throbber
Case 1:17-cv-01447-JFB-SRF Document 22 Filed 04/02/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 235
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 17-1447-JFB-SRF
`
`)))))))))))
`
`
`
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`BLU PRODUCTS, INC.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)
`
`Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”) and Defendant BLU Products, Inc. (“BLU”) hereby
`
`stipulate to transfer this action to the Southern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 1404(a) and the Court’s inherent powers.
`
`WHEREAS, Maxell filed its complaint for patent infringement in this action on October
`
`13, 2017;
`
`WHEREAS, BLU moved to dismiss the complaint for improper venue or, in the
`
`alternative, to transfer to the Southern District of Florida on January 12, 2018;
`
`WHEREAS, briefing on BLU’s motion to dismiss is now complete, and the Court
`
`scheduled oral argument on the motion for March 29, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.;
`
`WHEREAS, the Southern District of Florida would have personal jurisdiction over BLU
`
`and subject matter jurisdiction over the causes of action alleged in Maxell’s complaint pursuant
`
`to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a);
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and agreed that a transfer of this action
`
`to the Southern District of Florida is appropriate;
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-01447-JFB-SRF Document 22 Filed 04/02/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 236
`
`WHEREAS, 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) permits a district court, in the interest of justice, to
`
`transfer a case to another district where venue is proper, and a district court also has inherent
`
`authority to transfer cases in order to manage its docket, see, e.g., Beacon Navigation GmbH v.
`
`Crysler Group L.L.C., No. 11-CV-921, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38437, at *30-32 (D. Del. Mar.
`
`20, 2013);
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties agreed to submit a proposed scheduling order in the new court
`
`with a standard case track providing for trial in or around May 2019;
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the
`
`Court’s approval, that:
`
`1. This case is hereby transferred to the Southern District of Florida; and
`
`2. The oral argument scheduled for March 29, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. is hereby
`
`cancelled.
`
`ROSS ARONSTAM & MORITZ LLP
`
`PANITCH SCHWARZE BELISARIO & NADEL, LLP
`
` /s/ Benjamin J. Schladweiler
`Benjamin J. Schladweiler (#4601)
`100 S. West Street, Suite 400
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 576-1600
`bschladweiler@ramllp.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd.
`
`Dated: March 28, 2018
`
` /s/ Dennis J. Butler
`Dennis J. Butler (#5981)
`Wells Fargo Tower
`2200 Concord Pike, Suite 201
`Wilmington, DE 19803
`(302) 394-6006
`dbutler@panitchlaw.com
`
`Counsel for Defendant BLU Products, Inc.
`
`SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of April
`
`, 2018.
`
`THE HONORABLE JOSEPH F. BATAILLON
`SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket