Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document 62 Filed 01/17/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 8235
`
`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document62 Page1of 5 PagelD #: 8235Filed 01/17/19
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`GENENTECH,INC. and CITY OF HOPE,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Vv.
`
`C.A. No. 18-1363-CFC
`
`SAMSUNGBIOEPIS CO., LTD.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`anptorosnyo
`
`ORDER
`STIPULATION
`REGARDING AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`WHEREAS, on September 4, 2018, Plaintiffs Genentech,
`
`Inc. and City of Hope
`
`(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed the above-captioned action against Defendant Samsung Bioepis
`
`Co., Ltd. (“Samsung”);
`
`WHEREAS,on November 7, 2018, pursuant to this Court’s scheduling order (D.I. 26),
`
`Plaintiffs sent Samsungaletter (the “Claim Narrowing Letter”) identifying allowed claims 10
`
`and 11 of U.S. App. No. 14/073,659 (“the ’659 application”) as among the narrowedset of
`
`patents and claimsto belitigated in this case once issued by the United States Patent Office;
`
`WHEREAS,on December 25, 2018, the United States Patent Office issued U.S. Patent
`
`No. 10,160,811 (“the 811 patent”) from the ’659 application;
`
`WHEREAS,claims6 and 7 ofthe °811 patent correspond to claims 10 and 11 of the ’659
`
`application;
`
`WHEREAS,pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 262(/)(7), Plaintiffs have supplementedtheirlist of
`
`patents pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 262(/)(3)(A)to include the ’811 patent, to the extent that the list
`
`of patents that Genentech provided to Bioepis on April 23, 2018, constitutes a list under to 42
`
`RLFI 20629538v.|
`
`-l-
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document62 Page1of 5 PagelD #: 8235Filed 01/17/19
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`GENENTECH,INC. and CITY OF HOPE,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Vv.
`
`C.A. No. 18-1363-CFC
`
`SAMSUNGBIOEPIS CO., LTD.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`anptorosnyo
`
`ORDER
`STIPULATION
`REGARDING AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`WHEREAS, on September 4, 2018, Plaintiffs Genentech,
`
`Inc. and City of Hope
`
`(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed the above-captioned action against Defendant Samsung Bioepis
`
`Co., Ltd. (“Samsung”);
`
`WHEREAS,on November 7, 2018, pursuant to this Court’s scheduling order (D.I. 26),
`
`Plaintiffs sent Samsungaletter (the “Claim Narrowing Letter”) identifying allowed claims 10
`
`and 11 of U.S. App. No. 14/073,659 (“the ’659 application”) as among the narrowedset of
`
`patents and claimsto belitigated in this case once issued by the United States Patent Office;
`
`WHEREAS,on December 25, 2018, the United States Patent Office issued U.S. Patent
`
`No. 10,160,811 (“the 811 patent”) from the ’659 application;
`
`WHEREAS,claims6 and 7 ofthe °811 patent correspond to claims 10 and 11 of the ’659
`
`application;
`
`WHEREAS,pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 262(/)(7), Plaintiffs have supplementedtheirlist of
`
`patents pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 262(/)(3)(A)to include the ’811 patent, to the extent that the list
`
`of patents that Genentech provided to Bioepis on April 23, 2018, constitutes a list under to 42
`
`RLFI 20629538v.|
`
`-l-
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document62-
`Filed 01/17/19
`Page 2 of 5 PagelD #: 8236
`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document 62 Filed 01/17/19 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 8236
`
`U.S.C. § 262()(3)(A);
`
`WHEREAS,U.S. Patent No. 8,425,908 (‘the °908 patent”), originally asserted against
`
`Bioepis, has since expired and Bioepis’s biosimilar product was not approved by the FDA for
`
`marketing in the United States prior to the expiration of the °908 patent;
`
`WHEREAS,Plaintiffs seek leave to amend the Complaintin this action to (1) add a count
`
`of infringementof the 811 patent and (2) remove a countof infringementof the 908 patent, and
`
`Samsung does not oppose such amendment;
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED,byand between
`
`the undersigned parties and subject to the Court’s approval, that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)
`
`and D. Del. L.R. 15.1, and in the interests ofjudicial efficiency, the proposed amended pleading
`
`attached hereto as Exhibit 1, which adds a countof infringement of the ’811 patent and removes
`
`a count of infringement of the °908 patent, shall be docketed by the Court as the amended
`
`pleading and shall be deemed served upon entry of this Order. A form of the amended pleading
`
`indicating in what respectit differs from the pleading which it amendsis attached as Exhibit 2.
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s scheduling order (D.I. 26) and the Plaintiffs’ Claim Narrowing Letter, the
`
`claims of the °811 patent to be litigated in this case are claims 6 and 7.
`
`RLF1 20629538y.1
`
`
`
`Filed 01/17/19
`Page 3 of 5 PagelD #: 8237
`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document 62
`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document 62 Filed 01/17/19 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 8237
`
`Dated: January 11, 2019
`
`
`/s/ Frederick L. Cottrell, Ill
`Frederick L, Cottrell, II] (#2555)
`Jason J. Rawnsley (#5379)
`Alexandra M. Ewing (#6407)
`RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER,P.A.
`920 North KingStreet
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 651-7700
`cottrell@rlf.com
`rawnsley@rlf.com
`ewing@rlf.com
`
`/s/ Bindu Palapura
`David E. Moore (#3983)
`Bindu Palapura (#5370)
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`Hercules Plaza,6" Floor
`1313 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 951
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 984-6000
`dmoore@potteranderson.com
`bpalapura@potteranderson.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Dimitrios T. Drivas
`Scott T. Weingaertner
`Amit H. Thakore
`Holly Tao
`WHITE & CASE LLP
`1221 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10020
`Tel: (212) 819-8200
`
`Attorneysfor Defendant Samsung Bioepis
`Co., Ltd.
`
`William F. Lee
`Lisa J. Pirozzolo
`Emily R. Whelan
`Kevin S. Prussia
`Andrew J. Danford
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND Dorr LLP
`60 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`(627) 526-6000
`william.lee@wilmerhale.com
`lisa.pirozzolo@wilmerhale.com
`emily.whelan@wilmerhale.com
`kevin.prussia@wilmerhale.com
`andrew.danford@wilmerhale.com
`
`Robert J. GuntherJr.
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DorR LLP
`7 World Trade Center
`250 Greenwich Street
`New York, NY 10007
`(212) 230-8800
`robert.gunther@wilmerhale.com
`
`Robert Galvin
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DorR LLP
`
`RLF 1 20629538v.1
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document 62 Filed 01/17/19 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 8238
`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC
`Document62_
`Filed 01/17/19
`Page 4 of 5 PagelD #: 8238
`
`950 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`(650) 858-6000
`robert.galvin@wilmerhale.com
`
`Daralyn J. Durie
`Adam R. Brausa
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`217 LeidesdorffSt.
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`(415) 362-6666
`ddurie@durietangri.com
`abrausa@durietangri.com
`
`Attorneysfor Plaintiffs Genentech, Inc. and
`City ofHope
`
`RLF 1 20629538v.1
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document62_Filed 01/17/19 Page 5 of 5 PagelD #: 8239
`Case 1:18-cv-01363-CFC Document 62 Filed 01/17/19 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 8239
`
`SO ORDEREDthis [PEaay of Masser
`
`~
`
`, 2019,
`
` United States Distri
`
`RLF1 20629538v.!
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
