. 3322 are not included in the above calculations.
`[A]: See Table 2, column [B].
`[B]: Sum of [C] from Table 1. 2—Table 1. 6.
`[C]: Sum of [F] from Table 1. 2—Table 1. 6.
`[D]: Sum of [G] from Table 1. 2—Table 1. 6.
`[E]: Sum of [H] from Table 1. 2—Table 1. 6.
`[F]: Sum of [I] from Table 1. 2—Table 1. 6.
`[G]: Sum of [C] and [E].
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 8 of 21 PageID #: 34432
`
`Table 1. 2: Prejudgment Interest Calculations (Awarded Verdict) – ’309 Patent
`
`Year/Quarter
`
`Bank Prime Loan
`Rate (Nominal
`Quarterly %)
`
`Royalty Base
`(Caterpillar Accused
`Machine Units)
`
`[A]
`
`[B]
`
`2016 Q2
`2016 Q3
`2016 Q4
`2017 Q1
`2017 Q2
`2017 Q3
`2017 Q4
`2018 Q1
`2018 Q2
`2018 Q3
`2018 Q4
`2019 Q1
`2019 Q2
`2019 Q3
`2019 Q4
`2020 Q1
`2020 Q2
`2020 Q3
`2020 Q4
`2021 Q1
`2021 Q2
`2021 Q3
`2021 Q4
`2022 Q1
`2022 Q2
`2022 Q3
`2022 Q4
`2023 Q1
`2023 Q2
`2023 Q3
`2023 Q4
`2024 Q1
`Total
`
`0.86%
`0.86%
`0.87%
`0.94%
`1.00%
`1.05%
`1.06%
`1.11%
`1.18%
`1.23%
`1.29%
`1.35%
`1.35%
`1.30%
`1.19%
`1.08%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.81%
`0.97%
`1.32%
`1.66%
`1.87%
`1.98%
`2.04%
`2.06%
`2.06%
`
`2
`9
`6
`9
`14
`14
`6
`8
`18
`13
`13
`8
`17
`18
`4
`10
`18
`10
`3
`3
`7
`0
`0
`2
`0
`0
`0
`0
`2
`0
`0
`0
`214
`
`Period Awarded
`Verdict
`
`Time Period Factor
`(April 29, 2016)
`
`Mid-Period Factor
`
`Prejudgment
`Interest on Period
`Awarded Verdict
`
`[C]
`$22,540.92
`$101,434.16
`$67,622.77
`$101,434.16
`$157,786.47
`$157,786.47
`$67,622.77
`$90,163.70
`$202,868.32
`$146,516.01
`$146,516.01
`$90,163.70
`$191,597.85
`$202,868.32
`$45,081.85
`$112,704.62
`$202,868.32
`$112,704.62
`$33,811.39
`$33,811.39
`$78,893.23
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$22,540.92
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$22,540.92
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,411,878.88
`
`[D]
`
`[E]
`
`[F]
`
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`
`$67.39
`$438.07
`$295.76
`$474.90
`$786.20
`$825.20
`$357.29
`$501.91
`$1,195.13
`$900.44
`$948.12
`$607.49
`$1,290.91
`$1,319.96
`$267.64
`$609.24
`$814.29
`$452.39
`$135.72
`$135.72
`$316.67
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$91.70
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$223.17
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$13,055.29
`
`0.69
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`0.42
`
`8
`
`Period Awarded
`Verdict and
`Prejudgment
`Interest
`[G]
`$22,608.32
`$101,872.22
`$67,918.53
`$101,909.05
`$158,572.67
`$158,611.67
`$67,980.06
`$90,665.60
`$204,063.45
`$147,416.45
`$147,464.12
`$90,771.18
`$192,888.76
`$204,188.28
`$45,349.49
`$113,313.86
`$203,682.61
`$113,157.01
`$33,947.10
`$33,947.10
`$79,209.90
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$22,632.62
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$22,764.09
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,424,934.17
`
`Prejudgment
`Interest on Ending
`Balance
`
`Ending Balance
`
`[H]
`
`$0.00
`$195.28
`$1,090.57
`$1,813.59
`$2,963.79
`$4,800.44
`$6,576.57
`$7,758.91
`$9,370.91
`$12,399.18
`$15,124.02
`$17,937.82
`$19,402.69
`$21,499.78
`$22,296.90
`$21,033.51
`$16,696.71
`$18,465.87
`$19,522.52
`$19,951.76
`$20,384.45
`$21,183.98
`$21,354.04
`$21,815.70
`$26,385.74
`$36,247.01
`$46,371.06
`$53,018.42
`$57,181.69
`$60,678.33
`$62,399.49
`$26,593.82
`$692,514.55
`
`[I]
`$22,608.32
`$124,675.82
`$193,684.92
`$297,407.57
`$458,944.04
`$622,356.15
`$696,912.78
`$795,337.29
`$1,008,771.65
`$1,168,587.27
`$1,331,175.42
`$1,439,884.42
`$1,652,175.88
`$1,877,863.94
`$1,945,510.33
`$2,079,857.71
`$2,300,237.03
`$2,431,859.91
`$2,485,329.52
`$2,539,228.39
`$2,638,822.74
`$2,660,006.72
`$2,681,360.75
`$2,725,809.07
`$2,752,194.81
`$2,788,441.82
`$2,834,812.88
`$2,887,831.30
`$2,967,777.07
`$3,028,455.41
`$3,090,854.90
`$3,117,448.72
`$3,117,448.72
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 9 of 21 PageID #: 34433
`
`Sources and Notes:
`Trial damages are based on the jury verdict in this matter. See D.I. 346, Redacted Jury Verdict (Feb. 22, 2024).
`The jury verdict covers Caterpillar’s infringing sales based on the most recent financial data provided by Caterpillar in Ex. 3322.
`Supplemental Damages for sales not included in Ex. 3322 are not included in the above calculations.
`[A]: See Table 2, column [B].
`[B]: Extended Exhibit 12.D, column [E].
`[C]: Proportion units sold in each respective period multiplied by the total awarded verdict for this patent.
`[C] Total: D.I. 346, Redacted Jury Verdict (Feb. 22, 2024).
`[D]: Date of first infringement for this patent is April 29, 2016. Factor equal to 1.00 for all periods. For the period
`of first infringement only, the factor is equal to (91-28)/91. There are 91 days in Q2, 28 of which were not
`infringed by Caterpillar. Following a similar logic, for the period of the jury verdict the factor is equal to (91-31-22)/91.
`[F]: [A] * [C] * [D] * [E].
`[G]: [C] * (1 + [A] * [D] * [E]).
`[H]: [A] * [D] * ending balance from prior period.
`[I]: [G] + [H] + ending balance from prior period.
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 10 of 21 PageID #: 34434
`
`Table 1. 3: Prejudgment Interest Calculations (Awarded Verdict) – ’641 Patent
`
`Year/Quarter
`
`Bank Prime Loan
`Rate (Nominal
`Quarterly %)
`
`Royalty Base
`(Caterpillar Accused
`Machine Units)
`
`[A]
`
`[B]
`
`2016 Q2
`2016 Q3
`2016 Q4
`2017 Q1
`2017 Q2
`2017 Q3
`2017 Q4
`2018 Q1
`2018 Q2
`2018 Q3
`2018 Q4
`2019 Q1
`2019 Q2
`2019 Q3
`2019 Q4
`2020 Q1
`2020 Q2
`2020 Q3
`2020 Q4
`2021 Q1
`2021 Q2
`2021 Q3
`2021 Q4
`2022 Q1
`2022 Q2
`2022 Q3
`2022 Q4
`2023 Q1
`2023 Q2
`2023 Q3
`2023 Q4
`2024 Q1
`Total
`
`0.86%
`0.86%
`0.87%
`0.94%
`1.00%
`1.05%
`1.06%
`1.11%
`1.18%
`1.23%
`1.29%
`1.35%
`1.35%
`1.30%
`1.19%
`1.08%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.81%
`0.97%
`1.32%
`1.66%
`1.87%
`1.98%
`2.04%
`2.06%
`2.06%
`
`2
`9
`6
`9
`14
`14
`6
`8
`18
`20
`18
`14
`38
`25
`10
`14
`30
`22
`13
`14
`25
`9
`14
`5
`6
`3
`2
`1
`2
`0
`1
`0
`372
`
`Period Awarded
`Verdict
`
`Time Period Factor
`(April 29, 2016)
`
`Mid-Period Factor
`
`Prejudgment
`Interest on Period
`Awarded Verdict
`
`[C]
`$15,055.80
`$67,751.10
`$45,167.40
`$67,751.10
`$105,390.60
`$105,390.60
`$45,167.40
`$60,223.20
`$135,502.20
`$150,558.00
`$135,502.20
`$105,390.60
`$286,060.21
`$188,197.51
`$75,279.00
`$105,390.60
`$225,837.01
`$165,613.80
`$97,862.70
`$105,390.60
`$188,197.51
`$67,751.10
`$105,390.60
`$37,639.50
`$45,167.40
`$22,583.70
`$15,055.80
`$7,527.90
`$15,055.80
`$0.00
`$7,527.90
`$0.00
`$2,800,378.88
`
`[D]
`
`[E]
`
`[F]
`
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`
`$45.02
`$292.60
`$197.55
`$317.20
`$525.13
`$551.18
`$238.65
`$335.24
`$798.26
`$925.28
`$876.84
`$710.08
`$1,927.36
`$1,224.51
`$446.91
`$569.71
`$906.49
`$664.76
`$392.81
`$423.03
`$755.41
`$271.95
`$423.03
`$153.12
`$218.61
`$148.72
`$125.19
`$70.40
`$149.06
`$0.00
`$77.55
`$0.00
`$14,761.61
`
`0.69
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`0.42
`
`10
`
`Period Awarded
`Verdict and
`Prejudgment
`Interest
`[G]
`$15,100.82
`$68,043.70
`$45,364.95
`$68,068.30
`$105,915.73
`$105,941.78
`$45,406.05
`$60,558.44
`$136,300.47
`$151,483.29
`$136,379.05
`$106,100.68
`$287,987.56
`$189,422.01
`$75,725.92
`$105,960.31
`$226,743.50
`$166,278.56
`$98,255.51
`$105,813.63
`$188,952.91
`$68,023.05
`$105,813.63
`$37,792.62
`$45,386.01
`$22,732.42
`$15,180.99
`$7,598.30
`$15,204.86
`$0.00
`$7,605.45
`$0.00
`$2,815,140.49
`
`Prejudgment
`Interest on Ending
`Balance
`
`Ending Balance
`
`[H]
`
`$0.00
`$130.43
`$728.43
`$1,211.36
`$1,979.61
`$3,206.36
`$4,392.70
`$5,182.42
`$6,259.13
`$8,281.81
`$10,788.00
`$13,215.41
`$14,823.22
`$18,255.30
`$19,122.66
`$18,437.34
`$14,689.08
`$16,627.25
`$18,095.59
`$19,029.63
`$20,031.85
`$21,709.54
`$22,429.90
`$23,775.72
`$28,883.43
`$40,275.91
`$51,903.30
`$59,627.63
`$64,460.34
`$68,188.28
`$70,122.46
`$29,950.68
`$695,814.75
`
`[I]
`$15,100.82
`$83,274.95
`$129,368.32
`$198,647.98
`$306,543.33
`$415,691.47
`$465,490.22
`$531,231.08
`$673,790.68
`$833,555.77
`$980,722.82
`$1,100,038.91
`$1,402,849.69
`$1,610,527.00
`$1,705,375.58
`$1,829,773.23
`$2,071,205.81
`$2,254,111.62
`$2,370,462.72
`$2,495,305.98
`$2,704,290.75
`$2,794,023.34
`$2,922,266.86
`$2,983,835.20
`$3,058,104.64
`$3,121,112.96
`$3,188,197.25
`$3,255,423.17
`$3,335,088.37
`$3,403,276.65
`$3,481,004.56
`$3,510,955.24
`$3,510,955.24
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 11 of 21 PageID #: 34435
`
`Sources and Notes:
`Trial damages are based on the jury verdict in this matter. See D.I. 346, Redacted Jury Verdict (Feb. 22, 2024).
`The jury verdict covers Caterpillar’s infringing sales based on the most recent financial data provided by Caterpillar in Ex. 3322.
`Supplemental Damages for sales not included in Ex. 3322 are not included in the above calculations.
`[A]: See Table 2, column [B].
`[B]: Extended Exhibit 12.B and Extended Exhibit 12.E, column [E].
`[C]: Proportion units sold in each respective period multiplied by the total awarded verdict for this patent.
`[C] Total: D.I. 346, Redacted Jury Verdict (Feb. 22, 2024).
`[D]: Date of first infringement for this patent is April 29, 2016. Factor equal to 1.00 for all periods. For the period
`of first infringement only, the factor is equal to (91-28)/91. There are 91 days in Q2, 28 of which were not
`infringed by Caterpillar. Following a similar logic, for the period of the jury verdict the factor is equal to (91-31-22)/91.
`[F]: [A] * [C] * [D] * [E].
`[G]: [C] * (1 + [A] * [D] * [E]).
`[H]: [A] * [D] * ending balance from prior period.
`[I]: [G] + [H] + ending balance from prior period.
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 12 of 21 PageID #: 34436
`
`Table 1. 4: Prejudgment Interest Calculations (Awarded Verdict) – ’788 Patent
`
`Year/Quarter
`
`Bank Prime Loan
`Rate (Nominal
`Quarterly %)
`
`Royalty Base
`(Caterpillar Accused
`Machine Units)
`
`[A]
`
`[B]
`
`2016 Q2
`2016 Q3
`2016 Q4
`2017 Q1
`2017 Q2
`2017 Q3
`2017 Q4
`2018 Q1
`2018 Q2
`2018 Q3
`2018 Q4
`2019 Q1
`2019 Q2
`2019 Q3
`2019 Q4
`2020 Q1
`2020 Q2
`2020 Q3
`2020 Q4
`2021 Q1
`2021 Q2
`2021 Q3
`2021 Q4
`2022 Q1
`2022 Q2
`2022 Q3
`2022 Q4
`2023 Q1
`2023 Q2
`2023 Q3
`2023 Q4
`2024 Q1
`Total
`
`0.86%
`0.86%
`0.87%
`0.94%
`1.00%
`1.05%
`1.06%
`1.11%
`1.18%
`1.23%
`1.29%
`1.35%
`1.35%
`1.30%
`1.19%
`1.08%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.81%
`0.97%
`1.32%
`1.66%
`1.87%
`1.98%
`2.04%
`2.06%
`2.06%
`
`2
`9
`6
`9
`14
`14
`6
`8
`18
`20
`18
`14
`38
`25
`10
`14
`30
`22
`13
`14
`25
`11
`17
`13
`24
`17
`9
`14
`26
`17
`17
`0
`494
`
`Period Awarded
`Verdict
`
`Time Period Factor
`(April 29, 2016)
`
`Mid-Period Factor
`
`Prejudgment
`Interest on Period
`Awarded Verdict
`
`[C]
`$14,483.32
`$65,174.92
`$43,449.95
`$65,174.92
`$101,383.21
`$101,383.21
`$43,449.95
`$57,933.26
`$130,349.84
`$144,833.15
`$130,349.84
`$101,383.21
`$275,182.99
`$181,041.44
`$72,416.58
`$101,383.21
`$217,249.73
`$159,316.47
`$94,141.55
`$101,383.21
`$181,041.44
`$79,658.23
`$123,108.18
`$94,141.55
`$173,799.78
`$123,108.18
`$65,174.92
`$101,383.21
`$188,283.10
`$123,108.18
`$123,108.18
`$0.00
`$3,577,378.88
`
`[D]
`
`[E]
`
`[F]
`
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`
`$43.30
`$281.47
`$190.03
`$305.14
`$505.16
`$530.22
`$229.57
`$322.49
`$767.91
`$890.10
`$843.50
`$683.08
`$1,854.07
`$1,177.95
`$429.92
`$548.04
`$872.02
`$639.48
`$377.88
`$406.94
`$726.68
`$319.74
`$494.14
`$382.97
`$841.19
`$810.68
`$541.92
`$948.07
`$1,864.09
`$1,258.52
`$1,268.28
`$0.00
`$21,354.57
`
`0.69
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`0.42
`
`12
`
`Period Awarded
`Verdict and
`Prejudgment
`Interest
`[G]
`$14,526.62
`$65,456.39
`$43,639.98
`$65,480.06
`$101,888.37
`$101,913.43
`$43,679.52
`$58,255.75
`$131,117.75
`$145,723.25
`$131,193.34
`$102,066.29
`$277,037.06
`$182,219.39
`$72,846.50
`$101,931.25
`$218,121.75
`$159,955.95
`$94,519.42
`$101,790.15
`$181,768.12
`$79,977.97
`$123,602.32
`$94,524.52
`$174,640.97
`$123,918.86
`$65,716.84
`$102,331.27
`$190,147.19
`$124,366.70
`$124,376.46
`$0.00
`$3,598,733.45
`
`Prejudgment
`Interest on Ending
`Balance
`
`Ending Balance
`
`[H]
`
`$0.00
`$125.47
`$700.73
`$1,165.30
`$1,904.34
`$3,084.44
`$4,225.67
`$4,985.36
`$6,021.13
`$7,966.90
`$10,377.79
`$12,712.91
`$14,259.57
`$17,561.16
`$18,395.54
`$17,736.28
`$14,130.54
`$15,995.01
`$17,407.52
`$18,306.04
`$19,270.15
`$20,884.05
`$21,693.75
`$23,168.39
`$28,704.13
`$41,731.92
`$55,448.69
`$64,626.42
`$71,727.45
`$79,417.44
`$84,232.65
`$36,968.95
`$734,935.71
`
`[I]
`$14,526.62
`$80,108.48
`$124,449.19
`$191,094.54
`$294,887.25
`$399,885.13
`$447,790.31
`$511,031.43
`$648,170.31
`$801,860.46
`$943,431.59
`$1,058,210.78
`$1,349,507.42
`$1,549,287.96
`$1,640,530.00
`$1,760,197.53
`$1,992,449.81
`$2,168,400.78
`$2,280,327.72
`$2,400,423.91
`$2,601,462.19
`$2,702,324.22
`$2,847,620.29
`$2,965,313.21
`$3,168,658.31
`$3,334,309.10
`$3,455,474.63
`$3,622,432.32
`$3,884,306.96
`$4,088,091.10
`$4,296,700.21
`$4,333,669.17
`$4,333,669.17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 13 of 21 PageID #: 34437
`
`Sources and Notes:
`Trial damages are based on the jury verdict in this matter. See D.I. 346, Redacted Jury Verdict (Feb. 22, 2024).
`The jury verdict covers Caterpillar’s infringing sales based on the most recent financial data provided by Caterpillar in Ex. 3322.
`Supplemental Damages for sales not included in Ex. 3322 are not included in the above calculations.
`[A]: See Table 2, column [B].
`[B]: Extended Exhibit 12.C and Extended Exhibit 12.G, column [E].
`[C]: Proportion units sold in each respective period multiplied by the total awarded verdict for this patent.
`[C] Total: D.I. 346, Redacted Jury Verdict (Feb. 22, 2024).
`[D]: Date of first infringement for this patent is April 29, 2016. Factor equal to 1.00 for all periods. For the period
`of first infringement only, the factor is equal to (91-28)/91. There are 91 days in Q2, 28 of which were not
`infringed by Caterpillar. Following a similar logic, for the period of the jury verdict the factor is equal to (91-31-22)/91.
`[F]: [A] * [C] * [D] * [E].
`[G]: [C] * (1 + [A] * [D] * [E]).
`[H]: [A] * [D] * ending balance from prior period.
`[I]: [G] + [H] + ending balance from prior period.
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 14 of 21 PageID #: 34438
`
`Table 1. 5: Prejudgment Interest Calculations (Awarded Verdict) – ’530 Patent
`
`Year/Quarter
`
`Bank Prime Loan
`Rate (Nominal
`Quarterly %)
`
`Royalty Base
`(Caterpillar Accused
`Machine Units)
`
`[A]
`
`[B]
`
`2016 Q2
`2016 Q3
`2016 Q4
`2017 Q1
`2017 Q2
`2017 Q3
`2017 Q4
`2018 Q1
`2018 Q2
`2018 Q3
`2018 Q4
`2019 Q1
`2019 Q2
`2019 Q3
`2019 Q4
`2020 Q1
`2020 Q2
`2020 Q3
`2020 Q4
`2021 Q1
`2021 Q2
`2021 Q3
`2021 Q4
`2022 Q1
`2022 Q2
`2022 Q3
`2022 Q4
`2023 Q1
`2023 Q2
`2023 Q3
`2023 Q4
`2024 Q1
`Total
`
`0.86%
`0.86%
`0.87%
`0.94%
`1.00%
`1.05%
`1.06%
`1.11%
`1.18%
`1.23%
`1.29%
`1.35%
`1.35%
`1.30%
`1.19%
`1.08%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.81%
`0.97%
`1.32%
`1.66%
`1.87%
`1.98%
`2.04%
`2.06%
`2.06%
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`4
`2
`7
`15
`11
`12
`8
`14
`17
`4
`10
`18
`11
`5
`4
`7
`1
`3
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`2
`0
`0
`0
`156
`
`Period Awarded
`Verdict
`
`Time Period Factor
`(May 23, 2017)
`
`Mid-Period Factor
`
`Prejudgment
`Interest on Period
`Awarded Verdict
`
`[C]
`
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$61,843.05
`$30,921.52
`$108,225.33
`$231,911.43
`$170,068.38
`$185,529.14
`$123,686.10
`$216,450.67
`$262,832.95
`$61,843.05
`$154,607.62
`$278,293.72
`$170,068.38
`$77,303.81
`$61,843.05
`$108,225.33
`$15,460.76
`$46,382.29
`$15,460.76
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$30,921.52
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,411,878.88
`
`[D]
`
`[E]
`
`[F]
`
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$323.43
`$163.38
`$602.45
`$1,366.23
`$1,045.19
`$1,200.57
`$833.35
`$1,458.36
`$1,710.12
`$367.15
`$835.76
`$1,117.04
`$682.64
`$310.29
`$248.23
`$434.41
`$62.06
`$186.17
`$62.89
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$306.14
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$13,315.85
`
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.43
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`0.42
`
`14
`
`Period Awarded
`Verdict and
`Prejudgment
`Interest
`[G]
`
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$62,166.48
`$31,084.90
`$108,827.78
`$233,277.66
`$171,113.57
`$186,729.72
`$124,519.44
`$217,909.02
`$264,543.08
`$62,210.20
`$155,443.38
`$279,410.76
`$170,751.02
`$77,614.10
`$62,091.28
`$108,659.74
`$15,522.82
`$46,568.46
`$15,523.66
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$31,227.66
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,425,194.73
`
`Prejudgment
`Interest on Ending
`Balance
`
`Ending Balance
`
`[H]
`
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$656.93
`$1,045.51
`$2,401.02
`$5,401.57
`$7,972.04
`$10,924.02
`$12,749.14
`$15,313.44
`$17,295.42
`$16,607.69
`$13,713.05
`$16,066.19
`$17,565.92
`$18,330.01
`$18,975.62
`$20,000.25
`$20,285.42
`$21,102.86
`$25,461.92
`$34,977.93
`$44,747.52
`$51,162.14
`$55,179.64
`$58,743.20
`$60,409.48
`$25,745.70
`$592,833.62
`
`[I]
`
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$62,166.48
`$93,908.31
`$203,781.60
`$439,460.27
`$615,975.41
`$810,677.16
`$946,120.62
`$1,176,778.79
`$1,456,635.30
`$1,536,140.92
`$1,708,191.99
`$2,001,315.80
`$2,188,133.01
`$2,283,313.03
`$2,363,734.32
`$2,491,369.68
`$2,526,892.75
`$2,593,746.63
`$2,630,373.15
`$2,655,835.08
`$2,690,813.01
`$2,735,560.53
`$2,786,722.67
`$2,873,129.97
`$2,931,873.17
`$2,992,282.65
`$3,018,028.35
`$3,018,028.35
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 15 of 21 PageID #: 34439
`
`Sources and Notes:
`Trial damages are based on the jury verdict in this matter. See D.I. 346, Redacted Jury Verdict (Feb. 22, 2024).
`The jury verdict covers Caterpillar’s infringing sales based on the most recent financial data provided by Caterpillar in Ex. 3322.
`Supplemental Damages for sales not included in Ex. 3322 are not included in the above calculations.
`[A]: See Table 2, column [B].
`[B]: Extended Exhibit 12.F, column [E].
`[C]: Proportion units sold in each respective period multiplied by the total awarded verdict for this patent.
`[C] Total: D.I. 346, Redacted Jury Verdict (Feb. 22, 2024).
`[D]: Date of first infringement for this patent is May 23, 2017. Factor equal to 1.00 for all periods. For the period
`of first infringement only, the factor is equal to (91-30-22)/91. There are 91 days in Q2, 52 of which were not
`infringed by Caterpillar. Following a similar logic, for the period of the jury verdict the factor is equal to (91-31-22)/91.
`[F]: [A] * [C] * [D] * [E].
`[G]: [C] * (1 + [A] * [D] * [E]).
`[H]: [A] * [D] * ending balance from prior period.
`[I]: [G] + [H] + ending balance from prior period.
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 16 of 21 PageID #: 34440
`
`Table 1. 6: Prejudgment Interest Calculations (Awarded Verdict) – ’972 Patent
`
`Year/Quarter
`
`Bank Prime Loan
`Rate (Nominal
`Quarterly %)
`
`Royalty Base
`(Caterpillar Accused
`Machine Units)
`
`Period Awarded
`Verdict
`
`Time Period Factor
`(September 2,
`2021)
`
`Mid-Period Factor
`
`Prejudgment
`Interest on Period
`Awarded Verdict
`
`2016 Q2
`2016 Q3
`2016 Q4
`2017 Q1
`2017 Q2
`2017 Q3
`2017 Q4
`2018 Q1
`2018 Q2
`2018 Q3
`2018 Q4
`2019 Q1
`2019 Q2
`2019 Q3
`2019 Q4
`2020 Q1
`2020 Q2
`2020 Q3
`2020 Q4
`2021 Q1
`2021 Q2
`2021 Q3
`2021 Q4
`2022 Q1
`2022 Q2
`2022 Q3
`2022 Q4
`2023 Q1
`2023 Q2
`2023 Q3
`2023 Q4
`2024 Q1
`Total
`
`[A]
`
`[B]
`
`0.86%
`0.86%
`0.87%
`0.94%
`1.00%
`1.05%
`1.06%
`1.11%
`1.18%
`1.23%
`1.29%
`1.35%
`1.35%
`1.30%
`1.19%
`1.08%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.80%
`0.81%
`0.97%
`1.32%
`1.66%
`1.87%
`1.98%
`2.04%
`2.06%
`2.06%
`
`[C]
`
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$24,842.91
`$24,842.91
`$24,842.91
`$248,429.09
`$273,272.00
`$124,214.54
`$198,743.27
`$372,643.63
`$273,272.00
`$223,586.18
`$0.00
`$1,788,689.44
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1
`1
`1
`10
`11
`5
`8
`15
`11
`9
`0
`72
`
`[D]
`
`[E]
`
`[F]
`
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$31.43
`$99.72
`$101.06
`$1,202.39
`$1,799.53
`$1,032.83
`$1,858.51
`$3,689.34
`$2,793.62
`$2,303.43
`$0.00
`$14,911.86
`
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.00
`0.32
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`1.00
`0.42
`
`16
`
`Period Awarded
`Verdict and
`Prejudgment
`Interest
`[G]
`
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$24,874.34
`$24,942.63
`$24,943.97
`$249,631.48
`$275,071.52
`$125,247.37
`$200,601.78
`$376,332.97
`$276,065.62
`$225,889.61
`$0.00
`$1,803,601.30
`
`Prejudgment
`Interest on Ending
`Balance
`
`Ending Balance
`
`[H]
`
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$199.69
`$406.94
`$729.56
`$4,289.92
`$10,062.49
`$13,847.42
`$18,906.88
`$27,603.54
`$34,074.69
`$16,465.73
`$126,586.84
`
`[I]
`
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$24,874.34
`$50,016.65
`$75,367.56
`$325,728.60
`$605,090.04
`$740,399.90
`$954,849.10
`$1,350,088.95
`$1,653,758.11
`$1,913,722.41
`$1,930,188.14
`$1,930,188.14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 373 Filed 04/26/24 Page 17 of 21 PageID #: 34441
`
`Sources and Notes:
`Trial damages are based on the jury verdict in this matter. See D.I. 346, Redacted Jury Verdict (Feb. 22, 2024).
`The jury verdict covers Caterpillar’s infringing sales based on the most recent financial data provided by Caterpillar in Ex. 3322.
`Supplemental Damages for sales not included in Ex. 3322 are not included in the above calculations.
`[A]: See Table 2, column [B].
`[B]: Extended Exhibit 12.I, column [E].
`[C]: Proportion units sold in each respective period multiplied by the total awarded verdict for this patent.
`[C] Total: D.I. 346, Redacted Jury Verdict (Feb. 22, 2024).