throbber
Case 1:18-cv-00924-CFC-SRF Document 450-4 Filed 10/25/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID
`#: 32973
`
`Exhibit 4
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-00924-CFC-SRF Document 450-4 Filed 10/25/19 Page 2 of 5 PageID
`#: 32974
`CONFIDENTIAL
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`-- oOo---
`GENENTECH, INC. and CITY OF
`HOPE,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`vs.
`
`AMGEN, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`C.A. No. 17-1407-GMS
`CONSOLIDATED
`
`1 23 4 5 67 89
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`* * *CONFIDENTIAL***
`VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF
`MELODY TREXLER SCHMIDT, PH.D.
`(30(B)(6) DESIGNEE, GENENTECH, INC.)
`
`TUESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2019
`
`REPORTED BY: HOLLY THUMAN, CSR No. 6834, RMR, CRR
`JOB NO. 3566739
`PAGES 1 - 243
`
`Page 1
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`800-826-0277
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-00924-CFC-SRF Document 450-4 Filed 10/25/19 Page 3 of 5 PageID
`#: 32975
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`INDEX
`1
`INDEX OF EXAMINATIONS
`2
`3 EXAMINATION BY:
`4 MR. GUTMAN
`5
`--0O0--
`6
`EXHIBITS MARKED FOR IDENTIFICATION
`7 NO.
`DESCRIPTION
`PAGE
`8 Exhibit 1 United States Patent 8,574,869, Kao 5
`et al.
`
`PAGE
`
`6
`
`9
`
`Exhibit 2 Combined Declaration for Patent
`Application and Power of Attorney
`(GNEAVA-AMG-00562904 through -906)
`
`5
`
`Exhibit 3 Presentation deck, 2H7 Reduction
`Prevention - Late Stage Senior
`Review, Melody Schmidt, Late Stage
`Purification, June 27,2007
`(GNEAVA-AMG-00737442 through -520)
`
`57
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`Exhibit 4 "Identification and Prevention of 67
`Antibody Disulfide Bond Reduction
`During Cell Culture Manufacturing,"
`Melody Trexler-Schmidt and others,
`Biotechnology and Bioengineering
`(GNEAVA-AMG-02802665 through -674)
`17
`18 Exhibit5 Hand-drawn diagram created by the 85
`witness at deposition
`
`19
`
`Exhibit 6 Presentation deck, "2H7 Reduction 93
`Inhibition Update," ppdrc, April 9,
`2007, Melody Schmidt
`(GNEAVA-AMG-02364542 through -4579)
`21
`22 Exhibit 7 Presentation deck, "Inhibiting 2H7
`99
`Reduction," Sandy Sargis, ESP/LSP
`Dept. Meeting, June 13, 2007
`(GNEAVA-AMG-00737333 through -395)
`
`20
`
`23
`
`24
`25 (Cont’d)
`
`Page 2
`
`—oOo—
`1
`Videotaped deposition of MELODY TREXLER SCHMIDT,
`2
`3 PH.D., taken by the Defendant, at DURIE TANGRI, 217
`4 Leidesdorff Street, San Francisco, California 94111,
`5 commencing at 9:01 A.M., on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2019,
`6 before me, HOLLY THUMAN, CSR, RMR, CRR.
`7
`-o0o--
`8
`APPEARANCES
`9 FOR PLAINTIFF GENENTECH, INC.:
`10 WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
`11 Washington, D.C. 20005
`By: LUKE McCLOUD, Attorney at Law
`lmccloud@wc.com
`12
`13 FOR DEFENDANT AMGEN:
`14
`PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
`2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400
`Los Angeles, California 90067-3206
`By: SIEGMUND Y. GUTMAN, Attorney at Law
`sgutman@proskauer.com
`DAVID HANNA, Attorney at Law
`dhanna@proskauer. com
`17
`18 ALSO PRESENT:
`19
`SEAN GRANT, Videographer
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`15
`
`16
`
`Page 4
`
`1 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA; TUESDAY, OCTOBER 1,2019
`2
`9:01 A.M.
`3
`~o0o—
`4
`PROCEEDINGS
`5
`(Deposition Exhibits 1 and 2 were
`6
`marked for identification.)
`7
`THE VIDEO OPERATOR: Good morning. We're 09:00:43
`8 on the record. The time is 9:01 A.M., and the date 09:00:53
`9 is October 1st, 2019. This begins the videotaped
`09:01:00
`10 deposition of Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope
`09:01:03
`11 pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) and Dr. Melody
`09:01:07
`12 Trexler Schmidt, Ph.D., in her individual capacity. 09:01:10
`13
`This deposition is being taken on behalf
`09:01:14
`14 of counsel for defendant in the matter of
`09:01:16
`15 Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope versus Amgen, Inc. 09:01:18
`16 This case is filed in the United States District
`09:01:22
`17 Court, District of Delaware, consolidated case
`09:01:23
`18 17-1407-GMS.
`09:01:28
`19
`This deposition is being held at Durie
`09:01:33
`20 Tangri, LLP in San Francisco, California.
`09:01:35
`21
`My name is Sean Grant, from the firm
`09:01:39
`22 Veritext. I'm the videographer, and the court
`09:01:42
`23 reporter is Holly Thuman, also from Veritext.
`09:01:44
`24
`Please note that audio and video recording 09:01:48
`25 will take place unless all parties have agreed to
`09:01:51
`
`Page 5
`2 (Pages 2 - 5)
`
`1 (Exhibits, cont'd)
`2 Exhibit 8 Blue Sheets - Genentech Information 222
`Release (GNEAVA-AMG-0036753 through
`-807)
`3
`4 Exhibit 9 Blue Sheets - Genentech Information 238
`Release (GNEAVA-AMG-00737250 through
`-277)
`5
`6 Exhibit 10 Document headed "2H7 Reduction Task 239
`Force" (GNEAVA-AMG-02051810 through
`-812)
`7
`240
`8 Exhibit 11 Photocopy of folder and contents
`labeled "2H7 Reduction/ Roche/CMCRC"
`(GNEAVA-AMG-00753114 through -235)
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 3
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`800-826-0277
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-00924-CFC-SRF Document 450-4 Filed 10/25/19 Page 4 of 5 PageID
`#: 32976
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`14:36:40
`14:36:43
`14:36:47
`14:36:51
`14:36:57
`
`Can you say where the threshold of
`6
`7 antibody production is no longer substantially
`8 occurring or would occur?
`9
`MR. McCLOUD: Object to form.
`10
`THE WITNESS: I need to clarify what I
`11 said before the break.
`14:36:59
`12
`What I mean--to further clarify,
`14:36:59
`13 threshold is the temperature threshold of--and so 14:37:04
`14 to answer your question, whether it's a stoppage of 14:37:08
`15 cell growth or stopping--a stoppage of antibody
`14:37:15
`16 production, I could not state what is that actual
`14:37:19
`17 temperature threshold where that would occur.
`14:37:24
`
`Page 146
`
`Page 148
`
`Page 147
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`800-826-0277
`
`Page 149
`38 (Pages 146 - 149)
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-00924-CFC-SRF Document 450-4 Filed 10/25/19 Page 5 of 5 PageID
`#: 32977
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`17:52:41
`17:52:42
`17:52:44
`17:52:48
`
`17:52:51
`17:52:54
`
`2019.
`
`MELODY TREXLER SCHMIDT
`
`1
`MR. McCLOUD: We disagree. There's
`2 absolutely no basis to keep the deposition open.
`3
`In our view, the deposition is closed.
`4
`MR. GUTMAN: I'm not surprised,
`17:52:49
`5 Mr. McCloud.
`6
`Thank you very much, Dr. Schmidt. I
`7 appreciate your time. Thank you for coming in
`8 today.
`17:52:56
`17:52:56
`9
`THE WITNESS: Thank you.
`10
`17:52:57
`THE VIDEO OPERATOR: This concludes
`11 today's deposition. We're off the record at
`17:52:58
`17:53:00
`12 5:53 P.M. Thank you.
`17:53:02
`13
`(Time noted, 5:53 P.M.)
`17:53:23
`14
`—oOo—
`15
`1 declare under penalty of perjury that the
`16 foregoing is true and correct. Subscribed at
`17
`, California, this
`day of
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 242
`
`1
`CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
`2
`I, HOLLY THUMAN, a Certified Shorthand Reporter,
`3 hereby certify that the witness in the foregoing
`4 deposition was by me duly sworn to tell the truth, the
`5 whole truth, and nothing but the truth in the
`6 within-entitled cause; that said deposition was taken
`7 down in shorthand by me, a disinterested person, at the
`8 time and place therein stated; and that the testimony
`9 of said witness was thereafter reduced to typewriting,
`10 by computer, under my direction and supervision;
`11
`That before completion of the deposition review of
`12 the transcript [] was [X] was not requested/offered.
`13 If requested, any changes made by the deponent (and
`14 provided to the reporter) during the period allowed are
`15 appended hereto.
`16
`I further certify that I am not of counsel or
`17 attorney for either or any of the parties to the said
`18 deposition, nor in any way interested in the event of
`19 this cause, and that I am not related to any of the
`20 parties thereto.
`21
`22 DATED: October 2. 2019
`
`24
`25
`
`HOLLY THUMAN, CSR
`
`Page 243
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`800-826-0277
`
`62 (Pages 242 - 243)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket