throbber
Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC
`
`Document119_
`
`Filed 04/29/19
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`Page 1 of 5 PagelD #: 14068
`
`
`laintiff:
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
` GENENTECH,INC, and CITY OF HOPE,
`
`
`‘
`
`SAMSUNGBIOEPIS CO., LTD.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`C.A. No. 18-cv-1363-CFC
`REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
`WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ASSERTED PATENTS AND CITY OF HOPE
`
`WHEREAS Defendant Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. filed an abbreviated biologics Hcense
`
`application seeking FDA approval of SB3 as a trastuzumab biosimilar, which will be marketed
`
`under the brand name Ontruzant®;
`
`WHEREASPlaintiffs Genentech, Inc. and City of Hopefiled a First Amended Complaint
`
`in this case on January 17, 2019, which asserts infringement of twenty-one patents in connection
`
`with Samsung Bioepis seeking FDA approval of SB3 as a trastuzumabbiosimilar (D.I. 63);
`
`WHEREAS Samsung Bioepis has answered the First Amended Complaint and asserted
`
`counterclaims of non-infringement, invalidity, and/or unenforceability with respect to the
`
`twenty-one patents in the First Amended Complaint (D.I. 66);
`
`WHEREAS,on January 14, 2019, Samsung Bioepis filed a letter with the Court stating
`A
`
`WHEREASSamsung Bioepis representsthatitPO
`ee
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document119_Filed 04/29/19 Page 2 of 5 PagelD #: 14069
`
`
`
`WHEREASUSS. Patent No. 6,407,213 will expire on June 18, 2019, and certain other
`
`patents in the First Amended Complaint have expired or will expire on or before June 18, 2019;
`
`NOW THEREFORE,it is hereby stipulated and agreed by the Parties, subject to the
`
`approval of the Court, that:
`
`1.
`
`All claimsfor infringement of U.S, Patent Nos. 6,331,415; 7,923,221; 6,407,213;
`
`6,417,335; 9,249,218; and 6,339,142 (the “Dismissed Patents”) (Counts I, If, HY, EX, X, and XI
`
`of the First Amended Complaint (D.1. 63)) are dismissed without prejudice, and all
`
`counterclaims for non-infringement, invalidity, and/or unenforceability of the Dismissed Patents
`
`(Counts [, I, I, 1V, V, VI, VIL, VIL, XIX, XX, XXI, XX, XXIIand XXIV of Samsung
`
`Bioepis’s Counterclaims (D.I. 66)) are dismissed without prejudice;
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`City of Hopeis dismissed as a party to this case; and
`
`Eachparty shall! bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees associated with
`
`this action with respect to the Dismissed Patents.
`
`This stipulation is solely for the purpose of limiting the scopeof the litigation with
`
`respect to patents that have already expired or will expire on or before June 18,2019. This
`
`+pana
`1s sition doc
`
`not affect the parties’ claims, counterclaims, or defenses with respect to the remaining patents-in-
`
`suit.
`
`This stipulation is expressly conditioned onPO
`
`EE 11:dismissal is without prejudice to
`
`Genentech’s ability to bring a new cause of action with respect to any Dismissed Patentif,
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document 119
`
`Filed 04/29/19
`
`Page 3 of 5 PagelD #: 14070
`
`subsequent tothis stipulation,[I i
`
`/s/ Frederick L. Cottrell, HT
`Frederick L. Cottrell, HI G2555)
`Jason J. Rawnsley (#5379)
`Alexandra M. Ewing (#6407)
`RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
`920 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 651-7700
`cottrell@rlf.com
`rawnsley@rlf.com
`ewing@rlf.com
`
`OfCounsel:
`
`William F. Lee
`Lisa J, Pirozzolo
`Emily R. Whelan
`Kevin S. Prussia
`Andrew J. Danford
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`
`60 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`(617) 526-6000
`william.lee@wilmerhale.com
`lisa.pirozzolo@wilmerhale.com
`emily.whelan@wilmerhale.com
`kevin.prussia@wilmerhale.com
`andrew.danford@wilmerhale.com
`
`/s/ David E, Moore
`David E. Moore (#3983)
`Bindu A. Palapura (#5370)
`Stephanie E. O’Byrne (#4446)
`Jennifer Penberthy Buckley (#6264)
`POTTER ANDERSON CORROON
`Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor
`1313 N. Market Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Tel: (302) 984-6000
`dmoore@potteranderson.com
`bpalapura@potteranderson.com
`sobyrne@potteranderson.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Dimitrios T. Drivas
`Scott T. Weingaertner
`Amit H. Thakore
`Holly Tao
`John P. Padro
`WHITE & CASE LLP
`1221 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, New York 10020-1095
`Tel: (212) 819-8200
`
`Attorneysfor Defendant Samsung Bioepis Co.,
`Ltd.
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC
`
`Document119_
`
`Filed 04/29/19
`
`Page 4 of 5 PagelD #: 14071
`
`Robert J. Gunther Je.
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`7 World Trade Center
`250 Greenwich Street
`New York, NY 10007
`(212) 230-8800
`robert.gunther@wilmerhale.com
`
`Daralyn J, Durie
`Adam R.Brausa
`DURIE TANGRILLP
`217 LeidesdorffSt.
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`(415) 362-6666
`ddurie@durietangri.com
`abrausa@durietangri.com
`
`Attorneysfor Plaintiffs Genentech, Inc. and
`City ofHope
`
`Dated: April 22, 2019
`
`SO ORDEREDthis
`
`day of
`
`, 2019.
`
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC
`
`Document119_
`
`Filed 04/29/19
`
`Page 5 of 5 PagelD #: 14072
`
`CERTIFICATEOFSERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on April 22, 2019, true and correct copies of the foregoing document were caused
`
`be served on the following counsel in the mannerindicated:
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`David Moore
`Bindu Ann Palapura
`POTTER ANDERSON CORROON LLP
`1313 North Market Street, 6th Floor
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`dmoore@potteranderson.com
`bpalapura@potteranderson.com
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`Amit Thakore
`Dimitrios T. Drivas
`Holly Tao
`Scott T, Weingaertner
`John P. Padro
`WHITE & CASE LLP
`1221 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, New York [0020-1095
`athakore@whitecase.com
`ddrivas@whitecase.com
`holly.tao@whitecase.com
`sweingaertner@whitecase.com
`jpadro@whitecase.com
`
`/s/ Jason J. Rawnsley
`Jason J. Rawnsley (#5379)
`rawnsley@rlf.com
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket