throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 403 Filed 05/31/24 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 37266
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
`
`Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,
`
`v.
`
`CATERPILLAR INC.
`
`Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.
`
`)
`)
`) C.A. No. 17-770-JDW
`) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`)
`) REDACTED VERSION
`)
`Filed: May 31, 2024
`)
`)
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.’S RESPONSE TO
`CATERPILLAR’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`In response to Caterpillar’s motion to seal, Wirtgen America, Inc. (“Wirtgen”) seeks to
`
`redact from the public record limited portions of the following:
`
`1. Caterpillar’s Brief in Support of its Opposition to Wirtgen America’s Motion for
`
`Enhanced Damages, Attorneys’ Fees, Injunction or Ongoing Royalties, and Other
`
`Relief (D.I. 389);
`
`2. Declaration of Christopher D. Mays and certain underlying exhibits thereto (D.I.
`
`392); and
`
`3. Declaration of Brett Reed and one underlying exhibit thereto (D.I. 393).
`
`The Court ordered Wirtgen to file this response to Caterpillar’s motion to seal. See
`
`D.I. 394. The information in these documents and exhibits were either designated highly
`
`confidential and produced pursuant to the Protective Order in this case or designated
`
`Confidential Business Information and produced in the ITC action pursuant to the protective
`
`order in that action. The portions of these documents that Wirtgen seeks to seal are highlighted in
`
`yellow in the respective documents.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 403 Filed 05/31/24 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 37267
`
`
`
`Courts have long recognized that commercial litigation in general—and patent litigation
`
`in particular—compels parties to disclose their most confidential information to their most
`
`threatening competitors. For discovery in such cases to work, parties must be able to rely on
`
`protective orders and the ability to seal confidential information. See Lunareye, Inc. v. Gordon
`
`Howard Assocs., Inc., 78 F.Supp.3d 671, 676 (E.D. Tex. 2015) (“[C]ompliance with protective
`
`orders is essential to modern discovery practices.”); Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., No.
`
`CV 11–01846 LHK, 2013 WL 9768650, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2013) (“Time and again in
`
`competitor patent cases, parties resist producing confidential information to their adversaries’
`
`lawyers. . . . Yet time and again, the court assuages these fears with assurances that a protective
`
`order will keep the information out of the competitors’ hands.”). Caterpillar and Wirtgen are
`
`exactly the kinds of competitors that Protective Orders are intended to protect.
`
`As itemized below, the portions of the brief, the declarations, and the underlying exhibits
`
`that Wirtgen seeks to seal fall under two categories: (1) internal Wirtgen confidential email
`
`communications related to Wirtgen’s pricing and sales strategies; and (2) confidential business
`
`information produced in the ITC proceeding. Despite Caterpillar’s claims that some of these
`
`email communications were admitted as evidence at trial, none of the email communications that
`
`Wirtgen now seeks to seal were admitted as evidence at trial. See, e.g., Mays Declaration, D.I.
`
`392, ¶¶ 56–58.
`
`The public interest in knowing these internal strategy communications is minimal and is
`
`greatly outweighed by the sensitivity of the information to Wirtgen. The impact of these
`
`redactions on the readability of the motion is likewise minimal, and the completeness of the
`
`public record created by the briefing and resolution of this motion will not be undermined by
`
`these small but essential redactions. This is the type of information that Courts routinely allow
`
`parties to file under seal.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 403 Filed 05/31/24 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 37268
`
`Document
`D.I. 389
`
`Cite
`p. 19
`
`Redaction
`Quoted text
`
`Mays Decl. ¶ 47
`
`¶ 48
`
`¶ 50
`
`¶ 51
`
`¶ 53
`
`¶ 54
`
`¶ 56
`
`¶ 57
`
`¶ 58
`
`Ex. 8
`
`Ex. 9
`
`Ex. 10
`
`Ex. 11
`
`Bulleted
`quotes
`Bulleted
`quotes
`Quoted text
`
`Bulleted
`quotes
`Screenshot of
`email
`Screenshot of
`email
`Bulleted
`quotes
`Screenshot of
`email
`Screenshot of
`CBI invoice
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Quotes to
`emails
`Entirety
`
`Ex. 12
`
`Entirety
`
`Ex. 13
`
`Email
`
`Ex. 14
`
`Entirety
`
`Ex. 31
`
`Entirety
`
`Ex. 32
`
`Entirety
`
`Reed Decl.
`
`¶ 14
`
`Quoted text
`
`¶ 15
`
`¶ 18
`
`Quoted text
`
`Quoted text
`
`
`
`Justification
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Document designated as confidential business
`information at the ITC
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 403 Filed 05/31/24 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 37269
`
`Document
`
`Cite
`¶ 21
`
`Redaction
`Quoted text
`
`Ex. R2,
`p. 45
`Ex. R2,
`FN 113
`Ex. R2,
`FN 115
`Ex. R2,
`p. 46
`Ex. R2,
`p. 47
`Ex. R2,
`FN 122
`Ex. R2,
`FN 123
`Ex. R2,
`p. 49
`Ex. R2,
`FN 130
`
`Text
`
`Text
`
`Text
`
`Text
`
`Text
`
`Text
`
`Text
`
`Text
`
`Text
`
`
`
`Justification
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`Confidential internal Wirtgen email communications
`related to pricing and sales strategies
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Wirtgen asks that the Court seal the above-listed portions of
`
`
`
`Caterpillar’s Brief in Support of its Opposition to Wirtgen America’s Motion for Enhanced
`
`Damages, Attorneys’ Fees, Injunction or Ongoing Royalties, and Other Relief, the Declaration of
`
`Christopher D. Mays, and the Declaration of Brett Reed.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 403 Filed 05/31/24 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 37270
`
`
`
`YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT &
`TAYLOR, LLP
`
`/s/ Adam W. Poff
`Adam W. Poff (No. 3990)
`Samantha G. Wilson (No. 5816)
`Rodney Square
`1000 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 571-6600
`apoff@ycst.com
`swilson@ycst.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Wirtgen America, Inc.
`
`
`Dated: May 31, 2024
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Ryan D. Levy
`Seth R. Ogden
`William E. Sekyi
`Mark A. Kilgore
`PATTERSON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY LAW, P.C.
`1600 Division Street, Suite 500
`Nashville, Tennessee 37203
`(615) 242-2400
`rdl@iplawgroup.com
`sro@iplawgroup.com
`wes@iplawgroup.com
`mak@iplawgroup.com
`- and -
`Daniel E. Yonan
`Paul A. Ainsworth
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
`1100 New York Ave., NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`dyonan@sternekessler.com
`painsworth@sternekessler.com
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket