throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 439-9 Filed 07/31/24 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 39983
`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 439-9 Filed 07/31/24 Page 1 of 5 PagelD #: 39983
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 9
`EXHIBIT 9
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 439-9 Filed 07/31/24 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 39984
`
`that I think is probably ready for us. In the meantime, I
`
`think before we get them up though, we have some
`
`housekeeping to do.
`
`So I did see the e-mails last night that came in
`
`and then there were a couple of additional issues, whatever,
`
`to discuss. So let me start -- well, why don't you tell me
`
`what the other issues were so we can set an agenda.
`
`MR. YOON: Your Honor, this is one issue we can
`
`handle very quickly, it's as to the '972 patent. When you
`
`go to the '972 patent, there are two claims asserted in this
`
`case, claims 12 and 13. Claim 12 was subject to the IPR and
`
`the final decision in the IPR came out. That decision came
`
`out on February 6th, and that final decision found that
`
`Caterpillar did not prove that claim 12 was unpatentable.
`
`THE COURT: Okay.
`
`MR. YOON: For the exact reasons that the Court
`
`had issued in its January 4th decision with regards to
`
`collateral estoppel as to the '530 and '309 patent. We
`
`agree that that reasoning would apply to claim 12. And so
`
`what the parties have proposed, Your Honor, is that we don't
`
`dispute that pursuant to the grounds set forth in the
`
`Court's summary judgment decision, IPR estoppel applies with
`
`regard to claim 12, and that decision was docket number 272.
`
`And we would submit a proposed order to the Court. The
`
`purpose of this is so that we preserve your right to appeal.
`
`If you recall in your order you respectfully disagreed with
`
`Judge Bryson on that rational. We want to make sure that
`
`claim 12 of the '972 would be included in that appeal so we
`
`would not have to present an invalidity defense 120 claim 12
`
`in this trial, we don't waiver anything.
`
`THE COURT: That's fine. That makes sense to
`
`me. And so right, you need an order on the docket so that
`
`is something to appeal.
`
`MR. YOON: Also this was agreed upon, we met and
`
`conferred with counsel, we'll submit a proposed order for
`
`the Court.
`
`THE COURT: Fine. That would be -- okay. And
`
`then in terms of sort of what I think is the triage
`
`standpoint I guess is the issues with respect to the opening
`
`slides. And so why don't I hear from Caterpillar on the
`
`objections that were made. I did look at these slides, it
`
`was 678.2.
`
`MR. YOON: Your Honor, the parties worked very
`
`hard to meet and confer. There is just this very small
`
`number of issues. If you go to slide 1.6, we believe that
`
`it's argumentative as to the bullet points, third from
`
`bottom, that says generated 1,128 new ideas, quote, so they
`
`can "mimic" Wirtgen. I think that's argumentative in the
`
`context of the opening, and we had asked for that to be
`
`taken out, Your Honor.
`
`APPEARANCES (Cont'd):
`
` PATTERSON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
` BY: RYAN D. LEVY, ESQ.
`
` -and-
`
` STERNE KESSLER GOLDSTEIN & FOX
` BY: PAUL AINSWORTH, ESQ.
` BY: DANIEL YONAN, ESQ.
` BY: WILLIAM H. MILLIKEN, ESQ.
`
` Counsel for the Plaintiff/
` Counterclaim-Defendants
`
` POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
` BY: BINDU A. PALAPURA, ESQ.
` BY: ANDREW L. BROWN, ESQ.
`
` -and-
`
` WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.
` BY: JAMES C. YOON, ESQ.
` BY: MATTHEW MACDONALD, ESQ.
`
` Counsel for the Defendant/
` Counterclaim-Plaintiff
`
` _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
`
`THE COURT: Good morning, everyone. Have a
`seat, please.
`All right. I am told that we have a jury panel
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 439-9 Filed 07/31/24 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 39985
`
`A customer can expect to spend a similar amount of
`money on spare parts over the operation of the machine as
`they did on the machine. It's a very rough environment and
`they eat a lot of parts.
`Mr. McEvoy, would you also please turn to
`Exhibit 2687 A.
`Yes.
`Mr. McEvoy, have you seen this exhibit before?
`I have.
`What is this document?
`This document represents the spare parts sales and
`gross margin on spare part sales.
`MR. LEVY: Your Honor, I move to admit
`Exhibit 2687 A into evidence.
`MR. YOON: No objection Your Honor.
`THE COURT: Okay. It's admitted.
`(PTX Exhibit No. 2687A was admitted into
`
`evidence.)
`BY MR. LEVY:
`Mr. McEvoy, what other machines does Wirtgen America
`sell that are used for road construction?
`The other product in the road construction space is
`the soil stabilizers, mixers, reclaimers, they basically are
`like a milling machine but they have a tendency to mix kind
`of deeper below what a milling machine will do.
`
`or an additive that would help enhance the load bearing
`structure underneath so that it is a stable base to work on.
`Mr. McEvoy, I would like to talk a little bit about
`Wirtgen America's marketing customers. What involvement do
`you have as CEO with Wirtgen America customers?
`Very fortunate, I spend a lot of time with customers.
`Our business is highly specialized. We know our customer
`base very well. I have been in the industry for a long
`time. And I have come to know -- I see customers at trade
`shows, we have events that we host at our facility and I see
`customers in the industry quite often. We also have a sales
`organization that's constantly in contact with customers as
`well, so people come visit our facility in Nashville for
`training fairly consistently.
`Generally what type of feedback have you received
`from your customers?
`Good. You hear the good and the bad. A lot of times
`questions that other people can't answer. But it's mainly
`good. I think we have listened to our customers well and
`are providing the, you know the types of material, the
`products and the features and the support that they like.
`And I think that's evidenced by our market share and our
`market position.
`And considering this feedback, Mr. McEvoy, why do you
`believe customers buy Wirtgen America's milling machines and
`
`If you would please turn to Exhibit 2690 in your
`binder.
`Yes.
`Mr. McEvoy, have you seen this document before?
`I have.
`And what is this document?
`This is a cold recycler soil stabilizer W R model
`series brochure.
`MR. LEVY: Your Honor, I move to admit
`Exhibit 2690 into evidence.
`MR. YOON: No objection, Your Honor.
`THE COURT: Okay. It's admitted.
`(PTX Exhibit No. 2690 was admitted into
`
`evidence.)
`
`jury?
`
`MR. LEVY: Your Honor may I publish it for the
`
`THE COURT: Yes.
`MR. LEVY:
`Mr. McEvoy, what type of applications are soil
`stabilizers used for?
`Soil stabilizer is like a milling machine, it has a
`rotor, but it goes much deeper. So if the road is unstable
`underneath or you have soil conditions that don't allow for
`good load bearing capacity, this is the machine you would
`bring in to mix in, you would mix in like a cement or a lime
`
`soil stabilizer products?
`Again, I go back to product, and it is about the
`productivity of the product, it's about innovation, it's
`about being a leader in that technology space where you are
`providing the next generation of machines that help the
`contractor be more effective and efficient in doing their
`job and ultimately make them more successful. And in
`addition to that, will be supporting the customers to the
`point which they feel confident and secure.
`You mentioned the term productivity. What do you
`mean by productivity in the milling space?
`Again, with milling, time is money, you have a very
`tight window, you have to get in and get out. So a machine
`has to be, again, producing at a high hourly rate. It has
`to be highly reliable, and it has to be highly accurate in
`the way that it does its work. So milling contractors are
`paid by the amount of tons they cut out and the number of
`hours they cut it out, so productivity and time is money.
`And we talked about market share a little bit
`earlier. What has Wirtgen's market share been in the U.S.
`over the past couple of years?
`The past four years we have held over 70 percent
`market share.
`And what companies compete in the milling machine and
`soil stabilizer markets in the United States?
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 439-9 Filed 07/31/24 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 39986
`
`205
`
`207
`
`Levy - direct
`1
`A.
`Clearly three other competitors, Caterpillar and
`2
`another company called Vomag and one called Road-Tech.
`3 Q.
`And roughly what relative market share does each of
`4
`these companies have?
`5
`A.
`Caterpillar being the number 2 Position, Road-Tech
`6
`and Vomag are really in a space that I would say are, you
`7
`know, lesser products, significantly less support and not as
`8
`widely accepted as the Wirtgen products. Caterpillar is
`9
`really right there with us because of specifications,
`10
`pricing, and the strength of their distribution system.
`11 Q.
`So which of these companies then would you describe
`12
`as competing with Wirtgen?
`13
`A.
`Caterpillar all the time, yes.
`14 Q.
`Mr. McEvoy what happened in 2016 that contributed to
`15
`Caterpillar's ability to compete with Wirtgen?
`16
`A.
`2016 was the launch of the PM600 series machines.
`17 Q.
`And have you seen anything like that before?
`18
`A.
`It was pretty surprising. I mean, I think prior to
`19
`2016, Caterpillar had been in the marketplace, and I would
`20
`say almost in and out in a very --struggling when the PM600
`21
`series came in, their market share immediately doubled, they
`22
`just moved very quickly in the market space, were very
`23
`aggressive with the customers, a lot of our existing
`24
`customers, and were moving very rapidly.
`25 Q.
`Before 2016, roughly what was Caterpillar's market
`
`Levy - direct
`shipments over a period of time, and the relative shipments
`also of Wirtgen, on sales of Wirtgen over the same period of
`time, and then supports the exhibits that are listed here.
`MR. LEVY: Your Honor, I move to admit
`Exhibit 3368 into evidence.
`MR. YOON: No objection, Your Honor.
`THE COURT: 3368 is admitted.
`MR. LEVY: Your Honor, may I publish the
`
`THE COURT: Yes.
`(PTX Exhibit No. 3368 was admitted into
`
`exhibit?
`
`evidence.)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`MR. LEVY:
`14 Q.
`Mr. McEvoy, this -- is this the information from
`15
`which Wirtgen America calculates its market share?
`16
`A.
`Yes.
`17 Q.
`Let's switch to a different topic here. How does
`18
`Wirtgen America go about obtaining machines from Wirtgen
`19
`GmbH to sell in the United States?
`20
`A.
`We have a production forecast system that we -- a
`21
`model that we have been running for many years and which we
`22
`would forecast out 12 months in advance what we believe the
`23
`market is going to take, what we believe we will need. And
`24
`then as that window gets a little bit closer, we refine
`25
`those numbers, but we're always keeping forecast out in
`
`206
`
`208
`
`Levy - direct
`
`Levy - direct
`1
`1
`front of the factory for production, to have production
`share?
`2
`2
`A.
`position.
`Maybe four percent.
`3 Q.
`3 Q.
`How accurate is Wirtgen America's demand forecast?
`And what happened to Caterpillar's market share after
`4
`4
`A.
`I think we're pretty good. This is a relatively
`the introduction of the new many in 2016?
`5
`5
`A.
`small market, but we know really well. So our ability to
`It quickly doubled.
`6
`6 Q.
`understand what moves this market and how it moves, I think
`And correspondingly what happened to Wirtgen
`7
`7
`we're very close to and I would say our forecasting history
`America's market share during this time?
`8
`8
`A.
`is very good.
`Ours went down.
`9 Q.
`9 Q.
`What kind of events have prevented Wirtgen America
`By about how much?
`10
`10
`A.
`from meeting market demand?
`An equal amount as to what Cats went up.
`11
`11 Q.
`A.
`Most recently Covid. Covid I think put the entire
`Mr. McEvoy, how did you get this information on
`12
`12
`world in a tail spin on supply chain issues. We had the
`market share?
`13
`13
`A.
`same, I think every industry, every space had the same
`We use the association of equipment manufacturers,
`14
`14
`issues. Supply chain related delays for components in the
`it's an association that all manufacturing companies in our
`15
`15
`factories, so lead times got stretched out, but so did
`industry space report into on a monthly basis. We submit
`16
`16
`everybody else's.
`our unit numbers into that association. We aggregate, or
`17 Q.
`17
`Was this effective -- was this effect unique to
`they pull the numbers together for the entire industry, put
`18
`18
`Wirtgen?
`them back out and from there we can determine our share
`19
`19
`A.
`It was not. It was not. It was everybody's at the
`position.
`20
`20 Q.
`same time.
`Mr. McEvoy, if you could please turn to Exhibit 6638.
`21 Q.
`21
`A.
`Well, today how is manufacturing capacity?
`Yes.
`22
`22 Q.
`A.
`It's very good. It's very good. We have much better
`Have you seen this document before?
`23
`23
`A.
`availability, lead times and really prepared to move.
`I have.
`24 Q.
`24 Q.
`Further we talked about Caterpillar market share,
`What is this document?
`25
`25
`A.
`It's a summary document that shows the industry
`could Wirtgen America absorb their market share?
`02/12/2024 06:35:11 PM
`Page 205 to 208 of 246
`52 of 100 sheets
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00770-JDW Document 439-9 Filed 07/31/24 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 39987
`
`is it gets in your head, even if you say oh, I don't care,
`it gets in your head and it affects what you're thinking.
`The best thing to do is just stay out of it. When the case
`is over, you can tell anybody you want about it. But for
`now you just got to keep away from it. The last thing, I'm
`going to emphasize, don't go looking stuff up, I don't think
`there is any news coverage about this, possible, but even if
`it's not, the internet is not your friend. Don't look stuff
`up, consider the evidence you hear in this courtroom and
`only in this courtroom. Finally logistics, I know some of
`you have some distance to travel to get back and forth here,
`we can start at 9:00 or 9:30 tomorrow, I don't know if
`people have a preference, given what you have going on at
`home. Does anyone have a preference? If you do just raise
`your hand and tell me. Oh no. So my inclination is to
`start at 9:00. And that way we can get through more of it
`and not extend the case any longer than it has to be. I'll
`see everyone here, try to be here a little before nine and
`we'll start as soon as we can. Thanks and have a good
`evening.
`
`COURT CLERK: All rise.
`(Jury leaving the courtroom at 4:40 p.m.)
`THE COURT: Okay. You can have a seat.
`You know, I know I have obviously some-- I
`haven't had a chance to look at the transcript. I'm going
`
`to do that over night and why don't we plan to be here at
`8:30 tomorrow and we'll take that up. If there is any
`housekeeping, we can take that up as well.
`Who is your next witness, Mr. Levy?
`MR. LEVY: Your Honor, Dr. Hahn.
`THE COURT: Who is it?
`MR. LEVY: Dr. Gunter Hahn.
`THE COURT: And he's the one we need an
`interpreter?
`MR. LEVY: The interpret will be there just to
`assist if there is an issue, not to interpret.
`THE COURT: You all agreed on an interpreter?
`MR. YOON: Yes, Your Honor.
`THE COURT: I'll probably give the jury
`instructions so they understand what is happening. But I
`think that's it. So I'll see you all in the morning and I
`will look for your e-mail tonight.
`Thanks.
`COURT CLERK: All rise.
`(Court recessed at 4:42 p.m.)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket